Marta José, Instituto Grifols S.A., Barcelona, SPAIN

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standardization of PCR for Trypanosoma cruzi detection
Advertisements

1 HIV Drug Resistance Training Module 7: HIV Genotyping Assay Validation.
Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn
High Throughput Donor Plasma NAT Screening Assay Applied to Acute HIV Detection in a Public Health Setting December 5, 2007 Josh Goldsmith, Ph.D. National.
Calibration Techniques
Replacement of the 1 st Parvovirus B19 DNA International Standard SoGAT XXI, Brussels, 28th-29th May 2009 Sally Baylis.
NIBSC Multiplex Proficiency Panel - A multicentre study
National Institute for Biological Standards and Control Assuring the quality of biological medicines Proposal for a Hepatitis A genotype panel Rob Anderson.
Validation of screening methods (2002/657/EC)
Analytical Method Development and Validation
XX. SoGAT Meeting Warsaw 12./13. June 2007 IU vs. NAT-Detectable Units Albrecht Gröner CSL Behring Virology Marburg, Germany.
REAL TIME PCR ………A step forward in medicine
Yi-Chen Yang, Drug Biology Division Bureau of Food and Drug Analysis Department of Health, Taiwan Collaborative study for establishment of the first national.
Paris, May 2004SoGAT XVII SoGAT and the Development of Standards Harvey Holmes Division of Retrovirology NIBSC, UK.
Karen Cristiano Biologicals Unit, CRIVIB Calibration against the WHO Standards of National Reference Preparations for detection of blood viruses by NAT:
Linearity Panels HIV RNA, HCV RNA, HBV DNA, and CMV DNA
XVIII SoGAT Washington 24 May 2005 SoGAT and HIV NAT Standards - 2 nd International Standard for HIV-1 RNA Harvey Holmes*, Clare Davis* and Alan Heath**
World Health Organization
Summary 1 l The Analytical Problem l Data Handling.
Validation: concept, & considerations
Validation of Analytical Method
HIV, HCV, and HBV NAT Controls Formulation, Stability and Performance Mark Manak BBI Diagnostics, Inc. A Division of SeraCare Life Sciences, Inc. SoGAT.
FDA’s Current Considerations of Parvovirus B19 Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) Mei-ying W. Yu, PhD Division of Hematology CBER/FDA Extraordinary SoGAT Meeting.
Lara Isobel Compston, Daniel Candotti, Jean-Pierre Allain
The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: Drug substance or a finished (drug) product 80 to 120 % of the test concentration Content.
Update on the Replacement of the HCV RNA International Standard Sally Baylis & Alan Heath, NIBSC SoGAT XX, Warsaw June 2007.
Quantification of RNA by real-time PCR
SOGAT Validation of HCV-RNA detection in small test pools on cadaveric samples Marco Koppelman #, Theo Cuypers #, Mirjam de Waal #, Maarten.
Bacterial Screening of Platelet Concentrates by Real-Time PCR Theo Cuypers 1 also on behalf of, H.W. Reesink 1,3 I.G.H. Rood 1,2 T. Mohammadi¹, ²P.H.M.
Establishment of the 1st WHO International Standard for Detection of Antibodies to Hepatitis B Virus Core Antigen (anti-HBc) SoGAT XXI 29 May 2009 Dr.
Persistent human erythrovirus infection in blood donors National Blood Service, UK Div. Transfusion Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK Public Health.
Parvovirus B19 Genotype 2 Plasma, Sourced from the US Dr Sally A. Baylis, Division of Virology NIBSC.
Stability of HCV, HIV-1 and HBV nucleic acids in plasma samples stored at different temperatures Marta José, Rodrigo Gajardo and Juan I. Jorquera Instituto.
Yi-Chen Yang, Yu-Hsuan Chen, Show-Lan Chiu, Hwei-Fang Cheng Drug Biology Division, Bureau of Food and Drug Analysis Department of Health, Taiwan, ROC National.
NAT Detection of Blood Borne Viral Markers in Tissues from Cadaver Donors John Saldanha 1 and David Padley 2 1 Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Canada.
All Rights Reserved AEIC Response Concentration 5% CV 20% CV Error bars for concentrations determined by the.
HCV PCR By Henrietta Orji July 31 st, 2010 Hepatitis C Virus by Polymerase Chain Reaction.
SoGAT June 14, 2006 HCV-RNA and HIV-RNA detection in small test pools of cadaveric samples for viral safety of tissue transplants Maarten Koot#,
SoGAT, Berne 2006BTS SRC Berne Ltd. Evaluation of the Procleix TIGRIS System at the Blood Transfusion Service Berne Ltd. Dr. Martin Stolz.
History of ILC Involvement in NAT Standardization 1998: Inter-Organization Discussion for the Establishment of Standard Reference Material for Nucleic.
W W W. Q I A G E N. C O M Dirk Heckel, PhD Diagnostic Sample Preparation and Stabilization QIAGEN GmbH.
Update on the P. falciparum Standard & Replacement of the HBV & HCV International Standards Sally Baylis, NIBSC SoGAT XIX.
Performance of Chiron Quantitative and Qualitative HBV PCR Assay and Confirmation of HBV Yield Cases Yiu-Lian Fong, Ph.D, Associate Director June 13, 2007.
NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNOLOGY HCV-RNA / HBV-DNA / HIV-RNA testing blood and blood components for transfusion Italian External Quality Assessment.
SoGAT 2005 Donor screening for parvovirus B19 antibodies: Reducing or eliminating the risk of transmission SoGAT 2005 Gordon Elliott Biotrin 93 The Rise.
Elisa Moretti Process and Analytical Development KEDRION S.p.A SoGAT XVI Paul Ehrlich Institut - Langen, Germany 3 rd July 2003 Automated Extraction for.
Preparation of HBV DNA reference standards and the experience of HBV NAT in Taiwan Dr. Hwei-Fang Cheng Department of Health, Taiwan.
Ro / BSD Hessen Institut für Transfusionsmedizin SoGAT XVII, Paris, Paris 2004 B19 Overview of Testing for Blood Banks W. Kurt Roth Red Cross Blood Transfusion.
An Overall View of Standardization May 26, 2004 Indira Hewlett, Ph.D. CBER/FDA.
February 24, 2016 | 1 Paul Strengers MD, FFPM Sanquin Blood Supply Amsterdam The Netherlands Risk assessment schemes: Impact of.
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
SoGAT May 2005 Are conversion factors to international units assay related? Marco Koppelman, Henk Reesink, Nico Lelie, Theo Cuypers.
 Routine viral diagnostics: indirect and direct detection of viruses. ◦ Indirect detection: serological tests; ◦ Direct detection:  Viral antigens;
SOGAT Presence (absence) of genotype 2 and 3 Erythrovirus DNA in manufacturing plasma Theo Cuypers, Marco Koppelman, Margret Sjerps, Henk Reesink.
EQUIPMENT and METHOD VALIDATION
Saeko Mizusawa, Yoshiaki Okada
GRIFOLS PLASMA: genotype 2 vB19 sample
Testing for Parvovirus B19 - Broadening the Assay to Cover Variants
Harvey Holmes, Clare Morris and Neil Berry Division of Retrovirology
Results of Recent EQA Panels for Blood Borne Viruses
Analytical Method Validation
Evaluation data on the new Roche cobas s 201 system with the cobas TaqScreen MPX test Lutz Pichl, Volkmar Schottstedt German Red Cross Blood Transfusion.
Evaluation of Candidate Standard XX (97/650)
K.H. Buchheit, A. Daas, C.M. Nübling, J.M. Spieser 3 July 2003
Feasibility of Synthetic Materials as Primary Standards
Italian EQA study for HCV RNA, HIV RNA and HBV DNA G. M. Bisso, K
1st International Standard for HIV-1 RNA NIBSC Code 97/656
Distributions of parvovirus B19 genotype 1-3 in blood donations
Comparison of a commercial and ‘in house’ assay for B19 DNA
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION
Presentation transcript:

Marta José, Instituto Grifols S.A., Barcelona, SPAIN EXPERIENCE WITH IN-HOUSE ASSAY: VALIDATION OF AN IN-HOUSE NAT ASSAY FOR THE DETECTION OF DIFFERENT GENOTYPES OF vB19 Marta José, Instituto Grifols S.A., Barcelona, SPAIN SoGAT Standardisation of Parvovirus B19 Genotypes, March 2007

IN-HOUSE vB19 METHOD DESIGN Automatic DNA extraction using the BioRobot 9604 (QIAGEN). Subsequent amplification by PCR of a conserved sequence of VP1 capsid structural protein region. Detection by means of a specific capture probe in a liquid medium and colorimetric reaction (ELISA-DIG Detection, Roche). The internal control (from the extraction) is a plasmid which is amplified with the same primers as vB19 without competition, and detected with a different probe. SoGAT Standardisation of Parvovirus B19 Genotypes, March 2007

IN-HOUSE vB19 METHOD DESIGN and VALIDATION The method is designed to work in the exponential phase of the PCR reaction in order to use the same procedure as qualitative or quantitative assays. The method is validated according to current guidelines for the following parameters: detection limit, quantitation limit, linearity, range, accuracy, precision, specificity and robustness. SoGAT Standardisation of Parvovirus B19 Genotypes, March 2007

IN-HOUSE vB19 METHOD VALIDATION: DETECTION LIMIT This detection limit is applicable when the method is used to give qualitative results. The detection limit at 95 % and 50 % was established by Probit test using the WHO IS for vB19 DNA NAT assays code 99/800. WHO IS 99/800 Dilution 1/101.75 1/102 1/102.25 1/102.5 1/102.75 Titre IU/ml 17783 10000 5623 3162 1778 Positives vs replicates Total 24/24 23/24 20/24 15/24 9/24 % 100 95.8 83.3 62.5 37.5 95 % Detection limit 9.2 x 103 IU/ml (CI 95 %: 6.6 X 103 – 1.8 X 104 IU/ml) 50 % Detection limit 2.4 x 103 IU/ml (CI 95 %: 1.6 X 103 – 3.0 X 103 IU/ml) SoGAT Standardisation of Parvovirus B19 Genotypes, March 2007

IN-HOUSE vB19 METHOD VALIDATION: QUANTITATION LIMIT This quantitation limit (QL) is applicable when the method is used to give quantitative results. To calculate the quantitation limit, different dilutions of WHO IS, near the detection limit were assayed. A regression test between the titre (IU/ml) and the OD mean of each concentration was applied. Titre (IU/ml) OD Mean* 562.34 0.104 1000 0.136 1778.3 0.215 REGRESSION TEST Slope 9 x 10-5 Standard error of the interception (δ) 0.00869 R2 0.9941 QL (IU/ml) 941.64 (2.97 log10) *Mean of 3 independent assays in triplicate SoGAT Standardisation of Parvovirus B19 Genotypes, March 2007

IN-HOUSE vB19 METHOD VALIDATION: QUANTITATIVE METHOD Linearity: The method is linear in the range studied, between 1.8x103 and 105 IU/ml (3.25 - 5 log10 IU/ml) with a coefficient of regression 0.95 and a coefficient of determination 0.91 . Accuracy: The method shows a correct accuracy in the interval from 3.25 to 4.75 log10 IU/ml with a recovery within the interval 100 ± 10% for each concentration. Precision: In the same interval the method shows a correct precision, with a coefficient of variation of 10%, for both repeatability and intermediate precision studies. Range: The method is accurate and precise in the concentration range between 3.25 and 4.75 log10 IU/ml. SoGAT Standardisation of Parvovirus B19 Genotypes, March 2007

IN-HOUSE vB19 METHOD VALIDATION: GENERAL PARAMETERS ROBUSTNESS Cross-contamination: 20 samples of negative plasma spiked with vB19 DNA at approximate final concentration of 106 IU/ml, mixed alternately with the same samples without spiking, were tested. The results showed that the measures taken to prevent cross-contamination are efficacious. The method shows no operating differences neither with the extraction kit batch nor with the thermocycler employed. SPECIFICITY I No cross-reactivity was observed with the presence of other blood borne viruses (HCV, HIV-1, HBV, HAV, GBV-C). No interference was detected by the presence of these viruses. SoGAT Standardisation of Parvovirus B19 Genotypes, March 2007

IN-HOUSE vB19 METHOD VALIDATION: SPECIFICITY II.- Genotype 2 detection A6 virus DNA sample (genotype 2) from European Pharmacopoeia panel was analysed at titres of 104, 105 and 106 IU/ml and detected as positive using the qualitative method with a 95 % detection limit of 9.2 x 103 IU/ml. Two samples of the same donor analysed during the validation of the method were identified as genotype 2. QUANTITATION RESULTS Sample GRIFOLS’ method Lab 1 Lab 2 Sample A 1.90x107 IU/ml 1.14x107 IU/ml NT Sample B 3.71x109 IU/ml >5.1x108 IU/ml ≈1x1010 IU/ml N.T.: Not Tested SoGAT Standardisation of Parvovirus B19 Genotypes, March 2007

IN-HOUSE vB19 METHOD VALIDATION: SPECIFICITY III IN-HOUSE vB19 METHOD VALIDATION: SPECIFICITY III.- Genotypes 3 and 1 detection Genotype 3 A vB19 genotype 3 sample with a previous titre established in 105 IU/ml was analysed at titres between 104 and 104.5 IU/ml and found positive with our qualitative method. The titre established by our quantitative method was also of 105 IU/ml. Genotype 1 The vB19 genotype 1 detection was demonstrated during the method validation using different samples (IS, NIBSC, working reagents and in-house calibrated controls). SoGAT Standardisation of Parvovirus B19 Genotypes, March 2007

IN-HOUSE vB19 METHOD VALIDATION: CONCLUSIONS I Qualitative method: The detection limit at 95 % has been established in 9.2 x 103 IU/ml. Quantitative method: The quantitation limit has been established in 941.64 IU/ml. The method is linear in the range studied, between 3.25 and 5 log10 IU/ml. The method shows correct accuracy and precision in the concentration range between 3.25 and 4.75 log10 IU/ml. Qualitative and quantitative method: The measures taken to prevent cross-contamination are efficacious. The method shows no operating differences neither with the extraction kit batch nor with the thermocycler employed. Neither cross-reactivity nor interference was observed with the presence of other blood borne viruses (HCV, HIV-1, HBV, HAV, GBV-C). SoGAT Standardisation of Parvovirus B19 Genotypes, March 2007

IN-HOUSE vB19 METHOD VALIDATION: CONCLUSIONS II Qualitative and quantitative method: The method detects and quantitates samples of genotypes 1, 2 and 3 of vB19 with approximately the same efficacy. We developed and validated an in-house PCR method for detection and/or quantitation of vB19 DNA that could detect samples from the three described genotypes. SoGAT Standardisation of Parvovirus B19 Genotypes, March 2007

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INSTITUTO GRIFOLS: Araceli Maya Mireia Prat Dr. Rodrigo Gajardo Dr. Juan I. Jorquera NATIONAL BLOOD SERVICE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY, UK: Dr. Daniel Candotti Dr. Jean Pierre Allain BIOMAT (GRIFOLS): Margarita Estrada Dr. Dolors Xairó SANQUIN, NETHERLANDS: Dr. Marco Koppelman SoGAT Standardisation of Parvovirus B19 Genotypes, March 2007