Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Semi-Inclusive electroproduction of pions with CLAS M. Osipenko 14 th Lomonosov conference, August 21, Moscow State University.
Advertisements

Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements Sufficient data for Energy Flow algorithm development Provide data for calorimeter tracking algorithms  Help setting.
Joanne Beebe-Wang 7/27/11 1 SR in eRHIC IR Synchrotron Radiation in eRHIC IR and Detector Background Joanne Beebe-Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory 10/
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
1 Vacuum Requirements in the Detector Region from Beam Gas and other Considerations Takashi Maruyama (SLAC) LCWA 2009, Albuquerque October 2, 2009.
June 28, 2004 BBBTF Steven H. Robertson McGill University, Institute of Particle Physics 1 Beam Background Simulation with B A B AR with B A B AR June.
CLIC collimator survival IWLC 2010 J.L. Fernández-Hernando – ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute (Daresbury Lab.) 21/10/2010 J.L. Fernández-HernandoASTeC/CI21/10/2010.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
PROBLEM: Radiation Dose Rate in IR2 When IR1 is Operating (and Vice Versa) Muon Dose Rate > 1 mRem/hr for 0.1% Collimated Halo.
Background Studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC ALCPG 2004 Winter Workshop January 8, 2004.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
Background comparison between 20 mrad and 2 mr crossings Takashi Maruyama SLAC Machine-Detector Interface Workshop SLAC January 6-8, 2005.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Beamline update Ken Moffeit 5 June 2013 The Beginning Overview of the beamline Beam diagnostics Silicon Protection New options for location of HPS Beamline.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
Backgrounds in the NLC BDS ISG9 December 10 – Takashi Maruyama SLAC.
HPS Beamline: Background Rates, Sensitivity to Field Uncertainties M. Ungaro1HPS Collaboration Meeting, JLAB, May Concrete Wall thickness Study.
Hovanes Egiyan Jefferson Lab. Main Hall B Beamline Components Beam Tuning Procedure HV System in Hall B Temperature Sensors Summary 10/19/ Hovanes.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.
1 G9a -FROST. 2 Experiments FROST New generation of CLAS photoproduction experiments with FROzen Spin Polarized Target (FROST) E02-112: γp→KY (K + Λ,
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
EIC Compton detector update October 24 th 2014 Alexandre Camsonne.
Photon Flux Control Liping Gan UNCW. Outline PrimEx-  experiment requirement Tagged photon Procedure to obtain the number of tagged photons Relative.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.
MDI Simulations at SLAC Takashi Maruyama, Lew Keller, Thomas Markiewicz, Uli Wienands, SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting, FNAL June 21, 2013.
Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
PPAC Parallel Plate Avalanche Counter Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa For meeting at SLAC June 2, 2004.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
Further SR Studies for the Electron Polarimeter M. Sullivan for the JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2016.
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
The New CHOD detector for the NA62 experiment at CERN S
Plans for Radiation Damage Studies for Si Diode Sensors Subject to 1 GRaD Doses SLAC Testbeam Workshop March
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
The Interaction Region
Radiation Damage Studies for Solid State Sensors Subject to Mrad Doses
The MDI at CEPC Dou Wang, Hongbo Zhu, Huamin Qu, Jianli Wang, Manqi Ruan, Qinglei Xiu, Sha Bai, Shujin Li, Weichao Yao, Yanli Jin, Yin Xu, Yiwei Wang,
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
Member States HST2000.
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Experimental Particle Physics
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
Parasitic Run Physics Simulations
End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Tertiary Collimators in IP1/IP5: Progress Report
Experimental Particle Physics
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator HPS Collaboration Meeting, Jefferson Lab, June 4-6 2013 Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator Takashi Maruyama SLAC

Beam Background HPS is the first experiment to place silicon sensors at 500 m and trigger detector at a few cm from the beam. Successful running is critically dependent on understanding and controlling the beam background. We have made exhaustive studies of the background, but we may have missed important background. I would encourage everyone to find possibly serious background.

Beam background Souce Effect on Detector Simulation/Estimation Multiple Coulomb Scattering beam energy e- SVT occupancy Ecal occupancy Ecal trigger EGS5/Geant4 Bremsstrahlung , degraded energy e- Neutron production EGS5/Fluka Moller scattering low energy e- EGS5 Hadron production Geant4/Fluka Mostly inclusive production X-ray generation Beam Halo HARP measurement shows halo is not a problem. Synchrotron radiation Negligible Beam induced EM Beam field, wake field, transition radiation Electronics noise Negligible because bunch charge in CW machine is small.

SVT Protection Collimator Protect SVT from direct beam When the beam moves away from the nominal position by mm, the halo counter/beam offset monitor system will shut off the beam in 40 s. SVT may not be able to take the 40 s direct beam exposure. 1.1×108 e-’s with (y)  50 m at 6.6 GeV Beam halo suppression Beam halo was  10-5 in the 6 GeV era. We are getting a brand new beam in 2014. Due to outgassing from new vacuum components, beam halo from beam-gas scattering could be still high. What if the halo is 10-4? Absorb synchrotron radiations from the last vertical bend

SVT Protection Collimator Protection Collimator in vertical bellows 1 cm 1 mm Tagger Magnet

Frascati Magnet SVT Layer 1 Collimator Tagger 2” beam pipe Z = -800 cm Z= -172 cm Z = 10 cm Low energy e+/e-’s are produced from the collimator. But Frascati magnet is very effective in sweeping away these particles. Only particles above ~1 GeV will become potential background in SVT Layer 1. Additional particles above ~1 GeV could be produced from interactions in the beam pipe.

Collimator Scattering 600 cm long beam pipe (OD=2”, 65 mil thick) 6.6 GeV e- 4 mrad 1 mm 2 cm thick W Energy > 1 GeV  < 4 mrad rms  36 m Energy > 1 GeV  < 4 mrad Y (cm) Secondary production in the beam pipe is negligible.

Hit density in 40 s at Layer 1 2 cm thick W At SVT Layer 1 6.6 GeV 450 nA: 2.8 × 1012 e-’s /sec 1.1 × 108 e-’s/40 s Y (cm)  Hit density will be ~3000 e-’s /cm2 in 40 s e+ e- X (cm)

What if the halo is > 10-4 Halo will dominate the SVT hits and possibly the trigger rate at > 10-4. Protection collimator can clean up the halo.

Halo Suppression =1 mm beam into 2 cm thick collimator 10-4 halo in |Y| > 0.5 mm can be reduced to 2×10-6 Y (cm) X (cm) Y (cm)

Summary Beam background studies will continue. Protection collimator is essential for Protecting the SVT from direct beam hit Suppressing the beam halo. Issues: How much area do we need to protect? Only active area or guard ring too? Sensitivity of the beam offset monitor. y  500 m at SVT layer 1 Collimator vertical alignment.