Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crystal Structure of Manganese Catalase from Lactobacillus plantarum
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Adrian T. Keatinge-Clay  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Yu Luo, Su-Chen Li, Min-Yuan Chou, Yu-Teh Li, Ming Luo  Structure 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Crystal Structures of a Ligand-free and Malonate-Bound Human Caspase-1
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages (July 1997)
Jennifer Raaf, Elena Brunstein, Olaf-Georg Issinger, Karsten Niefind 
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Sebastiano Pasqualato, Jacqueline Cherfils  Structure 
The Structural Basis of Hammerhead Ribozyme Self-Cleavage
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Structural Roles of Monovalent Cations in the HDV Ribozyme
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages (July 2007)
Crystal Structure of the Vanadate-Inhibited Ca2+-ATPase
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Absence of Ion-Binding Affinity in the Putatively Inactivated Low-[K+] Structure of the KcsA Potassium Channel  Céline Boiteux, Simon Bernèche  Structure 
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Glutamate mutase from Clostridium cochlearium: the structure of a coenzyme B12- dependent enzyme provides new mechanistic insights  R Reitzer, K Gruber,
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Qun Liu, Qingqiu Huang, Xin Gen Lei, Quan Hao  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e4 (March 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Structural Basis of Swinholide A Binding to Actin
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Crystal Structure of a Trapped Catalytic Intermediate Suggests that Forced Atomic Proximity Drives the Catalysis of mIPS  Kelly Neelon, Mary F. Roberts,
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Stanley J Watowich, John J Skehel, Don C Wiley  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 217-224 (February 2006) Flexibility of Thiamine Diphosphate Revealed by Kinetic Crystallographic Studies of the Reaction of Pyruvate-Ferredoxin Oxidoreductase with Pyruvate  Christine Cavazza, Carlos Contreras-Martel, Laetitia Pieulle, Eric Chabrière, E. Claude Hatchikian, Juan C. Fontecilla-Camps  Structure  Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 217-224 (February 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2005.10.013 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Standard Pyruvate Decarboxylation Cycle (1) ThDP in the “V” conformation with an N4′ imino tautomer; (2) binding of pyruvate with its C2α facing the C2 carbanion of the thiazolium ring; (3) decarboxylation of the substrate and formation of the enamine species; and (4) formation of the free-radical species after one electron is transferred to one of the FeS clusters. Structure 2006 14, 217-224DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.10.013) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Electron Density Map of Oxygen-Inhibited PFOR Pyruvate was excluded from phase and structure factor calculations (omit map). The electron density peak next to N4′ of the aminopyrimidine ring may represent the oxygen atom of an oxime moiety. This and the displacement of a water molecule are the only differences between inhibited and active PFORs (see Figure 3A). This figure and Figures 3 and 6 were prepared with TURBO (Roussel and Cambillaud, 1989). Structure 2006 14, 217-224DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.10.013) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Omit Fourier Electron Density Maps around the Active Site of PFOR at Different Pyruvate Soak Times (1) The active site of native PFOR at 1.8 Å resolution. The two electron density peaks contoured at 6 σ have been modeled as a chloride ion (Cl−) and a water molecule (W). Averaged temperature factors for Cl− and W are 21.2 Å2 and 17.3 Å2, respectively. The putative chloride ion occupies the site of both CO2 in the radical species and the carboxylate group of unreacted pyruvate. (2) Electron density map of the pyruvate-PFOR complex after a 15 min soak in an artificial mother liquor solution containing 50 mM pyruvate and 25% (v/v) glycerol as cryoprotectant. Both ThDP and pyruvate have been excluded from phase and structure factor calculations. Under these conditions, the substrate binds productively but the reaction has not taken place to any observable degree (see Discussion). There is continuous electron density (contoured at the 1 σ level) between the carbonyl oxygen of the substrate and N4′ from the aminopyrimidine of ThDP, indicating a strong interaction between these two atoms. (3) Electron density map of the pyruvate-PFOR complex after a 40 min soak in an artificial mother liquor solution containing 50 mM pyruvate and 25% (v/v) glycerol as cryoprotectant. The map was calculated excluding atoms belonging to these moieties from phase and structure factor calculations. The observed electron density (contoured at the 3 σ level) has been interpreted as corresponding to the 2-(2-hydroxypropionyl)ethyl ThDP tetrahedral intermediate rather than a mixture of reacted and unreacted species (see Discussion). (4) The free-radical species. The map was calculated excluding atoms belonging to these moieties from phase and structure factor calculations. The conformation and bond lengths are essentially the same as in Chabrière et al. (2001). Structure 2006 14, 217-224DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.10.013) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 PFOR Activity Measurements as a Function of pH We assign the long lag phase at acidic pH to the very sluggish activity of PFOR under these conditions. Because the as-isolated enzyme requires reductive activation, in the absence of added reductant, electrons probably come from pyruvate decarboxylation catalyzed initially by a small fraction of active PFOR. Subsequently, a cascade effect will accelerate the activation process. The decarboxylating reaction is much faster at optimal basic pHs, significantly reducing the lag time. Structure 2006 14, 217-224DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.10.013) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Pairwise Superposition of Successive States (A) t0 (blue) and t15 (gold) structures. (B) t15 (gold) and t40 (violet) structures. (C) t40 (violet) and free-radical (green) structures. (D) Superposition of t0 and t40 structures. Positive (green) and negative (red) difference electron density peaks obtained from a map calculated with (Ft40 − Ft0) coefficients are also shown as indicators of conformational changes. Structure 2006 14, 217-224DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.10.013) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Superposition of the Enamine Species of TK and the Native and Putative Radical Forms of PFOR In TK, the thiazole ring is found halfway between the two PFOR species. The relative positions of pyruvate and ThDP in PFOR make the formation of an enamine intermediate unlikely. Green, enamine species of TK; orange, native form of PFOR; red, putative radical species. Structure 2006 14, 217-224DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.10.013) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Catalytic Cycle Depicting the Intermediate States Reported in This Study See Figure 3. (1) t0; (2) t15; (3) t40; and (4) free-radical species. The dot over the C2-C2α signifies a one-electron bond between these two atoms. Also, note that the C2α-C2 bond between the acetyl and thiazole moieties is unusually long (Chabrière et al., 2001) and thus incompatible with enamine formation as normally postulated (see Figure 1). Structure 2006 14, 217-224DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.10.013) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions