Succession Planning at Glaxo Wellcome, R&D

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Succession and talent management
Advertisements

Service Excellence & Competencies 21 February 2014 VPHC, Pontiac Land Group, 21 February 2014.
Citi’s Talent Practices: Emerging from the Financial Crisis
13th June '121Getrude Childrens' Hospital. Getting started 2 2 Organising the workplace involving employees, employee training and committees 3 3 Gathering.
Global Talent and Global Mobility Maureen Potts Director, Global Mobility Programmes.
MGT-555 PERFORMANCE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT
with Terry Doerscher Doerscher Consulting LLC
Leaders influence in five ways: 1.What they pay attention to 2.Their reaction to critical incidents 3.Their deliberate role-modelling and teaching 4.Their.
San Antonio Regional Relocation Council September 17, 2013 Today’s Talent Management.
Are you looking for an opportunity to join a company that has a long history and an exciting future? A place where you can grow within an international.
Human Resource Management in Organizations
Global Leadership Forecast 2011 Delaware SHRM April 10, 2012 The Talent Management Expert.
TALENT MANAGEMENT. Consider this…..at any one time 59% of employees will be open to working elsewhere.
Aligning HR & Business Strategy. “The long-held notion that HR would become a truly strategic function is finally being realized.”
People Priorities Framework
The Business Case for Executive Assessment : Why Assessment in Challenging Times Can Enhance Productivity and Be a Talent “Game Changer” Linda Sharkey,
Management Development. Manage Human Capital to measure and improve performance in the workplace.
1 - 1 Employee Training and Development Introduction: Training for Competitive Advantage.
Leading Nottingham Programme update to ACOS 7 September 2010 Angela Probert Director of HR and Organisational Transformation Contributions from Lisa Sharples.
Unifying Talent Management. Harnessing the Power of Workforce Intelligence in Talent Planning to Drive Business Performance.
High Potential Leader Program Brevard Public School District Nancy Rehbine Zentis, Ph.D.
1 Introduction to Human Resource Management Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Ltd
Building Teams and Empowering Members 1. Empowerment Empowerment is not bestowed by a leader, it is the process of an individual enabling himself to take.
MARATHON COUNTY CORE VALUE LEARNING RESOURCE July 20, 2016.
The benefits of skills-based hiring
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Columbus Water Works Case Study “Who sits on your bench?”
Simi Dubb Head of BT Group Talent Management June 2011
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
DRIVING GROWTH THROUGH LEADERSHIP Justin Dunn
Department of Business Management Human Resource Management
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Module 5: Communication Plan and Process for Addressing Barriers
Succession Planning: Concept and Practice in Nepalese context
Learning and Development Developing leaders and managers
Performance Management and Employee Development
Talent development and resourcing Manager
CHAPTER 3: STRATEGIC PLANNING.
SAMPLE Develop a Comprehensive Competency Framework
2017 HR Trends Report SAMPLE
SAMPLE Foster an Effective Feedback Environment
Ulrich’s model of HR.
WEBINAR Improve B2B Sales Force Behavior Through Gamification Programs
SAMPLE Optimize the Referral Program Learn about becoming a member
The Keys to Succession Planning
Strategic Management of Human Capital Recruitment Strategy
HR Business Partner Individual Development Plans
Competency Based Learning and Development
Managing Change and Other Keys to Successful Implementation
Work-force planning involves two major activities
Learning and Development Developing leaders and managers
Assessing your total rewards offer
Chapter 2 Fundamentals of Strategic HRM
Human Resources | C & B Operations | Concha Martinez/Rajani Koduganti
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Innovative HR Innovative HR in the UK Civil Service Deborah Crewe, Modernising People Management.
HR challenges and opportunities
Introduction: Training for Competitive Advantage
Human Capital Transformation Evolution
People Lead: This is the visual representation of our model. This model supports and reinforces our definition of leadership - achieving results, with.
The Leadership Equation Clarity of Purpose & Clarity of Role
KEY INITIATIVE Finance Function Management
Strategic Human Resources Management Providing Accountability for Your Agency’s Mission in Indian Country SAIGE 2019.
Leaders We Need Now.
Managing Employee Performance and Reward
The Power of HR as a Strategic Business Partner
Presentation transcript:

Succession Planning at Glaxo Wellcome, R&D Succession planning goals Alignment to corporate culture Process Benefits Identification criteria Types of development Monitoring progress Summary

Succession Planning Goals Develop and retain high performers optimize intellectual capital Leadership pipeline groom individuals for future leadership positions

Alignment with R&D Culture Employee development principles and roles Performance management system competency-based performance & development planning reviews Internal recruitment Diversity

Alignment with GW world Across 76 sites, in 30 countries, 6 regions, with ~ 60,000 employees Support regionalization Centralizing - establishing global functions: i.e. M&S, IS, Finance, R&D, HR Align policies/systems Talk about size, spread of sites, Many systems and processes - no single infrastructure hard to share info hard to make decisions across operating companies and sites hard to move people around into development positions different policies regarding comp/bens & grading different policies regarding budgets and headcount Move innovations in different parts of company arenow sharing and adapted in others creative freedom to try out - R&D is place to experiment Centralizing our global functions - connect and streamline operations succession planning is happening globally now - all feed into central activity

Succession Planning Process: Strategic Talent Management Strategizing for Success Review/Define Business Objectives & Challenges Identify Critical Capabilities Agree Development Needs (Gap Analysis for Dept/Div) Identify Development Opportunities Coaching Skills Training Developing Others (1 day) Coaching Edge (2 days) Shaping the Culture Employee Development Philosophy Identify Barriers to Success Develop Action/Communication Plan for Department EDR Process Strategic Talent Review Development Planning Discussions

The Process Global EDR meeting Mgr-EE Dept. Mgmt team Div. Mgmt team Dir. Mgmt team R&D Exec E.D.R. 3-4 times per year 2 times per year Yearly

Benefits Development occurs in line with business needs Stimulates ideas & actions for development Shared ownership of people’s development Reduces bias Foundation for EDR Continuing to embed the process and culture around development Managers are starting to see the benefits HR structure to support OE working with each R&D Divisional Exec team support unique Divisional cultures work to adapt STM within each Division creative ways to get same outcome I drive process and work with OES to pull across R&D to interface with other business areas

Identification Criteria Past performance Development potential Competencies Behaviors Goals & aspirations

Types of Development Opportunities On-the-job: assignments projects new positions location functional Coaching/mentoring Leadership training Give real life examples where development happened as a result of STM/EDR process...

Types of Executive Leadership Training In house: S.E.D.P. I.L.P. I.C.L. External, e.g. C.C.L. I.N.S.E.A.D. L.B.S.

Monitoring progress for continuous improvement Track turnover Track promotions & new positions Track rewards bonus, share options Track training Gather feedback Employee survey

Key Results of Surveys In ‘98, 68% EDRC reported having written development plan vs 54% in ‘97 In ‘98, 77% EDRC given opportunity to improve professional skills vs 65% in ‘97 In ‘98, 80% EDRC reviewed development with manager for >60min vs 59% non-EDRC In ‘98, 70% EDRC believed rewards were linked to performance, vs 50% in ‘97 In ‘98, 51% non-EDRC believed rewards were linked to performance vs 35% in ‘97

In Summary Established a consistent process People are engaged Development is happening Increased communication & coordination across GW Continuously improving