Welcome June 8, 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
Advertisements

1 Higher Education Opportunity Act: Implications for the PRR Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President MSCHE PRR Workshop.
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the Higher Education Opportunity Act 2008 – Part I Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus.
Substantive Change Policy – Response to the HEOA of 2008 Accreditation Provisions Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Barbara Samuel Loftus Vice President, MSCHE.
Understanding Expectations for the Self Study from the HEOA 2008 Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President Debra G. Klinman.
Middle States Commission on Higher Education 1 Implementing the Accreditation Provisions in the HEOA Mary Beth Kait – Senior Director for Policy & Planning,
Probe Process New Program Request Process Substantive Change February 1, 2012.
The Florida College System House Bill 7135: Relating to Postsecondary Education Julie Alexander & Carrie Henderson April 20,
Substantive Change: Understanding Middle States Policy and Process
Substantive Change, SACS and Electronically-delivered Programs FDLC Panel Presentation May 15, 2009.
David S. Adegboye, PhD Professor of Biology Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs & SACS Liaison University Professional Conference August 18,
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
Telemedicine Credentialing and Privileging October 16, 2014.
Florida’s Transient Student Process Webinar  We will be using chat and a conference call for audio purposes. To participate in the conference call, follow.
SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE COMPLIANCE WORKSHOP Presented by Jodi Pettazzoni, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Accreditation and SACSCOC Liaison October.
Hannah Frankel High School Articulation Analyst
Promoting Objectivity in Research by Managing, Reducing, or Eliminating Conflicts of Interest UT HOP UT HOP The University of Texas at Austin.
Consortium & Contractual Agreements Jonna Marholz Brittany Tweed.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Report on the Study of Special Education Certification July 16, 2008 August 13, 2008 Ensuring Educator Excellence.
Fifth Year Interim Reports Texas Association for Institutional Research Ralph Russell Director of Institutional Support Commission on Colleges.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Fall 2014.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units Wednesday, October 31, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.
CCLC Conference March 18, 2005 Pam Deegan, CIO President, Miramar Randy Lawson, CIO President Elect, Santa Monica.
SUBSTANTIVE CHANGE COMPLIANCE WORKSHOP Presented by Jodi Pettazzoni, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Accreditation and SACSCOC Liaison October.
1. 2 State Regents’ Policy Workshop Thursday, July 14, :00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Webinar.
Recognize the practices that have GA and SACSCOC implications Recognize the Substantive Change compliance processes, actions, and timeframes Identify.
The Office of Curriculum Systems
Expectations and Accountability in Regional Accreditation Ellie A. Fogarty, EdD – Vice President Debra G. Klinman, PhD – Vice President Middle States Commission.
The Substantive Change Process: What is it and why should you care? ASCCC Accreditation Institute February 11, 2012.
SACRAO FEBRUARY 8, 2016 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK STEVEN M. SHEELEY VICE PRESIDENT Accreditation Update.
Competency Based Education August 4, Definition In general, competency-based education (CBE) is an outcomes-based approach to earning a college.
Preliminary Legislative Recommendations to the 85th Texas Legislature October 2015.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas Dr. Larry R. Faulkner Vice-Chair, Higher Education Strategic Planning Committee Presentation to Texas Higher Education.
1 Final Criteria, Proposed Criteria, and Other Information ACICS Webinar June 4, 2009.
Keith M Wilson Director, Education Service U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs February 2009 The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008.
Faculty Leadership Training
COLLEGE AND CAREER PATHWAYS
CURRICULUM-CHANGE APPROVAL PROCESSES
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Academic Affairs Update
Move On When Ready (MOWR)
Plenary II - Annual Reports
Curriculum Model Policy (7.18)
Curriculum and Accreditation
The Office of Curriculum Systems
HLC Day February 13, 9:30am - 2:00pm, TUC Great Hall.
Department of Defense Implementation of the Principles of Excellence (EO 13607) Carolyn Baker Chief Voluntary Education Programs.
Jodi Pettazzoni, PhD March 20 & 26, 2018
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Proposed Policy on Undergraduate Certificates
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Deans Compact June 7, 2018.
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
SACSCOC Definition of Substantive Change
Accreditation and curriculum
Overview of Sabbatical Leave Policies and Procedures
Everything new with curriculum
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
The Value of the Substantive Change Process
Agency on the Move ACCJC Update
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Presentation transcript:

Welcome June 8, 2018

Facilitators Dr. Pam Goad, Senior Vice President Ms. Valerie Martinez, Vice President Elsa Gossett, Coordinator of Communication and External Relations

Effective July 1, 2018 Revised Substantive Change Policy Revised Categories of Change Revised Fees Revised Processes Created a manual as a Guide to Substantive Change

Why we made the changes Respond to members’ requests Align more closely with USDE Regulations Clarify Commission expectations Streamline submission process

The New Policy Closely aligns with US Department of Education Regulations Reduces ambiguity around NWCCU expectations for substantive change Separates Policy from Procedure

Change Categories and Fees From 25 categories to 17 Simplified fee structure Minor changes = $1,000 Major changes = $1,500- $20,000 Reduced time to process proposals (after receipt of payment) Minor change = 8 weeks Major change = 24 weeks Specified level or review required for each proposal Notification Staff Review Panel Review Executive Committee Review Commission Review

Notification Only Fee Change Category $0 Expedite via staff review = $1000 (2 week processing) Expedite via Panel review = $2000 (12 week processing) $0 Adding Title IV-eligible certificate programs not related to existing degree program(s), not significant departure (25% difference in program core) from approved program(s) Suspending, terminating, or placing into moratorium, Title IV eligible academic program or major(s) Closing or suspending an existing additional location or a branch campus (For more than 1 semester or 2 quarters) Combining two approved programs to create a new program

Minor Changes $1000 Adding courses or academic program(s) including Title IV-eligible certificate programs not related to existing degree program(s), that represent a significant departure (25% difference in program core) from program(s) previously approved Staff Initiating or expanding of distance education delivery where 50% or more of the courses or credits in an academic program are provided using distance delivery 3; 5(First three programs only) Substantially increasing the number of clock or credit hours awarded for successful completion of a program (more than 25% of total program credits or clock hours) Establishing an additional location where 50% or more of program requirements can be earned via face-to-face instructional delivery

Major Changes $1500 Initiating or expanding Competency-Based Education (CBE) delivery Panel or Staff Dual Degree Program -Entering into a consortial agreement with accredited institution 24% or less of the credits delivered by the consortium 25-50% of institution’s educational programs provided by the consortium c. More than 50% of institution’s educational programs provided by the consortium    a. No requirement b. Notification c. Staff Joint Degree Program Entering into a contract under with an institution not certified to participate in Title IV offers more than 25 percent of an accredited Title IV-eligible institution’s educational programs  Panel Establishing an additional location at international location or location outside the institution’s region Panel

Major Changes $1500 Initiating an agreement to teach-out agreement with another institution Staff Establishing a new branch campus Panel Changing from clock to credit hours (or vice versa) Adding the first academic program at a degree or credential level Panel or Staff Substantially changing institutional mission or objectives Panel, Exec Cmte or Commission $10000 Change legal status, form of control, or ownership $20000 Acquiring or merging with another institution

A Manual was Created To provide definitions, common examples, and details of types of reviews needed Procedures for submission Site visit details Resources

Section One THE CHART OF CATEGORIES!! Minor versus Major categories Definitions of categories Who reviews them, timelines, issues of noncompliance

Section Two Notification versus Proposal Proposal information by content areas First-come, first-served – proposal and fee determine queue Decision options of Review Panel, Executive Committee, and Commission

Section Two – cont’d Revising a proposal – three months Request for reconsideration Hosting a site visit Final approval via email

Section Three Site visits: Pre-implementation site visit: mission, extenuating circumstances Post-implementation site visit: off-campus sites, international programs, extenuating circumstances

Section Four Federal regulations Resources: policies and other Common issues FAQ

Questions Link to Substantive Change FAQS http://www.nwccu.org/tools-resources/institutions/substantive-change/substantive-change-updated-policy-manual/ Link to Substantive Change Manual (Subject to change through June 30, 2018) Link to Substantive Change Policy http://www.nwccu.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Revised-Substantive-Change-Policy-2018-7-1.pdf Link to Substantive Change Categories and Fees