US Module Production Quality

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 Faulty Channel Sources (TOB) Fault Sources (excluding cable breaks and CMN)  Hybrid-0.004%
Advertisements

Slide 1 Anthony Affolder US Module LT meeting June 17, 2004 UCSB Module LT Testing.
Slide 1X-Calibration Common Testing Issues-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, June 3, 2003 X-Calibration Common Testing Issues: Grounding, Environmental.
May 13, FNAL Hybrid Thermal Test Status  Hybrid Thermal Test Procedure  Test Results Eva Medel FNAL CMS Group June 22, 2004.
Recent TOB Developments First LT failure and Stereo Module Status J. Incandela With slides provided by E. Chabalina, A. Affolder, Dean White.
6/22/04 Slide 1 Hybrid Testing Status Lance Simms 6/22/04.
US Module and Rod Production Overview and Plan For the US CMS Tracker Group.
Slide 1Electrical Testing at UCSB -Anthony AffolderDOE review, January 20, 2004 Module Testing at UCSB: Simulated Production Derek Barge On behalf.
1 US Testing Status-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, Dec. 11, 2003 Update of US Testing Status Anthony Affolder On behalf of the US testing group.
1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 US Module Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group) Update.
Slide 1 Electrical Testing at UCSB -Anthony AffolderDOE review, January 18, 2005 Electrical Testing at UCSB: Hybrids & Modules Anthony Affolder On behalf.
CMS Tracker Week, CERN, Apr Apr 2004CMS Tracker Week - Module ProductionSalvatore Costa - Catania Module Production ___________ Report on.
Defect Analyzer for Rods Patrick Gartung. Installation Tried to install and compile on my desktop –Fermi Linux LTS 3.0 –Newer system QT library caused.
Commissioning and Operation of the CMS Tracker analogue optical link system at TIF with CMSSW: R.Bainbridge, A.Dos Santos Assis Jesus, K.A.Gill, V. Radicci.
Fermilab PMG - Results from module testing - April 9, 2004 – E.Chabalina (UIC) 1 Results from module testing E.Chabalina University of Illinois (Chicago)
Electrical Tests of Modules and Ladders Markus Friedl (HEPHY Vienna) 2 October 2014.
APV Lectures APV FE Basic Building Blocks How Our Testing Works
UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder
Defect Analysis algorithms for the ARC, Lt and LtStruct tests
Update of US Testing Status
US Module Production Status
UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder
UCSB Short-term Testing Plan
UCSB Testing 3 Stereo Modules Tested 1 SS6 Module Tested
Hamburg Bonding Report
Results from module testing
Local database Local testing database seems necessary in current situation A common solution for UCSB/FNAL would be optimal Based in root, ascii file summaries,
Recent TOB Developments
Vienna Module Production
FNAL Module Testing Status
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
Module production in Italy
US Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group)
Noise in TOB modules and sensor quality
FNAL Module Testing Status
UCSB Qualification Module Grading
Hybrid & Module Electrical Testing
Sensor probing (Summary)
First UCSB TEC Module (Pictures)
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Module Testing at UCSB: Simulated Production 11-04
Anthony Affolder UC Santa Barbara
Module Testing in Florence Carlo Civinini INFN-Florence
Electrical Testing at UCSB: Hybrids & Modules
Noise in TOB modules and sensor quality
US Module Testing Progress Report
Status of 44 ARCS tested TOB modules, June 24, 2004
5018 Sensors Channels 420 at 150 V.
FNAL Hybrid Testing Status
Is Increased Bias Current and CMN Correlated?
TOB Module Production Overview and Plan
FNAL module testing summary
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Recent TOB Developments
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Recent TOB Developments
Module Testing Status Week of 3/14-3/18.
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
US Module Testing Progress Report
Status of Bonding R1N, R1S, R3 of TEC University of Hamburg
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
5018 Sensors Channels 420 at 150 V.
FNAL Hybrid Testing Status
Presentation transcript:

US Module Production Quality 58 ST Sensor Modules 6 R5N, 33 R5S, 12 L12p, 7 L34 53 Grade A, 2 Grade F, 3 Irradiated 1 CMN module, 1 damaged by handling, 3 irradiated 0.28% Faulty Channels Per Module 134 HPK Sensor Modules 24 L34p, 26 L56p 132 Grade A, 2 Grade F 1 High bias current module, 1 module damaged in handling 0.06% Faulty Channels Per Module All modules passed Vienna Box tests

Noise Studies Differences in noise noticed for modules produced with ST/HPK and with different hybrid versions No evidence of change of noise is observed in TOB1 modules Dramatic decrease of noise in TOB2 STM (Version 4) compared to STM (Version 3) HPK (Version 5) noise is slightly higher than in STM (Version 4)

TOB2: STM(H4) vs STM(H3) Over 0.1 ADC noise decrease in ST modules when changing from hybrid version 3 to version 4 Modules all re-tested on the same stand to confirm difference

TOB2: HPK(H5) vs STM new (H4) With newer hybrid versions, HPK modules have a slightly higher noise than ST module (~0.05 ADC in peak mode) As the depletion layer is smaller in HPK than ST sensors, this increase in noise is not unexpected

LT Data Processing Outline LT Thermal Cycle Root File XML File Defect Analyzer Root File LT Macro Summary Plots Text File with Summarized Results XML File lt.pl script

Defect Analyzer Parses root file output from LT and creates an xml file with the data in format needed for uploading to database Bad channels are determined by applying cuts on each test performed Noise: Relative cuts are currently being used Due to slight change in average noise between First, Cold, and Last tests Peak Time: Absolute cuts are currently being used Pulse Height: Percentage cuts are currently being used

LT Macro Analyzes root files and creates plots for each test on a channel basis as well as summary files with a list of channel flags in each test mode.

lt.pl Script Modifications Identifies bad runs and makes comparison to ARCS database entry Much progress made over last few months Finalized cuts on the average value of each APV for CMN, Noise, and Peak Time Used as an absolute check against tests that use relative or percentage cutting methods (Noise, Pulse Height) The program now lists channel flags in ARCS, and channel flags in each temperature mode in LT (First, Cold, Last) Used to find discrepancies between channel flags in LT and ARCS Appends list of modules tested with Good/Bad flag to a summary.log file Used for automating qualification of production modules

Work to Be Done for LT Cut Values for Defect Analyzer must be tuned Final cuts are being set Waiting for more data False flags listed in xml files must be corrected Can be done manually after the data has been reviewed by modifying the xml file (very tedious) Flagging algorithm can be modified to reduced false flag rate False flags can be ignored and uploaded into database Rate of false flags small, but noticable (X/module)