Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Fu, G. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z. Huang, B. Yu, F. Meng 
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 13, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Posttranslational regulation of self-renewal capacity: insights from proteome and phosphoproteome analyses of stem cell leukemia by Matthias Trost, Martin.
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
P53 Mediates Vast Gene Expression Changes That Contribute to Poor Chemotherapeutic Response in a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer  Crystal Tonnessen-Murray,
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
Revealing Global Regulatory Perturbations across Human Cancers
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Transcriptomic analysis of patients with tetralogy of Fallot reveals the effect of chronic hypoxia on myocardial gene expression  Mohamed T. Ghorbel,
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (March 2015)
Dynamic Gene Regulatory Networks of Human Myeloid Differentiation
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (October 2017)
Andrew D. Bosson, Jesse R. Zamudio, Phillip A. Sharp  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Transcriptional Profiling of Quiescent Muscle Stem Cells In Vivo
Determinants and Regulation of Protein Turnover in Yeast
TNFα Signaling Exposes Latent Estrogen Receptor Binding Sites to Alter the Breast Cancer Cell Transcriptome  Hector L. Franco, Anusha Nagari, W. Lee Kraus 
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 19, Issue 13, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Revealing Global Regulatory Perturbations across Human Cancers
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 127, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
SUMO-2 Orchestrates Chromatin Modifiers in Response to DNA Damage
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages e4 (August 2018)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Evgenij Fiskin, Tihana Bionda, Ivan Dikic, Christian Behrends 
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 13, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Invasion of Macrophages: Linking Bacterial Gene Expression to Environmental Cues  Kyle H. Rohde, Robert B. Abramovitch, David.
SUMO-2 Orchestrates Chromatin Modifiers in Response to DNA Damage
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (July 2018)
Volume 11, Pages (January 2019)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Yuichiro Mishima, Yukihide Tomari  Molecular Cell 
Nef Triggers a Transcriptional Program in T Cells Imitating Single-Signal T Cell Activation and Inducing HIV Virulence Mediators  Alison Simmons, Varuna.
Yuanli Zhen, Yajie Zhang, Yonghao Yu  Cell Reports 
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Maria S. Robles, Sean J. Humphrey, Matthias Mann  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Multiplex Enhancer Interference Reveals Collaborative Control of Gene Regulation by Estrogen Receptor α-Bound Enhancers  Julia B. Carleton, Kristofer.
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
Volume 92, Issue 2, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 127, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 159-171 (March 2016) Deep Proteomics of Breast Cancer Cells Reveals that Metformin Rewires Signaling Networks Away from a Pro-growth State  Francesca Sacco, Alessandra Silvestri, Daniela Posca, Stefano Pirrò, Pier Federico Gherardini, Luisa Castagnoli, Matthias Mann, Gianni Cesareni  Cell Systems  Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 159-171 (March 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.02.005 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Systems 2016 2, 159-171DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2016.02.005) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Metformin Remodels the Breast Cancer Cell Proteome and Transcriptome (A) Schematic representation of the experimental strategy to analyze the changes in transcriptome, proteome, and phosphoproteome profiles of MCF7 breast cancer cells after 24 hr of metformin treatment (10 mM). The coverage and overlap of the genes and gene products identified by the RNAseq and proteomic approaches are illustrated in the Venn diagram. Percentage and number of phosphorylation sites with protein expression levels quantified or not are shown in the pie chart. (B) The correlation between the quantified proteome and transcriptome changes of each gene product after metformin treatment is shown as a density scatterplot. (C) Protein expression and phosphorylation levels were compared and represented in the scatterplot. Proteins and phosphorylation sites were considered “regulated” by metformin according to the t test (FDR < 0.05). Comparison between biological replicates of MS-based phospho-proteomic experiments of metformin treated (Metf1-3) and untreated (NT1-3) cells. Each dot represents one protein. (D) Metformin inhibits the mTOR pathway and hyperactivates AMPK. The metformin-induced change at the phosphorylation, protein, and transcript levels of mTOR direct and indirect substrates and AMPK direct substrates are shown as bar graph in a Log2 scale. Median and SD are shown. Cell Systems 2016 2, 159-171DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2016.02.005) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Metformin Modulates Key Biological Processes (A) Two-dimensional annotation enrichment analysis. Pathways modulated by metformin treatment at the proteome level in comparison with the transcriptome are plotted (Benjamin Hochberg FDR < 0.05). Each dot represents a specific KEGG pathway or GO-Biological Process (GO-BP) term. Groups of related pathways or GO-BP are labeled with the same color, as described in the inset. Position scores of the pathways at the transcriptome and proteome level are indicated in the x and y axes, respectively (Cox and Mann, 2012). Negative values indicate downregulation, whereas positive values upregulation. (B) Schematic representation of the glycolysis pathway; for each enzyme, the corresponding metformin-induced change in mRNA and protein concentration is shown. (C) The metformin-mediated changes in mRNA and protein concentration of enzymes controlling the oxidative phosphorylation are shown as a scatterplot. The protein complexes of the oxidative phosphorylation pathway are differentially color-coded. (D) Kinase substrates motifs significantly (Benjamin Hochberg FDR < 0.02) overrepresented in hyper- and hypophosphorylated proteins after metformin treatment are represented in a bar graph. Position scores of the kinase substrates motif at the phosphoproteome level are indicated in the x axis, whereas the corresponding p values are shown in the y axis. (E) GO-BP and Kegg pathways significantly (Benjamin Hochberg FDR < 0.05) overrepresented in inactivated and hyperactivated proteins after metformin treatment are represented as a bar graph. In the x axis, the enrichment factor of each category is plotted. Cell Systems 2016 2, 159-171DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2016.02.005) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Metformin Decreases the SP1 Protein Concentration through the Hyperphosphorylation of Serine 59 (A) Schematic representation of the molecular mechanisms leading to the metformin-induced decrease of SP1 protein concentration. The metformin-induced changes in phosphorylation, mRNA, and protein levels in the three biological replicates are represented as squares differentially color-coded (blue, downregulation; green, upregulation). (B) The metformin-induced modulation at mRNA and protein level of SP1-controlled genes is represented as a bar graph. (C) GO-BPs significantly (Benjamin Hochberg FDR < 0.02) enriched in downregulated SP1-controlled genes after metformin treatment are represented in a bar graph. In the x axis, the enrichment factor of each GO-BPs is plotted, whereas in the y axis the corresponding p values are shown. Cell Systems 2016 2, 159-171DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2016.02.005) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Mapping the Metformin-Induced Changes of the Proteome and Phosphoproteome Profiles to Prior Literature Signaling Networks (A) Global naive network of signaling information downloaded from the SIGNOR database. (B) MCF7 breast-cancer-cell-specific signaling network where only relationships between proteins that were identified in our proteomic analysis are maintained. (C) MCF7 breast-cancer-cell-specific signaling network where changes at the proteome and phosphoproteome level induced by metformin treatment are overlaid onto the cell-specific signaling network. (D) Metformin perturbation network filtered according to the rules described in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures. Cell Systems 2016 2, 159-171DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2016.02.005) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Metformin Rewires the Signaling Networks of MCF7 Breast Cancer Cells (A) The effect of metformin on the phosphoproteome and proteome profiles of MCF7 cancer cells was mapped on a literature curated signaling network, as described in Figure 3. Node size is proportional to the protein expression change after metformin treatment. Green and blue nodes are respectively inactivated or activated following metformin treatment. Phosphorylation and de-phosphorylation reactions on specific residues are represented as edges between nodes. Phosphosites are colored according to their phosphorylation state after metformin treatment, as indicated in the legend. (B) The metformin-induced changes at the proteome and transcriptome level of enzymes regulating the MAPK pathways are shown as a bar graph. (C) Western blot analysis of MCF7 cells treated with 10 mM metformin. (D) Western blot analysis of MCF7 cells co-treated with 10 mM metformin for the indicated times and with different concentration of TBB for 2.5 hr. Cell Systems 2016 2, 159-171DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2016.02.005) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Metformin Rewires the mTOR Pathway and Modulates the Cell Response to Incubation with IGF (A and B) Heat map of the phosphorylation levels of the significantly metformin-modulated mTOR (A) and AKT substrates (B). (C) The experimental strategy applied to see how metformin-treated cells respond to IGF stimulation. (D) Columns represent the signal intensity of the assayed signaling proteins (by Luminex technology, see Experimental Procedures), whereas rows represent different experimental conditions. Data were normalized to the relative basal activity in untreated cells; intensity values are color-coded in blue (maximum) and red (minimum), respectively. (E) Western blot of MCF7 cells treated as explained above. (F) Schematic representation of the relationships between the assayed signaling proteins. Nodes are color-coded (activated in blue and not affected in gray) and divided into two parts representing the fold activation level (reported next to the proteins and color coded by different shades of blue) after 15 min of IGF incubation in untreated (left) and metformin-treated (right) cells. Cell Systems 2016 2, 159-171DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2016.02.005) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Metformin Inhibits the p70S6K-rpS6 Axis by Increasing the PP2A Holoenzyme Assembly (A) Western blot of MCF7 and HTB-126 cells treated with 10 mM metformin for 24 hr or left untreated. (B and C) Volcano plot of MS-quantified PPP2R5C interactors in MCF7 (B) and HTB-126 cells (C). (D) MS-based quantification of pS497 of PPP2R5C in MCF7 and HTB-126 cells. (E) Sequence alignment of the pS497 peptides of PPP2R5C and PPP2R5D. (F) Model proposed for the metformin-mediated inhibition of the p70S6K-rpS6 axis. Cell Systems 2016 2, 159-171DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2016.02.005) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions