Using Data To Guide Continuous Improvement: Data Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.
Advertisements

Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
State Systemic Improvement Plan: Preparing, Planning, and Staying Informed Presentation to Louisiana ICC July 10, 2013.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Ideas from the Outcomes Think Tank. Gather family’s concerns and general information about child following program procedures Use 3 global outcomes as.
Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education Overview of Results Driven Accountability Assuring Compliance and Improving Results August.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
Linking Early Intervention Quality Practices With Child and Family Outcomes Technical Assistance for Local Early Intervention Systems Infant & Toddler.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
Considerations for Establishing Baseline and Setting Targets for Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, Lynne Kahn, Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC June 16,
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
State Performance Plan: A Two-Way Street Ruth Ryder Larry Wexler Division of Monitoring and State Improvement Planning.
Linking Early Intervention Quality Practices With Child and Family Outcomes Technical Assistance for a Local Early Intervention System Infant & Toddler.
Accountability for Results State Performance Plan improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities…
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)
SHAME FEAR I AM NOT SEEN ACCESS I AM SEEN SYSTEMS CHANGE I AM A SPECIAL CITIZEN ACCOUNTABILITY and BUILD CAPACITY I BELONG AND MEANINGFUL LIFE EFFECTIVENESS.
STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
Results Driven Accountability PRT System Support Grant Targeted Improvement Plan Cole Johnson, NDE.
No GSEG? Low Budget Data Initiative with High Dollar Impact Lisa Backer 619 Co-Coordinator/ECSE Specialist MN Department of Education
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement TASN – KITS Fall 2012 Webinar August 31 st, 2012 Tiffany Smith Phoebe.
2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Using Data for Program Improvement State and Local Activities in Minnesota Lisa Backer: 619 Coordinator/Part C Data Manager Loraine Jensen: Part C Coordinator.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.
Parent and National TA Perspectives on EC Outcomes Connie Hawkins, Region 2 PTAC Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn ECO at FPG and NECTAC.
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Title I University March 11, 2015 Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
1 Governance strategy for the Washington City Group Comments on draft proposal by Howard Meltzer (UK) February Brussels.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
O S E P Office of Special Education Programs United States Department of Education Aligning the State Performance Plan, Improvement Strategies, and Professional.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014 Digging into “Data Use” Using the DaSy Framework.
Understanding the Data on Preschool Child Find and Transition Annual Performance Report Indicator 12 February, 2016
Incorporating Early Childhood into Longitudinal Data Systems:
Office of Special Education
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Guam Department of Education
2016 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Sherry Franklin, North Carolina Part C Coordinator
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Supporting States in Building a Child Outcomes Measurement System
Monitoring Child Outcomes: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Sherry Franklin, North Carolina Part C Coordinator
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
Why Collect Outcome Data?
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
2018 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Early Childhood and Family Outcomes
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Kathy Hebbeler, Lynne Kahn, Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Using State and Local Data to Improve Results
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Presentation transcript:

Using Data To Guide Continuous Improvement: Data Analysis OSEP National Early Childhood Conference February 7, 2005 Accountability and System Improvement Work Group

Purpose of the Workshop To provide states and lead agencies with an experience in systematically analyzing data from multiple sources, in order to make informed decisions in identifying strategies for improving outcomes for infants, toddlers, preschoolers and their families and compliance.

Outcomes for Participants Gain a deeper understanding of the role of data analysis in continuous improvement planning Learn how to turn data into meaningful information that can be used to improve services and results for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers with disabilities and their families

OSEP’s Accountability Strategy High Risk Low Performance Continuous Improvement Verification Focused Intervention

OSEP’s Accountability Strategy System Verification Continuous Improvement High Risk Focused Monitoring Inquiry Level I: Information Review Level II: SEA/LA State Visit Level III: SEA/LA and Local Level State Visit Intervention Technical Assistance Revision to Annual Performance Report Required Targeted Corrective Action Plan Sanctions

Merging Reporting Requirements Monitoring Priorities and Timelines (Clusters, Probes) Targets Improvement Activities Timelines, Resources State Performance Plan APR Performance on Targets Explanation of Progress and Slippage Revisions to Activities, Timelines, Resources and Targets Annual Performance Report Context for Ruth: Do we need to go back that far? People have seen this before and it may be a little dated.

Elements of a Continuous Improvement Process State Performance Planning Self-Assessing Improvement Planning Data Analysis Target Setting Future Activities/Strategies Improvement Plan Implementation Reporting-Annual Performance Report Emphasize the cyclical nature of this process and the nonlinear nature of it. Continual sharpening of the PG & Indicators. Keep; needs revisions?

Data Analysis:

Data Analysis Compare present levels of system performance to baseline and targets to formulate educated “guesses” (hypotheses), to identify strengths and weaknesses, and to determine areas for improvement through a systematic examination of performance data.

Why is systematic data analysis important? Check Assumptions Target Limited Resources Set High Expectations Heighten Accountability Focus on Continuous Improvement Examine Results

Data analysis & use - considerations Get ready – what do you know already? Identify areas for comparison. Examine trends and relationships. Identify and define (possible) problem areas. Review and evaluate data to determine hypotheses. Develop potential improvement strategies. Evaluate – how did the interventions work? What are alternate hypotheses?

EXERCISE Part 1 – Indicators & Measures Part 2 – Baseline/Trend Data Part 3 – Analysis Part 4 – Future Targets

Wrap-up

Why is this important? Focus improvement efforts Target scarce resources Improve results for children with disabilities

Thanks to the Accountability and System Improvement Work Group Especially—Marsha Brauen, Lynne Kahn, Jane Nell Luster, Kristen Reedy, Jim Henson, and Dick Zeller and OSEP Staff—Larry Ringer, Rex Shipp, Rhonda Spence, and Maral Taylor