Vashek Vylet RadCon Manager UITF Internal Safety Review May 10, 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MNM Fatal Falling Material Accident Falling Material Accident August 17, 2012 (Florida) August 17, 2012 (Florida) Victim Recovered September 4,
Advertisements

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Presentation to ASAC R. Casey Radiation Shielding: Assumption and Design April 24, 2007.
PROBLEM: Radiation Dose Rate in IR2 When IR1 is Operating (and Vice Versa) Muon Dose Rate > 1 mRem/hr for 0.1% Collimated Halo.
1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.
C. Theis, D. Forkel-Wirth, S. Roesler, H. Vincke.
UCN Phase 2 Design Status September 10, Design Components Bulk Shielding Target Crypt Cryogenic Insert Target Insert UCN Port Beam Window Cooling.
1 MICE Hall Layout MICE Collaboration Meeting, LBNL, February 12, 2005 Paul Drumm for Yury & the RAL team.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Radiological Design Considerations of Synchrotron Radiation Facilities P.K. Job Radiation Physicist National Synchrotron.
Posting of Accelerator Enclosures Vashek Vylet and Keith Welch DOE Accelerator Workshop SLAC, August 17 – 19,
ALPHA Project Safety Assessment Document Vladimir Anferov.
Lali Tchelidze Safety work package leader
FAA/NASA Joint University Program for Air Transportation Research Jeff Dickman Chris Bartone June 20, 2003 A New Anechoic Chamber for Nearfield Antenna.
1 Overview of the NPDGamma Experiment at the Fundamental Neutron Physics Beamline Geoff Greene UT/ORNL.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 UITF Progress meeting Approved Labyrinth Fresh air pulled through “chicken wire” gate.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 UITF Progress meeting UITF ODH Discussion How to avoid ODH2 conditions? August 5, 2015.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
October 13, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 International Linear Collider Machine Detector Interface Materials for discussion at Engineering Forum: experiences.
Upgrade Injector Test Facility: UITF Why Build It? HDIce commissioning Bubble chamber physics with Bremsstrahlung x-rays: photo-disintegration of oxygen.
The Status of ESS Accelerator Shielding and Accident Scenarios Lali Tchelidze May 26, 2014.
HAPL Concrete Shielding Requirements Mohamed Sawan UW Fusion Technology Inst. HAPL Project Meeting UW-Madison October 22-23, 2008.
NLCTA Safety Audit Radiation Safety Review W. R. Nelson 9 November 2001.
Radiation safety evaluation for “KAMABOKO” Main Linac Tunnel KEK-APL : T.Sanami, S.Ban KEK-ACC : A.Enomoto, M.Miyahara ILC Mechanical & Electrical Review.
D. Beavis (RSC) May 4, 2010 EBIS ARR Radiation Safety.
Status of Radiation Protection studies in support of ELENA R. Froeschl and J. Vollaire DGS-RP-AS.
NUMI NuMI Internal Review July 27, 2001 Target Hall Shielding Review Page 1 Target Hall Shielding Review Radiation Safety Coordinator Nancy Grossman FNAL.
The four basic types of structures are :
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS2 Bulk Shielding calculations Methodology P.K. Job Radiation Physicist Peer Review 2007 March 27, 2007.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy RSVP Safety and Environmental Protection Issues E. Lessard Associate Chair for ESHQ Collider-Accelerator.
Overview of HINS Operations and Radiation Shielding Considerations in the Meson Detector Building Bob Webber August 16, 2006.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Summary of Shielding Calculations for NSLS2 Accelerators P.K. Job Radiation Physicist Peer Review 2007 March
BooNE / NuMI Rad. Protection NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) Radiation Protection for Mini-BooNE & NuMI 18 March, 2002 Mini-BooNE inputs from Peter Kasper.
Radiation Protection studies for the Linac4 / Linac2 interface Joachim Vollaire, DGS-RP 28/09/2015 Linac4 Coordination Meeting.
Ma zhongjian Ding yadong Wang qingbin Wu qingbiao Radiation Protection Group/IHEP.
UITF ODH Assessment UITF Safety Review May 10, 2016.
Layout and conventional facility N.Terunuma KEK. Conventional facility 1 Layout of beam line should be fixed until end of June We have to start.
EURISOL DS Task meeting Orsay, 07 Janvier Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
1 Implementation at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering Department, RAL MICE Collaboration.
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
UITF Laser and Gun High Voltage John Hansknecht UITF Operational Review March 18, 2016.
CHANGE OF ACCESS CONTROLS TO SERVICE BUILDINGS DURING BEAM PERMIT Vashek Vylet StayTreat, July 17, 2015.
Upgrade Injector Test Facility: UITF Why Build It? HDIce commissioning Bubble chamber physics with Bremsstrahlung x-rays: photo-disintegration of oxygen.
Prompt dose upstream the 12-ft concrete shielding blocks Igor Rakhno May 4, 2007.
EURISOL, TASK#5, Bucuresti, November 1 Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
Shielding Design for LCLS Injector Operation – Phase one
Introduction Used for covering spaces in the form of roof or floor
UITF – Upgrade Injector Test Facility
Desirable BCM Performance
Radiation protection of Linac4 M. Silari Radiation Protection Group
C100 Activation Status and Projections JLab Ops Staytreat 2016
4th Annual Construction Law Summit
Radiation Physics requirements for the IR
UITF Operational Review
Resident Physics Lectures
Upgraded Injector Test Facility
Source term test in Hall C
Upgraded Injector Test Facility - UITF
The NPDGamma Experiment at the SNS FnPB
Andreas Jansson, Lali Tchelidze
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
Beam dump for J-Parc neutrino facility
Operations Section Leader
Upgraded Injector Test Facility
Maximum Credible Beam Event Paul Emma et al
Neutron guide Shielding Concept
Shielding requirements for the baseline bunker shielding (current CATIA version ) Günter Muhrer
Elevations, Layout and Drawing Technique.
UITF Conduct of Operations Review
Radiation fields During 1st stage beam commissioning
Vashek Vylet, RadCon UITF Conduct of Operations Review April 24, 2019
CEPC Radiation and Shielding
Presentation transcript:

Vashek Vylet RadCon Manager UITF Internal Safety Review May 10, 2016 Radiation Control Vashek Vylet RadCon Manager UITF Internal Safety Review May 10, 2016

Radiation Control Goal: Insure radiation safety of workers, public and the environment, in compliance with regulatory and Jlab requirements (Shielding Policy) Radiation Control System (ANSI N43.1): Shielding Monitoring - in process Beam Containment (Henry Robertson)

Shielding Policy Normal operation (incl. beam mis-steering) < 250 mrem/y in occupied RCAs < 100 mrem/y in other occupied areas < 10 mrem/y at site boundary radionuclides in groundwater per VPDES permit Max. credible accident: <15 rem per incident

Shielding – Envisioned Phases A – HDIce: operation at 10 MeV for 900 h/y Iav = 5 nA for 80% of time Iav = 100 nA for 20% of time (for tuning) B – Operation at 10 MeV with Iav = 100 mA C – Operation at 35 MeV with Iav = 100 mA

Shielding – Phase A This review: partial phase A – no HDIce, beam ends in cave 2 at 42” beam height Cave 1 shielding as is; Iav = 100 mA (mA) is desired in cave 1 Cave 2 has 4 ft forward and lateral concrete shielding, with a 1.75 ft thick roof

Cave 1 at 100 mA CAVE 1 Dose rate [mrem/h] Note Side 100% loss 41 RA   [mrem/h] Note Side 100% loss 41 RA Side 1% loss 0.4 RCA Side up 1% loss 26 Thinner wall may be an issue for stairs (and ground due to skyshine). Cable penetrations under west wall must be filled with grout or similar 28” 27” 30”

Cave 1 at 100 mA CAVE 1 Dose rate   [mrem/h] Roof 100% loss 2973 Roof 1% 30 Penet* 100% 40621 Penet* 1% 406 * with current 3.25" Fe shield 30” concrete 3” steel 7.8” steel Penetrations are above the beamline – about 8” of steel is needed for same attenuation as the 30” concrete slab. Roof will have to be inaccessible; Depending on results of measurements, full 100 mA may not be feasible at 10 MeV

Cave 1 at 100 mA

Cave 2 at 100 nA Existing side shielding (4 ft) adequate for both 5% and 100% loss RCA on roof, potential for RA for large losses Local shielding needed for FARCs and beam dump Local shielding needed at ODH vent HDIce config & forward shielding to be modeled in detail for forward shielding

Cave 2 at 100 nA

Cave 2 at 100 nA 42” dump Side 5% loss Side 100 % Existing shielding is adequate in this regime; HDIce dump to be designed + few other details

Cave 2 at 100 nA Local shielding needs to be added on the roof to keep streaming radiation from ODH vent reaching occupied areas Skyshine on ground and adjacent Areas may be an issue – will be addressed by monitoring

Summary Both caves sufficiently shielded for 100 nA 100 uA in Cave 2 has issues Monitoring layout (CARMs) to be defined (include probes for skyshine) MC calculations needed to address HDIce dump and possible special configurations