Chemical state in lakes and rivers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE EU-LIST OF PRIORITY SUBSTANCES A NEW STRATEGY AGAINST WATER POLLUTION Bernd Mehlhorn, Umweltbundesamt, Berlin.
Advertisements

Predicting Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients (K ow ) from Water Solubility and Molar Volumes Cary T. Chiou National Cheng Kung Univ., Tainan,Taiwan.
Introduction to Chemistry Activity. SJWP June 18, Fish Kill Scenario There has been a massive fish kill in Lake St. Louis. Your team has been dispatched.
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
How close are we in the Water Framework Directive’s Implementation ? Paul C.M. Frintrop Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste-Water Treatment.
Discharges of Dangerous Substance Directive 76/464/EEC and “daughter” directives Multilateral Screening Meeting - Croatia and Turkey Chapter 27 – Environment.
Improving monitoring campaigns : A case study Dissemination Workshop on Evaluating Source Control Options for Reducing Emissions of Priority Pollutants.
Post-Katrina Water Quality Assessment: Lake Pontchartrain and Surrounding Water Bodies Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Assessment.
Source control of priority substances in Europe EU-project within the sixth framework program John Munthe IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
Dr Ulrich Borchers PRIMER CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL DE DOCENCIA
Criteria for water quality assessment between countries: how to proceed in the next few years ? F. László Water Resources Research Centre Budapest, Hungary.
Heavy metals (Pb, Cd and Zn) levels in roadside soils in Nairobi County.
Environmental Assessment and Sustainability CIV913 CHEMICAL ASSESSMENT of RIVER WATER QUALITY.
Air Quality Monitoring Networks Maine DEP 2015 Annual AQ Monitoring Meeting MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Protecting Maine’s Air, Land and.
Envi Sci Brianna Barkus. Essential Question-How do humans affect the Earth’s natural cycles? Warm-up- Write a one paragraph hypothesis of whether you.
Contaminated Soil Monitoring Pornsri Suthanaruk, Ph.D Pollution Control Department (PCD) Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Thailand Workshop.
Bulgarian National Emission Inventory System Assoc. Prof. N.Miloshev – Geophysical Institute BAS St. Tzonev – National Statistical Institute E. Nikolova.
Water.europa.eu Questionnaire on existing priority substances WG E Chemical Aspects Brussels October 2010 Agenda Item 5.3(a) Helen Clayton WFD Team.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.
1 New policies in environmental quality strategies within the EU Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Fulvio Ferrara Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Rome, Italy.
Methodology for the assessment of Member States’ reporting on monitoring programmes (Article 11) Milieu Ltd Consortium WG DIKE, September 2014.
What is EPA’s NPEP Program? NPEP is a partnership with EPA to help member organizations identify opportunities for product substitutions, process changes,
AMPS 2 Analysis and Monitoring of Priority Substances and Chemical Pollutants Second Meeting Ispra Review of Actions.
Mussel watch programme in support of the WFD monitoring : the RINBIO and MYTILOS project Louis A. ROMAÑA Ifremer - France Workshop on ‘In-situ trialing.
COHIBA preliminary results for implementation HELCOM BSAP Ms. Eva Brorström-Lundén, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute 32rd Meeting of the Helsinki.
Part-financed by the European Union. Control of hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea region - COHIBA Sept 2010 Frank Marscheider-Weidemann Slides prepared.
Review of the Daughter Directives of the Discharge of Dangerous Substances Directive Thomas Zabel.
Rob Collins Water Group EEA Hazardous Substances in Europe’s fresh and marine waters – An overview Report for publication – 1 st half of 2011 Rob Collins.
ECENA Plenary meeting January Implementation of EC Decision No. 479 from 17 July 2000 on EPER (European Pollutant Emission Register) in ROMANIA.
Debbie Miller Water Quality Standards Toxic Criteria Coordinator.
Europe-wide monitoring obligations under the EU Water Framework Directive Jos G. Timmerman Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.
Potential of ozone for the removal of hazardous micropollutants and related changes in dissolved organic matter composition in a municipal biotreated effluent.
1 Current Analytical Challenges in Water Policy Philippe QUEVAUVILLER Joint NORMA-EAQCWISE-CMA Workshop, Paris 21 October 2008.
Priority Substances - Source Screening and Measures Sheets Tenth Meeting of Working Group E on Chemical Aspects 24 June 2010.
SOCOPSE WP5 Brussels Case North Baltic Sea Region Vantaa River catchment.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL VARIABLES Overview.
SOCOPSE Final Conference Maastricht, June 2009 Prof.Dr.Damià Barceló, Paula Guerra, Dr. Ethel Eljarrat IDAEA-CSIC, Spain. WP5: Case Studies Ter and Llobregat.
Anthropogenic pressures and classification on 2 nd planning period.
ESTIMATED COMPOSITION Of Solid WASTES
Lecture on Bhopal Gas Tragedy
Dedicated maps on contaminants
What is water pollution?
Bhopal Gas Tragedy.
4th Expert E-PRTR Group Meeting Brussels, 4 February 2011
Han Blok, Royal Haskoning
מפעל ביולוגי מכני בשיטת בוצה משופעלת
CIS WORKSHOP ON SURFACE WATERS MONITORING NETWORKS
OSPAR chemical monitoring and assessment of the North-East Atlantic
Dedicated maps on contaminants
1st CHEMICAL MONITORING AND EMERGING POLLUTANTS (CMEP) PLENARY MEETING 25th November 2010 Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute, Bratislava.
Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE)
Table of existing standard methods and proposed quality standards for priority substances in water AMPS (2) Jan Wollgast.
Analysis and Monitoring of Priority Substances and Chemical Pollutants
Contaminants products for EMODNet Chemistry 3
Data collection and dedicated maps on contaminants
Control of hazardous substances in the Baltic Sea region - COHIBA
Overview of environmental monitoring at EU and regional level
*Atrazine + metabolites
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Existing Priority Substances EQS revision - MS questionnaire
Workshop on metals bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive
The harmonization between soil contamination and waste management Jyh-Shing Yang CTCI Roundtable Oct.25 ,2007.
Preparation of the Heavy Metals Protocol Ratification by Ukraine
13th Working Group E meeting March 2011 Jorge Rodriguez Romero
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Sediment & biota standards Monitoring for prioritisation & emerging pollutants National EQSs for specific substances.
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
The Bhopal gas tragedy: An environmental disaster
7th Expert Advisory Forum on Priority Substances June 2004 Article 16 on priority substances under the Water Framework Directive.
Presentation transcript:

Chemical state in lakes and rivers Jari Pasanen 20.11.2018

Chemical state in classification EU priority substances National priority substances Other substances observed concentration/EQS observed concentration/EQS Included in ecological classification through their biological impacts Ecological state maximum ’moderate’ if observed > EQS Chemical state: ’good’ or ’not-good’ EQS: environmental quality standard

EU priority substances European Union wide environmental quality standard values for 33 substances. Nickel and its compounds Nonylphenols Octylphenols Pentachlorobenzene Pentachlorophenol Polyaromatic hydrocarbons Simazine Tributyltin compounds Trichlorobenzenes Trichloromethane (chloroform) Trifluralin Alachlor Anthracene Atrazine Benzene Brominated diphenyletheriv Cadmium and its compounds Chloroalkanes. C10-13 iv Chlorfenvinphos Chlorpyrifos 1.2-Dichloroethane Dichloromethane Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) Diuron Endosulfan Fluoranthenevi Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Hexachlorocyclohexane Isoproturon Lead and its compounds Mercury and its compounds Naphthalene

EU priority substances Observed annual average concentration is compared with the environmental quality standard value. For soluble metals local background concentration is taken into account. If any substance exceeds the EQS concentration. the water is classified chemically ’not-good’. EU priority substances observed concentration/EQS Chemical state: ’good’ or ’not-good’

EU priority substances Measured in concentrations (μg/l) in water sample. Metals are measured in soluble concentrations. Annual average results are used for AA-EQS Three substances are measured in perch, wet weight (ww) mg/kg. Mercury (Hb) EQS: 0.020 (+ background)= 0,22-0,25 mg/kg Earlier 1,0 mg/kg (pike) and 0,5 mg/kg for other fishes Hexachlorobenzene EQS: 0.010 mg/kg Hexachlorobutadiene EQS: 0.055 mg/kg Also interesting Nickel and its compounds 20 µg/l

Perch Nordic map shows the site-specific arithmetic means of observed mercury concentrations (mg/kg ww), collected in 1985-2002 Nordic mean for perch is 0,4 mg/kg (ww) Source: Mercury in Nordic ecosystems, 2007, Norden IVL report B1761

Mercury in perch in Finland These results are used in the classification on the second round Under EQS Over EQS Only exceeding in Lapland is artificial lake Porttipahta

National priority substances National environmental quality standard values for 15 substances. All expressed as concentrations in water sample (μg/l). Separate standard value for surface waters and water in domestic use. Chlorobenzene 1.2-dichlorobenzene 1.4-dichlorobenzene Benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP) 2 Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) Resorcinol (1.3-benzenediol) (benzothiazol-2-ylthio) methylithio cyanate Benzothiazole-2-thiol Bronopol (2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1.3-diol) Dimethoate MCPA (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy acetic acid) Metamitron Prochloraz Ethylene thiourea Tribenuron-methyl

National limit values Observed annual average concentration is compared with the environmental quality standard value. If any substance exceeds the EQS concentration -> ecological state is at most ’moderate’ National priority substances observed concentration/EQS if observed > EQS, ecological state maximum ’moderate’ high good moderate poor bad

Loading inventory of priority and harmful substances Work is coordinated by Finnish Environment Institute -> report concerning priority substances load and emissions in water district areas Regional authorities give feedback from their point of view (local participation) Installations (Ni, Hg, Cd, Pb, cooling waters) Mines (Ni) Municipal waste water treatment plants (no priority substance emissions) Municipal waste landfills (no priority substance emissions) Air deposit (Hg)

Point source emissionin Lapland for the inventory