Recent Updates to the Canadian Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System Michael Moran, Sylvie Gravel, Verica Savic-Jovcic, Alexandru.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EC Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System (RAQDPS) Mike Moran Air Quality Research Division Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario Mtg on AQ.
Advertisements

Development of a High Resolution Air Quality Prediction System for the 2015 PanAm and Para PanAm Games Craig Stroud, Sylvie Gravel, Balbir Pabla, Mike.
PREV ’AIR : An operational system for large scale air quality monitoring and forecasting over Europe
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
Air Quality-Climate Interactions Aijun Xiu Carolina Environmental Program.
A Comparative Dynamic Evaluation of the AURAMS and CMAQ Air Quality Modeling Systems Steven Smyth a,b, Michael Moran c, Weimin Jiang a, Fuquan Yang a,
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Emission processing methodology for the new GEM-MACH model ABSTRACT SMOKE has recently been adapted to provide emissions for the new Meteorological Service.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
10th CMAS Conference Special Session on AQ Modeling Applications In Memory of Dr. Daewon Byun.
©2005,2006 Carolina Environmental Program Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions SMOKE Modeling System Zac Adelman and Andy Holland Carolina Environmental.
Muntaseer Billah, Satoru Chatani and Kengo Sudo Department of Earth and Environmental Science Graduate School of Environmental Studies Nagoya University,
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
© Crown copyright Met Office Met Office dust forecasting Using the Met Office Unified Model™ David Walters: Manager Global Atmospheric Model Development,
Modelling the Canadian Arctic and Northern Air Quality using GEM-MACH Wanmin Gong and Stephen Beagley Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
University of California Riverside, ENVIRON Corporation, MCNC WRAP Regional Modeling Center WRAP Regional Haze CMAQ 1996 Model Performance and for Section.
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
Air Quality Forecasting Bas Mijling Ronald van der A AMFIC Annual Meeting ● Beijing ● October 2008.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Implementation of GEM-MACH10, A New Higher-Resolution Version of the Canadian Operational Air Quality Forecast Model Mike Moran 1, Sylvain Ménard 2, Radenko.
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
Rick Saylor 1, Barry Baker 1, Pius Lee 2, Daniel Tong 2,3, Li Pan 2 and Youhua Tang 2 1 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Air Resources Laboratory.
GEM/AQ Simulations on Intercontinental Transports Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Using Dynamical Downscaling to Project.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
A Five-Year Performance Evaluation of Environment Canada’s Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System M.D. Moran 1, J. Zhang 1, R.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
A ir Quality Research Branch Meteorological Service of Canada Environment Environnement Canada Performance Evaluation of AURAMS for Multiple Cases Michael.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Aerosol simulation with coupled meteorology-radiation- chemistry model WRF/Chem over Europe.
Background ozone in surface air over the United States Arlene M. Fiore Daniel J. Jacob US EPA Workshop on Developing Criteria for the Chemistry and Physics.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Developing a Vision for the Next-Generation Air Quality Modeling Tools: A Few Suggestions Mike Moran Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada,
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
Impact of New North American Emissions Inventories on Urban Mobile Source Emissions for High-Resolution Air Quality Modelling Junhua Zhang, Qiong.
Western Regional Technical Projects 2011 through 2013
Jeff Vukovich, USEPA/OAQPS/AQAD Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group
ADAGIO (Atmospheric Deposition Analysis Generated by optimal Interpolation from Observations): Project plans and status A.S. Cole1, A. Robichaud2, M.D.
New Developments in Wildfire Emission and Dispersion Forecasting with FireWork – The Operational Canadian AQ Forecast System with Near-Real-Time Biomass-Burning.
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
Lupu, Semeniuk, Kaminski, Mamun, McConnell
Model Future: Nesting with Regional Models
Atmospheric modelling of the Laki eruption
A model of sea salt aerosol for Cape Grim Preliminary investigations
Junhua Zhang, Michael Moran, Paul Makar,
Hybrid Plume/Grid Modeling for the Allegheny County PM2.5 SIPs
Recent Improvements to FireWork: Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Operational Air Quality Forecast System with Near-real-time Wildfire Emissions.
Xuguo ZHANG, Jimmy FUNG, Alexis LAU and Wayne Wei HUANG
IWAQFR 2017, Toronto, Didier Davignon1
Improvements to Wintertime Particulate-Matter Forecasting with GEM-MACH15 Michael Moran1, Sylvain Ménard2 Paul Makar1, Radenko Pavlovic2, Mourad Sassi2,
Multi-Year ( ) North American Population Exposure to PM2
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
Impact on Recent North American Air Quality Forecasts of Replacing a Retrospective U.S. Emissions Inventory with a Projected Inventory Michael Moran1,
10th CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC 2010 October 11-13
Models of atmospheric chemistry
Junhua Zhang and Wanmin Gong
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
M. Samaali, M. Sassi, V. Bouchet
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Joanna Struzewska Warsaw University of Technology
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
Michael Moran Air Quality Research Branch
Presented by: Sophie Cousineau
Atmospheric modelling of HMs Sensitivity study
Presentation transcript:

Recent Updates to the Canadian Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System Michael Moran, Sylvie Gravel, Verica Savic-Jovcic, Alexandru Lupu, Radenko Pavlovic, Alain Robichaud, Paul Makar, and Qiong Zheng Environment and Climate Change Canada 26 Oct. 2016 15th CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Background The Canadian Air Quality Prediction Program at Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) is a 17-year-old program that has evolved from issuing O3-only forecasts for eastern Canada to issuing O3, NO2, and PM2.5 forecasts for all of Canada (+ the continental U.S. and Alaska) The ECCC operational AQ forecast system is called the Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System (RAQDPS) The GEM-MACH in-line meteorology/chemistry model has been used in the RAQDPS since Nov. 2009 to produce twice-daily, 48-hour, continental-scale forecasts of O3, NO2, PM2.5, and Air Quality Health Index (AQHI)

Overview of the ECCC RAQDPS The core of the RAQDPS is the GEM-MACH chemical weather model, an in-line meteorology‒chemistry model GEM-MACH version 1 in operation since 2009; replaced by version 2 this year (2016) Regional grid covers much of North America 10 km horizontal grid spacing 80 vertical levels with lid at 0.1 hPa (~10 levels in 1st km above surface) One-way coupling (meteorology affects chemistry) for operational version Full representation of oxidant and aerosol chemistry processes: gas-, aqueous- & heterogeneous chemistry mechanisms aerosol dynamics dry and wet deposition (including in- and below-cloud scavenging) 2-bin sectional representation of PM size distribution (i.e., 0-2.5 and 2.5-10 μm) with 8 chemical components Regional yet more than 37 million sq km 3

Two Recent Updates to the RAQDPS There have been 16 updates to the operational RAQDPS since 2009 (from RAQDPS001 to 017); some updates were major while others were minor; each update must be shown to improve (or maintain) model performance and each must be approved by an ECCC internal committee One important recent update was the release in June 2015 of RAQDPS013, which introduced a new set of emissions files [see weblink http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmoi/product_guide/docs/changes_e.ht ml#20150611_raqdps] A second set of significant releases (RAQDPS015, RAQPS016, RAQDPS017) was made in 2016 to upgrade to the next generation of the GEM-MACH model [see http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmoi/product_guide/docs/changes_e.ht ml#20160907_raqdps016]

2015 Update to RAQDPS Input Emissions Newer emissions inventories were used Old emissions (SET0) Canada: 2006 v1 (without construction sector) USA: 2012 projection (based on 2005 NEI) Mexico: 1999 Updated emissions (SET2.1.1) Canada: 2010 v1 USA: 2011 v1 Mexico: 1999 (no change)

Percentage Differences in National Annual Emissions Of Criteria Air Contaminants Between SET2.1.1 and SET0 Country SO2 NOx VOC NH3 CO PM2.5 PM10 Canada -30 -9 -6 -15 -4 16 U.S. -48 8 -1 -3 -5 -11 http://iweb.cmc.ec.gc.ca/~arqpmik/Emissions/Inventories/2010_Canadian_CAC_EI/Canada2006_2009_2010_4July2012.xls

Many Improvements to Emissions Processing Methodology for Canada New Canadian population and dwelling spatial surrogates based on 2011 census replaced older versions based on 2006 census New Canadian spatial surrogates for residential wood combustion, on-road mobile sources, airports, marine pleasure craft, and others Land-use-dependent transportable fraction used to scale fugitive dust emissions for near-source capture in place of simple 0.25 factor New temporal profiles for major point sources New library of PM speciation profiles and addition of some VOC speciation profiles Removal of emissions from closed facilities

Impact of Revised Emissions on Winter 2014 Mean PM2 Impact of Revised Emissions on Winter 2014 Mean PM2.5 (µg/m3) and NO2 (ppbv) Concentrations SRPDQA (OPS) DIFF =SRPDQA(SET2.1.1) – SRPDQA(OPS) PM2.5 NO2

Impact of Revised Emissions on Summer 2014 Mean O3 (ppbv) and PM2 Impact of Revised Emissions on Summer 2014 Mean O3 (ppbv) and PM2.5 (µg/m3) Concentrations SRPDQA (OPS) DIFF =SRPDQA(SET2.1.1) – SRPDQA(OPS) O3 PM2.5

Objective Scores (MB, R, URMSE) for Winter & Summer 2014 for NO2, O3, PM2.5 Statistical Impact of Emissions Update Overall improvement of scores, especially for the winter period Reduction in problems with PM2.5 overpredictions for Canadian urban areas MONTRÉAL Observé GM-OPS GM avec SET2.1.1

2016 Updates to Forecast Model: GEM-MACH v2 vs. GEM-MACH v1 (1) With respect to GEM model, GEM-MACH v2 is: Based on GEMv4 (new version of NWP model) vs. GEMv3 Uses new GEM vertical coordinate (log-hydrostatic-pressure) Uses new GEM staggered vertical discretization Uses different model level for surface concentrations (level 80 at surface for G-Mv1 vs. level 80 at 20 m for G-Mv2) Has different thickness of lowest model layer (20 m for G-Mv1 vs. 40 m for G-Mv2) Uses updated subgrid-scale orographic blocking scheme Uses GEM vertical diffusion scheme for chemical tracers (changed for increased harmonization)

New Vertical Discretization GEM-MACH v1 GEM-MACH v2 T, f, u, v, w, tracers T, q, w, tracers f, u, v Ts, qs T, f, u, v, w, tracers T, f, u, v, w, tracers T, f, u, v, w, tracers T, f, u, v, w, tracers T, f, u, v, w, tracers T, f, u, v, w, tracers T, u, v, w, tracers Regular Grid Charney-Phillips Grid 12

GEM-MACH v2 vs. GEM-MACH v1 (2) New set of climatological chemical lateral boundary conditions (seasonal 1D vertical profiles in G-Mv1 vs. seasonal 3D mean fields in G-Mv2 from MOZART4) Call to sea-salt emissions operator moved in operator sequence Adoption of new limited-area-model version of new GEM mass-conserving advection scheme for tracers Corrections to gas-phase dry deposition scheme to include leaf-area-index (LAI) scaling in some surface resistance terms Fixes to surface emissions and gas-phase dry deposition bugs & numerous minor corrections and improvements

Change in Forecast Domain from GEM-MACHv1 to GEM-MACHv2

Impact of New Model Version on Winter 2014 Mean PM2 Impact of New Model Version on Winter 2014 Mean PM2.5 and NO2 Concentrations GMv1 (OPS) DIFF =GMv2 – GMv1(OPS) PM2.5 NO2

Impact of New Model Version on Summer 2014 Mean O3 and PM2 Impact of New Model Version on Summer 2014 Mean O3 and PM2.5 Concentrations GMv1 (OPS) DIFF =GMv2 – GMv1(OPS) O3 PM2.5

Objective Scores (MB, R, URMSE) for Hourly Forecasts (NO2, O3, PM2.5) WINTER 2014 SUMMER 2014

48-hour Season-Mean Hour-of-Day Concentrations SRPDQA015 SRPDQA016 Observed 48-hour Season-Mean Hour-of-Day Concentrations Winter – PM2.5 Summer – O3 G-M Domain G-M Domain Eastern Canada Eastern Canada Western Canada Western Canada

48-hour Season-Mean Hour-of-Day Concentrations SRPDQA015 SRPDQA016 Observed 48-hour Season-Mean Hour-of-Day Concentrations Winter – NO2 Summer – NO2 Eastern Canada Eastern Canada Western Canada Western Canada

Summary The ECCC operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System (RAQDPS) has been updated 16 times since 2009 One major update in 2015 introduced new input emissions based on newer inventories (2010 Cdn, 2011v1 U.S.) and improved emissions processing methodology Another major update in 2016 upgraded the GEM-MACH chemical weather model from version 1 to version 2: changes included (1) new vertical discretization, (2) new mass-conserving semi-Lagrangian advection scheme, (3) updated gas-phase dry deposition scheme, (4) new tracer vertical diffusion, (5) new chemical lateral boundary conditions, and (6) correction of surface emissions error

Thank you for your attention!

Current RAQDPS “Ecosystem” RDAQA RDPS GDPS RAQDPS (or FireWork) UMOS-AQ