Model Updating of a Nine-Story Concrete Core Wall Building

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Lateral Force Resisting Systems
Advertisements

Joan Tresserras Pujol-Xicoy TALL BUILDING DRAFT DESIGN.
Basic structural theory. Statics Things dont continue to move if forces are resisted – Static Equilibrium What resists the force? Equal and opposite Reaction.
Outline CH1.Introduction CH2.Preliminary Design CH3.3D Model.
Mechanics Based Modeling of the Dynamic Response of Wood Frame Building By Ricardo Foschi, Frank Lam,Helmut Prion, Carlos Ventura Henry He and Felix Yao.
An-Najah National University
CEE Capstone II Structural Engineering
Structural System Overview
Lecture 33 - Design of Two-Way Floor Slab System
Abstract This project is a structural analysis and design of a residential building located in JENIEN City, The building is consisted of 7 floors. The.
Contents : Introduction. Rapid Visual Screening.
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Terra Santa School Structural Design and Analysis Prepared By: Bara Shawahna.
by: Jon Heintz, S.E. & Robert Pekelnicky
Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
The University Sciences Building Northeast, USA Final Presentation Chris Dunlay Structural Option Dr. Boothby.
Prof. Sarosh H Lodi NED University of Engineering and Technology What Works and Does not Work in the Science and Social Science of Earthquake Vulnerability,
SEISMIC ANALYSIS WITH SHEAR WALLS
High Rise Structural Systems
Sensitivity Evaluation of Subspace-based Damage Detection Technique Saeid Allahdadian Dr. Carlos Ventura PhD Student, The University of British Columbia,
Samuel M. P. Jannotti Structural April 14, 2008 American Eagle Outfitters Quantum III: South Side Works.
The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering
Seismic Performance of Outriggered Tall Buildings
The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering
Villanova University Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE Capstone II Structural Engineering 1 CEE Capstone II Structural Engineering.
Concrete 2003 Brisbane July 2003 Design Of Pre-cast Buried Structures For Internal Impact Loading.
TOPICS COVERED Building Configuration Response of Concrete Buildings
IMPACT Phase II – 9/13/00 Activity Report Slide 1/20 University of Louisville IMPACT Architecture Team Glen Prater, Jr., Associate Professor Ellen G. Brehob,
Structural Analysis and Design of
1. Outline:  Introduction.  Architectural Design.  Structural Design.  Environmental Design.  Mechanical & Electrical Design.  Safety Design. 
The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering
300 North La Salle Liam McNamara BAE / MAE Senior Thesis April 13 th, 2010.
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department.
Dan Donecker BAE/MAE – Structural Option Senior Thesis Project 35 West 21 st Street New York, New York.
Robert M. Arnold Building Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Graduation Project Prepared by : 1- Areej Melhem 2- Jawad Ateyani 3-Rasha.
Welcome to Daniel Painter’s Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis Presentation of Two Freedom Square April 16, 2003 Pennsylvania State University.
Nonlinear Performance and Potential Damage of Degraded Structures Under Different Earthquakes The 5 th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering “Facing.
Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
Preliminary Design & Steel Deck Alternative Presentation
 Building Background  Building Structural System  Problem Statement  Proposed Solution  Structural Investigations  Architectural Impact  Sustainability.
RECORD EVALUATION OF A BRIDGE UNDER THE NAPA EARTHQUAKE RECORD EVALUATION OF A BRIDGE UNDER THE NAPA EARTHQUAKE Omar Alcazar Pastrana [Dr. Carlos E. Ventura]
THE NORTHBROOK CORPORATE CENTER Redesign of the Lateral Load Resisting System.
DESIGN OF AIRPORT TERMINAL AND CONTROL TOWER
An-Najah National University
CONDOMINIUM TOWER & PARKING
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering
AQQABA SECONDRY SCHOOL Structural Design.
Date of download: 10/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
CFHT Pier Building Evaluation
Integrated design Of Fuel Station
GUIDED BY, MS. D. DARLING HELEN LYDIA M.TECH., PRESENTED BY,
An-Najah National University
Characterization of C Pod
Integrative Design of a Secondary School
Characterization of NanoG
Columns and Other Compression Members
Welcome to My Presentation
Analysis and Design of Multiple story building
Outline CH1.Introduction CH2.Preliminary Design CH3.3D Model.
Mississippi Riverbank Project (Final Presentation) May 14, 1999
Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Nathan E. Reynolds Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt Structural Option The Pennsylvania State.
Supervisor: Dr. Mahmoud Dweikat.
AN-NAJAH NATIONAL UNIVRESITY
Analysis And Design Of AS-Shorooq Residential Building
An Najah National University
Mitre III Building McLean VA Debra Schroeder Structural Option.
Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم RaRami Abu Baker An- Najah National University
OUTLINES - location & Description. Material properties.
Presentation transcript:

Model Updating of a Nine-Story Concrete Core Wall Building The 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering “Facing Earthquake Challenges Together” May 4-8 2015, Tongji University Shanghai, China Model Updating of a Nine-Story Concrete Core Wall Building STEVE MCDONALD [Dr. Carlos Ventura] BASc | University of British Columbia, Canada (2012) MASc Student | The University of British Columbia, Canada (2013 - Present)

Outline Background & description of structure Vibration tests Finite element model Model updating Results and summary

Description of Structure

Description of Structure Constructed in 1963 Nine stories including recently added penthouse Reinforced concrete with steel-framed penthouse Slabs supported by concrete columns and core walls Connected to five-story classroom block

Description of Structure Typical floor plan 30.5 m by 16 m. Story height approximately 2.7 m.

Ambient Vib. Test Results Ten modes identified Mode Period (s) Freq. (Hz) Description 1 1.14 0.88 Site period 2 0.39 2.56 1st lateral 3 0.36 2.81 1st longitudinal 4 0.31 3.25 1st torsional 5 0.22 4.50 Coupled torsional-translational 6 0.17 5.75 7 0.14 7.38 2nd longitudinal 8 0.11 9.00 2nd torsional 9 0.09 11.00 2nd lateral 10 0.07 14.13 3rd longitudinal

Finite Element Model

Finite Element Model Modelled concrete walls in west end Rest of block modelled as single column at centre of geometry Rigid beams used to connect column to embedded walls Material properties: Elastic, uncracked Estimated lower-bound compressive strength of 34.5 MPa for concrete Elements: Columns and beams as elastic frames Walls and slabs as quad shells Architectural mullions as trusses

Finite Element Model

Response Selection Responses chosen as target for model calibration Mode shapes from FEM paired with AVT results using FEMTools Response quantities: frequencies and mode shapes

Sensitivity Analysis Structure separated into six groups: Beams and columns Elevator core walls Shear walls Classroom block “column” Rigid beams from classroom block Beams between embedded walls and tower

Sensitivity Analysis Properties of each group analyzed for sensitivity Software: FEMTools

Sensitivity Analysis Most sensitive groups: Classroom block column Rigid beam connections Significant because of assumptions made modelling these groups

Parameter Selection Seven parameters chosen: Modulus of elasticity Mass density Cross sectional area Shear stiffness area Moment of inertia about x, y, and z Shell thickness Poisson’s ratio

Results Average freq. difference of 32% reduced to 1.0% Average MAC of about 70% for paired modes Mode Description FT Results (Initial) Freq. (Hz) AVT Results Difference (%) FT Results (Updated) 2 1st lateral 3.05 2.56 18.99 -0.13 3 1st longitudinal 4.42 2.81 57.11 2.84 0.95 5 torsional 8.16 4.50 81.28 4.49 -0.25 7 2nd longitudinal 8.87 7.38 20.23 7.35 -0.37 8 2nd torsional 12.42 9.00 37.96 8.93 -0.81 9 2nd lateral 13.56 11.00 23.23 11.72 6.51 10 3rd longitudinal 10.08 14.13 -28.66 14.25 0.85

Summary Office tower tested and modelled in SAP2000 Model calibrated in FEMTools by varying seven parameters Close correlation with seven mode shapes Average frequency error of 1%

Proposed Seismic Retrofit

Thank you!