Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.
Advertisements

Slide 1 EPA Stormwater & Water Regulations: Local Impacts & Balancing Power 2011 Congressional City Conference.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Kansas City Missouri Health Department Kansas City Cross Jurisdictional Partnership Rex Archer M.D., M.P.H. Director of Health Feb. 23, 2005.
The Lancaster County Municipal Stormwater Financing Feasibility Study Sharing lessons learned Monica Billig Environmental Finance Center University of.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework Briefing CBP Partnership’s Communications Workgroup July 10, 2014.
Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
Moving towards a restored Chesapeake Bay watershed
Caroline County Pilot Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Katheleen Freeman, AICP, Director Caroline County Department of Planning & Codes Leslie Grunden,
STRATEGIES FOR EXPANDING AT-RISK AFTERSCHOOL MEALS SPONSORSHIP KARA PANOWITZ, No Kid Hungry Maryland/ Share Our Strength MELISSA MOORE, Family League of.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
Let’s Move! Sub-initiatives Launched June 2010 and enhanced in July Lead Partners Lead Federal Agency: U.S.
Let’s Move! Sub-initiatives Launched June 2010 and enhanced in July Lead Partners Lead Federal Agency: U.S.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Presented by: Brenton McCloskey, MD DNR Associate Director for Restoration Financing and Policy Watershed Restoration in Maryland Helping Advance Restoration.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
MODULE 15 – ORGANISATIONAL COMMUNICATION
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Chesapeake bay program
Streamlining Integrated Infrastructure Implementation: Workshop Report
Jim Edward, Deputy Director – EPA/CBPO
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Session I: Scoping Project and Explore Possibilities
SHRP 2 Organizing for Reliability: Regional Perspective
Comprehensive Conservation & Management Plan (CCMP)
Land Use Challenges In Maryland Today
Draft Strategy To Optimize Resource Management of Storm Water
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
State Profile Maryland
Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans
MACo Winter Conference
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Funding from the Local Perspective
Local Planning Process…
Robin Purdy, Statewide Regional Coordinator
Watershed Implementation Plan
State Profile Delaware
Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017
Funding from the Local Perspective
Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
Commonwealth of Virginia
State Profile New York.
FISH HABITAT OUTCOME Gina Hunt MD. Department of Natural Resources
Funding at Record Levels
Communicating Credit Where Credit is Due
Funding from the Local Perspective
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
MDE’s Phase III WIP Inventory 2018 Fall Regional WIP Meetings
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Approach to Setting Local Planning Goals
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Palais des Nations, Geneva, Switzerland
UNFCCC Needs-based Finance (NBF) Project
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
Presentation transcript:

Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy Maryland Phase III WIP Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy Presented by: Kathy Stecker, MD Dept. of the Environment October 5, 2017

Jurisdiction-Specific Considerations What does MDE need? Please tell us: Your barriers and obstacles Capacity, regulatory, etc. Your funding challenges Your ideas on streamlined permitting What makes sense to you? Your successes! MD Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy

Jurisdiction-Specific Considerations What do local partners need to do? Help develop Maryland’s Phase III WIP Report local actions through 2025 and beyond Work collaboratively to Ensure multiple benefits Provide local improvements in water quality Trading New regulations by January 2018 MD Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy

Engagement and Communication Goals Identify pollution reduction already being done What can be accomplished by 2025? Identify any gaps Strategies to fill any gaps Funding needs for implementation Pace of implementation beyond 2025 MD Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy

Target Audiences Local leaders Practitioners Elected officials Agricultural community Practitioners County, municipal, SCD staff Technical (state/federal agencies, universities) NGOs MD Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy

Engaging Practitioners by Sector Agriculture: MDA coordination Phase I MS4s: through permit development MACo coordination, regular meetings Phase II MS4s: through permit development One-on-one, small groups -- target newly-designated Unreg. stormwater: one-on-one, WAC WWTPs: permit development, funding opps Septic: water and sewer plan review MD Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy

Key Messages 2025 targets are within reach Fiscally responsible path to final targets Local WQ important to local economy WIP should reflect local priorities, constraints Conowingo Establish strategies that extend beyond 2025 MD Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy

Key Messengers/Trusted Sources MDE staff MD Department of Agriculture MD Bay Cabinet MD Bay Workgroup MD Association of Counties MD Municipal League NGOs MD Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy

Roles, Resources, and Capacity What do local governments need from the state? To help develop Phase III WIP To implement Phase III WIP MD Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy

Questions? Kathy Stecker, MD Dept. of the Environment kathy.stecker@maryland.gov 410-537-3864 Questions? MD Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy