Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting – TAMIL NADU On 16.02.2010 Ministry of HRD Government of India MDM-PAB Meeting – TAMIL NADU On 16.02.2010

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Part-I Review of Implementation of MDMS in Tamil Nadu (Primary + Upper Primary) (1.4.2009 to 31.12.2009) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Questions? What is the level of coverage – Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served? What is the level of unspent balances (Inventory) as on 31.03.09 as well as 31.12.09? How regular the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains? What is the level of lifting? How about cooking cost? Was disbursed to Districts? What is the level of utilisation at school level? How synchronous utilisation of food grains and cooking cost? How utilisation of foodgrains reconcile with number of meal served? …… contd Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Contd ….., Questions? How much MME was utilized? Under what activities? What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices? Part –II What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2008 to 2009? How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data? Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Benchmarks Target Coverage: 100% (Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served) Desirable stock in hand : 15% (+ or - 5%) Availability of foodgrains [1.4.09 to 31.12.09]: 85% (+ or – 10%) Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [1.4.09 to 31.12.09]: 75% (+ or – 10%) Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is lifted & distributed. Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost is synchronous. State’s AWP&B is in accordance with M/HRD’s guidelines. Data in the AWP&B is authentic, reliable & based on the records. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Approval Vs Achievement (No. of Meals) (Primary + Upper Primary) (5% more) No. of Meal (in Crore) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Non-Coverage : Number of Meals ( PY + U PY) Sl. No. Districts Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for 2009-10 ( In Cr.) Meals actually served during 1.4.2009 to 31.12.2009 ( In Cr.) Short-served No. of meals % Low 1 Chennnai 1.88 1.62 0.26 -14% 2 Kancheepuram 3.28 2.97 0.31 -10% Excess Dharmapuri 1.76 3.14 -1.37 78% Theni 1.68 1.94 -0.26 16% 3 Nagapattinam 2.59 2.86 -0.27 10% 4 Tuticorin 1.79 1.96 -0.17 Probable Reasons: - Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals .

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Approval Vs Achievement: (Avg. no of children during 1.4.09 to 31.12.09) ( 2% More) No. of children (In lakh) (3% more) (2% more) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Non-coverage : No. of Children availing MDM (Primary) Sl. No. Districts Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for 2009-10 Average No. of children availing MDM during 1.4.09 to 31.12.2009 Difference No. of children % LOW 1 Perambalur 34337 20809 -13528 -39% 2 Chennai 69697 54915 -14782 -21% 3 Kancheepuram 137095 112451 -24644 -18% 4 Karur 52775 44702 -8073 -15% Excess Dharmapuri 60724 90773 30049 49% Vellore 197884 265995 68111 34% Coimbatore 96090 119166 23076 24% Tuticorin 73201 84256 11055 15% Probable Reasons: - Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals .

Non-coverage : No. of Children availing MDM (Up. Primary) Sl. No. Districts Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for 2009-10 Average No. of children availing MDM during 1.4.2009 to 31.12.2009 Difference No. of children % LOW 1 Vellore 112632 48936 -63696 -57% 2 Coimbatore 96913 77038 -19875 -21% EXCESS Dharmapuri 54735 95994 41259 75% Probable Reasons: - Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals .

Approval Vs Achievement (No. of Working Days as on 31.12.09) 6% excess No. of working days Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative) Foodgrains (in MTs) *: Including unspent balance as on 31.3.2009 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise) Foodgrains (in MTs) *: Including unspent balance as on 31.3.2009 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Analysis: Foodgrains Availability (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) Foodgrains (in MTs) 100% 56% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Foodgrains lifting (Availability) – Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Foodgrains Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) Benchmark : 75% 1.26 Lakh MTs 0.71 Lakh MTs 0.68 Lakh MTs Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Foodgrains Utilization– Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Cooking Cost Disbursed and Utilisation (1.4.2009 to 31.12.2009) Cooking Cost (in % Disbursed and utilisation.) Benchmark :75% Rs. 270.22 Cr. Rs. 270.22 Cr. Rs. 202.66 Cr. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Mismatch in Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost (District-wise) State average: 54%(FG) & 75%(CC) Benchmark: 75% % Utilisation Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Qty of Food grains Sl. No District No. of Meals served [In Cr.] Expected consumption of Food grains (MTs) Actual Consumption of Food grains (MTs) Deficit in % Defeat Consumption 1 Theni 1.94 2334.19 1322.98 -43% 2 Chennai 1.62 2025.80 1174.43 -42% 3 Krishnagiri 2.43 2883.38 1763.03 -39% 4 Dharmapuri 3.14 3944.02 2559.08 -35% 5 Namakkal 1.71 2005.90 1320.02 -34% 6 Nagapattinam 2.86 3469.38 2324.94 -33% 7 Perambalur 0.73 928.31 626.09 8 Virudhunagar 2.34 2698.31 1829.53 -32% 9 Villupuram 5.36 6346.58 4312.10 10 Sivaganga 1.61 1917.74 1311.20 11 The Nilgiris 0.82 985.41 685.26 -30% 12 Madurai 3.02 3583.10 2497.87 13 Trichy 2.82 3370.91 2364.38

Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Qty of Cooking Cost Sl. No District No. of Meals served [In Cr.] Expected Utilization of cooking cost (Rs. In Lakh) Actual Utilization of cooking cost (Rs in Lakh) Deficit in % Deficit Consumption 1 Dharmapuri 3.14 835.20 529.37 -37% 2 Theni 1.94 506.48 414.62 -18% 3 Namakkal 1.71 441.35 370.64 -16% 4 Pudukottai 2.90 753.32 651.35 -14% Excess Nagapattinam 2.86 748.40 1038.91 +39% Krishnagiri 2.43 630.08 762.17 +21% Kancheepuram 2.97 775.13 907.76 +17% Ramanathapuram 1.59 414.43 478.37 +15% 5 Perambalur 0.73 195.64 224.97 6 Chennai 1.62 430.40 483.77 +12%

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India MME Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) Rs. 923.78 Lakhs Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs) (100%) (20%) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Achievement during 2009-10 (Kitchen Sheds) Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Achievement during 2009-10 (Kitchen Devices) Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Performance Score card – A Summary Sl. No. Component Achievement Benchmark 1. Foodgrains Availability 56% 85% 2. Foodgrains Utilisation 54% 75% 3. Cooking Cost Utilisation 4. MME Utilisation 7% 100% 5. Kitchen Shed construction 91% 6. Kitchen Devices procurement 72% 7 QPRs received 2nos. 3 nos. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2010-11 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY) (Down by 4%) (Up by 3%) No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) Q-1 Q-2 2010-11 (Proposed) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2009-10 (UPPER PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) Q-1 Q-2 2010-11 (Proposed) *:SSA= Govt+LB+GA Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

No. of School Working Days (Pry & U Pry) DISE Vs MDM Sl. No Year As per DISE Data As per MDM Sanctions 1 2007-08 217 220 2 2008-09 Pry-214 U Pry-210 3 2009-10 Not available Pry-217 U Pry-207 4 2010-11 Pry-220 U Pry-200 (State’s claim for 2010-11) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Thank You Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India