Experimental Heavy Quark Physics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bruce Kennedy, RAL PPD Particle Physics 2 Bruce Kennedy RAL PPD.
Advertisements

LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics.
Application of Straw Tube Detectors to Hyperon Studies Sedigheh Jowzaee Symposium on Applied Nuclear Physics and Innovative Technologies Sep. 2014,
Owen Long, UC Santa Barbara Lake Louise Winter Institute, Feb Initial Performance of the BaBar Experiment Owen Long University of California, Santa.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
Jan 28th, 2009Colin Jessop at Notre Dame An experiment to measure CP violation in B mesons Colin Jessop University of Notre Dame.
Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
February 2001B Factory Detectors1 B-Factory Detectors 9 th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation Daniel Marlow Princeton University February 23, 2001.
P Spring 2003 L14Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
The Belle Experiment at KEK Christoph Schwanda Institute of High Energy Physics (HEPHY) Austrian Academy of Sciences Symposium Wissenschaftliche Kooperation.
June 28, 2002BEACH2002 B Physics at the Tevatron B Physics at the Tevatron Jack Cranshaw Texas Tech University For the CDF and D0 Collaborations.
The BTeV Project at Fermilab Talk to DOE/Fermi Group Jan. 11, 2001 Introduction – Joel Butler Tracking detectors – David Christian Particle Identification.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Sep/19/2008 Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation: Accelerator based Particle Physics1 Accelerator Based Particle Physics Su Dong Stanford Student Orientation.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
The Standard Model of the elementary particles and their interactions
M. Garcia-Sciveres July 2002 ATLAS A Proton Collider Detector M. Garcia-Sciveres Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Comparing Luminosity Scans and Profile Monitor Results The size of the overlap of the two beams can be calculated from the individual beam sizes using:
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Daniel Sherwood 03/2005 Search for Crypto-Exotic States in Babar Daniel Sherwood Dr. Liliana Teodorescu.
P Spring 2002 L16Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.
Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states PANIC th -14 th November 2008, Eilat, ISRAEL A.
IoP Masterclass The Physics of Flavour at the Large Hadron Collider Tim Gershon University of Warwick March 30 th 2011.
IoP Masterclass B PHYSICS Tim Gershon University of Warwick March 18 th 2009.
Belle II status and plans
Design and performance of the ALICE Muon Spectrometer
Charmless Hadronic B Decays at BaBar
Status of BESIII and upgrade of BESIII
More technical description:
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
future CP violation Experiment
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Hadron Physics Lecture Week
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
G. Arnison et al., UA1 Collaboration
Radiative and electroweak penguin processes in exclusive B decays
CKM Status In this lecture, we study the results summarized in this plot. November 17, 2018 Sridhara Dasu, CKM Status.
Exploring Matter-Antimatter Asymmetries at the B Factories
For the BaBar Collaboration
Elementary particles Spring 2005, Physics /24/2018 Lecture XXV.
new measurements of sin(2β) & cos(2β) at BaBar
Searching for SUSY in B Decays
Misure dell’angolo a del Triangolo Unitario
The KL reconstruction for the Belle experiment at KEK B-factory
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
CP Violation lectures Measurement of the time dependence of B0B0bar oscillation using inclusive dilepton events [BABAR-CONF-00/10] G. Cerminara.
Top Quark a particle odyssey Todd Huffman University of Oxford
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
B Physics at In relation to SUSY ? 4th Workshop on Mass Origins
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
SuperKEKB Proto-collaboration
9th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation
Top quark production cross section Top quark mass measurement
Charmed Baryon Spectroscopy at BABAR
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
* Michael D. Sokoloff Physics Department University of Cincinnati
March 9, 2011 High Energy Physics 101 Kihyeon Cho.
Presentation transcript:

Experimental Heavy Quark Physics XXX Nathiagali Summer College 27 June - 2 July 2005 Experimental Heavy Quark Physics Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino, Italy and INFN - Torino Fabrizio Bianchi

XXX Nathiagali Summer College 27 June - 2 July 2005 Outline Lecture 1: Fundamental Questions in Particle Physics Goals of Heavy Quark Physics Tools for Heavy Quark Physics Lecture 2: CP Primer Observation of Direct CP Violation Measurement of sin2b Lecture 3: Measurement of a and g Measurement of |Vcb| and |Vub| F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College Fabrizio Bianchi

Fundamental Questions in Particle Physics: Generation and Masses In the SM, Gauge Forces do not distinguish fermions of different generations: • e,µ have same electrical charge • quarks have same color charge Why generations ? Why 3 ? Why fermion masses are so different ? F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Fundamental Questions in Particle Physics: What happened to antimatter ? All Matter no Antimatter Matter Antimatter Symmetric Big Bang F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Fundamental Questions in Particle Physics: Baryogenesis Sakharov criteria: • Baryon-number violation • CP violation • Non-equilibrium SM satisfies prerequisites for baryogenesis • Baryon-number violation at high temperatures (DB=DL) • Non-equilibrium during phase transitions (symmetry breaking) CP violation in the quark and lepton sectors Fundamental connection between particle physics and cosmology! F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Luminosity and Energy Frontiers Study of Flavor Physics is complementary to the discovery of new particles at high energy Any extension of the SM that can solve the hierarchy problem contains many new flavor parameters If New Physics exists at or below a TeV, its effects should show up in flavor physics! Flavor and CP-violating couplings can only be studied using precision measurements at highest luminosity F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

XXX Nathiagali Summer College Example: the top quark Couplings ( |Vts| ~ 0.04 and |Vtd| ~ 0.003) measured in B physics. Mass prediction based on precision electro weak measurements. Direct production has proved existence and measured mass and spin. Study of Flavor Physics is an essential part of the roadmap for the exploration of new energy scales, now and even in the LHC era. F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

XXX Nathiagali Summer College CKM Matrix I SM accounts for flavor changing quark transition through the coupling of the V-A charged current operator to a W boson: where: Vij are the elements of the CKM matrix i, j run on the three quark generations F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Wolfenstein Parameterization CKM Matrix II CKM matrix can be regarded as a rotation from the quark mass eigenstates (d, s, b) to a set of new states (d’, s’, b’) with diagonal coupling to u, c, t Complex matrix described by 4 independent real parameters (including one phase) l~ 0.22 sinθC Cabibbo angle Wolfenstein Parameterization 2 ® 1 ~l 3 ® 2 ~l2 3 ® 1 ~l3 h changes sign under CP F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Product of 1st and 3rd columns Unitarity Triangle Product of 1st and 3rd columns (1 of 6 relations) Can be represented as a triangle in the complex plane a = f2 g = f3 b = f1 Dividing all sides by F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Normalized Unitarity Triangle h Apex at r, h a g b r F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Goals of Heavy Quark Physics Precise determinations of the elements of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix Measure sides and angles of the Unitarity Triangle Over constraint r and h Tests of the CKM mechanism of flavor and CP violation Search for deviations from the SM F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

What you want to achieve… F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Averaging Results of Different Experiments Heavy Flavor Averaging Group http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/ Averages results from different experiments. UTfit: http://utfit.roma1.infn.it/ Uses Bayesan approach described in: hep-ph/0012308 to makes global fits to UT CKM Fitter: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/ckmfitter/ckm_welcome.html Uses Frequentistic approach to makes global fits to UT F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

To do Heavy Quark Physics… XXX Nathiagali Summer College 27 June - 2 July 2005 To do Heavy Quark Physics… You need: To produce a lot of b & c hadrons Hadrons vs. e+e- machines To build a detector with: high tracking efficiency good tracking and vertexing to have good mass resolution good particle identification capability to distinguish among different modes and reject background good g and p0 reconstruction capability to reconstruct neutral hadrons F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College Fabrizio Bianchi

Hadronic vs e+e- colliders I Hadronic machines: • enormous production of c and b-hadrons (sbb ~ 50 mb) • all b-hadrons can be produced • trigger is challenging • complicated many-particles events • incoherent production of B mesons Tevatron @ FNAL: CDF, D0, BTEV LHC @ CERN: CMS, ATLAS, LHCB F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Hadronic vs e+e- colliders II e+ e- collider at the Y(4S) (b-factory): • Trigger is moderately easy. • Simpler events, easier to reconstruct. Copious production of b, c and t. sbb = 1.05 nb scc = 1.30 nb stt = 0.94 nb F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Hadronic vs e+e- colliders III B Physics at an e+ e- collider at the Y(4S): • only B0 and B+ can be produced. all the final state particles come from B decays. • coherent production of B mesons in a L=1 state. • B are produced almost at rest in the Y(4S) rest frame. Travel ~26 mm before decaying in that frame. Solution: use beams of different energies to boost the Y(4S) rest frame w.r.t. the lab frame increasing the spatial separation of the decays making it measurable. PEP-II @ SLAC: BaBar KEK-B @ KEK: Belle F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Hadronic vs e+e- colliders IV XXX Nathiagali Summer College 27 June - 2 July 2005 Hadronic vs e+e- colliders IV Others e+ e- colliders (mostly charm/t physics): CESR-c @ Cornell (3 < < 5 GeV): CLEO-c BEPC @ IHEP (3 < < 4 GeV ): BES Plan to start in 2007 with L ~ 1034 cm2 s-1 From now on, I’ll discuss mainly b-factories F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College Fabrizio Bianchi

XXX Nathiagali Summer College KEK-B vs PEP-II Both started in summer 1999. KEK-B: 8.0 GeV electrons and 3.5 GeV positrons bg = 0.42 PEP-II: 9.0 GeV electrons and 3.1 GeV positrons bg = 0.56 mean separation between decay vertices: 260 mm CM boost: • folds particles forward • Increases momentum range to cover with Particle ID F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

XXX Nathiagali Summer College PEP-II F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

XXX Nathiagali Summer College Interaction Region F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

XXX Nathiagali Summer College PEP-II Luminosity F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Trickle injection at the B Factories XXX Nathiagali Summer College 27 June - 2 July 2005 Trickle injection at the B Factories Best shift, no trickle Best shift, LER only trickle Nov 2003 Best shift, double trickle Mar 2004 PEP-II: ~5 Hz continuous KEKB: at ~5-10 min intervals PEP-II Lumi HER current LER current F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College Fabrizio Bianchi

XXX Nathiagali Summer College BABAR Detector F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

XXX Nathiagali Summer College BABAR Detector F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Silicon Vertex Tracker I Performance Requirements: • Single vertex resolution along z-axis better than 80 μm • Stand-alone tracking for 50 < pt < 120 MeV/c with high efficiency PEP II Constraints: • Dipole magnets (B1) at +/-20 cm from interaction point • Polar angle: 17.2o < q < 150o • Bunch Crossing Period 4.2 ns • Radiation exposure at innermost layer: average 33 Krad/year in beam plane: 240 Krad/year F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Silicon Vertex Tracker II 5 layers of double-sided AC-coupled Silicon 340 Si wafers, 150K channels Custom rad-hard readout IC (the AToM chip) Stand-alone tracking for slow particles: • inner 3 layers for angle and impact parameter measurement • outer 2 layers for pattern recognition and low pt tracking F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Silicon Vertex Tracker III F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Silicon Vertex Tracker: Performances z side Phi side SVT Hit Resolution vs Incident Track Angle Average hit efficiency ~97% Slow pion efficiency >70 % for pT > 50MeV Average hit resolution 10-40 μm, depending on angle of track No change observed so far due to radiation F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

XXX Nathiagali Summer College Drift Chamber I 40 layers of wires (7104 cells) Helium:Isobutane 80:20 gas, Al field wires, Beryllium inner wall, and all readout electronics mounted on rear endplate Particle identification from ionization loss (7% resolution) F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Drift Chamber: Performances F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

XXX Nathiagali Summer College Tracking sPt/Pt ~ 1% @ 3 GeV Doca resolution vs pt F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Detection of Internally Reflected Cherenkov light I Ring imaging Cherenkov detector based on total internal reflection. Uses long, rectangular bars made from synthetic fused silica ("quartz") as both radiator and light guide. A charged particle traversing a DIRC quartz bar with velocity produces Cherenkov light if nb > 1. Through internal reflections, the Cherenkov light from the passage of a particle is carried to the ends of the bar and to an array of 11,000 2.5 cm-diameter phototubes. F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Detection of Internally Reflected Cherenkov light II The high optical quality of the quartz preserves the angle of the emitted Cherenkov light. The measurement of this angle, in conjunction with knowing the track angle and momentum from the drift chamber, allows a determination of the particle mass. qc = arcos (1/nb) F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Detection of Internally Reflected Cherenkov light III F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

DIRC: Control samples for p and K Projection for 2.5 < p < 3 GeV/c F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

XXX Nathiagali Summer College DIRC Impact Impact on D0 purity: Background rejection factor ~ 5 F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Electromagnetic Calorimeter 6580 CsI(Tl) crystals with photodiode readout About 18 X0 0 s = 5.0% F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Instrumented Flux Return Up to 21 layers of resistive-plate chambers (RPCs) between iron plates of flux return Muon identification > 800 MeV/c Neutral Hadrons (KL) detection; also with EMC/ECL Bakelite RPCs Problems with QC, dark current, and stability Forward end cap replaced in 2003; barrel replaced with LST in 2004- 2006 F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Instrumented Flux Return F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

Electron and Muon ID Muon ID Efficiency & Electron ID Efficiency p Mis-ID Probability Electron ID Efficiency & p Mis-ID Probability F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College

XXX Nathiagali Summer College F. Bianchi XXX Nathiagali Summer College