E-cloud instability at CESR TA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Advertisements

Possibility of narrow-band THz CSR by means of transient H/L coupling NewSUBARU, LASTI, University of Hyogo Y. Shoji.
Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
Ion instability at SuperKEKB H. Fukuma (KEK) and L. F. Wang (SLAC) ECLOUD07, 12th Apr. 2007, Daegu, Korea 1. Introduction 2. Ion trapping 3. Fast ion instability.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
E-Cloud Effects in the Proposed CERN PS2 Synchrotron M. Venturini, M. Furman, and J-L Vay (LBNL) ECLOUD10 Workshshop, Oct Cornell University Work.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
Beam-beam studies for eRHIC Y. Hao, V.N.Litvinenko, C.Montag, E.Pozdeyev, V.Ptitsyn.
Sep 29 – Oct 3, 2009 LCWA 09 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas Sept 29 – Oct 4, 2009 Damping Ring R&D updates SLAC Mauro Pivi SLAC Allison Fero.
25-26 June, 2009 CesrTA Workshop CTA09 Electron Cloud Single-Bunch Instability Modeling using CMAD M. Pivi CesrTA CTA09 Workshop June 2009.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Recent electron cloud studies at CESR David Rice Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
Fast Ion Instability Studies in ILC Damping Ring Guoxing Xia DESY ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Electron cloud simulations for SuperKEKB Y.Susaki,KEK-ACCL 9 Feb, 2010 KEK seminar.
March 23, 2010 CMAD a tracking and e-cloud beam instability parallel code (M.Pivi SLAC) Taking MAD(X) optics file at input, thus tracking the beam in a.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
FCC electron cloud study plan K. Ohmi (KEK) Mar FCC electron cloud study meeting CERN.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Preliminary results on simulation of fast-ion instability at 3 km LBNL damping ring 21 April 2005 Pohang Accelerator Laboratory Eun-San Kim.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
Motivation and Overview David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
Highlights from the ILCDR08 Workshop (Cornell, 8-11 July 2008) report by S. Calatroni and G. Rumolo, in CLIC Meeting Goals of the workshop:
Electron cloud beam dynamics G. Dugan, Cornell University CesrTA Advisory Committee 9/11/12.
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
1 Update on Ion Studies Guoxing Xia, Eckhard Elsen ILC2007 Workshop, May 30~Jun 2, 2007 DESY, Hamburg.
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
3 February 2010 ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort Mauro Pivi SLAC on behalf of ILC DR working group on e- cloud ILC DR Webex Meeting Jan 3, 2010.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Envelope tracking as a tool for low emittance ring design
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
Electron Cloud Effects in SuperB
Electron Cloud R&D at Cornell ILCDR08--7/8/08
Electron cloud and ion effects in SuperKEKB
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Status of Fast Ion Instability Studies
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Large Booster and Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Intra-Beam Scattering modeling for SuperB and CLIC
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Recent Electron Cloud Studies at CESR and Future Plans
Update of Damping Ring parameters
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Status of CEPC lattice design
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
Collective effects in CEPC
ILC DR workshop at Cornell
A Head-Tail Simulation Code for Electron Cloud
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
M. Pivi PAC09 Vancouver, Canada 4-8 May 2009
Electron cloud studies at CESR
ILC DR Working Group on Collective Effect: Electron Cloud
Study of Fast Ions in CESR
ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
ILC DR instability simulations
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Preliminary Analysis of April 24, 2006 CESR Bunch Measurements
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
Damping Ring parameters with reduced bunch charge
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

E-cloud instability at CESR TA Hyunchang Jin, Moohyun Yoon, POSTECH Eun-San Kim, KNU, Kazuhito Ohmi, KEK Presented at the ILC Damping Rings Mini-workshop, KEK, December 2007

Outline CESR TA parameters for simulation by PEHTS Linear Theory Simulation results Uniform b model CESR TA Damping ring lattice model Summary 2 2

Parameters for simulation Positron energy (GeV) 2 Average bunch population 2.0×1010 Horizontal / Vertical b functions (m) 10 / 10 Rms bunch length (mm) 6.8 Horizontal / Vertical emittances (nm) 2.25/ 0.002 Rms energy spread (se/E) 8.6×10-4 Synchrotron tune 0.098 Ring circumference (m) 768.44 Number of interaction points (Ip) 10/20 Horizontal / Vertical tunes 14.59 / 9.63 Horizontal / Vertical chromaticities 0.0 / 0.0 3 3

Linear Theory The oscillation frequency of electrons under a bunch population ( = 2.0×1010 ) is given by The number of oscillations ( ) is approximately 10. The threshold of electron cloud density for a given bunch population is given by where K=Q=10 4

Rms vertical beam sizes for Uniform b model Vertical beam size grows when the beta functions are uniform. The burst-like behavior of beam size growth is seen above Ne= 2.0×1012 m-3 . Therefore the threshold of e-cloud density is roughly 2.0×1012 m-3 for both cases. The vertical beam size under the threshold becomes smaller as the number of interaction points increases. Therefore it can be an artificial incoherent beam size growth. 5 5

Bunch and e-cloud profiles ( Ip=10) The coherent motions of bunch and e-cloud are seen above the threshold around the burst-like behavior of vertical beam size growth.

Bunch and e-cloud profiles ( Ip=20)

Rms vertical beam sizes for CESR TA Lattice Vertical beam size grows when CESR TA lattice (provided by Mark Palmer) is used assuming that e-cloud exists only in bending magnets. The threshold of e-cloud density is roughly 1.0×1012 m-3 ~ 1.5×1012 m-3. At Ne=1.0×1012 m-3, the growth rate of vertical beam size is about 1.9×10-3. This value is greater than the damping rate (~5.5×10-5) of CESR TA lattice. Therefore the vertical beam size growth below the threshold is serious. 8

Bunch and e-cloud profiles at 500 turn 9 9

Bunch and e-cloud profiles at 500 turn From Ne=1.5×1012 m-3, coherent motions are seen in these snapshots. 10 10

The turn-by-turn motions of vertical bunch and e-cloud centroids Ne= 1.0×1012 m-3 Ne= 1.5×1012 m-3 In the case of Ne= 1.5×1012 m-3, the coherent motions of positron bunch and e-cloud are seen clearly. Therefore the threshold of e-cloud density is about 1.5×1012 m-3.

Summary Threshold of e-cloud density predicted based on the linear theory is about 2.8×1012 m-3. The threshold of e-cloud density is about 2.0×1012 m-3 when uniform b functions are used. The coherent motions of bunch and e-cloud are seen above the threshold. In the simulation with CESR TA lattice, the threshold is about 1.5×1012 m-3. The threshold becomes smaller than the uniform b model. Dispersion can affect (lower) the threshold value. Coherent motions of bunch and e-cloud are seen above the threshold. And the incoherent effect under the threshold may be serious. 12 12