The experiment requires that you continue. The IRB, on the other hand…

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Human Subjects Protections, Concepts, and Procedures Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Tom Lombardo, Ph.D., Director, Research Integrity & Compliance.

Advertisements

Research Ethics The American Psychological Association Guidelines

Research at the Sociocultural Level of Analysis Ethical Considerations Alli Cales & David Rivera.

IRB 101: Informed Consent Columbia University Medical Center IRB September 22, 2005.

ETHICAL TREATMENT OF HUMAN SUBJECTS All research projects must be approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) Federal law APA (American Psychological.

RESEARCH ETHICS Why Do We Have Ethical Standards? What is an IRB? What are the Main Ethical Principles for Human Subjects? What are the Main Ethical Principles.

Research Ethics in Psychology. Some History APA Guidelines developed in 1973 Revised again in 1982 and 2002 Broad context of ethical concerns - research.

Ethics of Research I Lawrence R. Gordon Psychology Research Methods I.

Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,

ETHICAL RESEARCH © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

1 Psychology 2020 Unit 1 cont’d Ethics. 2 Evolution of ethics Historic Studies Tuskegee Syphilis Study ( ) Milgram’s Obedience Study (1960s)

Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager College of Graduate and Professional Studies Radford University, Radford, VA.

METHODS IN BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH NINTH EDITION PAUL C. COZBY Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager

RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.

SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.

Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,

How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.

IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.

SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.

Ethics Ethics Applied to Research. Ethics in Nursing Research Scientific Misconduct – a fabrication, falsification, plagiarism or other practice that.

Ethics and Research. Ethics is Educational Research Committee on Scientific and Professional Ethics of American Psychological Association -- Ethical Principals.

Research Ethics. Ethics From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character Implies a judgment of character.

Ethics Ethics Applied to Research Back to Class 2.

NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.

Objective 9/23/15 Today we will be completing our research methods unit & begin reviewing for the upcoming unit assessment 9/25. Agenda: -Turn in all homework.

WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.

Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.

Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.

THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.

Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.

 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.

 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.

 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.

Ethics in Research Each research study involves a careful risk/benefit analysis prior to beginning data collection. The question each researcher must ask.

HRPP Coordinator Meeting May 19, 2017

Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.

Chapter 3 Ethics in Research

Ethics in Social Psychology

Research with human participants at Carnegie Mellon University

SOU Institutional Review Board

Ethics in Research.

CHAPTER 2 Ethics in Psychological Research

Chapter 5 Research Ethics

Baruch College HRPP Office

CHAPTER 7: Ethics in Psychological Research

Research Requirement Research participation gives you an understanding of the methods used by psychologists, and allows you a first-hand look at psychological.

Kasee Hildenbrand and Darcy Miller

Research Methods: Concepts and Connections First Edition

Division of General Internal Medicine

IRB The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.

SOU Institutional Review Board

Psychological Experimentation

Ethics lecture To publish research in psychology must first be approved be a board or committee at the institution you are working at. Institutional Review.

Chapter 4 Ethics.

Basic Practice of Statistics - 3rd Edition Lecture PowerPoint Slides

Chapter 4 Ethics.

Ethical Considerations

IRB and Ethics in Research

Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.

Appendix 2 of New Application

What are the Major Changes to the IRB under the Final Common Rule?

Ethics in Psych In order to ensure that psychology and psychologist do not abuse their positions psychologist have adopted certain standards of behavior.

Office of Research Integrity and Protections

Valdosta State University

Module 7 Research Design and Ethics in Psychology

Research with Human Subjects

Module 7 Research Design and Ethics in Psychology

Institutional Review Board

Presentation transcript:

The experiment requires that you continue. The IRB, on the other hand… Ethics in Psychological Research

Competent research Accurate reporting Proper use of resources Fair acknowledgement of contributions

IRB IRB Human research Federal form 45 Exempt, Expedited, Full Review

Risk/Benefit Ratio Is the information worth the risk Risk is defined quite broadly: Anything that the participant is subjected to that they might not alreadyu experience in their everyday life. Time spent on your survey Potential loss of confidentiality in an archival study Exposure to potential issues through your questions

Three standard protections Double-locking data Remove/redact identifying data Provide resources at debriefing Ensure that inducements are not coercive

Informed Consent Many IRBs will have a standard informed consent from which you may model Purpose Standard duration Right to withdraw Possible consequences thereof Potential risks, discomfort, or adverse effects

More Informed Consent Components Potential benefits Even indirect! Any limits on confidentiality Inducements Who to contact if there are any questions Principal investigator Advisor IRB Many IRBs require a statement saying that the research was approved.

When you don’t need informed consent: Academic setting to assess instructional efficacy Anonymous questionnaires To be safe, use a “Statement of consent,” containing all of the elements of the informed consent, with a statement that completing the survey indicates informed consent. Naturalistic observations Don’t collect identifying information (like license plate numbers) Archival research Good to have a generic consent at intake: “….may be used for research purposes….”

Deception Only used when necessary Omission vs Commission Not always (or even often) necessary Omission vs Commission Can’t cause harm The mild negative affect anagram test Staging a crime Not telling your client what the study is about Bystander apathy tests

Debriefing Here’s when you give your participant information about: Nature Results Conclusions If you can’t just then, minimize harm Send them an abstract (or post it online and tell them where to go) Resources for help after the study…just in case Local or national psychologists referral site (AzPA, APA)

Reporting IRB doesn’t usually deal with this part Must report honestly and fairly Invented data Mistakes happen. Acknowledge and amend Plagiarism

Authorship Intellectual contribution to the published product Helping to collect data does not confer authorship Can still be acknowledged, however. Generally has to write a section, or part of a section Do not add authors gratuitously For prestige In order to present at a conference, may need a member of an organization as an author Order of authors? First and last as “bookends?” Descending order?

Duplicate Submission Double dipping The Poling Shuffle and the LPU Sharing data for verification through reanalysis Can ask the requestor to cover the cost of such Only the data for that purpose

Protecting the Data Reviewing articles Don’t shoot them down simply because their research disagrees with yours Do not sabotage their pub and take their research! Keep the review confidential “Jones & Graham submitted this, and oh boy, did they mess up!”

Questions? Thoughts?