Tyler Ballweg Ashley Lee Morgan McLinden

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Im not sure what my strengths are Im not always confident in my own strengths My boss doesnt recognize my strengths.
Advertisements

Supplemental regarding simple effects. Simple effects* Often you will see people say that one cannot test for simple effects in the presence of a non-
P u t y o u r h e a d o n m y s h o u l d e r.
Ashley Adams & Whitley Holt Hanover College
Kelsey Grossman Laura Jimenez
The Effects of Empathy & Social Exclusion PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND Individuals’ willingness to engage in prosocial behavior is a popular topic in social.
The Behaviors of Coaching A Roadmap to Teacher Reflection Liz Norton SAM Conference 2013.
C82MST Statistical Methods 2 - Lecture 7 1 Overview of Lecture Advantages and disadvantages of within subjects designs One-way within subjects ANOVA Two-way.
Abstract Rankin and Reason (2005; Reason & Rankin 2006) have suggested than women and students of color experience more harassment on college campuses.
Numbers 100 to 120 Unit of Study: Counting and Modeling Numbers to 120
Different Pathways To Offending and Violence: An Examination Of The Differences Among Youths With Varying Histories Of Contact With The Juvenile Justice.
Lecture 14: Factorial ANOVA Practice Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.
Student Engagement Tony Frontier, PhD Cardinal Stritch University EMOTIONALBEHAVIORALCOGNITIVE.
Ms. Lemons General Chemistry Syllabus and Class Guidelines.
New Leader 101 Lesson 4 What to Do Your First Day on the Job as New Leader.
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH Hypothesizing, counting, and reporting.
Chapter 12: The Analysis of Categorical Data and Goodness- of-Fit Test.
1 Coding Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students’ Successful and Unsuccessful English Productions Dr. Gerald P. Berent National Technical Institute for the Deaf.
An Analysis of Successful Online Behaviors Across Disciplines Catherine Finnegan, University System of Georgia Libby V. Morris, University of Georgia Kangjoo.
Noticing When Students are Not Engaged
Acknowledgments We thank Dr. Yu, Dr. Bateman, and Professor Szabo for allowing us to conduct this study during their class time. We especially thank the.
Tips on Making Friends. Learning Goals  Identify ways to make new friends  Identify different types of friends  Describe ways to maintain friendships.
Admit Slip List 5 things that come to mind when you think of research.
 Allows researchers to detect cause and effect relationships  Researchers manipulate a variable and observe whether any changes occur in a second variable.
FCE Speaking Test – Part 3
Main effect of “you” category words, F(2, 333)= 24.52, p
Lecture #8 Thursday, September 15, 2016 Textbook: Section 4.4
Inferential Statistics
Use of Academic Resources Among Different Socioeconomic Classes
Factorial Designs Q560: Experimental Methods in Cognitive Science Lecture 11.
Middle School Classroom Procedures
Staff Buy-In to SW-PBIS
Paired Samples and Blocks
Warm Up Check your understanding on p You do NOT need to calculate ALL the expected values by hand but you need to do at least 2. You do NOT need.
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
SPSS Homework SPSS Homework 12.1 Practice Data from exercise ) Use linear contrasts to compare 5 days vs 20 and 35 days 2) Imagine you.
Simplifying Fractions
Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 16: Research with Categorical Data.
Between-Subjects, within-subjects, and factorial Experimental Designs
Review Game Rules Only 1 person per team may answer a question.
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Attractiveness and Advertising: Reactions to Pop-up Ads
Unit 1 Task.
Gavilan College Vania Parakati Career & Transfer Center
When Someone is Talking
Just what is a rubric?.
Are You Really My Friend?
Are You Really My Friend?
Bringing our message to schools
Do Now What makes an experiment ethical? Reliable?
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Health Disparities Facing Sexual Minority Women
Inference on Categorical Data
Geographical Skills Gathering Techniques.
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
When Someone is Talking
Conducting experiments
人民教育出版社、浙江省教育厅教研室 送教、交流活动.
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Chapter 2 Ethics and Validity
What if. . . You were asked to determine if psychology and sociology majors have significantly different class attendance (i.e., the number of days a person.
Question 40.
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Christian Lynch Errol Toulon Jr.
The Effect of Instagram on Text Messaging, Age, and Pinterest
Presentation transcript:

Tyler Ballweg Ashley Lee Morgan McLinden Asking for Directions Tyler Ballweg Ashley Lee Morgan McLinden

Study Design Three different locations Three different conditions Union South to Noland, SAC to Grainger, College Library to Humanities Three different conditions Control - White majority (n=36) Minority - White with hijab (n=36) Minority - Asian (n=36) We focused on campus buildings and destination would be one or two blocks away from the location. Relatively close and not a long distance to walk, so we do not set too much constraints for We conducted three conditions at each location.

Measures Willingness to help Participant demographics Giving directions Duration of conversation Participant demographics Gender Race/Ethnicity Giving directions - measured with two questions And the length of conversation that we assumed as participants’ effort to engage in helping behavior.

Procedure “Excuse me. I’m trying to find _____. Would you be able to help me with directions?” “I’m still confused. Do you think you could take me there?” Explain what counted as a yes (don’t know followed by help as well as just as yes response)

Hypotheses Expected participants to be more willing to help in White condition than in Muslim or Asian condition Participants more likely to take White confederate to destination Participants more likely to spend more time helping White confederate Overall hypotheses and then specific hypotheses

Participants 108 Pp (62 F) Tried to only test students Those who were not in groups and without earplugs 62 F, 46 M; selected by looking up from phone and first person seen

Results No significant results found. Chi-Square: p = .38 for across all conditions, not including “don’t knows” (n=88); p = .17 for white and hijab (n=56); p = .70 for asian and white (n=60) ANOVA: p =.41 for mean difference in conversation length across all three conditions (n=108) We did a chi-square comparing frequency of no’s across conditions and did not get a significant results. Conversation length across groups was also not significant. We did other tests comparing frequencies of conditions two at a time and found no significant results. We cannot conclude there is differential treatment between white, Muslim, and Asian women, at least in terms of the help they receive when asking for directions.

Suggestions Hijab Manipulation Different Task Ethical? Offensive? Difficulties ? - Some other incidents (at college) or one participant noticed it was an experiment Morgan-Talk about hijab manipulation. Tyler-Talk about different task