Introduction to COB Smart®

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) Replacement
Advertisements

HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session esMD Requirements, Priorities and Potential Workgroups – 2:00pm.
©2014 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Experian and the marks used herein are service marks or registered trademarks of Experian.
SHELLY GUFFEY MAKING THE MOST OF YOUR REVENUE CYCLE MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY
CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield is the shared business name of CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. and Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc. which are.
Medical Banking Strategy Presenter: Nav Ranajee, VP Healthcare Strategy Date: September 14 th, 2004 © ABN AMRO Services Company 2004.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session Charter Discussion – 9:30am – 10:00am October 18, 2011.
Electronic Initiatives Presented by: Provider Outreach and Education June 13,
CHAA Examination Preparation
Health Plan Industry Provider Domain Overview. 2 Company Confidential | For Internal Use Only | Do Not Copy Health Plan And Provider Data Health plans.
Assessing The Value of Web 2.0 on Knowledge Management A HEALTH CARE REIMBURSEMENT STUDY ICELW CONFERENCE JUNE 2013.
F.O.R.C.E. Healthcare Resources, LLC (Founded on Regulatory Compliance and Ethics) How to Avoid the Most Common Home Health Billing Errors October 17,
Presented by Joan Kossow Data Compliance Manager The Changing Face of Claims Processing &
SRA Enabling Programme SRA Board Meeting – Public Session Carey Street, London 26 th February 2009.
1 Patient Access Management Leveraging Best Practices.
 Being the new reimbursement manager, I hope to work with you all for the benefit of this entity.  I manage reimbursement transactions, as well as facilitating.
HP Provider Relations October 2011 CMS-1500 – Medicare Crossover Claim Billing.
HP Provider Relations October 2011 Medical Review Team.
RESEARCH AND RESOLVE Professional Claim Denials HP Provider Relations/June 2014.
- Revenue CycleRevenue Cycle Improvement “From customer contact to cash in the bank” HIPAA Transaction Implementation Eligibility Case Study 270/ X092A1.
The Coming Crash? HIPAA: Transactions, Codes Sets and Identifiers (TCI) Joseph C Nichols MD Paladin Data Systems Sept 16, 2003.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska is an Independent Licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. Timely Filing and Corrected Claims October.
Maximize Administrative Savings with an Enterprise Payment Integrity Strategy.
©2010 RealMed Corporation. RealMed Overview National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics Subcommittee on Standards Sean Kilpatrick, Director of Product.
© 2015 TriZetto Corporation 2 Managing Patient Debt: Minimizing the Cost of Collections Pete Bekas TriZetto Provider Solutions ®
All-Payer Model Update
TUNGSTEN NETWORK AND PAPER INVOICING
Fragmented Services: 7+ Average number of health related vendors employees need to interact with. Lack Engagement: 57% of large employers say that a lack.
The Peer Review Higher Weighted Diagnosis-Related Groups
Health Advocate Overview
The Michigan Primary Care Transformation (MiPCT) Project
Program Overview.
Patient Encounters and Billing Information Chapter 3
Module 13: Claims & Appeals
Issue Codes Claim not on file Claim in process Claim forwarded to
LAKELAND CARE PAYER CONFERENCE OCTOBER 18, 2017
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
Electronic Transactions Workshop
Electronic Transactions Workshop
Department of Community Health’s Technology Project Update
National Credentialing Forum Vicki L. Searcy
Practice Insight ERA & Denial Manager 2014
Updates on U.S. Spending Transparency Improvements
Lets talk about why we are offering you Hassle-Free Authorizations
NJAAHAM Semi Annual Payer Seminar November 7, 2017
Credentialing Process
Introduction to the Texas Credentialing Verification Organization
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DIABETES CENTRES 2016
RAC Update January 8, 2018.
CASE STUDY Intelligent Subrogation
Chapter 9 Receiving Payments and Insurance Problem Solving.
11 Physician Medical Billing.
A new fantastic source for updating the Statistical Business Register
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
All-Payer Model Update
DRAFT - FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
Presentation Overview
Provider Peer Grouping: Project Overview
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
CAQH Provider Data Discussion for NCF
Lesson 6: Payments Topic 1: EOBs and Claim Tracking
Service Delivery Maturity
Electronic Data Interchange: Transactions and Security
Presented by: Jarvis Shockey, Tom Mort and Jason Koch
Implementation Business Case
Electronic Data Interchange: Transactions and Security
Details to Check during Insurance Eligibility Verification Process
Texas Council Managed Care Summit
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to COB Smart® AAHHSA Conference November 16, 2016

Contents About CAQH COB Challenges COB Smart Solution Overview Health Plan Adoption and Results Provider Access Summary

About CAQH CAQH, a non-profit alliance, is the leader in creating shared initiatives to streamline the business of healthcare. Through collaboration and innovation, CAQH accelerates the transformation of business processes, delivering value to providers, patients and health plans. Perhaps add a sub-bullet for provider directory under ProView and also for PSV Solution. Marketing team to think about re-organizing this slide

CAQH Initiatives Replace with updated logo slide when available.

Industry Collaboration as a CAQH Strategy CAQH seeks to collaborate and build consensus among involved stakeholders for lasting, effective change by: Aligning stakeholder goals. Creating focused direction. Health plans can: Act as catalysts for change. Reduce complexities of inefficient business processes. Implement consistent approaches to non-proprietary processes by participating in shared, industry-wide initiatives. Healthcare Providers can: Promote and request consistent approaches across their vendors. Participate in initiatives that reduce their administrative burden and costs.

CAQH Members

The Coordination of Benefits Challenge Related Inefficiencies Patient paperwork. COB denials and resubmissions. Unpaid or delayed payments. Overpayment recoveries. Appeals and grievances. Financial impact on practice operations. Does my patient have multiple coverage? Which insurer is primary? Better bubble 7

Health Plan Pain Points Summary of Health Plan COB Pain Points Members often unresponsive to inquiries or do not have accurate/complete information. Health plan difficulty identifying the secondary health plan based on the claim. Lack of transparency into other health plan’s responsibilities and payments. Lack of standardization between transactions, leading to high manual touch for resolution. Provider claims do not provide consistent information needed for accurate adjudication. Method for identifying primary and secondary ownership varies among health plans. Inaccurate and missing data often keeps claims pending, leading to high manual processing. Members frequently change health plans leading to inaccurate eligibility data and COB identification. Inaccurate data provided by other health plan causes under- or over- payments. Poor Cross Health Plan Information Lack of Uniform Process for COB Delete 3rd column, see slide 10 Data Inaccuracy 8 8 8

Provider Pain Points Administrative burden collecting coverage information at point of service (e.g., different forms, formats, rules). Patients provide unreliable coverage information. Care givers may not know relevant coverage information. Lack of visibility into a patient’s cross-health plan coverage and benefits. Lack of visibility into progress of submitted COB invoice. Low transparency of processes for reimbursements, appeals, and adjustment. Existing rules, such as statutes of limitations, do not account for COB complexity. Claims rejected due to different provider interpretations of primary and secondary health plan hierarchy. Multiple COB claim filing formats leads to manual massaging or technology complexity. Providers spend substantial time manually processing bills. Providers experience increased processing time and significant delays in collection. More staff required to follow-up on denials and appeals. Poor Patient Information Fragmented Lifecycle Transparency Lack of Uniform Process for COB Manual Processing 9 9 9

Current “Reactive” COB Strategy Plans forced into a reactive strategy in determining and investigating COB. Resource intensive process with frequent unfavorable outcomes. Provider Billing / Claim Receipt Routing Claim Adjudication EOB/Claim Payment Patient Access and Eligibility Appeals & Adjustments Missing or inaccurate patient information. Manual downstream. Lack of uniform use of billing codes, complicating COB reviews. Extra paperwork from denials and resubmission. Incorrect bill submission (e.g., to the wrong health plan). Results in repeat bills. Ad-hoc patient data requests. Confusion over primary health plan COB payment. Results in significant manual turn around time. Confusion over health plan payment (i.e., ambiguous EOB). Results in lengthy and manual secondary COB bill submissions. Manual work associated with non- standardized appeal processes. 10

COB Touchpoints Across the Enterprise Use data in claims processing workflows Load data into primary membership systems Disclose data in plan created HIPAA 271 responses to external inquiries Empower providers with robust COB data for their patients Use data in claims investigations and recovery Karen - make graphic easier to read. 11

Estimated Costs of COB Administrative Inefficiencies = $800M Estimated Annual Costs for COB Inefficiencies (in $M) Highlights Figures based on interviews, internal data analysis and industry research. Providers are burdened with ~60% of the extra costs, of which $430M are billing related (primary and secondary billing processes). FTE costs represent $500M (60%) of extra costs. IT and vendor spend represent the remaining $340M (40%) of extra costs. $<1 $350 Health Plan Provider $490 $230 $<1 $70 $<1 $<1 $40 Patient Access & Eligibility Provider Billing / Claim Receipt Routing Claim Adjudication EOB / Claim Payment1 Appeal and Adjustments Total 1) Claim Payment includes EOB review (for secondary billing) and claim payment assessment. Source: Booz & Company Analysis; Stakeholder Data Requests. 12

Requirements for Efficient, Industry-Wide COB Easily determine primary and secondary payers for health claims through system integration and automation Inform providers of overlapping coverage and correct order of benefits before care is delivered 13

COB Smart: Meeting the COB Challenge COB Smart is a collaborative, secure solution developed in partnership with health plans. It automates the COB process to: “Get it right the first time.” Shares accurate and complete COB information with appropriate providers and health plans. Built-in primacy engine determines correct order of benefits. Identifies individuals with overlapping coverage across multiple health plans. 1 2 3 14

High-Level Solution Overview 1 Participating health plans submit a thin layer of enrollment data weekly 2 COB Smart determines overlapping coverage including primacy. Health Plans CAQH COB Solution Providers Health Plan A Physicians Member Matching COB Registry Facilities Primacy Rules 4 COB data is also available to providers via 271 responses Health Plan B 3 Participating health plans receive a weekly COB report 15

High-Level Primacy Logic Subject to COB? Medicaid Record? Medicare Record? No Contractual Provisions? Subscriber or Dependent? Active Employment or Retirement? COBRA or Coverage Continuation? Length of Plan Coverage? 16

High-Level Member Matching Logic Full Name Date of Birth ? Suffix (e.g.,Jr.) Gender SS# Address 17

Participating Health Plans Include: * * * * Implementation in Q1 2016

A National Database is Crucial to Identifying COB COB Smart includes both resident and contract state information: Resident State – Location of member. Contract State – Location of member’s policy used to determine primacy rules (e.g., employer location for employer-sponsored coverage). One-third of the members included in COB Smart have resident states different from their contract states. Looking only in-state for COB is insufficient. A national perspective is required to find COB. 25

COB Smart: First Nationwide Commercial COB Database 26

Results On average, COB Smart is finding overlapping coverage for: 5.1% of the overall medical membership. 5.5% of commercial group [ranging from 3% to 8.5%]. 4.3% of individual [ranging from 1% to 6.5%]. 4.5% of Medicaid MCO [ranging from 4% to 18%]. 2.3% of Medicare Advantage [ranging from 1.4% to 4.5%] 12% of total matches are internal to a health plan. On average, participating health plans find that primary and secondary coverage is evenly split (50/50) for newly found overlaps. 27

Examples: Newly Identified COB and Confirmed Data Accuracy Plan identified 9,158 overpaid claims = $6M *Internal payer validation by contacting other plans 28

Examples: Newly Identified COB and Confirmed Data Accuracy Results from Two Newly Participating Regional Heath Plans 29

Health plans have been able to increase the rate of COB detection by 40% Health plans report that legacy methods have been able to identify COB in 5% of their respective membership. More than 80% of this, on average, is derived from Medicare reporting. Commercial COB typically represents less than 20% of total identified COB cases. Importantly, this data is often highly inaccurate due to quality challenges associated with member surveys and other legacy identification methods. COB Smart enables a 40% increase in the overall rate of COB detection. These cases represent net new COB and were previously undetected – primarily due to the nature and complexity of identifying commercial overlaps. Data quality is substantially higher due to automated weekly updates and “direct from source” information. Additional undetermined COB cases that can be identified yield potential cost of care savings. Knowledge of cases in which the health plan pays primary can improve eligibility responses and claims submission accuracy, thereby reducing member and provider abrasion. 40% increase *CAQH participating health plan experience, large national health plan over two years with COB Smart.

Creating a Better COB Experience for All Stakeholders Members Fewer member surveys. Fewer delayed or rejected claims. Fewer claim-status inquiries. Providers Reduced staff time following up on claims. Improved cash flow. Plans Reduced “pay and chase.” Increased recovery dollars. Reduced claim rework. More accurate determination of primary and secondary payer status. Check webinar deck 31

Supplying Accurate COB Information to Providers Provider sends a 270 eligibility query to health plans, which in turn send a corresponding 271 eligibility response. Participating plans can access accurate overlapping coverage information from COB Smart to enrich the 271 response sent to providers or displayed on a portal. Participating clearinghouses can also access COB Smart information to include in the 271 response. ILLUSTRATIVE CAQH Coordination of Benefits Information Information: Other or Additional Payer Coordination of Benefits Date: 01/01/2010 Other Payer Name: Health Plan B Member ID Number: XX XXXX Detailed COB information via 271 EB*R segment (additional data elements available) 32

Opportunity to Improve COB Engagement with Providers Provider receives insurance information from member and asks clearinghouse to confirm eligibility. Practitioners Facilities Providers Member Matching Primacy Rules COB Smart® Participating health plans submit a thin layer of enrollment data weekly. 1 Participating health plans receive a weekly COB report to guide payment decisions. 2 Clearinghouse submits an inquiry for a COB Smart participating plan to the payer and to COB Smart, and receives responses with coverage and primacy information on other participating plans. Health Plan A Health Plan B COB Registry Clearinghouse Clearinghouse reports combined member eligibility with COB and primacy information to provider via enriched 271 response. 4 5 3 To be updated. 39

Reporting COB Data on the 271 Response Accurate COB data at the time of service enables providers to: Submit a claim to the correct health plan the first time. Avoid errors, rework, resubmission and withdrawn payment. Improve practice operations, cash flow and reduce administrative costs. Increase patient satisfaction with provider claims and billing process. Ensures providers receive COB and primacy information regardless of the communication channel used. Several participating plans are currently reporting COB data on 271 eligibility responses to providers. CAQH resources are available to work with health plan EDI teams. The CAQH Trading Partner program enables clearinghouses, RCM and PMS vendors to access COB information for inclusion in 271 responses as they process provider 270 eligibility inquiries. 33

Summary: Get It Right The First Time With COB Smart Collaborative, secure solution developed in partnership with health plans to automate the COB process and “get it right the first time.” Improve accuracy, timeliness and secure availability of coverage status information when processing claims. Improve provider network and member satisfaction. Reduce staff burden and save money. 35