Updates on IR and FF for super-B factory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review of Detector Solenoid Effect to the Beam Effect on Beam Orbit Effect on Beam Size S.Kuroda(KEK)
Advertisements

Solenoid effects and compensation B. Dalena, D. Swoboda, R. Tomás.
Overview of Beam Delivery System Final Focus Optics Collimator Final Doublet Extraction/Dump Others S.Kuroda ( KEK ) MDI meeting at SLAC 1/6/2005.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
January 2004 GLC/NLC – X-Band Linear Collider Peter Tenenbaum Beam Dynamics of the IR: The Solenoid, the Crossing Angle, The Crab Cavity, and All That.
1 4 Oct 05 Optimization of anti-DID for SiD, GLD and LDC A.Seryi October 4, 2005.
1 August 12, 2005 Running 2mrad IR in e-e- mode: BDS constraints A.Seryi August 12, 2005.
1 27 Sep 05 Discussion of anti-DID ( “DIDNT” ? ) A.Seryi September 27, 2005.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
Beam Delivery System Review of RDR(draft) 1.Overview 2.Beam parameters 3.System description 3.1 diagnostic, tune-up dump, machine protection MPS.
November 07, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 Beam Delivery System updates BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Hitoshi Yamamoto, Andrei Seryi Valencia GDE.
Overview of Extraction Line Designs and Issues
ATF2 optics … 1 3 rd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF ATF2 optics, tuning method and tolerances of initial alignment, magnets, power supplies etc.
CLIC main detector solenoid and anti-solenoid impact B. Dalena, A. Bartalesi, R. Appleby, H. Gerwig, D. Swoboda, M. Modena, D. Schulte, R. Tomás.
Re-evaluating the Need for a anti-DID in SiD T. Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Optimization Meeting
First investigations of ATF2 at SLAC Axel Brachmann, Thomas Himel, Tom Markiewicz, Janice Nelson, Toshiyuki Okugi, Mauro Pivi, Tor Raubenheimer, Marc Ross,
Andrei Seryi ILC BDS, DOE review 1 June 2005 The ILC Beam Delivery System, ATF2 and ESA Andrei Seryi SLAC DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 14-15,
Global Design Effort ILC Crab Cavity Overview and requirements Andrei Seryi SLAC on behalf of ILC Beam Delivery and Crab-Cavity design teams Joint BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH.
Philip Burrows Snowmass 2005: SiD Concept Plenary, 15/8/05 SiD and MDI issues Philip Burrows Queen Mary, University of London Thanks to: Toshiaki Tauchi,
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
ILC luminosity optimization in the presence of the detector solenoid and anti-DID Reine Versteegen PhD Student CEA Saclay, Irfu/SACM International Workshop.
Manchester Christmas meeting 2006: The ILC interaction region and beyond Rob Appleby Happy New Year everyone!
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Tor Raubenheimer Beam Delivery System Design Differences American Linear Collider Physics Meeting SLAC January 8.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
COMPENSATION OF DETECTOR SOLENOID FIELD WITH L*=4.1M Glen White, SLAC April 20, 2015 ALCW2015, KEK, Japan.
Beam Delivery (wg4) update since Snowmass Andrei Seryi for WG4 GDE meeting December 8, 2005 Snowmass 2005 GDE Meeting at INFN-LNF.
September 18, 2007 Magnetic Field Requirements in the IR Sergei Seletskiy IRENG07 September 17-21, 2007 September 18, 2007.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring, 2016.
ILC BDS Commissioning Glen White, SLAC AWLC 2014, Fermilab May 14 th 2014.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
Hardwares for commissioning 2 nd ATF2 Project Meeting KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 5/ 31/ 2006 T.Okugi (KEK)
The design of the 2mrad extraction line Rob Appleby Daresbury Laboratory On behalf of the SLAC-BNL-UK-France task force ILC European Regional Meeting and.
Grahame Blair, Tomoyuki Sanuki, Andrei Seryi
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Machine Detector Interface Design Updates
Near IR FF design including FD and longer L* issues
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
Beam Delivery update Andrei Seryi December 12, 2005
Large Booster and Collider Ring
2nd Workshop on a Super B-Factory INFN-LNF, Frascati, Italy
The small crossing angle layout - where are we and what do we do now?
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
The 2mrad horizontal crossing angle IR layout for the ILC
Compensation of Detector Solenoid with Large Crossing Angle
The 2mrad crossing angle alternative
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
First look at final focus part of super-B factory
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
SuperB CDR Machine P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team Paris, May 9, 2007.
Final Focus optics for Possible New B-Line
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Local double ring MDI Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
J. Seeman SLAC Paris Super-B 5th Workshop May 9-11, 2007
BINP Tau-Charm Project Update E.Levichev, BINP, Novosibirsk
Studies of crossing angle and SR effects for CLIC TENTATIVE
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
ILC Beam Switchyard: Issues and Plans
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

Updates on IR and FF for super-B factory June 15, 2006 Andrei Seryi SLAC

Content Not really any new work, thoughts on optics optimization optimization for common FD (like in ILC 2mrad IR) benefits of separate beamlines (like in ILC 20mrad IR) use of antisolenoids in IR (like in ILC)

Summary from March 16 talk: Optics of FF can be designed Requirements of the ring to aberrations in FF need to be checked IR layout need to be discussed Results presented yesterday show that dynamic aperture need to be improved

Optimization of optics Changed optimization procedure to look simultaneously at IP and at the exit from ff and to improve symmetry (assuming symmetric ff with bends and sextupoles reversed)

Chromaticity & second order dispersion

Bandwidth at IP and exit Clearly, the exit bandwidth is not great and need improvements

Aberrations and tracking IP Exit Aberration terms from Transport Tracking with Turtle (100k particles, sE=0.1%): IP sgx=2.6785 , sgy= 0.012823 mm sgx/x0=0.99859 sgy/y0= 1.0028 Exit: sgx/x0=0.99999 sgy/y0= 1.007 Further optimization require lengthening the optics May 16 results at IP: sigma/sigma_0 = 0.99859 , 1.0087

Optimization of optics if FD is common In ILC design one of IR has 2mrad crossing angle, where FD is common for both beams (except QF1) We found that one could optimize FD so that sextupole SD0 give additional focusing for the disrupted beam That was the main reason that allowed the design of 2mrad extraction optics

Shared Large Aperture Magnets 2mrad IR Shared Large Aperture Magnets Disrupted beam & Sync radiations SF1 Q,S,QEXF1 SD0 QF1 QD0 60 m Beamstrahlung Incoming beam Panofsky septum quad pocket coil quad g outgoing Large aperture SC quad and sextupole incoming

Similar approach can be used in Super-B Outgoing beam in 2mrad extraction. Beam is well contained up to dE=-65% The FD, incoming FF optics and extraction optics are optimized simultaneously Similar approach can be used in Super-B

14mr, L*=3.5m BNL design

Anti-solenoid for IR 15T Force When solenoid overlaps QD0, anomalous coupling increases the IP beam size 30 – 190 times depending on solenoid field shape (green=no solenoid, red=solenoid) Even though traditional use of skew quads could reduce the effect, the LOCAL COMPENSATION of the fringe field (with a little skew tuning) is the best way to ensure excellent correction over wide range of beam energies Local correction requires anti-solenoid with special shape. The antisolenoid is weak since its integrated strength is much smaller than that of detector solenoid 15T Force without compensation sy/ sy(0)=32 SiD, earlier version with compensation by antisolenoid sy/ sy(0)<1.01

Weak antisolenoids for super-B 2 Coupling due to solenoid not overlapping with FD ~ assume 5GeV beam (16.7T*m) and Bl=1T then coupling ~ 3% , very small If field overlap with FD by Bl, coupling is Assume Bl=0.5T, L*=0.8m, sxp0=0.3mrad, sy0=12.6nm => coupling ~ 570 !!! This coupling is about 10 times more than in ILC weak antisolenoids probably unavoidable for local compensation this is one of the terms. there are many other. see ref. for details

B.Parker, BNL Antisolenoid was recently redesigned, and use of high temperature superconductor was considered. Top ~20-35K would make cooling much easier http://ilcagenda.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=696

ATF2 model of ILC FF Optics Design of ATF2 Beam (A) Small beam size Obtain sy ~ 35nm Maintain for long time (B) Stabilization of beam center Down to < 2nm by nano-BPM Bunch-to-bunch feedback of ILC-like train new extraction New diagnostics New final focus New Beamline Designed and constructed in international manner, with contributions from all three regions

Summary Need to lengthen the optics to decrease aberrations in FF and improve dynamic aperture of the ring there are other optics ideas (e.g. sextupole for crab) that need to be implemented If FD is common, optics can be optimized to improve focusing of the outgoing beam with Separate FD give a lot of advantages and L* of ~0.8m or less may be possible Weak antisolenoids are beneficial for local compensation of coupling