Principles and Applications of Backward-in-Time Modeling of Contaminants in the Environment Roseanna M. Neupauer Department of Civil, Environmental, and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mass Transport of Pollutants
Advertisements

Introduction to Environmental Engineering Lecture 15 Water Supply and Groundwater.
Subsurface Fate and Transport of Contaminants
Numerical simulations of oil contaminant transport in sandy coastal aquifers Presenter : Yi-Ming Wei Adviser : Chuen-Fa Ni Date : 2011/04/21.
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT MODELING FOR RIVER BASINS
Dale T Littlejohn Senior Geologist. What is fate and transport in the vadose zone? Vadose Zone Hydrocarbon release from buried pipeline Aquifer Surface.
Recent enhancements of the OTIS model to simulate multi-species reactive transport in stream-aquifer systems. Ryan T. Bailey 1 Department of Civil & Environmental.
Gaseous And Particulate Dispersion In Street Canyons
LDEQ’s RECAP Domenico and Summer’s Models. DOMENICO MODEL.
Potential Effects of Roadside Dry Wells on Groundwater Quality, Island of Hawai‘i Assessment Using Numerical Groundwater Models A study in cooperation.
Groundwater The Unseen Part of the Water Cycle Salt Groundwater Ground Water Reservoir The present-day surface hydrologic cycle. The numbers in parentheses.
Ground-Water Flow and Solute Transport for the PHAST Simulator Ken Kipp and David Parkhurst.
Conservative and Reactive Solutes Conservative do not react with soil / groundwater Chloride is a good example Sorbed onto mineral grains as well as organic.
(Z&B) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow model & transport model) Adjust parameter values.
Introduction to GW contamination and
Subsurface Hydrology Unsaturated Zone Hydrology Groundwater Hydrology (Hydrogeology )
Today’s Lecture: Grid design/boundary conditions and parameter selection. Thursday’s Lecture: Uncertainty analysis and Model Validation.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering Partitioning of Volatile Organic Carbon Compoundss.
Interdisciplinary Modeling of Aquatic Ecosystems Curriculum Development Workshop July 18, 2005 Groundwater Flow and Transport Modeling Greg Pohll Division.
Gas Phase Transport Principal Sources: VLEACH, A One-Dimensional Finite Difference Vadose Zone Leaching Model, Version 2.2 – United States Environmental.
Figure taken from Hornberger et al. (1998). Linear flow paths assumed in Darcy’s law True flow paths.
Figure from Hornberger et al. (1998) Darcy’s data for two different sands.
BIOPLUME II Introduction to Solution Methods and Model Mechanics.
Solute (and Suspension) Transport in Porous Media
CHAPTER 20: GROUNDWATER. Groundwater It is estimated that there is 3000 times more water stored as groundwater in the upper 800 meters of continental.
What We Know (and Don’t Know) about the Effects of Oil and Gas Development on Water Quality Martz Conference, June 5-6, 2014 Prof. Joe Ryan University.
FSA Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Model Presentation to Scottsdale Citizens Group March 19, 1999.
FRAMES-2.0 Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
Groundwater 1 Groundwater flows slowly through the voids between grains or the cracks in solid rock. Much of our knowledge depends on field and laboratory.
(Zheng and Bennett) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow model & transport model) Adjust parameter values Traditional approach.
Clean water Start and end times of two reaction intervals Specify domain’s starting fluid composition on the Initial pane.
Hierarchical Modeling Linking to Science-Support Models EXAMPLE Hierarchical Modeling Linking to Science-Support Models Groundwater Modeling System RT3D.
Darcy’s Law and Flow CIVE Darcy allows an estimate of: the velocity or flow rate moving within the aquifer the average time of travel from the head.
Scenarios 1.Tidal influence 2.Extreme storm surge (wave overtopping, max. limit 200 l/s/m, period 2 h) Outlook calibration and validation of 3D model transfer.
19 Basics of Mass Transport
Constructing student knowledge of mass transport through interpretation of field data x Jodi Ryder Central Michigan University vs x.
Working With Simple Models to Predict Contaminant Migration Matt Small U.S. EPA, Region 9, Underground Storage Tanks Program Office.
Tracers for Flow and Mass Transport
Probabilistic Modelling Golder Associates (UK) ltd Ruth Davison Attenborough House Browns Lane Stanton on the Wolds Nottingham NG12 5BL
Darcy’s Law Philip B. Bedient Civil and Environmental Engineering Rice University.
Final Project I. Calibration Drawdown Prediction Particle Tracking
(Z&B) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow & transport model) Adjust parameter values Design conceptual model Assess uncertainty.
Modeling Subsurface transport of oil-field brine at the USGS OSPER “A” Site, Oklahoma William Herkelrath and Yousif Kharaka U.S. Geological Survey.
Chitsan Lin, Sheng-Yu Chen Department of Marine Environmental Engineering, National Kaohsiung Marine University, Kaohsiung 81157, Taiwan / 05 / 25.
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology Lecture 2: Surface and Groundwater Hydrologic Systems.
Environmental Engineering Lecture Note Week 10 (Transport Processes) Joonhong Park Yonsei CEE Department CEE3330 Y2013 WEEK3.
CHAPTER 2 MASS BALANCE and APPLICATION
CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT MECHANISMS
Groundwater in Hydrologic Cycle
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology
Advective Transport Advection (convection) is the transport of dissolved or suspended material by motion of the host fluid. Requires knowledge of the fluid.
Uncertainty and Non-uniqueness
Impact of Flowing Formation Water on Residual CO2 Saturations
Estuarine models: what is under the hood?
Deliberate tracer releases in Groundwater
Nonpoint Source Pollution
Specify domain’s starting fluid composition on the Initial pane
Specify domain’s starting fluid composition on the Initial pane
Modeling Natural Attenuation with GROUNDWATER SERVICES, INC.
Philip B. Bedient Civil and Environmental Engineering Rice University
Models of atmospheric chemistry
Transport Modeling in Groundwater
Config → Dual Porosity… Run → Go
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.
Unit: Contaminant Transport in Groundwater
(1) Amphos 21 Consulting S.L. (2) Grupo Tragsa - SEPI, Spain.
Transport Modeling in Groundwater
Philip B. Bedient Civil and Environmental Engineering Rice University
Modeling Water Treatment Using the Contaminant Transport Module
Presentation transcript:

Principles and Applications of Backward-in-Time Modeling of Contaminants in the Environment Roseanna M. Neupauer Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering University of Colorado March 26, 2008

Motivation Source Characterization TCE is observed in wells Where did it come from? When was it released? Flow direction How much TCE was released? (Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation)

Motivation Capture Zone Delineation Water supply wells Where does their water come from?

Motivation Aquifer Vulnerability How sensitive is the pesticide concentration here … … to a pesticide application here? … or here? … or here? … or here? © Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Motivation Groundwater Age Simulations Water sampled in well When did the water recharge the aquifer? (Stoner et al., 1997)

Motivation Remediation Prioritization Abandoned Mines Which mine contributes the most contamination to the water bodies? How long does it take for the mine contamination to reach the water bodies? (Ryan and Reynolds, 2003)

Forward Modeling vs. Backward Modeling Where is the contamination going? Where did the contamination come from? Flow direction

Forward Modeling vs. Backward Modeling Information is known (or assumed to be known) about the source Information is known about the present state of contamination Flow direction

Forward Modeling vs. Backward Modeling One or a few sources Many possible receptors Many possible sources One or a few receptors Flow direction

Forward Modeling vs. Backward Modeling Models transport from the source to the receptors Models transport from the receptor to the possible sources Flow direction

Forward Modeling vs. Backward Modeling Concentrations Probability density function Flow direction

Forward Contaminant Transport = - (vqC) (q D ÑC ) Ñ · - lqC + qI CI - qoC Rq Co(x) =(M/q)d(x-xo) Contour interval: C = 0.1 g/m3 C = concentration R = retardation coefficient t = time q = porosity D = dispersion coefficient l = decay rate v = groundwater velocity qI = inflow rate per unit volume CI = inflow concentration qO = outflow rate per unit volume

Forward Location PDF, fX(x;t) = - (vqC) (q D ÑC ) Ñ · - lqC + qI CI - qoC Rq Co(x) =(M/q)d(x-xo) Contour interval: C = 0.1 g/m3; fX = 1 x 10-5 m-2 C(x,t) dC(x) fX(x;t)= q = q(x) M dM(xo)

Forward Location PDF, fX(x;t) Co(x) =(M/q)d(x-xo) xo xw Contour interval: C = 0.1 g/m3; fX = 1 x 10-5 m-2 dC(x) Sensitivity of concentration, C, at any X to source mass, M, at xo fX(x;t) = q(x) dM(xo)

Backward Location PDF, fX(x;t) fo(x) =d(x-xo) xw dC(xw) fX(x;t) = q(x) dM(x)

Backward Location PDF, fX(x;t) fo(x) =d(x-xo) xw dC(xw) Sensitivity of concentration, C, at xw to source mass, M, at any X fX(x;t) = q(x) dM(x)

Backward Travel Time PDF and CDF 5 x 10-5 8.64 0.36 5.78 0.24 PDF fT (d-1) CDF FT (-) 2.88 0.12 dCf(xw) Sensitivity of flux concentration, Cf, to source mass, M fT(t;x) = Q(x) dM(x)

Forward and Backward Models dM(xo) fX(x;t)= dC(x) q(x) Forward Equation C t Rq = Ñ (q D ÑC ) - Ñ (vqC) - lqC + qI CI - qoC · · dM(x) fX(x;t)= dC(xw) q(x) Backward (Adjoint) Equation  y t ¶h ¶C Rq + = Ñ ( qD Ñy ) Ñ (v q y) - lqy - qI y + · · C = concentration R = retardation coefficient t = time q = porosity D = dispersion coefficient l = decay rate v = groundwater velocity qI = inflow rate per unit volume CI = inflow concentration qO = outflow rate per unit volume y = adjoint state (sensitivity) t = backward time

Forward and Backward Models Forward Equation C t Rq Ñ (q D ÑC ) - = Ñ (vqC) - lqC + qI CI - qoC · · Backward (Adjoint) Equation  y t ¶h ¶C Rq = Ñ ( qD Ñy ) + Ñ (v q y) - lqy - qI y + · · C = concentration R = retardation coefficient t = time q = porosity D = dispersion coefficient l = decay rate v = groundwater velocity qI = inflow rate per unit volume CI = inflow concentration qO = outflow rate per unit volume y = adjoint state (sensitivity) t = backward time

Forward and Backward Models Forward Equation C t Rq Ñ (q D ÑC ) - = Ñ (vqC) - lqC + qI CI - qoC · · Backward (Adjoint) Equation  y t ¶h ¶C Rq = Ñ ( qD Ñy ) + Ñ (v q y) - lqy - qI y + · · C = concentration R = retardation coefficient t = time q = porosity D = dispersion coefficient l = decay rate v = groundwater velocity qI = inflow rate per unit volume CI = inflow concentration qO = outflow rate per unit volume y = adjoint state (sensitivity) t = backward time

Forward and Backward Models Forward Equation C t Rq Ñ (q D ÑC ) - = Ñ (vqC) - lqC + qI CI - qoC · · Backward (Adjoint) Equation  y t ¶h ¶C Rq = Ñ ( qD Ñy ) + Ñ (v q y) - lqy - qI y + · · C = concentration R = retardation coefficient t = time q = porosity D = dispersion coefficient l = decay rate v = groundwater velocity qI = inflow rate per unit volume CI = inflow concentration qO = outflow rate per unit volume y = adjoint state (sensitivity) t = backward time

Forward and Backward Models Forward Equation C t Rq Ñ (q D ÑC ) - = Ñ (vqC) - lqC + qI CI - qoC · · Backward (Adjoint) Equation  y t ¶h ¶C Rq = Ñ ( qD Ñy ) + Ñ (v q y) - lqy - qI y + · · C = concentration R = retardation coefficient t = time q = porosity D = dispersion coefficient l = decay rate v = groundwater velocity qI = inflow rate per unit volume CI = inflow concentration qO = outflow rate per unit volume y = adjoint state (sensitivity) t = backward time

Forward and Backward Models Forward Equation C t Rq Ñ (q D ÑC ) - = Ñ (vqC) - lqC + qI CI - qoC · · Backward (Adjoint) Equation  y t ¶h ¶C Rq Ñ ( qD Ñy ) + = Ñ (v q y) - lqy - qI y + · · Location PDF dM(x) dC(xw,t) dCf(xw,t) y = h = C(x,t) d(x-xw) d(t) fX(x;t) =q(x)y(x,t) Travel Time PDF fT(t;x) =|Q(x)|y(x,t) Cf(x,t) d(x-xw) d(t) h =

Applications of Backward-in-Time Modeling Source characterization (location, release time): Unconditioned location and travel time PDFs Conditioned location and travel time PDFs Capture zone delineation: travel time CDF Groundwater age dating: travel time CDF Remediation Prioritization: Marginal sensitivity of concentration to source mass Travel time CDF

Source Location Identification (MMR TCE Plume; 1997 5 mg/L contour) 1 scale in km 3 4 Scale in miles C = 58 mg/L C = 203.1 mg/L C = 150 mg/L 2 C = 5110 mg/L Model provided by Chunmiao Zheng; data provided by Jacobs Engineering Group Model provided by Chunmiao Zheng; data provided by Jacobs Engineering Group

Backward Governing Equation  y t = + (v q y) ( qD Ñy ) Ñ · - lqy - qI y + Rq ¶h ¶C Location PDF h = C(x,t) d(x-xw) d(t) fX(x;t) =q(x)y(x,t) One simulation for each observation

Backward Location PDF for 1962 (Neupauer and Wilson, 2005) Sample Location Contour Interval: 2 x 10-7 m-2 1 scale in km Contour: 2 x 10-7 m-2 1 scale in km 3 4 C = 58 mg/L C = 203.1 mg/L C = 150 mg/L 2 C = 5110 mg/L

Backward Location PDF for 1962 (Neupauer and Wilson, 2005) 1 scale in km 3 4 C = 58 mg/L C = 203.1 mg/L C = 150 mg/L 2 C = 5110 mg/L Contour Interval: 2 x 10-7 m-2 Sample Location 1 scale in km Contour: 2 x 10-7 m-2 Multiple-detection Location PDF Contour Interval: 2 x 10-6 m-2

Conditioned Location PDF (Neupauer and Lin, 2006) 4 3 Contour Interval: 2 x 10-7 m-2 Sample Location 1 scale in km Contour: 2 x 10-7 m-2 Conditioned Location PDF Contour Interval: 2 x 10-6 m-2

Backward Governing Equation  y t = + (v q y) ( qD Ñy ) Ñ · - lqy - qI y + Rq ¶h ¶C Travel Time PDF h = Cf(x,t) d(x-xw) d(t) fT(t;x) =Q(x)y(x,t) One simulation for each observation

Backward Travel Time PDFs 1 3 4 2 T

Capture Zone Delineation Reinjection Well Extraction Well Infiltration Trench TCE Plume Plume boundary: 5 mg/L Scale in km Groundwater Remediation System Massachusetts Military Reservation (model provided by Chunmiao Zheng)

Backward Governing Equation  y t = + (v q y) ( qD Ñy ) Ñ · - lqy - qI y + Rq ¶h ¶C Travel Time PDF h = Cf(x,t) d(x-xw) d(t) Travel Time CDF h = Cf(x,t) d(x-xw) FT(t;x) =|Q(x)|y(x,t)

Capture Zone Delineation (Neupauer and Wilson, 2004) Groundwater Remediation System Massachusetts Military Reservation (model provided by Chunmiao Zheng) 10-yr probabilistic capture zone Groundwater Remediation System Massachusetts Military Reservation TCE Plume Infiltration Trench Extraction Well Reinjection Well Scale in km Plume boundary: 5 mg/L

Groundwater Age Dating (Weissmann et al. 2002) 10 5 km

Prioritizing Remediation Activities Warden Gulch

Which mine is the major source?  y t = + (v q y) ( qD Ñy ) Ñ · - lqy - qI y + Rq ¶h ¶C Marginal Sensitivity h = C (x,t) d(x-xw) d(t) dC(t)|stream y(x,t) = dM

Model Domain and Flow Field Warden Gulch Head contours: 2-m interval m Hypothetical mine sites Sampling sites

Marginal sensitivity dC(t)|stream y(x,t) = dM Conservative solute t=50 yr t=125 yr dC(t)|stream y(x,t) = dM Conservative solute Contour intervals: 10-11,10-10,…10-7 m-3 t=50 yr t=125 yr Strontium, R=151

When will remediation have an impact?  y t = + (v q y) ( qD Ñy ) Ñ · - lqy - qI y + Rq ¶h ¶C Travel Time CDF, Solute Age Distribution h = Cf(x,t) |at stream FT(x,t) =|Q(x)|y(x,t)

Solute Age Distribution t=50 yr t=125 yr Contour intervals: 10-4,10-3,10-2,10-1,0.95 t=50 yr t=125 yr t=250 yr t=500 yr t=250 yr t=500 yr Conservative solute Strontium, R=151

Summary Backward-in-time modeling: is useful if information is known about where contamination is now, and information is desired about where contamination was in the past produces probability density functions that can be used to Determine groundwater age or solute age Delineate probabilistic capture zones Identify characteristics of contaminant sources uses standard numerical codes with some minor post-processing

Dispersion - C t (vqC) (q D ÑC ) Ñ - lqC + qI CI - qoC Rq = · - lqC + qI CI - qoC Rq Mean groundwater flow direction C = concentration R = retardation coefficient t = time q = porosity D = dispersion coefficient l = decay rate v = groundwater velocity qI = inflow rate per unit volume CI = inflow concentration qO = outflow rate per unit volume

Advection - C t (vqC) (q D ÑC ) Ñ - lqC + qI CI - qoC Rq = t=t1 · - lqC + qI CI - qoC Rq Dissolved contaminant t=t1 t2>t1 groundwater flow path t3>t2 C = concentration R = retardation coefficient t = time q = porosity D = dispersion coefficient l = decay rate v = groundwater velocity qI = inflow rate per unit volume CI = inflow concentration qO = outflow rate per unit volume

Sorption - C t (vqC) (q D ÑC ) Ñ - lqC + qI CI - qoC Rq = FLOW t=t1 · - lqC + qI CI - qoC Rq FLOW t=t1 t2>t1 C = concentration R = retardation coefficient t = time q = porosity D = dispersion coefficient l = decay rate v = groundwater velocity qI = inflow rate per unit volume CI = inflow concentration qO = outflow rate per unit volume

Transformations - C t (vqC) (q D ÑC ) Ñ - lqC + qI CI - qoC Rq = · - lqC + qI CI - qoC Rq MICROBE t=t1 CO2 t2>t1 C = concentration R = retardation coefficient t = time q = porosity D = dispersion coefficient l = decay rate v = groundwater velocity qI = inflow rate per unit volume CI = inflow concentration qO = outflow rate per unit volume

Forward Governing Equation C t = - (vqC) (q D ÑC ) Ñ · - lqC + qI CI - qoC Rq Sources of contamination: - natural recharge - infiltration from rivers - spills - accidental releases Sinks of contamination: - discharge to rivers - withdrawals at wells C = concentration R = retardation coefficient t = time q = porosity D = dispersion coefficient l = decay rate v = groundwater velocity qI = inflow rate per unit volume CI = inflow concentration qO = outflow rate per unit volume

Multiple Observations P fx(x;t,xwi) i=1 N fx(x;t,xw1,xw2, …,xwN) = N õ ó P fx(x;t,xwi) dx i=1 fx(x;t,xwi) = single observation location probability fx(x;t ,xw1,xw2,…,xwN) = multiple observation location probability

Why Use Concentrations? xo = source location Mo = source mass

Conditioning on Measurements fx (x;t|Ĉ (xw1,t1)…Ĉ (xwn,tn)) = backward location PDF n a P fx(x;t,xwi,ti) P(Ĉ(xwi,ti)| M,x) dM i=1 source mass Conditioned location PDF measured concentration PDF of measured concentration P(Ĉ(xwi,ti)| M,x) ~ N(C(xwi,ti), s2)