Susceptibility Assessment for Public Water Supply sources

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
Advertisements

Alert: Waste Spill Environmental Science. Artesian well.
Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination in Texas
Subsurface Fate and Transport of Contaminants
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Add Main Topic Here Created by Educational Technology Network
B EMIDJI C RUDE O IL S PILL Darren Cartwright Stephen Toone.
DRASTIc Groundwater Vulnerability map of Tennessee
MICHIGAN SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Michigan Section AWWA Annual Conference September 15, 2000 Bradley B. Brogren, P.E. Michigan Department of Environmental.
Risk Map Early Demonstration Project Lackawanna County, PA CCO Meeting September 13, 2011.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
N ON- P OINT S OURCE P OLLUTION Analysis and Prediction in ArcView David Munn Texas A&M University/Dept. of Civil Engineering CVEN 689 Applications of.
1-Degree USGS DEM Control Points Locations National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Drainage Lines Corrected Stream Lines Filled DEM Burned DEM Flow Area Accumulation.
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
Geographical & Environmental Modelling Dr Nigel Trodd Coventry University.
Biological and Environmental Engineering Soil & Water Research Group Spatial Variability of Groundwater Soluble Phosphorous on an Alluvial Valley-Fill.
Water Quality Modeling in GIS Application of Schematic Network Processing Schema Links and Nodes have unique behaviors based on their type A framework.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Characterizing the Landscape for Water-Quality Analysis Methods and implementation 2006 National.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering Department of Civil Engineering Southern Illinois University Carbondale Instructor: Dr. L.R. Chevalier Lecture Series.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
Water Systems Mrs. Bader. Water Systems In this exercise, you will learn more about what makes up a watershed, track the movement of water through the.
Models to predict metal leaching to ground- and surface water: from soil data to scenario studies Bert-Jan Groenenberg, Luc Bonten, Paul Römkens.
Employee Presentation p 1
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model Copano Bay watershed Copano Bay watershed Copano Bay Carrie Gibson CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Spring Semester.
Overview of US EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Carrie Rasik Ohio EPA CO- Risk Assessor
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Core and Supplementary Agricultural Topics Section B 1.
Time of Travel. American Water Charleston intake on the Elk River Charleston 1,000, ,984 = 1880 seconds or 31 minutes.
LAKE OHRID MACEDONIA AND ALBANIA Experiences with Nutrient Management and Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution Control.
Nonpoint Source Pollution u Some basic principles u Example study of total pollution loads in the Corpus Christi Bay System –rainfall-runoff relationship.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
Using Ground-Water Model Predictions and the ppr and opr Statistics to Guide Data Collection.
AQUIFER VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT: PROJECT REVIEW COLUMBIA COUNTY June 11, 2009 Columbia County, Florida Advanced GeoSpatial Inc. Alan Baker, P.G. James.
HSE Screening Risk Assessment (SRA) for Geologic CO 2 Sequestration Curtis M. Oldenburg Earth Sciences Division WESTCARB Meeting Portland, OR October 27-28,
USGS Partnership Opportunities for SLICE Proposal Richard L. Kiesling US Geological Survey MN Water Science Center 2280 Woodale Drive Mounds.
Precipitation in North America Figure 9.5. Potential Evapotranspiration Figure 9.6.
Proposed Tools and Approach for Ground-Water Vulnerability Assessment (GWAVA) Using a Geographic Information System and Simulation Modeling Jack Barbash.
GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION. IMPORTANCE OF GROUND WATER Approximately 99 percent of all liquid fresh water is in underground aquifers At least a quarter.
Introduction to Spatial Calculation Estimation of Areas Susceptible to Flood and Soil Loss.
Tracking Groundwater Contamination
NHD Tools for the Evaluation of Watershed Condition and Management Performance Authors: William Cooter (presenter) Peter Ilieve. Tim Bondelid Mark Bruhn.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Land and Water Resource Information Systems By David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Presented at UN.
Groundwater Protection Project Greg Robison Project Manager Ed Sullivan Consulting Engineer June 23, 2008.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Scenario generation for long-term water budget.
Determining Watershed Parameters for Water Rights in the Cypress River Basin By: Hema Gopalan GIS in Water Resources (C E 394K) Fall 2001.
Watershed Parameters for Water Rights in the Trinity River Basin Melissa Figurski CE 394K.
GO C3Analyze and Evaluate Mechanisms Affecting the Distribution of Potentially Harmful Substances within an Environment. Transport of Materials Through.
Water Quality Analysis of The Lower Colorado River Paula Kulis CE 394K.1.
RASP - Risk Assessment of flood and coastal defence for Strategic Planning A High Level Methodology Project partners and co-authors Paul Sayers / Corina.
The Dane County Regional Hydrologic Study. Conceptualized groundwater flow system for Dane County Source: Bradbury and others, 1999.
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601
Routing-Hydrologic and Hydraulic
Key Concepts from Exercise 4
Flow field representations for a grid DEM
Terrain Analysis for Water Quality Modeling
Drinking Water Mapping Application
Nonpoint Source Pollution
Where is Earth’s fresh water?
Drinking Water Mapping Application:
The Johnson Co., Inc. Montpelier, VT
Do Now: While watching the following clip answer the following:
Energy performance and Carbon emissions Assessment and Monitoring tool
The Water Cycle.
Groundwater contamination
Groundwater contamination
Do We Have Enough ? USGS can’t answer that question …. but can provide data and science tools/analyses to help society answer this question. USGS provides.
10.3 Ground water supply.
The Water Cycle.
GIS Analysis in Land Management
Presentation transcript:

Susceptibility Assessment for Public Water Supply sources Gil Strassberg

What is a Susceptibility Assessment? The traditional risk assessment – Point effects an Area What is a susceptibility assessment? We want to know how the area supporting the water intake affects the water quality at the intake. We are trying to determine a quality relationship between the area and the water source. Need to consider Point sources and non point sources – petroleum storage tanks, Toxic release sites, land fills etc. Non Point source – land use (pesticides in agriculture), urbane areas, some types of soil have influence on water quality. The good news is we can use similar physical properties that have been researched in the risk assessment analysis in the past Susceptibility Assessment – Area effects a Point Point Source Non Point Source We can use the similar physical properties for both assessments

Schematic Overview Schematic overview of the assessment procedure. An example using the datasets for lake aquilla. We start with a point that represents the intake (surface water intake or a well for ground water) All the different layers that represent the watershed. – Topographic, Annual and seasonal averages for Climate, Soils, land coverage. Demonstration of the different layers available. Potential sources coverage Length Zones, calculation of zones that represents the flow distance upstream from the intake, will enable us to do zonal statistics and simplify the assessment, will talk more and show how we calculate. Based on the information we Want to implement Business Rules to evaluate the susceptibility, we will use chemical grouping and properties of these groups and also compare to water quality monitoring data. Outcome will be the final assessment.

Calculating Length Zones –Time Zones Flow Direction Grid Flow Length Grid Using flow length function in arc info workstation Explain how we calculate the zones – the same thing in ground water we use time of travel. Using function “Flow length” we calculate the length of flow from a point to the outlet. Each cell in the grid has a value that represents the flow distance to the intake. Give unique values to the cells so that each value represents a zone e.g: zone number 1 from 0 to 10000. Transform the grid into a coverage – enables us to intersect different layers. Length Zones Coverage Calculate new grid with unique values From grid to coverage

Intersecting sources and length zones Using select by location function Zone number Petroleum Storage tanks Toxic release inventory 1 2 3 11 4 5 6 Intersecting the length/ time zones with the source locations will give us an inventory of the sources and there location from water source. The number of Sources in the Area Relative location of the sources

Physical Model Qin Co Qout Ce Want to apply some physical model to determine the effect of the sources on the water supply source. Applying an attenuation factor is a simple approach to calculate the relative effects of sources on the intake. However calculating the attenuation Factor is not simple due to multiple Process that effect attenuation. Two faze attenuation: 1. Attenuation due to Filtration from surface to the saturated zone. 2. Attenuation during transport in the saturated zone Physical Attenuation: Sorption Decay Volatilization Advection Dispersion

Summary What do we know? Area that effects the intake and its properties. Number of sources in the area. Relative location of point and non point sources. Attenuation Factor in groundwater Future Work? Refine attenuation factors for ground and surface water. Apply the methodology on case studies. Compare to available water quality data.

Acknowledgments Dr. Maidment and Dr. Katz USGS: Randy Ulery Richard Kiesling Toby Welborn TNRCC – SWAP team Research Team at Pickle Dr. Maidment and dr. Katz for there guidance and help. USGS – for guiding me through the data and help process it. TNRCC- for there contribution.