Natural Family Planning (NFP) Research Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING AGI PRESENTATION TOOLS References for this presentation can be found in the report In Their Own Right: Addressing the Sexual and Reproductive Health.
Advertisements

Building the capacity of Community Health Centers to collect occupational health data Letitia Davis, ScD, EdM Occupational Health Surveillance Program.
Integration: Intersection for Reproductive Health and HIV Programs: the Kenyan Experience Family Health International Sponsored Satellite Session World.
Contraception and Family Planning Content Profile IHE October 2013.
2.11 Conduct Medication Management University Medical Center Health System Lubbock, TX Jason Mills, PharmD, RPh Assistant Director of Pharmacy.
Terrell W. Zollinger, DrPH Evaluation Consultant Healthy Women, Healthy Hoosiers Conference October 7, 2011.
Fertility Awareness Methods
Midwest AIDS Training & Education Center Health Care Education & Training, Inc. HIV/AIDS Case-Finding In Family Planning Clinics.
Sexual and Reproductive Health.  An egg can live up to 24 hours in the uterus following ovulation  Sperm usually live up to 5 days in the uterus following.
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
Evaluation of family planning program
The Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality November 14, 2012 Marilyn J. Keefe, MPH, MPP Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs U.S.
Perceptions and attitudes of fifth year medical students of Stellenbosch University regarding the Rural Clinical School in Worcester.
Expanding Access to RH and Maternal Health Services for Adolescents Girls Living with HIV Harriet Birungi and Francis Obare Reproductive Health Program,
Darren A. DeWalt, MD, MPH Division of General Internal Medicine Maihan B. Vu, Dr.PH, MPH Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention University.
Re-Screening of CT Positive Clients in Region X IPP, Goldenkranz S., 1 Fine D. 1 1 Center for Health Training 2010 CDC STD Prevention Meeting,
ADAPT serving geriatric populations in rural communities. Project ADAPT Assessing Depression and Proactive Treatment The Minnesota Area Geriatric Education.
Together for Health is funded by the United States Agency for International Development and implemented by JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. in collaboration.
Agency: Planned Parenthood of Delaware Intern: Bevin Hileman.
Assessing access to family planning services for the urban poor in Bangladesh The 12 th International Conference on Urban Health may, 2015 Dhaka,
Strategic assessment of policy, quality and access to contraception and abortion services in Macedonia Main findings 2007/08.
Lessons from the CDC/RTC HIV Integration Project Marianne Zotti, DrPH, MS, FAAN Team Leader Services Management, Research & Translation Team NCCDPHP/DRH/ASB.
Integration of Male Services into Family Planning Settings April 4, 2006 Norman Clendaniel Delaware Division of Public Health.
Infrastructure Update Jennifer Kawatu Kim Watson Andee Krasner
Predicting Pregnancy Risk among Women Attending an STD Clinic Judith Shlay MD, MSPH Denver Public Health September 21, 2008 CityMatCH Conference.
New England Vocational Rehabilitation Quality Assurance System
Transitioning to the New CDC Guidelines CDC HIV Integration Check List Region VIII Thursday, June 14 th 2007 New Orleans, Louisiana JSI Research and Training.
Baltimore City’s Preventing Substance Exposed Pregnancies Collaborative.
Family Planning In Jordan
Lessons Learned: Integration of Services Regional Training Center Perspective April Pace, Regional Manager Center for Health Training 2007 OPA HIV Prevention.
Smoking Cessation Services in a Baltimore County Title X Family Planning Program CityMatCH Urban Maternal and Child Health Leadership Conference Albuquerque,
Karen Cheung, MPH, Pamela Luna, DrPH, MST, Sarah Merkle, MPH American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting November 11, 2009 The findings and conclusions.
Determinants of Family Planning uptake among Female Sex Workers Enrolled in a HIV incidence study in Eldoret Kenya. Authors: J. Kipyego, E. Kaguiri, G.
Adult Hepatitis A and B Vaccination in Traditional and Non-Traditional Sites, North Carolina Beth Rowe-West, Head Immunization Branch Division of Public.
Family PACT Program Report FY09-10: Overview of Contraceptive Services and Practical Applications for Practice Improvement February 8, 2012 Family PACT.
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Incorporating Perspectives of Consumers and Frontline Staff: Presentation at the American Evaluation Association Conference Denver, Colorado Understanding.
Funded by HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau Titles I & II Technical Assistance (TA) Webex January 11, 2007 Donna Yutzy, NQC Consultant Quality Management 101.
Laura Bright, LJB Consulting, Inc. Gila Pyke, Cognaissance, Inc.
The Landscape of Project PrIDE Data Reporting Requirements
Disclosure of HIV status to children living with HIV in Malawi: needs assessment and formative evaluation of an intervention to help with the disclosure.
Mental and Behavioral Health Services
Carolina Health Centers, Inc.
Natural Family Planning
DATA COLLECTION METHODS IN NURSING RESEARCH
Opioid Management in Primary Care Michael Parchman, MD, MPH
Unit 6: Second-Generation HIV/AIDS Surveillance
Research Questions Does integration of behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location, improve patient-centered outcomes in.
Natural Family Planning Project
MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation
Julia Searl Rusert, M.S.W., Ph.D. David Martin, M.A.
Title of Research Project Unique Clicks to Website (n)
Pre-implementation Processes Implementation, Adoption, and Utility of Family History in Diverse Care Settings Study Lori A. Orlando, MD MHS.
Universal Screening to Assess Chlamydia Prevalence and Risk Among Older Women Attending Family Planning Clinics in Wisconsin Roberta (Bobbie) McDonald.
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Provincial Evaluation Plan By Kathleen Douglas-England
Urban Indian Health Institute Seattle Indian Health Board
Introduction NCONN Core Competency Area 4: Advocacy
Housekeeping Please DO NOT place your phone on “HOLD”
Pathways from Developmental Screening to Services: Spotlight of Effort led by Northwest Early Learning Hub - in collaboration with the Oregon Pediatric.
Shannon Phillips, PhD, RN
Health care for the Homeless Strategic Planning 2018
Provider and Member Education in Managed Care Pharmacy
Women’s Health Care and Education Coalition
Introduction Acknowledgments Identified need Project objective
Needs Assessment Slides for Module 4
Chapter 15 Community As Client: Applying the Nursing Process
Augmentative and Alternative Communication Awareness and Training Among Staff and Nurses in WI McKinzie Comer and Lynn Gilbertson, PhD University of Wisconsin.
Florida International University
Utilizing Immunization Registries in Local Public Health Accreditation
Presentation transcript:

Natural Family Planning (NFP) Research Study David Fine Karen Dluhosh Sarah Goldenkranz Center for Health Training Seattle, WA January, 2009

Study Aims/Goals Exploratory and descriptive study which aims to: Identify factors that affect the use of NFP 2. Assess predictors of contraceptive success among NFP users

Focus will be on the following areas: Social, cultural, and demographic indicators associated with NFP use; Individual and institutional barriers to use; Factors that may impact compliance with NFP practices; Indicators of self-efficacy among NFP users; and Rate and indicators of contraceptive success in this service population.

What is Natural Family Planning (NFP)? Contraceptive method / prevent unintended pregnancy Relies on identification of days in menstrual cycle when woman is most fertile and most likely to be come pregnant Teaches a woman to accurately monitor her cycle, identify her fertile period and either abstain from intercourse or use an alternative method of contraception

Definitions Natural Family Planning (NFP) Fertility Awareness Method (FAM) *FPAR definition: Broad term which includes “fertility awareness methods include rhythm/calendar, Standard DaysTM, Basal Body Temperature, Cervical Mucus, and Sympto-Thermal methods.” Fertility Awareness-Based (FAB) methods Cluster 1 - calendar based Cluster 2 - sympto-thermal based *Source: Family Planning Annual Report: 2007 National Summary, Table 7

Who are the users? Generally educated, young and single, or older and married Most prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean NFP use in USA has decreased as more effective methods of contraception have become available

Reasons they use NFP Limited availability of other methods to prevent pregnancy (globally) Other reasons: cultural beliefs about self-discipline and self-restraint desire to use more natural methods of birth control fear of side effects and adverse health impacts of modern hormonal methods

Research Population of Interest Who: Title X providers (staff & clinicians) Clinic clients using NFP as their primary method of contraception Where: Title X-funded Family Planning clinics in Region X Focusing on Washington State in particular

Research Partners Washington State DOH Family Planning and Reproductive Health Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest Research partners will: assist with selection of project field sites participate in staff needs assessments, staff and client interviews, staff focus groups & client interviews

Research Advisory Committee Provide input on all phases of the research Program-research linkages, NFP service financing issues, clinical staff needs, and NFP client service provision Membership will include: A state family planning grantee nurse consultant A medical director from PPGNW Title X grantee and delegate agency representatives Key stakeholders from participating clinics

Research Methods & Data Sources Quantitative Data Region X Title X needs assessment surveys Use: Describe agency and staff perspectives on NFP, program trends and variation in NFP service provision Source: Supplemental NFP questions added to annual web-based survey administered to clinic staff Clinic Visit Records, 2004-2008 Use: Characterize clients that use NFP and client contraceptive success Source: existing electronic records of clinic client visits, regional data base used for program monitoring, FPAR

Clinic Visit Records (CVRs)--Completed in each Region X Title X FP site for client visits qualifying as Title X events CVR domains Client demographics RH history Medical and lab service provision Counseling and education Provider types Contraceptive method, before/after visit Referrals

Focus groups and interviews with clinic staff Qualitative Data: Focus groups and interviews with clinic staff Use: Explore knowledge and training on NFP, experiences with clients, collect clinician-client stories Source: face-to-face and phone interviews, selected FP clinics in WA state NFP client interviews Use: Explore reasons for choosing NFP, methods used, training and information received, experiences at FP clinics, client expectations Source: face-to-face and phone interviews, selected FP WA state clinics

NFP Visits and Users Data from CVRs, 2004-2008 (through June ’08) 6,098 visits to FP clinics in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington where NFP was listed as BC method 5,061 female patients using NFP methods, before/after their clinic visit Aggregated by clinic and client ID An additional ~13,000 visits for these 5,061 patients, 2004-08, where NFP was not listed as BC method These records to be used to describe patterns of FP client BC method, services Assess number of pregnancies and intention status

NFP Visits Visit data, n = 6,098 NFP after visit 24% NFP before visit 29% NFP before/after visit 47%

NFP Visits—Contraceptive Methods % Before Visit NFP 76% Barrier 4% Hormonal Other 2% None 14% After Visit 71% 12% 1% No NFP at T1 and Yes NFP at T2=24% Yes NFP at T1 and No NFP at T2=37% N = 6,098

NFP Users Characteristic % State Alaska 4% Idaho 7% Oregon 60% Washington 29% Population Density (RUCA) Urban 75% Large Rural 12% Small Rural Isolated 6% N= 5,061

NFP Clients Characteristic % Age < 20 11% 20-24 27% 25-29 26% 30-34 16% 35-39 10% > 39 9% Race/Ethnicity White 82% Black 2% AI/AN 1% Hispanic Asian 4% NH/PI N= 5061

Characteristic % Number of Pregnancies 43% 1 21% 2 14% 3 10% 4 or more 43% 1 21% 2 14% 3 10% 4 or more 12% N= 5061

Next Steps—Regional CVR Data Update 2008 to annual data set Add other ~13,000 clinic visits where NFP was not the BC method Explore visit patterns Generate aggregate patient data set (n=~5,000) with all relevant data from the ~20,000 visits Pregnancy history (number/intention status), referrals, BC methods used

Other Next Steps Implement regional needs assessment with NFP items Finalize participating clinics Generate qualitative tools, client recruitment protocols, consent procedures Implement field qualitative study component