Tao Feng1, Evan Couzo2, Noelle E. Selin1,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The other Harvard 3-D model: CACTUS Chemistry, Aerosols, Climate: Tropospheric Unified Simulation Objective: to improve understanding of the interaction.
Advertisements

Global Change and Air Pollution (EPA-STAR GCAP) …and some more recent work on climate-AQ interactions Daniel J. Jacob with Eric.
TRACKING TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS from emissions to impacts NOELLE E. Carnegie Mellon University Center.
The Tyndall Centre comprises nine UK research institutions. It is funded by three Research Councils - NERC, EPSRC and ESRC – and receives additional support.
A stocks and flows approach An Integrated Assessment Framework for Considering Climate Change: 1. the principal domains Society and Economy Greenhouse.
Effect of global change on ozone air quality in the United States Shiliang Wu, Loretta Mickley, Daniel Jacob, Eric Leibensperger, David Rind.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Workshop USEPA/OAQPS.
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF AIR POLLUTION WITH GMI AND PLANS FOR THE NEW HEMISPHERIC TRANSPORT OF AIR POLLUTANTS (HTAP) MODEL INTERCOMPARISON STUDY ROKJIN.
Aerosol Microphysics: Plans for GEOS-CHEM
FROM AIR POLLUTION TO GLOBAL CHANGE AND BACK: Towards an integrated international policy for air pollution and climate change Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University.
Links between ozone and climate J. A. Pyle Centre for Atmospheric Science, Dept of Chemistry University of Cambridge Co-chair, SAP 7th ORM, Geneva, 19.
INTERACTIONS OF AIR POLLUTION AND CLIMATE CHANGE Daniel J. Jacob How do air pollutants contribute to climate change? How will climate change affect air.
Air Quality and Climate Change Co-authors: Amos Tai, Eric Leibensperger, and Xu Yue, Daniel Jacob, Jennifer Logan What U.S. city is this? Loretta Mickley.
Investigation of the U.S. warming hole and other adventures in chemistry-climate interactions Loretta J. Mickley Pattanun Achakulwisut, Becky Alexander,
Effect of NO x emission controls on the long-range transport of ozone air pollution and human mortality J. Jason West, Vaishali Naik, Larry W. Horowitz,
Integrated projections of U.S. air quality benefits from avoided climate change Fernando Garcia Menendez Rebecca K. Saari, Erwan Monier, Noelle E. Selin.
Impact of Climate Mitigation on Aerosol Concentrations and Health Effects in Asia Noelle Eckley Selin Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global.
. s Yuqiang Zhang 1, J. Jason West 1, Meridith M. Fry 1, Raquel A. Silva 1, Steven J. Smith 2, Vaishali Naik 4, Zachariah Adelman 1, Susan C. Anenberg.
Connecting Climate Change, Air Pollution, and Human Health J. Jason West Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering University of North Carolina,
The links to global problems Presentation at the 25 th anniversary special event of the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution “Past successes.
UNECE-CLRTAP and EMEP Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling 26th session, Brussels, May 2001 Integrating the environmental effects of Particulate.
E.A. Mathez, 2009, Climate Change: The Science of Global Warming and Our Energy Future, Columbia University Press. Source: Solomon et al., 2007 Chapter.
Variability in surface ozone background over the United States: Implications for air quality policy Arlene Fiore 1, Daniel J. Jacob, Hongyu Liu 2, Robert.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Connecting Air Pollution, Climate Change, and Health J. Jason West Dept. of Environmental Sciences and Engineering University of North Carolina.
Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health J. Jason West Department of Environmental Sciences &
Importance of chemistry-climate interactions in projections of future air quality Loretta J. Mickley Lu Shen, Daniel H. Cusworth, Xu Yue Earth system models.
Future Air Quality in Representative Concentration Pathway Scenarios: Relationships Between Economic Wellbeing and Air Quality J. Jason West Steven J.
WORKSHOP ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND AIR QUALITY : part I: Intercontinental transport and climatic effects of pollutants OBJECTIVE: Define a near-term (-2003)
The Double Dividend of Methane Control Arlene M. Fiore IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria January 28, 2003 ANIMALS 90 LANDFILLS 50 GAS 60 COAL 40 RICE 85 TERMITES.
Climate-Air Quality: Linkages and OAQPS Strategy National Tribal Forum April 2007.
1 “Experiences of economic valuation applied to air quality and pollultion management : Examples of experiences, political implications and application.
Co-benefits of Global Greenhouse Gas Mitigation for US Air Quality and Health J. Jason West Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering University.
TROPOSPHERIC OZONE AS A CLIMATE GAS AND AIR POLLUTANT: THE CASE FOR CONTROLLING METHANE Daniel J. Jacob with Loretta J. Mickley, Arlene M. Fiore, Yaping.
SLCP Benefits Toolkit:
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
Adverse Effects of Drought on Air Quality in the US
The Human Health Co-Benefits of Fossil Fuel Emissions Reductions for Climate Change Mitigation George D. Thurston, ScD. Professor NYU School of Medicine.
Linking regional air pollution with global chemistry and climate:
Urszula Parra Maza, Peter Suppan
Global Influences on Local Pollution
Reducing tropospheric ozone with methane controls:
Influence of climate change on U. S
Mingwei Li Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences
Impact of Solar and Sulfate Geoengineering on Surface Ozone
Rebecca Saari Assistant Professor Civil & Environmental Engineering
Climate change impacts on extreme events in the United States
Global Change and Air Pollution
The Double Dividend of Methane Control
The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) - a new scenario framework to provide key narratives for different climate futures Alexander Nauels, Zebedee Nicholls.
ICARTT: COORDINATED ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY CAMPAIGN OVER EASTERN NORTH AMERICA AND NORTH ATLANTIC IN SUMMER 2004 International, multi-agency collaboration.
Climate response to changing United States aerosol sources
WEST AFRICAN MONSOON EXPERIMENT (WAM)
For a given spatial and temporal scale, how large is the uncertainty?
Climate Change Mitigation: Research Needs
Global atmospheric changes and future impacts on regional air quality
Intercontinental Transport, Hemispheric Pollution,
Research connecting air quality, climate change, energy, policy and health J. Jason West Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering University.
Linking Ozone Pollution and Climate Change:
AIR POLLUTION AND GLOBAL CHANGE: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED POLICY
Questions for consideration
Schematic framework of anthropogenic climate change drivers, impacts and responses to climate change, and their linkages (IPCC, 2007).
Effects of global change on U.S. ozone air quality
Air Pollution Climate Change Interactions
Quantifying Uncertainty in Earth-System Response to Changing Human Activity Objective: Recalibrate estimates of Earth-system response for the revised MIT.
Climate Risk JRC 6° EIONET meeting Brussels 22 May 2012.
Air quality and health benefits of shale gas development in China
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
Fine particulate matter and ozone pollution in China: recent trends, future controls, and impact of climate change Daniel J. Jacob A typical day in Beijing.
Fig. 3 Simulated change of surface air pollution in China.
Presentation transcript:

Influence of Air Pollutant Emission Controls on the “Climate Penalty” in the United States Tao Feng1, Evan Couzo2, Noelle E. Selin1, Fernando Garcia-Menendez3, Erwan Monier1 1 MIT; 2 University of North Carolina at Asheville; 3 North Carolina State University 05/03/2017

“Climate penalty” “Climate penalty” is the increases in concentrations of air pollutants that pose human health risks, resulting from regional climate warming, in the absence of precursor emission changes Ozone (O3), and PM2.5 Meteorological variables: T, (U,V), precip “Climate penalty” – a function of both climate and emissions Research objective – quantify the influence of changes in emissions on the “climate penalty” Polluted world Clean world Source: mpfeblog, Wordpress

IGSM-CAM-GEOS-Chem modeling framework CTM: GEOS-Chem (v9-02) Integrated Global System Model: MIT IGSM (v1.0) General Circulation Model: CAM (3.0) 3 climate policy scenarios No climate policy: 2100 radiative forcing = 9.7 W/m2 Policy 4.5: 2100 radiative forcing = 4.5 W/m2 Policy 3.7: 2100 radiative forcing = 3.7 W/m2 4 climate sensitivity: 2.0°C, 3.0°C, 4.5°C or 6.0°C 5 different initial conditions one initial condition 30-year simulations around 2000, 2050, and 2100 1981→2010 2036→2065 2085→2115 Meteorological years Name of the scenarios Emissions Current climate: 1991-2010 Future climate: 2091-2110 REF 2006 emissions REF-50 50% of 2006 US non-GHG emissions REF+50 150% of 2006 US non-GHG emissions REF+100 200% of 2006 US non-GHG emissions Adapted from Mingwei Li et al., in prep

PM2.5 climate penalty is enhanced with emissions in Northeastern US REF-50 REF REF+50 REF+100

O3 climate penalty is enhanced with increases in emissions REF-50 REF REF+100 REF+50

Addition policy benefit obtained from emissions mitigation In addition to direct benefit of emissions mitigation, 1.46ppb. There is an indirect benefit of avoided climate penalty, 0.28ppb, 20% of the direct benefit Under current climate O3 concentration of REF: 48.00 ppb O3 concentration of REF-50: 46.54 ppb minus = 1.46 ppb 20% O3 climate penalty of REF: 4.68 ppb O3 climate penalty of REF-50: 4.40 ppb minus = 0.28 ppb

Takeaways PM2.5 climate penalty is enhanced with increases in emissions in Northeastern US due to enhanced sulfate formation O3 climate penalty is enhanced with increases in emissions Additional benefit of emissions mitigation policies from avoided climate penalty– 20% of direct benefit from decreases in pollutant (O3) concentration