Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Comprehensive Provincial Air Emissions Inventory to Support AEMERA, ESRD and the AER Richard Melick Emissions Inventory Scientist Air Policy.
Advertisements

1 PM NAAQS: Update on Coarse Particle Monitoring and Research Efforts Lydia Wegman, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA Presentation at the.
Hazard Prevention Program
Ambient Air Monitoring for the Revised Lead NAAQS Daniel Garver US EPA Region 4.
Meeting with IESBA CPAB Update Glenn Fagan and Kam Grewal April 7, 2014.
Halûk Özkaynak US EPA, Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, RTP, NC Presented at the CMAS Special Symposium on Air.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
Direct PM 2.5 Emissions Data, Testing, and Monitoring Issues Ron Myers Measurement Policy Group SPPD, OAQPS.
LEARNING MATERIALS for AQUATIC MONITORING N. Scott Urquhart Department of Statistics Colorado State University.
IMPROVE Network Assessment Plans. IMPROVE Network Assessment Motivation: –EPA’s air quality monitoring budget is not growing, but their requirements are.
1 AQS Ambient Monitoring Topics AQS Conference August 20, 2008 David Lutz.
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
EFPIA EFPIA IT Proposals ppt Slide 1 EFPIA Proposals for IT Support to the European Regulatory Procedures Mr S. Hasler EFPIA PAT Regulation 2000.
EPA Update- Bob Judge Maine Air Quality Monitoring Committee April 18, ) NAAQS schedule 2) Budget 3) Technical Systems Audit.
NACAA FALL MEMBERSHIP MEETING - SEPTEMBER 21-23, Overview of NAAQS Monitoring Issues Lewis Weinstock NACAA Fall Meeting Boston, MA September 22,
Ozone Overview John Koswan July 11, OZONE SIP DEVELOPMENT: TASKS COMPLETED TO DATE.
Air Quality Health Risk Assessment – Methodological Issues and Needs Presented to SAMSI September 19, 2007 Research Triangle Park, NC Anne E. Smith, Ph.D.
1 Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application By: Richard J. Stec Jr., Ph.D. February 7, 2007.
Elfego Felix Air Quality Analysis Office EPA Region 9 1-Hour NO 2 Near Roadway Monitoring April 12, 2011.
1 WRAP Policy Fire Tracking Systems Draft December 9, 2002 FEJF Meeting December 10-11, 2002 Jackson, WY.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of the Rules and Applications Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
Melinda Ronca-Battista, ITEP, TAMS Center Tribal Air Monitoring and QA Requirements for NAAQS- Comparable Data.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
Timely Policy-Related Monitoring Issues 2013 NACAA Spring Meeting May 6-8, 2013 Richard A. “Chet” Wayland Air Quality Assessment Division U.S. EPA OAQPS.
Guidance on Establishing Monitoring to Comply with CAM and Other Title V Requirements A Summary of Technical and Policy Materials Barrett Parker, EPA,
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Proposed Revisions to Ambient Air Monitoring Regulations, and Proposed FY2007 Air Monitoring Guidance WESTAR Spring Business Meeting March 28, 2006.
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
Working together for clean air Tacoma Clean Air Performance Commitment May 2010.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
JOINING THE TEAMCFA CHARTER SCHOOL NETWORK. BRIEF OVERVIEW One Year Process 300 Point Scale Divided Evenly Between Three Committees (Academics, Business,
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of Rules and Permitting Issues Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
Ambient Air Monitoring Networks 2010 CMAS Conference Chapel Hill, NC October 13, 2010 Rich Scheffe, Sharon Phillips, Wyatt Appel, Lew Weinstock, Tim Hanley,
Development of 24-Hour 2006 PM 2.5 Designations Guidance NTAA National Tribal Air Quality Forum Barbara Driscoll EPA, OAQPS April 17, 2007.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For AMTAC April 12, 2011 Kate Hoag – US EPA, Region 9.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) February.
An Overview of EPA’s Quality Assurance Guidance for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data Data Analysis and Interpretation February 12 – 14, 2008, Tempe,
Current and Future Air Quality Issues Facing the States Bart Sponseller Air Management Bureau Director Joseph Hoch Regional Pollutants Section Chief NASA.
WESTAR National Air Monitoring Steering Committee Update Spring Business Meeting 2010 Denver, CO Bruce Louks, Idaho DEQ.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
ECOS Information Session Draft EPA Quality Documents February 13, 2013 Presented by EPA Quality Staff, Office of Environmental Information For meeting.
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
Network Plan - Not a new requirement [40 CFR 58.10(a)] Due every year Simple accounting of changes expected for that year Network Assessment – Once every.
Keeping Our Air Clean Local and Regional Strategies to Improve Air Quality in Chittenden County Presentation to: CCMPO – February 17, 2010.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For NESCAUM Monitoring Meeting April 29, 2011 Tim Hanley – US EPA, OAQPS 1.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
SO 2 NAAQS Modeling MassCAIR Stakeholder Meeting December 13, 2011.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
NAAQS Status in GA & PSD Inventory Update James W. Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch Manager, Planning & Support Program AWMA Regulatory Update.
Research Progress Discussions of Coordinated Emissions Research Suggestions to Guide this Initiative Focus on research emission inventories Do not interfere.
Annual Air Monitoring Data Certification and Concurrence Process 1.
Area Wide Optimization
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Division of Special Education and Student Services
Interim Air Quality Policy on Wildland and Prescribed Fires
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
A New Tool for Evaluating Candidate PM FEM and PM2.5 ARM Monitors
Sulfur Dioxide 1-Hour NAAQS Implementation
Region 4 Air Directors Spring Meeting May 20, 2015
Status of the PM NAAQS Review
Overview of The Bidder Response Form and Changes to the IT RFP Template March 8, 2019.
Colleen McKaughan, EPA Region 9 December 14, 2005
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment Lewis Weinstock Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards AAPCA December 15, 2014

Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment Regulatory Text “The State, or where applicable local, agency shall perform and submit to the EPA Regional Administrator an assessment of the air quality surveillance system every 5 years to determine, at a minimum, if the network meets the monitoring objectives defined in appendix D to this part, whether new sites are needed, whether existing sites are no longer needed and can be terminated, and where new technologies are appropriate for incorporation in the ambient air monitoring network. The network assessment must consider the ability of existing and proposed sites to support air quality characterization for areas with relatively high populations of susceptible individuals (e.g., children with asthma), and, for any sites that are being proposed for discontinuance, the effect on data users other than the agency itself, such as nearby States and Tribes or health effects studies. For PM2.5, the assessment also must identify needed changes to population-oriented sites. The State, or where applicable local, agency must submit a copy of this 5-year assessment, along with a revised annual network plan to the Regional Administrator. The first assessment is due July 1, 2010.”

Contrasting Annual Plans and Network Assessment Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment Contrasting Annual Plans and Network Assessment Element Annual Plan 5-Year Assessment Frequency Annually 5-years (2010, 2015, etc) EPA Approval & Public Inspection Requirement Yes (for changes) No (although language murky) Specified Content Requirements Extensive Minimal Applicability period Relatively short - 18 months (see 58.10(b)(5)) Long

A Few (Mis)impressions About the Assessment Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment A Few (Mis)impressions About the Assessment Belief EPA Position The content and format of the assessment is closely specified by EPA. There is a lot of freedom to design and implement an assessment according to agency needs. Work closely with your region to meet expectations. EPA is the primary client for the assessment. The assessment is a tool to encourage the agency and it’s stakeholders to plan for the future. We believe that YOU are the client for this product. The assessment needs to justify the operation of the current network. Networks are expected to evolve over time as objectives and requirements change. Assessments should present the case for network divestments and investments. Use of statistical analysis tools is essential. A successful assessment can be completed without complex statistics. What IS needed is a basic analysis of current air quality and trends, thoughtful evaluation of agency needs and priorities, understanding of EPA requirements, and a dose of creativity, insight, and imagination.

Useful Components & Random Observations Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment Useful Components & Random Observations Develop a scoring system for monitors Factors might include population, emissions, concentration relative to NAAQS, trends, correlation, and qualitative issues (e.g., use in health studies) CO DPHE: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/networkplans/COAssess2010.pdf Band together with your neighbors LADCO/Region 5: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/networkplans/R5Assess2010.pdf

Useful Components & Random Observations Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment Useful Components & Random Observations Include consideration of logistical and budgetary issues Shelter and equipment condition; manpower, capital, and related costs Clark County NV: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/networkplans/NVClarkAssess2010.pdf Have a good Executive Summary Address specific changes upfront (add, replace, remove) WA Dept of Ecology: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/networkplans/WAAssess2010.pdf

Useful Components & Random Observations Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment Useful Components & Random Observations The new O3 NAAQS will be………. Acknowledge what you know and what you don’t know Consider the needs and interests of your internal and external stakeholders Distribute the assessment as widely as possible to gather input

Status of OAQPS Resources Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment Status of OAQPS Resources Annual Plans and 5-year assessments http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/plans.html Guidance Documents http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/network-assessment.html Statistical Tools 2010 tools are not workable; OAQPS will create and post a limited number of static national files, for example, on site-site correlation LADCO and Region 5 are also working on web-based tools

Potential Assessment Products Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment Potential Assessment Products Year Site1 Site2 Dist parm Rval Pval 2013 370670022 370030004 88561.17 44201 0.834568 370030005 89072.04 0.700529 1.09E-14 370330001 71222.38 0.876661 370590003 37891.88 0.940897 370670028 10286.42 0.911802 370670030 13935.12 0.939089 370671008 9929.178 0.945158 370810013 37246.27 0.905283 371191009 94449.15 0.888655 371570099 39492.63 0.907653 371590021 63691.53 0.890498 371590022 75083.14 0.89599 92295.22 0.884994 92971.08 0.657332 1.47E-12 67794.16 0.906771 45629.62 0.940136 22618.64 0.955273 18039.38 0.940556 37968.46 0.913882 33925.82 0.949367 73883.24 0.872452 84409.23 0.868685 Inter-site correlation matrix for ozone and PM2.5 for sites within 100 km of each other

Potential Assessment Products Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment Potential Assessment Products

Potential Assessment Products Preparing A Useful 5-Year Network Assessment Potential Assessment Products