Non-Automatic Power Saving Delivery

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0881r0 Submission July 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 PS Mode Enhancements with Timing Indication Date:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Submission January 2004 Mathilde Benveniste, Avaya Labs -- ResearchSlide 1 Clarifications on APSD Mathilde Benveniste Avaya.
Doc.: IEEE /0846r0 Submission July 2008 Mathilde BenvenisteSlide 1 Power save for wireless mesh Mathilde Benveniste
1 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee 1. Possible Access Sequences for a STA in PS Mode 2. PS in Infrastructure Network 3. PS in Ad.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0288r0 TXOP Sharing Operation for Relay Date: Slide 1Eric Wong, Broadcom Authors: March 2013.
Doc.:IEEE /0114r0 January 2012 Low Power Medium Access Date: Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0409r6 Submission July 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Channel Access Supporting Low Power Operation Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Non-TIM Mode Negotiation Date: Slide 1 Authors: Kaiying Lv, ZTE.
Doc.: IEEE /0619r0 Submission May 2008 M. Benveniste (Avaya Labs) Scheduled service periods in wireless mesh Notice: This document has been prepared.
Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
Discussion on MAC Calibration Power Saving Test
WUR coexistence with existing power save mode
DLS Power Save Delivery Mechanism
Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms
Solving Status mismatch
Solving Status mismatch
BSS Max Idle Period and Sleep Interval
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
Overlapping coverage issues with n BSSs
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Further Discussion on “Lost Ack” During Unscheduled Service Period
Further Discussion on “Lost Ack” During Unscheduled Service Period
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
Power Efficient PS Poll
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
WUR MAC Consideration Date: Authors: Nov 2016 Liwen Chu
Remedy to the ‘Missing Ack Problem’
Some Power-save changes in e Draft
Wake Up Response mode to WUR frame
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
Use of EDCA Access During HCF Polling
Clarifications on Call Admission Control for EDCA
Remedy to the Lost Ack Problem while Power Saving
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2005
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Power efficient and unified s solution
TGe Consensus Proposal
Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework
BSS parameters update notification
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
HT Features in Mesh Network
MDA Enhancements Date: Authors: May 2008 Month Year
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Resolution to Comment 497, TGe D5.0
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
802.11e EDCA-APSD TXOP Handoff September 2003
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Interference Signalling Enhancements
Schedule Element Synchronization and Simplification
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
Resolutions of the Remaining Power Management Comments
Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation
Use of EAPOL-Key messages
Peer Service Period Date: Authors: January 2008 Month Year
Use of More Data Field Date: Authors: Nov 2005 Month Year
Some Power-save changes in e Draft
Pekko Orava, Henry Haverinen, Simon Black (Nokia)
Chapter 11 Comment Resolution for Letter Ballot 63
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Admissions Control and Scheduling Behaviours for Scheduled EDCA
Peer Traffic Indication enhancements
WUR with conventional power save
Enhancement of Low Power Medium Access STAs
Resolution to Comment 497, TGe D5.0
Presentation transcript:

Non-Automatic Power Saving Delivery Mathilde Benveniste benveniste@ieee.org Avaya Labs – Research August 26, 2003

August 2003 Reverse Polling Reverse polling can be done with the legacy power management mechanism enhanced with existing 802.11e features M. Benveniste, Avaya Labs - Research

Station in power save mode August 2003 Reverse Polling Contention time (not drawn to scale) Downlink Frames ------------- Uplink More Data field = 1 More Data field = 0 ACK D data D data ACK time Data PM field=0 ACK Null+ACK PM field=1 Station wakes up Station in power save mode M. Benveniste, Avaya Labs - Research

Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 August 2003 Uplink transmissions 1.       The station will signal the AP that it is awake by sending an uplink frame with the Power Management field set to 0 in the frame control field. 2.      The station will stay awake until it has transmitted all its uplink frames and has received notice from the AP that either there are no buffered frames pending transmission, or downlink transmission of buffered frames is postponed. A downlink frame with the More Data field set to 0 in the frame control field, will signal that there are no more downlink frames pending transmission. A downlink frame with the Last field set to 1 in the QoS control field, signals that the AP will not transmit more downlink frames during this wake-up period. 3.       The station will stay awake until it has received a frame with the More Data field set to 0, a QoS frame with a “queue size” value of ‘0’, a beacon with its TIM bit cleared, or the Last bit set to 1. 4. Having received a frame with the More Data field set to 0, a QoS frame with a “queue size” value of ‘0’, a beacon with its TIM bit cleared, or the Last bit set to 1, the station shall indicate in its last frame that it is going back to sleep. The last frame will be either the last uplink MSDU or a (Null+)ACK to the last downlink frame. 5. A station that goes to sleep having received a downlink frame with the Last field set to 1 and the More Data field set to 1 may subsequently send a null frame with Power Management field set to 0 to receive the remaining buffered frames. M. Benveniste, Avaya Labs - Research John Doe, His Company

Month 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/xxxr0 August 2003 AP Operation 1. The AP sends frames buffered for a power saving station as soon as the station wakes up. That is indicated when a frame is received from that station with the Power Management field set to 0 in the frame control field. If there is no frame to send in a cycle, it sends nothing. 2. Receipt of a frame with the Power Management field set to 1 in the frame control field indicates that the station sending the frame is in power save mode. 3. The AP buffers the frames destined to a station in power save mode. 4. The More Data field in the frame control field is 1 for all buffered frames except the last, in which the same is set to 0. 5. The Last bit in the QoS control field is 0 for all downlink frames sent to a station until the AP determines that other downlink transmissions have precedence, in which case the AP sends downlink frames with the Last field set to 1. M. Benveniste, Avaya Labs - Research John Doe, His Company

Reverse Polling vs Proposal 03/661 August 2003 Reverse Polling Downlink Frames ------------- Uplink More Data field = 1 More Data field = 0 ACK D data D data ACK time Data PM field=0 ACK Null+ACK PM field=1 Also provides protection for a lost Ack 03/661 Proposal Downlink Frames ------------- Uplink More Data field = 1 More Data field = 0 ACK D data D data time Data ACK ACK Reverse polling has an additional Null frame in the last frame exchange sequence In an error-free channel, the added frame would increases channel use minimally – much better than the 33% that 03/661 suggests for pure legacy (only one more frame is transmitted, and that without contention) In a noisy channel, reverse polling uses the channel more efficiently than proposal 03/661 because the extra Null frame in reverse polling prevents the repeated retransmission of a downlink frame whose ACK might be lost right before the station goes to sleep M. Benveniste, Avaya Labs - Research

Discussion Reverse polling is possible with present TGe draft standard August 2003 Discussion Reverse polling is possible with present TGe draft standard Any reverse polling mechanism has the problem of repeated retransmissions in case the final downlink ACK is lost This problem is already addressed by the mechanism described here A solution is not specified in proposal 03/661 Because of contention reduction and improved power saving achieved by EDCA when using APSD, APSD should remain an option M. Benveniste, Avaya Labs - Research