Internet2 Network Design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indiana University Global NOC Chris Robb The Hybrid Packet and Optical Initiative as a Connectivity Solution Presented to the APAN NOC & Resource Allocation.
Advertisements

1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
ONE PLANET ONE NETWORK A MILLION POSSIBILITIES Barry Joseph Director, Offer and Product Management.
GENI: Global Environment for Networking Innovations Larry Landweber Senior Advisor NSF:CISE Joint Techs Madison, WI July 17, 2006.
Internet2 Network: Convergence of Innovation, SDN, and Cloud Computing Eric Boyd Senior Director of Strategic Projects.
Internet2 Network Overview Steve Cotter, Director Network Services Internet2 Technical Coordination Meeting 11/12 July 2006 Ottawa, CA.
RIT Campus Data Network. General Network Statistics Over 23,000 wired outlets Over 14,500 active switched ethernet ports > 250 network closets > 1,000.
1 GENI: Global Environment for Network Innovations Jennifer Rexford Princeton University
Internet2 A Project of the University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development Ted Hanss Director, Applications Development VIEWNET April 1998.
COnvergence of fixed and Mobile BrOadband access/aggregation networks Work programme topic: ICT Future Networks Type of project: Large scale integrating.
Circuit Services - IPTV Christian Todorov Internet2 Fall Member Meeting October 9, 2007.
Abilene Update Joint Techs Summer ’05 Vancouver, CA Steve Cotter Director, Network Services Steve Cotter Director, Network Services.
TASIM Trans Eurasian Super Information Highway Summary Presentation October 2010.
The Research and Education Network: Platform for Innovation Heather Boyles, Next Generation Network Symposium Malaysia 2007-March-15.
HOPI Update Rick Summerhill Director Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies Jerry Sobieski MAX GigaPoP and TSC Program Manager Mark Johnson MCNC.
Rick Summerhill Chief Technology Officer, Internet2 Internet2 Fall Member Meeting 9 October 2007 San Diego, CA The Dynamic Circuit.
HOPI: Making the Connection Chris Robb 23 June 2004 Broomfield, CO Quilt Meeting.
Rick Summerhill Chief Technology Officer, Internet2 TIP January 2008 Honolulu, HI Internet2 Update.
A Framework for Internetworking Heterogeneous High-Performance Networks via GMPLS and Web Services Xi Yang, Tom Lehman Information Sciences Institute (ISI)
Delivering Circuit Services to Researchers: The HOPI Testbed Rick Summerhill Director, Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies, Internet2 Joint.
ASCR/ESnet Network Requirements an Internet2 Perspective 2009 ASCR/ESnet Network Requirements Workshop April 15/16, 2009 Richard Carlson -- Internet2.
Dynamic Lightpath Services on the Internet2 Network Rick Summerhill Director, Network Research, Architecture, Technologies, Internet2 TERENA May.
Internet2 Network Design Rick Summerhill, Director Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies Internet2 Internet2 Staff Retreat 22 June 2006.
3 December 2015 Examples of partnerships and collaborations from the Internet2 experience Interworking2004 Ottawa, Canada Heather Boyles, Internet2
Advanced Networks: The Past and the Future – The Internet2 Perspective APAN 7 July 2004, Cairns, Australia Douglas Van Houweling, President & CEO Internet2.
Circuit Services Christian Todorov Internet2 Fall Member Meeting October 9, 2007.
Internet2 Network Design Rick Summerhill, Director Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies Internet2 Community Design Workshop 15, 16 June 2006.
What’s Happening at Internet2 Renee Woodten Frost Associate Director Middleware and Security 8 March 2005.
IPv6 and the US higher education and research networking community Doug Van Houweling President and CEO, Internet2
Expanded WaveCo Services Linda Roos, Christian Todorov Joint Techs - January 21, 2008.
30 November 2001 Advisory Panel on Cyber Infrastructure National Science Foundation Douglas Van Houweling November 30, 2001 National Science Foundation.
Dynamic Network Services In Internet2 John Vollbrecht /Dec. 4, 2006 Fall Members Meeting.
INDIANAUNIVERSITYINDIANAUNIVERSITY HOPI: Hybrid Packet and Optical Infrastructure Chris Robb and Jim Williams Indiana University 7 July 2004 Cairns, AU.
7 May 2002 Next Generation Abilene Internet2 Member Meeting Washington DC Internet2 Member Meeting Washington DC.
Internet2 Strategic Directions October Fundamental Questions  What does higher education (and the rest of the world) require from the Internet.
Possible Governance-Policy Framework for Open LightPath Exchanges (GOLEs) and Connecting Networks June 13, 2011.
The Internet2 Network and LHC Rick Summerhill Director Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies Internet2 Given by Rich Carlson LHC Meeting 25.
Connecting to the new Internet2 Network What to Expect… Steve Cotter Rick Summerhill FMM 2006 / Chicago.
Internet2’s new network Heather Boyles, APAN Singapore Meeting – Network Engineering Session 19 July 2006.
HOPI Update Rick Summerhill Director Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies Internet2 Joint Techs 17 July 2006 University of Wisconsin, Madison,
The Internet2 Network and LHC Rick Summerhill Director Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies Internet2 LHC Meeting 23 October 2006 FERMI Lab,
Internet2 Networks, Current and Future Rick Summerhill Director Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies Internet2 International ICFA Workshop.
Community Design Workshop - First Day Summary, Issues Rick Summerhill, Director Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies Internet2 Community Design.
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
ENRON BROADBAND SERVICES
FiberCo/WaveCo Update
Grid Optical Burst Switched Networks
Welcome Network Virtualization & Hybridization Thomas Ndousse
SURFnet6: the Dutch hybrid network initiative
Dynamic Network Services In Internet2
The Women’s Council of REALTORS® Chapter-to-Network Project
Internet2 Update Rick Summerhill Chief Technology Officer, Internet2
WG1: RELIABLE, ECONOMIC AND EFFICIENT SMART GRID SYSTEM
MAN LAN Update Rick Summerhill
Internet Interconnection
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
Dynamic Circuit Service Hands-On GMPLS Engineering Workshop
Flexible Transport Networks
International Task Force Meeting – part 2
The HOPI Project Rick Summerhill
Fall 2006 Internet2 Member Meeting
Pfizer Internet2 Day Douglas E. Van Houweling President and CEO, UCAID
Infrastructure Update
National R&E networking infrastructure
Steve Corbató Director, Backbone Network Infrastructure Tempe
Corporate Program Update
The UltraLight Program
IPv6 in Internet2 This is a general overview presentation about Internet2. Internet2 is a consortium, led by US universities, which is recreating the partnership.
Abilene Update Rick Summerhill
Christian Todorov Internet2 Fall Member Meeting October 9, 2007
Presentation transcript:

Internet2 Network Design Rick Summerhill, Director Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies Internet2 Community Design Workshop 15, 16 June 2006 Indianapolis, IN Title Slide

Contents Strategic Objectives Background Requirements Architecture Network Usage Policy Engineering Network Research Advisory Groups Partnerships Agreement Summary

Strategic Objectives Strategic Objectives Ensure community control of the underlying network infrastructure Control those elements that allow development of new network capabilities Leverage the capabilities of a global telecommunications leader Providing carrier class reliability and expanded breadth of services, along with a broad set of partnership options Capitalize on the latest technological advancements in networking Create an asset that benefits the entire community - researchers, universities, regional optical networks, industry, government, K-12, and the international community

Background Background - I A defining goal of Internet2 is to support the US research universities’ need for scalable, sustainable, high-performance networking In 1998, the Abilene network was created using 2.5 Gbps SONET circuits as part of a partnership with Qwest Communications, Cisco Systems, and Nortel Networks The original agreement with Qwest was later extended to October of 2007 and the Abilene network was upgraded to a 10 Gbps network A further extension for one year was possible if notification was made by March 31, 2006, an extension that was recently declined

Background Background - II Abilene is an IP packet based network similar in design to the original NSFnet, but with much greater capabilities and bandwidths Today there is great Interest in Hybrid networks Greater availability of circuit based capabilities Greater interest world wide to bring circuit based services closer to the edge Most RONs now have developed this capability already The HOPI project has experimented with the basic ideas for the last two years

Background Process – I With pending end of MoU with Qwest, Internet2 began complete examination of all the possibilities Think out of the box - look at new ideas Consider different network options - IP, hybrid networks, etc. Considered a variety of different carrier and existing fiber options. For example, How does one share wavelengths on an existing system? Several viable options were available

Background Process – II In the end, one option stood out - the Dedicated Wave System (DWS) from Level3 A Hybrid Network, not just an IP network and waves Supports a wide variety of services and capabilities, from highly experimental to production level Control at layer 1 Uses equipment and fiber dedicated to Internet2 Internet2 board has approved the DWS for the Internet2 network and the contract has been executed.

Requirements Requirements Throughout the process, the requirements of the community were considered - the process did not occur in a vacuum Requirements documents produced during the spring of 2005 were considered The Group A report, produced by a joint engineering committee from NLR and describing a wide ranging set of network attributes The Abilene Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Report outlining a need to provide for new experimental services along with production services like IP The MORPHnet document (1997) - Multi-Modal Organizational Research and Production Heterogeneous Network

Requirements Requirements – II Input from the Quilt Optical workshops and discussions with the RONs Research examining a wide variety of different types of capabilities DRAGON and CHEETAH - NSF funded projects examining dynamic provisioning Science related projects such as UltraLight and eVLBI OptIPuter and TeraGrid HOPI Testbed Input from the International community GEANT2 providing hybrid types of capabilities GLIF and lightpath capabilities for scientific work

Requirements Process Revisited The actual process of negotiating with Level3 was done by a relatively small number of Internet2 staff The negotiations could not have been done with a large community group The process created a framework for the Internet2 network and enabling community involvement The process used the knowledge gained from the above requirements documents and discussions, and was done in the spirit of developing a network to serve the community by providing a wide range of capabilities for advancing the state of the art of networking Within the above framework, there are many details yet to be understood and ideas to be developed That is the purpose of this meeting, starting the process and … Leading to network deployment, future planning, and continuing community involvement

Architecture Design Goals – I Develop an innovative optical system on a national footprint to serve the broad research and education community The goal is to support all Internet2 members and to enhance the ability to serve a wider community Develop a hybrid network capable of providing point-to-point services together with an IP network Every connector (RON) connects a NewNet backbone ring across a metro location not requiring extensive backhaul The community retains complete control of the layer 1 optical system including provisioning and switching of wavelengths

Architecture Design Goals – II Internet2 does not have to concentrate on reliability and sparing - Level 3 is responsible for an SLA. The community focus is on networking, not on managing devices like amplifiers The system is capable of supporting network research in wide variety ways Minimal Conditions of Use (CoU), allowing full participation from the entire community in providing new services and capabilities

The System - I System uses dedicated fiber from the carrier Architecture The System - I System uses dedicated fiber from the carrier Significant financial advantage if owned (via IRU) footprint is used Built on Infinera platform providing innovative optical technology Simple and convenient add/drop technology Simple and convenient wave setup Demonstrated high reliability in initial period of operation on the Level3 network Economics of Infinera system are disruptive in the market place

Architecture The System - II Architecture has maximum flexibility. Every RON can access every wave on the system if needed System includes grooming capabilities - lightpaths can be built over Ethernet or SONET Can take advantage of advanced SONET cpabilities like GFP, VCAT, and LCAS Capable of lightpath provisioning to the campus

Lightpath Capabilities Architecture Lightpath Capabilities Image Slide Rick Summerhill

Architecture System - III RON connectivity expected to evolve to 2 x 10 Gbps connections 10 Gbps IP connection 10 Gbps point-to-point connection (capable of STS-1 granularity lightpaths provisioned in seconds), most likely provision using Ethernet (GFP based) Hybrid capabilities Expect 20 - 24 connectors Simple and consistent connection scheme Promoting aggregation Need input and discussion on exceptional cases

The following diagrams represent preliminary thoughts on topology Architecture System - IV The following diagrams represent preliminary thoughts on topology Exact locations may vary, but fiber is expected to be on the Level3 footprint One of the goals of this meeting is to clarify and optimize these locations

PROVISIONAL TOPOLOGY – SUBJECT TO DISCUSSION Architecture Layer 1 Topology Image Slide PROVISIONAL TOPOLOGY – SUBJECT TO DISCUSSION Rick Summerhill

IP Network IP network built on top of optical system Architecture IP Network IP network built on top of optical system High reliability - architecture provides a variety of protection options Commodity service offering - standard connection will include commodity services Current plan is to continue to use highly reliable Juniper routers, but open to new technologies Will likely use fewer routers, emphasizing point-to-point capabilities and hybrid networking Potential near term option of 40 Gbps Community input is important these issues

Layer 1 Topology with IP Network Architecture Layer 1 Topology with IP Network Image Slide PROVISIONAL TOPOLOGY – SUBJECT TO DISCUSSION Rick Summerhill

Architecture Architecture Summary Initially provisioned with ten 10-Gbps wavelengths (100 Gbps) Capacity: up to 80 wavelengths (0.8 Tbps) Scalability: Potential for 40 & 100 Gbps wavelength support Reliability: Carrier provides standard service assurances for these wavelengths Provide a variety of different types of reliability Flexibility: Support for dynamic provisioning and wavelength switching

PROVISIONAL ARCHITECTURE – SUBJECT TO DISCUSSION Node Architecture Advanced optical DWDM equipment Grooming capabilities to provide sub channels Support for other networks having a national footprint Simplified and standardized interface to connectors, exchange points, and other global research and education networks 2 x 10 Gbps interfaces Example displayed is the Denver optical node, showing connections required by the collocated IP router node and an additional network Image Slide PROVISIONAL ARCHITECTURE – SUBJECT TO DISCUSSION Rick Summerhill

PROVISIONAL ARCHITECTURE – SUBJECT TO DISCUSSION Node Architecture Node without IP router IP connection to remote router Same basic architecture Image Slide PROVISIONAL ARCHITECTURE – SUBJECT TO DISCUSSION Rick Summerhill

PROVISIONAL ARCHITECTURE – SUBJECT TO DISCUSSION Node Architecture Node without network connector Support for Other Network Same basic architecture Image Slide PROVISIONAL ARCHITECTURE – SUBJECT TO DISCUSSION Rick Summerhill

Example Circuit Services - I Architecture Example Circuit Services - I Services on NewNet Short Term Dynamically Configured STS-1 Granularity Deterministic Circuits using two waves on the full footprint, with framing either SONET or GFP mapped Ethernet. There is no additional cost to use these capabilities. They are included in the base connectivity Costs. The may be call blocking in the use of these capabilities. Long Term Circuits configured as above. There is an extra cost for these circuits, proportional to bandwidth, and charged on a day-by-day basis. The shortest term is one day, and there is no call blocking for these capabilities. Long Term full waves configured and provisioned for a minimum of a year.

Example Circuit Services - II Architecture Example Circuit Services - II Additional Carrier Services WaveCo services provisioned by Level3 as part of the agreement.

Example Projects on NewNet - I Architecture Example Projects on NewNet - I Dynamic services Creating lightpaths across multiple administrative domains in seconds Development of “Domain Controllers” Support for applications - setup of “Application SpecificTopologies” Dynamic inclusion of optical paths into IP networks TCP data transfers File transfers with long segments not having to require congestion control

Example Projects on NewNet - II Architecture Example Projects on NewNet - II Network research projects deploying programmable Ethernet capable chipsets at each optical node using “NetFPGA” cards from Stanford Service trial with GEANT2 on dynamic provisioning of 1 GigE circuits across Internet2 and GEANT2

Internet2/GEANT2 Service Trial Architecture Internet2/GEANT2 Service Trial Develop inter-domain 1 GigE services between hosts or clusters of hosts in Europe and the US Develop the technology to provide real services Domain controllers and interoperability Develop policies and cost models for providing such services Interested in enlisting a couple of RONs and campuses willing to participate The following diagram illustrates the problems

Internet2/GEANT2 Service Trial

Network Usage Policy – I The use of the network facility shall be consistent with the broad set of non-profit objectives of the U.S. research and education community and its affiliates Internet2 will seek to maximize the ability of the network to support the broad collaboration requirements of the Internet2 membership and their affiliates to interact with the broadest scope of domestic and international networks and collaborating organizations Each organization utilizing the facility will be responsible for complying with all technical and operational standards developed for the network, and will avoid actions that adversely impact the performance or stability of the facility itself or those experienced by other users

Network Usage Policy – II The facility shall not be used for illegal, classified, life-safety, or unrelated commercial activities Additionally, Internet2 will seek to maximize to its members the value of IP transit by expanding connectivity through peering with commercial networks including content providers (e.g., Google, Akamai) and other regional and national service providers (i.e., tier 2 ISPs)

Engineering Engineering - I Building on the experience from projects such as Abilene, HOPI, and NLR, operational support is expected to fall into three broad categories: Control plane development, deployment, and support. The Mid-Atlantic crossroads through the DRAGON project has focused on dynamic resource allocation. Application support, enabled by targeting key applications for the research community, applications such as eVLBI. The North Carolina Research and Education Network has focused on this area for the past year through the HOPI project Engineering, monitoring, and management has been provided by the Global Network Operations Center at Indiana University

Internet2 expects to continue these relationships for the new network Engineering Engineering - II These groups were originally selected as the HOPI testbed support center Internet2 expects to continue these relationships for the new network

Network Research Network Research - I The Internet2 network is an ideal platform for network research - the ability to support both highly experimental projects along with production based services is a key objective The Abilene observatory will be expanded to include the new capabilities of the network Data collection at all layers of the network, with datasets made available to network researchers Support for collocation of equipment in optical nodes

Network Research Network Research - II Internet2 has supported individual network research projects whenever possible. Examples include The router clamp MPLS tunnels for researchers - these can now be supported at layer 1 Support for the 100x100 project Flexibility is key feature of the new network Smaller projects at lower bandwidths can be supported on variable footprints Projects can also be supported for variable lengths of time Projects like VINI and GENI can be supported by the new network

Advisory Groups Advisory Groups - I Internet2 currently has four councils: Network Planning and Policy Advisory Council (NPPAC), the Applications Strategy Council (ASC), the Industry Strategy Council (ISC), and the Network Research Liaison Council (NRLC). The latter in particular will play a major role because of the developmental nature of the network (Note that the Internet2 board is in the process of reviewing the Internet2 governance) A network executive committee consisting of senior executives from Internet2, Level3, and others including Infinera

Advisory Groups Advisory Groups - II A technical advisory committee that reports on a regular basis to NPPAC The advisory committee could have detailed working groups or other advisory groups (e.g., the HOPI design team) organized to provide advice on specific subjects It could commission working groups to work on particular aspects of the network Input from the community is crucial - a later session on this will seek further input

Partnerships Partnerships The agreement with Level3 and the many capabilities of the network provide an opportunity for strong partnerships to form. For example, The partnership with Level3 to examine new service capabilities Joint work on control plane investigations Examination of new optical capabilities with Infinera and others International partnerships, for example related to service trials Federal government partnerships, continuing and expanding on collaborations with other networks such as Esnet Continued work with the original Internet2 partners, Qwest communications, Cisco Systems, and Nortel Networks

Additional Agreement Information Agreement Summary Additional Agreement Information Continuation of FiberCo Introduction of WaveCo Essentially, a “circuit” version of FiberCo Provides a platform for collaboration with the corporate and academic research communities to examine new services and ideas More information will be presented later

End Slide