COmmon Reference Environment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 XML Technologies You Need For Workflow Applications Roger L. Costello 2 January, 2009.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2008 SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. SAS and all other SAS Institute Inc. product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks.
What is workflow?  A workflow is a structured way of defining and automating structures and procedures within an organization. What is workflow management.
Software Engineering for Safety : A Roadmap Presentation by: Manu D Vij CS 599 Software Engineering for Embedded Systems.
Connecting Diverse Web Search Facilities Udi Manber, Peter Bigot Department of Computer Science University of Arizona Aida Gikouria - M471 University of.
Online Personal Finance Management Tool CHI 170 Project Final Presentation by Bert Gao; Bey Wang; Francisco Crespo.
Chapter 6– Artifacts of the process
Richard Hallgren Experience – iBiz Solutions Integration Expert – YIT Global IT Integration Architect – Sogeti Integration consultant – BEKK Application.
Object-Oriented Analysis and Design Iterative Development and the Unified Process.
The MyOcean Concept P.Bahurel, project coordinator.
Visual Linker Final presentation.
WSRF Supported Data Access Service (VO-DAS)‏ Chao Liu, Haijun Tian, Dan Gao, Yang Yang, Yong Lu China-VO National Astronomical Observatories, CAS, China.
Game Interface Design by Brent Fox
How to implement an SDMX architecture for dissemination and reporting
© DATAMAT S.p.A. – Giuseppe Avellino, Stefano Beco, Barbara Cantalupo, Andrea Cavallini A Semantic Workflow Authoring Tool for Programming Grids.
The Grid System Design Liu Xiangrui Beijing Institute of Technology.
Luxembourg January CORE ESSnet (COmmon Reference Environment) final meeting Carlo Vaccari Istat - Italy.
Software Production Chapter 2: Identifying Software Development Activities.
CORE Final Meeting – 11 January CORE Demo Scenario Diego Zardetto, Istat & CBS CORE team.
Session 10a, 21st October 2005 eChallenges e-2005 Copyright 2005 K-Wf Grid, Institute of Informatics SAS Experience Management based on Text Notes (EMBET)
CS/CAPP AUTOMATED TESTING PROGRAM Senior Design III Jeff Williams Bekah Michael.
TypeCraft Software Evaluation 21/02/ :45 Powered by None Complete: 10 On, Partial: 0 Off, Excluded: 0 Off Country: All, Region:
Making the System Operational Implementation & Deployment
ILC Cavity Data Management Final Report June 11, 2007 Peter Kasper.
PROJECT 35 – IBM MIDWAY PRESENTATION Supervisors: Tamer Salman, Ronen Levy Students: Sari Saba Sadiya, Hesham Yassin A platform for monitor definition,
CU Student Organizer Trey McAlhany CPSC 482 Mobile Software Development Clemson University April 14, 2015.
Plans for D7.7 The Security Report on the Final Project Release Linda Cornwall, RAL.
Carlo Vaccari – ITDG 2010 Luxembourg1 CORA ESSNet final results.
Fix: Windows 10 Error Code 0x in Mail App u/6/b/ /alexwaston14/reimage-system-repair/ /pages/Reimage-Repair-Tool/
Douglas HoffmanCopyright © , SQM, LLC.1 Test Automation Architectures: Planning for Test Automation Florida Tech Testing 2 January 27, 2014 Douglas.
Steps to Fix Error 0xc004d307 in Windows: /pages/Reimage-Repair- Tool/ u/6/b/ /alexwaston14/reimage- system-repair/
EGI-Engage is co-funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union under grant number Federated Cloud Update.
Contract Kari-Jouko Räihä. The Package  Contract (“core contract”) Signed between the coordinator and the commission Accession forms signed by the coordinator.
UNECE / Eurostat Workshop on Implementing CSPA – Geneva – June 2016 ESSNet on Sharing Common Functionalities
Lasse Pajunen Nokia Research Center Nokia Corporation Anna Ruokonen Institute of Software Systems Tampere University of Technology ICWS 2007 Modeling and.
Implementing ModernStats Standards Linked Open Metadata
Questionnaire Generator Based on the DDI standard
Peter Kacsuk, Zoltan Farkas MTA SZTAKI
Attention Tracking Tool
SAP Business One B1iF Training
MapInfo And ArcView Kara Thomas Mark Kalmbacher.
Fitness Planning Setting Goals and Designing Your Own Personal Fitness Plan.
Software Myths Software is easy to change
Designing Effective “PowerPoint Presentations”
WP4 – Knowledge platform and communication
Quality Assurance (Unplanned Inspections) Scenario Overview
cell biology Kirill Kiselyov, PhD, Department of Biological Sciences,
PEMPAL Treasury COP Plenary Meeting Tirana, May 2018
WP 3: Data Quality Alexia Katsanidou
Introduction to Software Testing
Risk management in Software Engineering
Chris Baker Jordan Hom Eric Kochhar
Making the System Operational Implementation & Deployment
GRUNTMASTER6000 A leading innovation for future programmers.
ESSnet on SDMX phase II June 7-8, Luxembourg.
The Student Tracking System:
SciQuest Update Purchasing and Distribution Services FAR
Regression testing Tor Stållhane.
CORA ESSNet COmmon Reference Architecture starting ...
Computer Architecture Group U.S.C.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
LONI Pipeline Integration/ UNC shape analysis
From STAB teleconference minutes
ESSnet #2 Implementing Services 13 December Luxembourg
ESSnet #2 Implementing Services 14 December Luxembourg
COmmon REference Environment - CORE:
Overview of Computer system
Evaluate the integral {image}
[INSERT ORGANISATION NAME] PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFECYCLE
VoiceXML An investigation Author: Mya Anderson
Presentation transcript:

COmmon Reference Environment CORE – COmmon Reference Environment Workflow solutions CORE final meeting – Luxembourg – 10/11 January 2012 – Franck Cotton – INSEE 1

CORE - WP4 Milestones M5 – Evaluation grid used to evaluate the different tools M10 – Recommendations on process management tools CORE final meeting – Luxembourg – 10/11 January 2012 – Franck Cotton – INSEE

CORE - WP4 Progress Lisbon – State of the art Paris – Evaluation grid Rome – Evaluation results CORE final meeting – Luxembourg – 10/11 January 2012 – Franck Cotton – INSEE

Evaluation grid Integration Execution Versioning User management Communication Execution Monitoring Traceability

Evaluation grid General Modeling Use of standards Automatic and manual steps Modeling GUI Model translation

Evaluation scenario

Softwares selected

Evaluation results Bonita Activiti ActiveVOS Simple Quite comprehensive Activiti Very promising Too young ActiveVOS Most standard Most comprehensive Most expensive

Evaluation results

Conclusion ActiveVOS gets the best mark but : It is expensive CORE needs something simpler The evaluation grid underweights the general ease of use Bonita seems more appropriate