Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (August 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Crystal Structure of Maltose Phosphorylase from Lactobacillus brevis
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Near-Atomic Resolution for One State of F-Actin
Volume 112, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Danny N.P Doan, Terje Dokland  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Aude Echalier, Celia F. Goodhew, Graham W. Pettigrew, Vilmos Fülöp 
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
A Putative Mechanism for Downregulation of the Catalytic Activity of the EGF Receptor via Direct Contact between Its Kinase and C-Terminal Domains  Meytal.
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Activation Mechanism of the MAP Kinase ERK2 by Dual Phosphorylation
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e6 (June 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Crystal Structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis KasA Show Mode of Action within Cell Wall Biosynthesis and its Inhibition by Thiolactomycin  Sylvia R.
How a Single T Cell Receptor Recognizes Both Self and Foreign MHC
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Crystal Structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis KasA Show Mode of Action within Cell Wall Biosynthesis and its Inhibition by Thiolactomycin  Sylvia R.
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e4 (March 2018)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (May 2004)
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 1119-1130 (August 2005) The Molecular Origins of Specificity in the Assembly of a Multienzyme Complex  René A.W. Frank, J. Venkatesh Pratap, Xue Y. Pei, Richard N. Perham, Ben F. Luisi  Structure  Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 1119-1130 (August 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2005.04.021 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Catalytic Mechanism of PDH and the Structure of E1-PSBD (A) Catalytic mechanism of the pyruvate dehydrogenase multienzyme complex. Reactions catalyzed by E1, E2, and E3 are shown by red, green, and yellow arrows, respectively. (B) E1-PSBD structure. A ribbon diagram of the complete E1 heterotetramer bound to the PSBD of E2. Two views are shown related by a 90° rotation. A color key for the domains of each subunit is shown. E1 α* and β* are the subunits that form an active site in the “closed” state, whereas the α and β chains making the second active site are in the “open state.” The PSBD from E2, colored green, binds on the 2-fold interface of two C-terminal domains of the E1 β chains (colored cyan and orange). Thiamine diphosphate and Mg2+ ions are highlighted as space-filled atoms. The entrances to the active sites in “closed” and “open” states are shown by black (to the foreground) and gray (to the background) arrows, respectively. Figures were made with PyMOL (DeLano, 2003). Structure 2005 13, 1119-1130DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.04.021) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Active Site of B. stearothermophilus E1 (A and B) The two active sites in each heterotetramer are found in the (A) “open” and the (B) “closed” state. The solvent-accessible surface area of the protein is shown, and the thiamine diphosphate (ThDP) cofactor is in stick form. (C) The arrangement of two conserved active site loops (gray, α*203–212; magenta, α*267–290), part of which undergo folding-unfolding transitions in the “closed” and “open” states. The solvent-accessible surface area is shown for residues surrounding the E1 active site. Residues highlighted in stick form, with the exception of Ile206, have all been shown to be catalytically important in mutagenesis studies of B. stearothermophilus E1 (Fries et al., 2003a). His128 (pink) from the β subunit is a proton donor to the dithiolane ring of the lipoyl group during catalysis (Fries et al., 2003b). (D) The geometric conservation of the loops and active site residues is shown by superimposition of the ThDPs from the E1 of the P. putida BCDH complex (blue), the Homo sapiens PDH (yellow) and BCDH complexes (orange), the Thermus thermophilus PDH complex (green), and the B. stearothermophilus PDH complex (majenta). Structure 2005 13, 1119-1130DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.04.021) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 A Ribbon Diagram and Electron Density of the PSBD in Association with E1 (A) The PSBD (green) sits across the 2-fold interface of E1 β subunits (orange and cyan). The binding surface is dominated by electrostatic interactions (dashed lines), many mediated by structured water molecules (red spheres). (B) Stereographic views of the electron density at the E1-PSBD binding interface contoured to 1.0 σ cutoff by using a σA-weighted 2Fo − Fc map. The modeled atoms for the PSBD, the E1 β subunit, and the β* subunit are rendered as green, cyan, and orange sticks, respectively. The interface is dominated by salt bridges such as the one between PSBD Arg157 and the C-terminal carboxylate of βPhe324. Hydrophobic interactions are made by PSBD Met132 and Pro133 within a groove at the β dimer interface. In addition, hydrogen bonded water molecules bridge the E1-PSPBD interface. Maps were generated in CCP4 (CCP4, 1994), and the figure was compiled with the program PyMOL (DeLano, 2003). Structure 2005 13, 1119-1130DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.04.021) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 E1-PSBD and E3-PSBD Interfaces (A–E) (A)–(C) show the charge complementarity of the binding surface of (A) E1, (B) the PSBD, and (C) E3. The positively charged PSBD associates with the acidic patch of either E1 or E3. Close-ups of the binding interface indicated by a box in (A) and (C) are shown in (D) and (E), respectively. (D) The interface residues of the PSBD are shown in stick format (green). The binding interface residues of E1 are also shown (Phe324, Ile281, Leu282, Ser283, Leu284, Glu285, Ala286, Pro287, and Arg266) from both β* (orange) and β (cyan) subunits. The interface is characterized by a hydrophobic plug formed by Met132 and Pro133 surrounded by a curtain of electrostatic interactions: a charge-zipper, electrostatic interactions, and hydrogen bonds (yellow dashed lines). Three interfacial water molecules (red nonbonded spheres) make up ∼45% of the electrostatic interactions. (E) PSBD interface residues in association with E3. Except for some alternate side chain conformations, the PSBD maintains the same fold in association with E1 and E3. The E3-PSBD and E1-PSBD are also structurally similar, except that one of three basic residues forming the charge-zipper is not the same; the PSBD makes use of Arg140 at the E3 interface and Arg154 at the E1 interface. Figures were compiled with GROMACS (Lindahl et al., 2001), MEAD (Bashford and Gerwert, 1992), and PyMOL (DeLano, 2003). Structure 2005 13, 1119-1130DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.04.021) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 An Atomic Model of the B. stearothermophilus PDH Multienzyme Complex (A) The principal protein-protein interactions between E1-E2 (described here) and E3-E2 (Mande et al., 1996) were determined by X-ray crystallography. The structures of the domains of E2 were determined independently by NMR or X-ray crystallography (Perham, 2000 and references therein). The icosahedral 60-mer E2 core is shown with a gray solvent-accessible surface, except for the three monomers of an E2 trimer, which are represented in green, blue, and red. The full-length E2 chain including the lipoyl domain (LD), the peripheral subunit binding domain (PSBD), and linkers are shown for only these three E2 monomers for clarity. The outer linker connecting the lipoyl domain (LD) to the PSBD is intrinsically flexible with a potential reach of >140 Å. LD1 and LD3 are shown extending outside and around the annular shell of peripheral enzymes, respectively. LD2 is shown approaching the inward-facing active site of E1. The relative position and orientation of the E1-PSBD and E3-PSBD complex were determined by cryo-EM analyses of the entire E2 assembled with E1 or E3 (Milne et al., 2002). (B) The cryo-EM electron density of the E1-E2 subassembly; the figure was adapted with permission from Milne et al. (2002). The model was built with Coot and XtalView (McRee, 1992), and the figure was compiled with MolScript (Kraulis, 1991), MSMS (Sanner et al., 1995), and Raster3D (Merritt and Murphy, 1994). Structure 2005 13, 1119-1130DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.04.021) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions