Takehiko Dohi, Fang Xia, Dario C. Altieri  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Role for PML3 in Centrosome Duplication and Genome Stability
Advertisements

Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
The Mitochondrial Protein hTID-1 Partners With the Caspase-Cleaved Adenomatous Polyposis Cell Tumor Suppressor to Facilitate Apoptosis  Jiang Qian, Erin.
Negative Regulation of Vps34 by Cdk Mediated Phosphorylation
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Cell Cycle-Regulated Phosphorylation of p21-Activated Kinase 1
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
A Rac-cGMP Signaling Pathway
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2012)
Phosphorylation of PML by mitogen-activated protein kinases plays a key role in arsenic trioxide-mediated apoptosis  Fumihiko Hayakawa, Martin L Privalsky 
NF-κB Inhibition through Proteasome Inhibition or IKKβ Blockade Increases the Susceptibility of Melanoma Cells to Cytostatic Treatment through Distinct.
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
TopBP1 Controls BLM Protein Level to Maintain Genome Stability
Volume 18, Issue 23, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Esther B.E. Becker, Azad Bonni  Neuron 
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
IAP Regulation of Metastasis
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
A JNK-Dependent Pathway Is Required for TNFα-Induced Apoptosis
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2012)
Marina Cardó-Vila, Wadih Arap, Renata Pasqualini  Molecular Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
A p34cdc2 survival checkpoint in cancer
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Andrew J. Deans, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 131, Issue 2, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Rational design of shepherdin, a novel anticancer agent
p53DINP1, a p53-Inducible Gene, Regulates p53-Dependent Apoptosis
Oncogenic Ras-Induced Expression of Noxa and Beclin-1 Promotes Autophagic Cell Death and Limits Clonogenic Survival  Mohamed Elgendy, Clare Sheridan,
Julien Colombani, Cédric Polesello, Filipe Josué, Nicolas Tapon 
IAP Regulation of Metastasis
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Phosphorylation on Thr-55 by TAF1 Mediates Degradation of p53
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages (June 2011)
Extracellular Regulated Kinase Phosphorylates Mitofusin 1 to Control Mitochondrial Morphology and Apoptosis  Aswin Pyakurel, Claudia Savoia, Daniel Hess,
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (March 2017)
The BRAF Oncoprotein Functions through the Transcriptional Repressor MAFG to Mediate the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype  Minggang Fang, Jianhong Ou,
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 1999)
tRNA Binds to Cytochrome c and Inhibits Caspase Activation
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Lindsey A. Allan, Paul R. Clarke  Molecular Cell 
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Negative Regulation of Tumor Suppressor p53 by MicroRNA miR-504
Fan Yang, Huafeng Zhang, Yide Mei, Mian Wu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
c-IAP1 Cooperates with Myc by Acting as a Ubiquitin Ligase for Mad1
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2012)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Compartmentalized Phosphorylation of IAP by Protein Kinase A Regulates Cytoprotection  Takehiko Dohi, Fang Xia, Dario C. Altieri  Molecular Cell  Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 17-28 (July 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.004 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Phosphorylation of Survivin by PKA (A) Sequence analysis. The consensus PKA phosphorylation site and survivin sequences between residues 18–23 or 77–85 are shown. Putative PKA phosphorylation sites on survivin Ser20 and Ser81 are indicated with an asterisk. (B) PKA phosphorylation of survivin, in vitro. Recombinant wild-type (WT) survivin, GST, or S20/81A survivin double mutant was incubated in a kinase assay in the presence of PKA and [γ-32P]ATP. Phosphorylated bands were detected by autoradiography. (C) PKA phosphorylation of survivin peptides. A synthetic peptide duplicating the survivin sequence P12-G30 with or without S20A or T21A substitutions was incubated with PKA in a kinase assay, and radioactive bands were detected by autoradiography. (D) Characterization of a survivin phosphospecific antibody to Ser20. Recombinant WT survivin or PKA phosphorylation-defective S20A survivin was incubated in a PKA kinase assay in the presence of unlabeled phosphate and analyzed by western blotting with a Ser20 phosphospecific antibody (Survivin[S20∗]) or an antibody to unmodified survivin (Survivin). Survivin(S20∗), survivin phosphorylated on Ser20. (E) Concentration dependence. Increasing concentrations of recombinant WT survivin (0.06, 0.3, 0.6, and 1.2 μg) were incubated in a PKA kinase assay in the presence of unlabeled phosphate and analyzed by western blotting. (F) Densitometry. Protein bands from the experiment in (E) were quantified by densitometry and expressed as ratio in the presence or absence of PKA phosphorylation. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 17-28DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Identification of PKA as a Survivin Ser20 Kinase, In Vivo (A) Akt kinase assay. Increasing concentrations of recombinant WT survivin (0.06, 0.3, 0.6, and 1.2 μg) were incubated in an Akt-1 kinase assay in the presence of unlabeled phosphate and analyzed by western blotting. Akt phosphorylation of recombinant Mdm2 (Ser166) was used as a control. (B) Effect of forskolin. INS-1 cells stably expressing WT survivin or S20A survivin (clones #8 and #10) were treated with the PKA activator forskolin (Fsk) and analyzed by western blotting. ∗, nonspecific. (C) Effect of PKI. (Top panel) INS-1 cells expressing WT survivin were treated with or without Fsk in the presence or absence of the PKA inhibitor, PKI, and analyzed by western blotting. (Bottom panel) PKA activity in the presence or absence of Fsk. ∗, nonspecific. (D) siRNA silencing of PKA. INS-1 cells expressing WT survivin were transfected with nontargeted (control) or PKA-directed siRNA, treated with or without Fsk, and analyzed by western blotting. For (A), (C), and (D), a kinase assay with recombinant survivin in the presence or absence of PKA was used as a control. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 17-28DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Differential Subcellular Phosphorylation of Survivin by PKA (A) Subcellular compartmentalization of survivin phosphorylation on Ser20. MCF-7 cells were fractionated in cytosolic or mitochondrial extracts and analyzed by western blotting. A kinase assay with recombinant survivin in the presence or absence of PKA was used as a control. ∗, nonspecific. (B) Immunoprecipitation. Survivin was immunoprecipitated from cytosolic (left panel) or mitochondrial (right panel) extracts, and pellets or supernatants were analyzed by western blotting. (C) Effect of PP2A. PKA-phosphorylated recombinant survivin was mixed with the indicated increasing concentrations of PP2A and analyzed by western blotting. (D) Submitochondrial fractionation. Isolated mitochondrial extracts treated with proteinase K were incubated with the indicated increasing concentrations of digitonin, and aliquots of pellets (P) or supernatants (S) were analyzed by western blotting. E, total cell extracts. ∗, nonspecific. (Bottom panel) submitochondrial localization of PKA. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 17-28DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Complex Formation between Mitochondrial Survivin and XIAP (A) Mitochondrial discharge of survivin during cell death. INS-1 cells stably expressing mitochondrially targeted survivin fused to GFP were treated with or without staurosporine (STS) and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy after 8 hr. (B) Western blotting. INS-1 cells expressing HA-tagged mitochondrially targeted survivin (HA-MT-S) were treated with STS, and mitochondrial (Mito) or cytosolic extracts were analyzed by western blotting. (C) Immunoprecipitation. Cytosolic extracts from untreated (None) or STS-treated MCF-7 cells were immunoprecipitated with an antibody to survivin, and pellets (P) or supernatants (S) were analyzed by western blotting. ∗, nonspecific. (D) In vivo capture assay. Mitochondrial (M) or cytosolic (C) extracts from MCF-7 cells were incubated with GST or GST-XIAP, and bound proteins were analyzed by western blotting. (E) Effect of STS on survivin Ser20 phosphorylation, in vitro. Recombinant survivin in a PKA kinase assay was incubated with the indicated concentrations of STS and analyzed by western blotting. (F) Time course. INS-1 cells stably expressing WT survivin were treated with STS, harvested at the indicated time intervals, and analyzed for survivin phosphorylation on Ser20. A kinase assay with recombinant survivin in the presence or absence of PKA was used as a control. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 17-28DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 PKA Regulation of Survivin-XIAP Complex (A) Phosphatase treatment. Cytosolic extracts from MCF-7 cells were treated with buffer or calf intestinal phosphatase (CIP) and mixed with GST or GST-XIAP, and bound proteins were analyzed by western blotting. Untreated mitochondrial extracts were used as control. (B) Effect of PKA dominant-negative (DN) mutant. MCF-7 cells were transfected with pcDNA3 or a PKA-DN cDNA and immunoprecipitated with an antibody to survivin, and immune complexes were analyzed by western blotting. A kinase assay with recombinant survivin in the presence or absence of PKA was used as a control. Recombinant survivin was used as a control for XIAP binding. (C) Differential survivin-XIAP interaction, in vitro. Increasing concentrations of WT survivin or S20E survivin were incubated with GST-XIAP (top panel) or GST (bottom panel), and bound proteins were analyzed by western blotting. (D) In vivo capture assay. Cytosolic extracts from MCF-7 cells transfected with S20A or S20E survivin were incubated with GST-XIAP (top panel) or GST (bottom panel), and bound proteins were analyzed by western blotting. (E) Coimmunoprecipitation. MCF-7 cells expressing HA-tagged S20A (A) or S20E (E) survivin were immunoprecipitated with IgG or an antibody to HA, and the immune complexes were analyzed by western blotting. ∗, nonspecific. (F) PKA modulation of survivin-XIAP affinity. WT survivin or S20A survivin was incubated in a PKA kinase assay with unlabeled phosphate, and binding to recombinant XIAP was analyzed by western blotting. Data are expressed as the ratio between phosphorylated and unphosphorylated survivin binding to XIAP and are the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. (G) Survivin-XIAP-binding site. The indicated survivin (SVV) mutants were expressed as GST fusion proteins and incubated with 35S-labeled XIAP, and bound proteins were analyzed by autoradiography. (H) Localization of Ser20 in the survivin crystal structure. Arrows indicate the position of Ser20 (yellow) in each survivin monomer. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 17-28DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 PKA Regulation of IAP Cytoprotection (A) Modulation of XIAP stability. INS-1 cells expressing GFP, survivin (WT), mitochondrially targeted survivin (MT-S), or S20A or S20E survivin were exposed to STS, and extracts were analyzed by western blotting at the indicated time intervals. (B) Quantification of XIAP stability. Protein band intensity of the experiment in (A) was quantified by densitometry. (C) Modulation of caspase activity. Recombinant XIAP, WT survivin, or S20E survivin was mixed alone (left panel) or in combination (right panel) in the presence of Apaf-1, dATP, and cytochrome c and analyzed for DEVDase activity. For combination experiments, a suboptimal concentration of XIAP (0.01 μM) was used. Data are the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. (D) DNA content analysis. INS-1 cells stably transfected with the indicated cDNAs were exposed to STS and analyzed for DNA content by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. The percentage of cells with hypodiploid DNA content is indicated. MT-S, mitochondrially targeted survivin. (E) Multiparametric flow cytometry. INS-1 transfectants stably expressing pcDNA3 (top panels) or S20A or S20E survivin (bottom panels) were treated with STS and simultaneously analyzed for caspase activity (DEVDase activity) and propidium iodide staining by multiparametric flow cytometry. The percentage of cells in each quadrant is indicated. (F) XIAP knockdown. INS-1 cells were transfected with nontargeted dsRNA oligonucleotide (VIII) or increasing concentrations of XIAP-directed siRNA and analyzed by western blotting (top panel). ∗, nonspecific. Cells stably expressing the indicated constructs were transfected with control (VIII) or XIAP-directed siRNA, exposed to STS, and analyzed for DNA content by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry (bottom panel). Black line, control siRNA; red line, XIAP siRNA. The percentage of cells with hypodiploid DNA content is indicated. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 17-28DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 PKA-Regulated IAP Cytoprotection Influences Tumor Growth (A and B) Colony formation assay. Colonies formed in semisolid medium by INS-1 cells stably expressing WT survivin, S20A survivin, mitochondrially targeted survivin (MT-S), or Bcl-2 were visualized by phase contrast microscopy (A) and scored in individual high-power fields (B). Data are the mean ± SEM of four independent experiments. (C) Kinetics of tumor growth. INS-1 cells stably expressing the indicated constructs were injected s.c. in the flanks of immunocompromised mice, and tumor growth was measured at the indicated time intervals. MT-S, mitochondrially targeted survivin. Data are the mean ± SEM of individual tumor groups (n = 8). (D) Histology. The various INS-1 tumors in (C) were analyzed for apoptosis by TUNEL staining, or cell proliferation by Ki67 labeling. Magnification, ×100. (E) Apoptotic index. Quantification of TUNEL+ cells in INS-1 tumors. (F) Mitotic index. Quantification of Ki67+ cells in INS-1 tumors. For (E) and (F), data are the mean ± SEM of an average of 800 cells. ∗∗∗, p < 0.0001; ∗∗, p = 0.0076. ns, not significant. Molecular Cell 2007 27, 17-28DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions