The SPS 800 MHz RF system E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
Advertisements

LONGITUDINAL (IN)STABILITY WITH BATCH INJECTION T. Argyropoulos, P. Baudrenghien, C. Bhat, J. E. Muller, T. Mastoridis, G. Papotti, E. Shaposhnikova,
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
Outcome from 2011 Chamonix workshop New structure of the SPSU Study Group E. Shaposhnikova /02/20111SPSU meeting.
Bunch Flattening with RF Phase Modulation T. Argyropoulos, C. Bhat, A. Burov, J. F. Esteban Müller, S. Jakobsen, G. Papotti, T. Pieloni, T. Mastoridis,
AB-ABP/LHC Injector Synchrotrons Section CERN, Giovanni Rumolo 1 Final results of the E-Cloud Instability MDs at the SPS (26 and 55 GeV/c) G.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
First measurements of longitudinal impedance and single-bunch effects in LHC E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF Thanks: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, T. Bohl,
PS (electron cloud?!) instability at flat top Mauro Pivi Gianni Iadarola, Giovanni Rumolo, Simone Gilardoni, Hannes Bartosik, Sandra Aumon 27/06/2012 ICE.
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
T. Argyropoulos, LIU /04/2013 Progress in the SPS: RF studies and beam quality T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, J. E. Muller,, H. Timko, E. Shaposhnikova.
Collected by E. Jensen, BE-RF 1 ATOP days RF limitations.
0 1 Alternative Options in the Injectors – Preliminary Summary H. Damerau LIU-TM#8 18 October 2013 Many thanks for discussions and input to T. Argyropoulos,
RF issues with (beyond) ultimate LHC beams in the PS in the Lin4 era 0.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
Production of bunch doublets for scrubbing of the LHC J. Esteban Muller (simulations), E. Shaposhnikova 3 December 2013 LBOC Thanks to H. Bartosik, T.
Renovation of the 200 MHz RF system LLRF issues. Cavities redistribution 26 October th LIU-SPS Coordination Meeting 2  2011 : 4 cavities 2 x 4.
Update on Crab Cavity: Impedance (at fundamental), RF noise, operational scenario P. Baudrenghien, R. Calaga, T. Mastoridis March 21 st, th HiLumi.
Lessons from SPS studies in 2010 E. Shaposhnikova Chamonix’11 session 09: LHC injectors upgrade.
Some ideas for/from the SPS LIU-SPS team. Scrubbing (only) for ecloud in SPS? aC coating remains baseline..... –but scrubbing has many potential advantages.
POWER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE LHC HARMONIC CAVITIES WITH THE FULL-DETUNING SCHEME P. Baudrenghien, T. Mastoridis, CERN BE-RF 2nd LHC Harmonic Cavity meeting,
RF improvements over the weekend Giulia on behalf of Delphine, Philippe, Andy and many other people in the RF team LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group,
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
Elias Métral, SPSU Study Group and Task Force on SPS Upgrade meeting, 25/03/2010 /311 TMCI Intensity Threshold for LHC Bunch(es) in the SPS u Executive.
SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.
Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage? 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 4 March 2014.
Coupled bunch instabilities in the CERN PS
Coupled-bunch oscillation feedback studies 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 20 February 2013 Many thanks to R. Garoby, S. Gilardoni, S. Hancock,
1 Consequences of RF system failures during LHC beam commissioning T.Linnecar AB-RF.
Momentum slip-stacking of the nominal I-LHC beam in the SPS Particle simulations (preliminary) T. Argyropoulos, E. Shaposhnikova LIU-SPS BD WG 30/01/2014.
Beam loss and radiation in the SPS for higher intensities and injection energy G. Arduini 20 th November 2007 Acknowledgments: E. Shaposhnikova and all.
RF measurements during floating MD in Week 40 3 rd of October 2012 LIU-SPS BD WG 25/10/2012 Participants: T. Argyropoulos, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, J. Esteban.
High Intensity Beams in Existing Accelerators for CN2PY: SPS studies, PS issues E. Shaposhnikova Laguna-LBNO General Meeting CERN, Acknowledgments:
Outcome of beam dynamics simulations - Scenarios, requirements and expected gains s LIU-SPS Coordination meeting 26/08/2015 A. Lasheen, E. Shaposhnikova,
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
Longitudinal Limitations of Beams for the LHC in the CERN PS 0.
LONGITUDINAL COUPLED-BUNCH OSCILLATIONS IN THE RECYCLER RING PRESENTED BY: MUHED RANA UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE COUNTY (UMBC), BALTIMORE, MD SUPERVISOR:
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
AB-ABP/LHC Injector Synchrotrons Section CERN, Giovanni Rumolo 1 Preliminary results of the E-Cloud Instability MDs at the SPS G. Rumolo, in.
Juan F. Esteban Müller P. Baudrenghien, T. Mastoridis, E. Shaposhnikova, D. Valuch IPAC’14 – Acknowledgements: T. Bohl, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo,
Synchrotron frequency shift as a probe of the CERN SPS reactive impedance s HB2014 – 11/13/14 A. Lasheen, T. Argyropoulos, J. Esteban Müller, D. Quartullo,
LIU-PS Beam Dynamics Working Group Introduction and objectives
Beam Instability in High Energy Hadron Accelerators and its Challenge for SPPC Liu Yu Dong.
Loss of Landau damping for reactive impedance and a double RF system
Harmonic system for LHC
Harmonic system for LHC
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
Longitudinal impedance of the SPS
Summary of the dedicated MD on July 4th 50ns in SPS with nominal and low γt optics – transverse aspects T. Argyropoulos, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, A. Burov,
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
Wideband, solid-state driven RF systems for PSB and PS longitudinal damper.
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
A. Al-khateeb, O. Chorniy, R. Hasse, V. Kornilov, O. Boine-F
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
Transverse Feedback System (LHC Damper)
Upcoming longitudinal MDs
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
G. Arduini, R. Calaga, E. Metral, G. Papotti, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, R
Measurements of the Synchronous Phase Shift Aaron Farricker Participants: A.Lasheen, J. Repond & M.Schwarz Acknowledgements: H. Bartosik, T. Bohl,
Limits on damping times
The LHC25ns cycle in the PS Triple splitting after 2nd injection
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.)
Observation of Transverse Mode Coupling Instability at the PS and SPS
Collective effects in the SPS and LHC (longitudinal plane)
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
SPPC Longitudinal Dynamics
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
eSPS Impedance Considerations Aaron Farricker Acknowledgements: T
Presentation transcript:

The SPS 800 MHz RF system E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF LIU-SPS Coordination meeting 4 April 2012 Acknowledgments: T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, T. Linnecar, E. Montesinos

800 MHz RF system in the SPS 2 Travelling Wave cavities installed 3 sections/cavity, 13 cells/section but only one used (has RF power) 2nd cavity is idle => induced voltage in 2 cavities Power in 1 cavity (E. Montesinos): 100 kW (in continuous mode) (original plant 225 kW/cavity) Voltage: now maximum asked 600 kV, probably just obtained for high intensities impedance 11/20/2018 SPS RF upgrade

800 MHz RF system in the SPS Is required for beam stability above bunch intensity of (2-3)x1010 It is used for all LHC beams from injection to extraction in bunch shortening mode Its phase is locked to the 200 MHz voltage, but the relative phase should be programmed during the cycle (according to the stable phase). Absolute phase is calibrated at the start of each run from beam measurements (bunch tilt at injection and beam stability during the cycle) It is essential but not sufficient for beam stability above nominal intensities and controlled longitudinal emittance blow-up is applied using band limited noise. It should be inside synchrotron frequency distribution which depends on the voltage and phase of the 800 MHz RF system affected by beam loading 11/20/2018 SPS RF upgrade

SPS voltage programs in operation and MDs transfer to LHC Instability threshold decreases with energy during the SPS cycle ultimate 25 ns 200 MHz Rsh [MOhm] nominal beams ultimate 50 ns + 800 MHz 800 MHz 200 MHz Higher voltages (200 MHz and 800 MHz) were used for ultimate beam intensities 11/20/2018 SPS RF upgrade

Longitudinal coupled bunch instability Bunch length [ns] during the cycle (T. Bohl) Threshold: single batch (25 ns spacing) with 2x1010/bunch (2006, 3x1010 before) is unstable at the end of the ramp Possible source: fundamental or HOMs of 200 & 800 MHz RF systems (not known) Cures: - FB, FF, longitudinal damper for 200 MHz - 800 MHz RF system in bunch shortening mode through the cycle - controlled longitudinal emittance blow-up (0.35 eVs → 0.42 eVs → 0.63 eVs) 11/20/2018 SPS RF upgrade

Landau Damping 11/20/2018 SPS RF upgrade

Landau Damping 11/20/2018 SPS RF upgrade

Landau Damping 11/20/2018 SPS RF upgrade

Bunch length and stability at 450 GeV/c as a function of the 800 MHz phase Bunch length (av., max-min) at 450 GeV/c Beam stability from ∆τ G. Papotti et al. Higher 800 MHz voltage was used (in voltage program) for ultimate beam intensities 11/20/2018 SPS RF upgrade

Non-uniform controlled longitudinal emittance blow-up in a double RF system of the SPS 50 ns beam 75 ns beam ni Non-uniform emittance blow-up due to beam loading in a double RF system => 800 MHz upgrade needed! Non-uniform emittance blow-up and beam instability for short injected bunches

Issues with controlled emittance blow-up by band-limited noise applied noise synchrotron frequency distribution varies along batch T. Argyropoulos et al., HB2010 measured & calcul. k-th bunch position ∆φs

Beam induced voltage during ramp 200 MHz, 4.5 MV + FF&FB steady transient 400 MHz, 0.5 MV Now the reference signal is sampled outside the beam T. Argyropoulos et al., HB2010 11/20/2018 SPS RF upgrade

Basic induced voltage and power requirement T. Linnecar, 2008 Nominal beam 25 ns 1.15*1011 Ib 0.74 A Peak Irf 1.48 A g0 ~ 0.33 (Shortest bunch) Irf800 0.45 A Max. induced voltage, no RF feedback, Irf800 ~ 0.5 A Two cavities ~ 2 MΩ 1 MV Compare 700 kV imposed in operation Even at 1/10 RF current 100 kV – not insignificant Single nominal bunch ~ 100 kV Power requirements: IRF = 0.75 A 350 kV / cavity 84 kW/ cavity 700 kV / cavity 131 kW / cavity 240 kW + 2.6 dB IRF = 0.5 A 350 kV / cavity 46 kW / cavity 700 kV / cavity 93 kW / cavity IRF = 0.1 A 350 kV/ cavity 17 kW / cavity 700 kV /cavity 65 kW / cavity IRF = 0 A 350 kV /cavity 16 kW / cavity 700 kV / cavity 65 kW / cavity Effect of phase errors between beam and 800: IRF = 0.5 A Phase (800) degs. @ 350 kV @ 700 kV 20 61 KW 123 kW 10 54 109 0 46 93 -10 38 78 -20 31 64 (Induced voltage with or against voltage imposed) We need 700 KV – 350 KV per cavity. If only one cavity available then 700 kV per cavity change of sign 1.5 ns bunch length go ~ 0.35 1.7 ns g0 ~ 0.2 3.0 ns g0 ~ -0.03 4.5 ns g0 ~ 0.01 Note change of sign and fast variation at shorter bunch lengths. NB distribution only approximately cosine squared.

Nominal and ultimate intensities with nominal and Q20 optics emit=0.5 eVs emit=0.6 eVs 11/20/2018 SPS RF upgrade

Total 200 MHz voltage on flat top after upgrade as a function of power/cavity with 1.6 MW from new power plants for 2x4-sections cavities at twice nominal current maximum 200 MHz voltage: 10 MV => 1 MV at 800 MHz 10/02/2011 SPS RF upgrade

800 MHz TW RF system upgrade - summary Due to induced voltage it is very difficult to control the 800 MHz voltage phase and amplitude which are essential for beam stability directly and via the use of controlled emittance blow-up which needs to be set-up for different beams More 200 MHz voltage and therefore 800 MHz will be required for higher intensity beam transfer to the LHC. Low γt optics needs even more 200 MHz and 800 MHz RF voltage. The 800 MHz voltage used at ~1/10 of the 200 MHz voltage (BSM) Total voltage of 1.5 MV (700 kV/cavity) should be provided in future for high intensity beams Accurate phase control of the 800 MHz, at ~1 deg level also needed The 800 MHz can be used for other high intensity beams (CNGS) The first request for 1-turn FB was made in 2003! 11/20/2018 SPS RF upgrade

Transient effect along batch, T. Linnecar 2008 200 feedback and feedforward 800 no feedback These transients move the local zeros of the total RF waveform i.e. where the bunch sits. Measured and calculated bunch position along batch. (Details can be re-produced with delay errors etc.) Note that the effect is different from batch to batch (gap) Sharp change at beginning - needs 800 to be included. These variations : eat into the transfer margin make stability and blow-up a function of bunch number

Controlled emittance blow-up in a double RF system 11/20/2018 SPS RF upgrade