The General Linear Model Christophe Phillips Cyclotron Research Centre University of Liège, Belgium SPM Short Course London, May 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The General Linear Model (GLM)
Advertisements

Event-related fMRI Christian Ruff With thanks to: Rik Henson.
Bayesian Inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 14 / 05 / 2010.
SPM – introduction & orientation introduction to the SPM software and resources introduction to the SPM software and resources.
Statistical Inference
Overview of SPM p <0.05 Statistical parametric map (SPM)
SPM Course Zurich, February 2012 Statistical Inference Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London.
SPM 2002 Experimental Design Daniel Glaser Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, UCL Slides from: Rik Henson, Christian Buchel, Karl Friston, Chris Frith,
SPM Software & Resources Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, May 2011.
SPM Software & Resources Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, October 2008.
SPM for EEG/MEG Guillaume Flandin
Event-related fMRI (er-fMRI)
Wellcome Centre for Neuroimaging at UCL
Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin SPM Course Zurich, February 2014
Group analysis Kherif Ferath Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, Oct 2010.
1st level analysis: basis functions, parametric modulation and correlated regressors. 1 st of February 2012 Sylvia Kreutzer Max-Philipp Stenner Methods.
Experimental design of fMRI studies SPM Course 2014 Sandra Iglesias Translational Neuromodeling Unit University of Zurich & ETH Zurich With many thanks.
Experimental design of fMRI studies Methods & models for fMRI data analysis in neuroeconomics April 2010 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural.
Bayesian models for fMRI data
Experimental design of fMRI studies SPM Course 2012 Sandra Iglesias Translational Neuromodeling Unit University of Zurich & ETH Zurich With many thanks.
Multiple comparison correction Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 18 March 2009 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research.
Statistical Inference
Multiple comparison correction Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 29 October 2008 Klaas Enno Stephan Branco Weiss Laboratory (BWL) Institute for Empirical.
Introduction to SPM SPM fMRI Course London, May 2012 Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London.
Linear Algebra and Matrices
Introduction to SPM Batching
Multiple Comparison Correction in SPMs Will Penny SPM short course, Zurich, Feb 2008 Will Penny SPM short course, Zurich, Feb 2008.
Random Field Theory Will Penny SPM short course, London, May 2005 Will Penny SPM short course, London, May 2005 David Carmichael MfD 2006 David Carmichael.
General Linear Model & Classical Inference London, SPM-M/EEG course May 2014 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium
SPM Course Zurich, February 2015 Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London With many thanks to.
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
Random Field Theory Will Penny SPM short course, London, May 2005 Will Penny SPM short course, London, May 2005.
Methods & models for fMRI data analysis – HS 2013 David Cole Andrea Diaconescu Jakob Heinzle Sandra Iglesias Sudhir Shankar Raman Klaas Enno Stephan.
SPM Software & Resources Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, October 2008.
SPM Software & Resources Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, October 2009.
Statistical Inference Christophe Phillips SPM Course London, May 2012.
FMRI Modelling & Statistical Inference Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course Chicago, Oct.
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM fMRI Course London, May 2012.
Contrasts & Statistical Inference Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course London, October 2008.
Mixture Models with Adaptive Spatial Priors Will Penny Karl Friston Acknowledgments: Stefan Kiebel and John Ashburner The Wellcome Department of Imaging.
The General Linear Model Christophe Phillips SPM Short Course London, May 2013.
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM fMRI Course London, October 2012.
General Linear Model & Classical Inference Short course on SPM for MEG/EEG Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London May 2010 C.
Group Analyses Guillaume Flandin SPM Course London, October 2016
Statistical Parametric Mapping for fMRI / MRI / VBM
SPM Software & Resources
General Linear Model & Classical Inference
The General Linear Model
Statistical Inference
SPM for M/EEG - introduction
Effective Connectivity
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
Keith Worsley Keith Worsley
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
The General Linear Model
From buttons to code Eamonn Walsh & Domenica Bueti
Statistical Parametric Mapping
Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging
The General Linear Model
Effective Connectivity
Statistical Parametric Mapping
Wellcome Centre for Neuroimaging at UCL
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
The General Linear Model
Mixture Models with Adaptive Spatial Priors
The General Linear Model
The General Linear Model
Linear Algebra and Matrices
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
Presentation transcript:

The General Linear Model Christophe Phillips Cyclotron Research Centre University of Liège, Belgium SPM Short Course London, May 2011

Normalisation Statistical Parametric Map Image time-series Parameter estimates General Linear Model RealignmentSmoothing Design matrix Anatomical reference Spatial filter Statistical Inference RFT p <0.05

Passive word listening versus rest 7 cycles of rest and listening Blocks of 6 scans with 7 sec TR Question: Is there a change in the BOLD response between listening and rest? Stimulus function One session A very simple fMRI experiment

stimulus function 1.Decompose data into effects and error 2.Form statistic using estimates of effects and error Make inferences about effects of interest Why? How? data statistic Modelling the measured data linear model linear model effects estimate error estimate

Time BOLD signal Time single voxel time series single voxel time series Voxel-wise time series analysis Model specification Model specification Parameter estimation Parameter estimation Hypothesis Statistic SPM

BOLD signal Time = error x1x1 x2x2 e Single voxel regression model

Mass-univariate analysis: voxel-wise GLM = + y y X X Model is specified by both 1.Design matrix X 2.Assumptions about e Model is specified by both 1.Design matrix X 2.Assumptions about e The design matrix embodies all available knowledge about experimentally controlled factors and potential confounds. N : number of scans p : number of regressors

one sample t-test two sample t-test paired t-test Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Factorial designs correlation linear regression multiple regression F-tests fMRI time series models Etc.. GLM: mass-univariate parametric analysis

Parameter estimation = + Ordinary least squares estimation (OLS) (assuming i.i.d. error): Objective: estimate parameters to minimize y X

A geometric perspective on the GLM y e Design space defined by X x1x1 x2x2 Smallest errors (shortest error vector) when e is orthogonal to X Ordinary Least Squares (OLS)

x1x1 x2x2 x2*x2* y Correlated and orthogonal regressors When x 2 is orthogonalized w.r.t. x 1, only the parameter estimate for x 1 changes, not that for x 2 ! Correlated regressors = explained variance is shared between regressors

= + y X What are the problems of this model?

1.BOLD responses have a delayed and dispersed form. HRF 2.The BOLD signal includes substantial amounts of low-frequency noise (eg due to scanner drift). 3.Due to breathing, heartbeat & unmodeled neuronal activity, the errors are serially correlated. This violates the i.i.d. assumptions of the noise model in the GLM

Problem 1: Shape of BOLD response Solution: Convolution model expected BOLD response = input function impulse response function (HRF) expected BOLD response = input function impulse response function (HRF) = Impulses HRF Expected BOLD

Convolution model of the BOLD response Convolve stimulus function with a canonical hemodynamic response function (HRF): HRF

blue = data black = mean + low-frequency drift green = predicted response, taking into account low-frequency drift red = predicted response, NOT taking into account low-frequency drift Problem 2: Low-frequency noise Solution: High pass filtering discrete cosine transform (DCT) set

High pass filtering

with 1 st order autoregressive process: AR(1) autocovariance function Problem 3: Serial correlations

Multiple covariance components = Q1Q1 Q2Q2 Estimation of hyperparameters with ReML (Restricted Maximum Likelihood). V enhanced noise model at voxel i error covariance components Q and hyperparameters

Parameters can then be estimated using Weighted Least Squares (WLS) Let Then where WLS equivalent to OLS on whitened data and design WLS equivalent to OLS on whitened data and design

Contrasts & statistical parametric maps Q: activation during listening ? c = Null hypothesis:

Summary Mass univariate approach. Fit GLMs with design matrix, X, to data at different points in space to estimate local effect sizes, GLM is a very general approach Hemodynamic Response Function High pass filtering Temporal autocorrelation

Thank you for your attention! …and thanks to Guillaume for his slides.