Sarah Hudson Scholle, DrPH

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 California Quality Collaborative Accelerating Improvement of the Commercial Delivery System Neil A. Solomon, MD Clinical Director, CQC.
Advertisements

Aetna and PCMH Improving Employee Health through Patient- Centered Medical Homes Morristown, New Jersey October 12, 2010 Aetna’s experience with Patient-Centered.
Regional Variation and Diabetes/Heart Disease Management in California Pay for Performance Tom Williams Executive Director Integrated Healthcare Association.
Informatics And The New Healthcare System Information Technology Will Provide the Platform for Quality Improvement in Healthcare for the 21 st Century.
America’s Health Insurance Plans Health Insurance Plans Approaches to Asthma Management: 2006 Assessment Supported through a cooperative agreement with.
Integrated Healthcare Association: Statewide Pay for Performance (P4P) Collaborative Ron Bangasser, MD Dolores Yanagihara, MPH National P4P Summit – Preconference.
Harvard Quality Colloquium Improving HealthCare Quality and Accountability Harvard Quality Colloquium Robert Margolis, MD Board Chair, NCQA CEO, HealthCare.
Holding Health Plans & Providers Accountable for High-Quality, Patient-Centered Care January 23, 2015.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Montana Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentive Program for Eligible Hospitals This presentation will focus on information related to your registration.
© 2006, CareVariance "Quality-based Purchasing in Public and Private Employer Health Insurance Programs" Health Plan Quality Transparency Efforts Mark.
California Pay for Performance: Understanding the Impact of Provider Incentives for Quality Tom Williams Executive Director Integrated Healthcare Association.
© 2006 All rights reserved. 1 The Silicon Valley Health Information Technology Pay for Performance Collaborative The National Pay for Performance Summit.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
Employer Initiatives in Disease Management Peter V. Lee Pacific Business Group on Health NATIONAL DISEASE MANAGEMENT SUMMIT May 13, 2003 – Baltimore, MD.
California Pay for Performance Dolores Yanagihara, MPH Integrated Healthcare Association Mendocino Health Information Exchange June 18, 2008.
Brown & Toland Medical Group National Pay for Performance Summit “Pay for Performance Pushes EMR Adoption” Stan Padilla, M.D. Vice-President, Medical Services.
Data Collection and Aggregation: Making It Work for Your P4P Program Dolores Yanagihara, MPH Integrated Healthcare Association February 27, 2008 National.
Rewarding Performance: Three-Year Results from California's Statewide Pay-for-Performance Experiment Cheryl L. Damberg, PhD, Kristiana Raube, PhD, Stephanie.
1 Pay for Performance and Regional Variation Michael J. Belman, MD MPH Anthem Blue Cross (California) Academy Health June
Assessing Weight Through Documentation of Body Mass Index (BMI) in Health Plan Populations Sarah Sampsel, MPH Research Scientist June 2008.
1 Visioning the 21 st Century Health System Kenneth I. Shine, MD National Health Information Infrastructure 2003: Developing a National Action Agenda for.
Performance Measurement Sets Dolores Yanagihara Program Development Manager IHA.
1 CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield is an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. ® Registered trademark of the Blue Cross and.
Measuring Quality In Health Care Linda K. Shelton Assistant Vice President Product Development.
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD CHAPTER 1.
11 Creating Value from EMR Investment Kevin Maben, MD, FAAP Associate Medical Information Officer Presbyterian Healthcare Services.
- a Rewarding Results National Grant Pay for Performance: Driving Improvement through Provider Recognition & Reward MCOL Healthcare Web Summit Participating.
California Pay for Performance: Reporting First Year Results and The Business Case for IT Investment Lance Lang, MD Health Net, California November 18,
Assessing opportunities to improve performance measures focused on major depressive disorder Sarah Sampsel, MPH Research Scientist June 2008.
Quality of Care in Physician Groups Do Larger Integrated Systems Deliver Higher Quality Care? Ateev Mehrotra MD MPH RAND Pittsburgh & University of Pittsburgh.
P4P and Group IT Investment Douglas Allen, MD., MMM. November 18, 2004.
Information Technology and Data Collection: February 28, 2008 Optimizing Lab Results and Pharmacy Data Collection Under P4P Concurrent Session 1.07 Horace.
The HIT Symposium at the Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyJuly 19, 2006 THINC A case study A. John Blair, III, MD President and Chief Executive Officer.
Quality and Incentives: Value-Based Purchasing, Pay for Performance and Transparency Tom Williams Executive Director Integrated Healthcare Association.
1 Pay for Performance and Regional Variation: Do the Rich Get Rich and the Poor Stay Poor? Michael J. Belman, MD, MPH Tracy I. Wang, MPH Clinical Quality.
The California Pay for Performance Program Stephen Shortell, Ph.D., MPH Dean, School of Public Health University of California at Berkeley National Pay.
From Concept to Practice: Early Experience with P4P Meredith B. Rosenthal Richard G Frank Elena Li Arnold M. Epstein Financial support for this research.
CHCS Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc. Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc. Nikki Highsmith Center for Health Care Strategies June 7, 2007 Pay.
Purchaser and Health Plan Initiatives to Support Medical Home Development Don Liss, MD Regional Medical Director Aetna.
Introducing Transparency to the use of Medical Device Implants Tom Williams, Executive Director Integrated Healthcare Association (IHA) The Quality Colloquium.
Quality December 7, 2005 Charles Milligan, JD, MPH Adequate Health Care Task Force.
Resolving Challenges in Data Collection, Aggregation, and Use of Standardized Measures Dolores Yanagihara, MPH Integrated Healthcare Association February.
Quality Meets H-IT: What Can We Expect? Margaret E. O’Kane, President Health Information Technology Summit October 22, 2004.
Measuring and Reporting Performance Data Through Health IT AHRQ Annual Meeting Wednesday September 26, 2007 A. John Blair, III, MD President, Taconic IPA.
- a Rewarding Results National Grant Promoting Medical Group IT through Pay for Performance January 14, 2003 UC Health Care IT Conference.
Pay for Performance- California Style Jack Rodnick, MD Conference on Practice Improvement Denver, Colorado November 10, 2006.
Patient Centered Medical Home: Patient Centered Medical Home: Are You Ready Yet? Carol L. Henwood, DO, FACOFP AOA/AOAMI Annual Convention November 2, 2009.
Sachin H. Jain, MD, MBA Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT United States Department of Health and Human Services The Nation’s Health IT Agenda:
© 2006 All rights reserved. 1 The Silicon Valley Health Information Technology Pay for Performance Collaborative The National Pay for Performance Summit.
Kaiser Permanente: A Model of Integration and Market Leader in Quality and Service Differentiation Healthcare Information Technology January 14, 2003 Robert.
Mini Summit I The Effectiveness of Pay for Performance: Lessons Learned and Program Adaptations for California P4P Dolores Yanagihara, MPH P4P Program.
Wireless Access SSID: cwag2017
Incentive Payments and Public Reporting
Patient Centered Medical Home
Charlotte Crist, BS, RN-BC, CCM, CPHQ
Bringing You More Than Ever Before
Systems, IT and Measurement: It’s All About Quality
Innovations in the Measurement and Payment of Care
SV HIT Program Summary IPAs and multisite Medical Group recognition based on highest volume practice sites for Cisco, Intel, and Oracle employees Maximum.
Point of Care Tool to Manage Patient Populations
A Case Study from California: Pay for Performance Incentives and the Adoption of Information Technology Tom Williams Integrated Healthcare Association.
Hill Physicians Medical Group
Purchasers’ Efforts to Promote Better Information Technology
Implementing the IOM’s Rewarding Provider Performance Report
A Review of National Trends Venture Advisory Services
Bridges to Excellence: Recognizing High-Quality Care
Pay for Performance: Data Collection and Reporting Results
President and Chief Executive Officer
Registered Nurse’s Use of HIT, 2006: Findings from a National Survey
Presentation transcript:

Sarah Hudson Scholle, DrPH Health IT in the Integrated Health Association’s Pay-for-Performance Program Sarah Hudson Scholle, DrPH

Agenda IHA’s pay-for-performance program IT measures Performance on IT Future directions

IHA’s Pay for Performance Program The goal of P4P is to create a compelling set of incentives that will drive breakthrough improvements in clinical quality and the patient experience through: Common set of measures A public scorecard Health plan payments 3

Plans and Medical Groups – Who’s Playing? Health Plans* Aetna Blue Cross Blue Shield Western Health Advantage Cigna HealthNet Pacificare Kaiser Medical Groups and IPAs Over 215 groups / 35,000 physicians 6.2 million HMO commercial enrollees

Organizing Principles All data collection is limited to electronic information only (no chart review). Data from all participating health plans is aggregated for a total patient population by physician organization. Financial incentives are being paid for IT adoption to support the structure needed for data collection and patient management 12

The Need for Information Technology Dilbert 4

IHA P4P: Measurement Weighting 2003 2004 2005 2006 Clinical 50% 40% Patient Experience 30% IT Investment 10% 20% Individual Physician Feedback program “extra credit” 5

Data Collection & Aggregation Plans OR Group CCHRI Clinical Measures IT Measures Patient Satisfaction Admin data PAS Scores Survey Tools and Documentation Data Aggregator - NCQA/DDD Produces one set of scores per group Medical Report Health Plan Score Card Vendor Note: 7 of 7 Plans used aggregated dataset for payment calculations 13

HIT Requirements Measure 1: Integrate clinical electronic data sets at the group level for the purposes of population management Measure 2: Support clinical decision-making at the point of care through electronic tools

Measurement and Scoring NCQA evaluates all documentation and scores results NCQA conducts an additional audit of 5% of groups/practices Requires documentation of Measure 1 through mail and attestation for Measure 2

IT Adoption Results 2003-2004 21

HIT Measures in IHA P4P: Integration of Clinical Electronic Datasets Use of computerized registries/databases integrating at least 2 kinds of data with the ability to report at the patient level Encounter/claims data Lab results Prescriptions Inpatient or ER records Radiology findings Clinical findings

HIT Measures in IHA P4P: Clinical Data Integration Activities Patient Registry Actionable Reports: Actionable reports/query lists from e-disease registry Electronic HEDIS results: collection of HEDIS measures across organization using lab results or clinical findings 22

Integration of Clinical Electronic Data 23

Information Technology (IT) Measurement: Point-of-Care Technology Activities E-prescribing and check for interaction E-access to lab results E-access to clinical notes E-retrieval of patient reminders E-messaging 24

Point-of-Care Technology 25

Stronger IT Related to Better Clinical Quality 26

Impact of P4P on Consumer Health 117,000 more women received cervical cancer screenings 8,000 more women received breast cancer screenings Thousands more California kids got 2 needed immunizations 13,000 more people received a diabetes test 27

Preliminary Evaluation Results: Physician Group Feedback Public reporting is viewed favorably Public reporting is strong motivation to perform Physician Groups believe the measures are reasonable Physician Groups are comfortable being held accountable for measures P4P has inspired significant efforts to collect relevant data Groups report a negative ROI on investments vs. incentive payments Lack of transparency on payment methods is confusing to Groups and creates distrust 28

IHA P4P Future Directions: Moving from IT to “Systemness” For 2007, IHA is considering expanding requirements on how physician organizations use data KEEP: Integration of clinical electronic data Point of care clinical decision-making ADD (from NCQA’s Physician Practice Connections program) Access & Communication Use of data to identify important conditions Care Management & Self-Management Support Performance reporting

Sarah Hudson Scholle, DrPH Assistant Vice President For More Information… Sarah Hudson Scholle, DrPH Assistant Vice President Research & Analysis scholle@ ncqa.org 202-955-1726 www.ncqa.org