C&T Rule Implementation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Pesticide Ordinance Development In A Tribal Community Presented At The 17th Annual Region 9 Tribal EPA Conference October 21-23, 2009 Barry.
Advertisements

Legislative Rule-Making Process. Three Different Processes Higher Education 29A-3A-1 et seq State Board of Education 29A-3B-1 et seq All other state agencies.
1 Grant Award Process Monika Lacka U.S. EPA Region 5.
1 CFR CHAPTER I AND 1 CFR PART 51 REGULATORY UPDATE.
Section 18 and 24c Pilot Projects in Indian Country Western Regions Pesticide Meeting May 18, 2006, Whitefish, MT Scott Downey, EPA Region 10 Pesticides.
Minnesota Law and Health Information Exchange Oversight Activities James I. Golden, PhD State Government Health IT Coordinator Director, Health Policy.
1. Construction/Safety Standards for Small Craft Webinar Presentation January 2014 Transport Canada Associate Assistant Deputy Minister Safety and Security.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Cooperating Agencies & Coordination Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and BLM Regulations Federal Coordination with Local Government Hosted.
NuPAFP Conference October 13-14, 2010 Operational Adjustment Grants.
Summary of Rulemaking in California for the Forensic Alcohol Laboratories Regulation Review Committee Cathy L. Ruebusch, RN, MSN Office of Regulations.
Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
2008 SPCC Rule Amendments 2008 SPCC Rule Amendments Donald P Smith US Environmental Protection Agency Region VI May, 2009 Current Status.
Designations for 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: Overview and Guidance Amy Vasu PM2.5 Workshop June 20-21, 2007.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
Board Member Management System (BMMS) October, 2015.
Dick Wiechman, EPA region 7 Nebraska Project Officer Tribal Pesticide Program Manager.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
1 The Exceptional Events Rule (EER) Overview Tom Link EPA – OAQPS Geographic Strategies Group Westar Meeting, San Francisco, February 25, 2009.
Registration of treaties under Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations Keiichiro Okimoto Associate Legal Officer Treaty Section, Office of Legal.
Under the new grants process, both districts and clubs assume greater responsibility for the management of grants. The Rotary Foundation has established.
Hazardous Waste Import-Export Final Rule Requirements and Implementation December 12, 2016.
CIVIL RIGHTS DIRECTORATE
District and Club Qualification
Major Changes Additional Updates
Submittal And Review Of New And Revised Water Quality Standards
Updates to the Federal Worker Protection Standard
Water Quality Standards Submittal & Review Process
Content of Tender Dossier Instructions to Tenderers
FEMA Tribal Consultation Policy
School-Parent Compact
Anna Preston Vance, HA of Paris
Coastal Carolina University
Step 3: Legally Binding agreements and contracts
Updates to the Federal Worker Protection Standard
School-Parent Compact
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
Sarah Martinez Patricia Meyertholen June 23, 2016
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) CAFO Rule and the Proposed Idaho NPDES CAFO General.
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
STUDENT COURT HOW TO GUIDE
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
Understanding the Planned Changes to the Federal Policy on Protection of Human Subjects (the Common Rule) Megan Kasimatis Singleton, JD, MBE, CIP Assistant.
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
PSO Overview for (name of organization’s) PSES Workgroup
IEEE WG Closing Report – March 2006
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
July 2015 SG CUB Opening Report
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2006 July 2006
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: November 2006 November 2006
District and Club Qualification
What is OAL? The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) ensures that agency regulations are clear, necessary, legally valid, and available to the public. OAL.
WRAP Regional Haze Planning Schedule of Communication
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
The Office of Open Records webinar will begin soon
PSO Overview for (name of organization’s) PSES Workgroup
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
July 2015 SG CUB Opening Report
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
WRAP Board Meeting April 3, 2003
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: May 2005 May 2005
TGw Closing Report March 2008
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
Step 3. Initiate Proposal
Presentation transcript:

C&T Rule Implementation

Certification Rule Effective Date Original effective date was March 6, 2017 The effective date was moved several times for review of questions of fact, law and policy EPA issued several rules to extend the effective date, but a court vacated those delay rules, and declared that the underlying rule went into effect on its original effective date, March 6, 2017 Original effective date was March 6, 2017 The effective date was moved several times for review of questions of fact, law and policy EPA issued several rules to extend the effective date, but a court vacated those delay rules, and declared that the underlying rule went into effect on its original effective date, March 6, 2017

Implementation Timeline 12/12/2016 Revised C&T final rule signed by EPA Administrator 3/6/2017 Revised C&T final rule becomes effective 3/4/2020 Date For Certification Plans to be Submitted to EPA based on 1/4/2017 rule 3/4/2022 EPA Completes its Initial Review of Revised Certification Plans and Some Revised State Plans Will Start to Become Effective* * (EPA will determine timeframes for implementation and compliance with revised certification plans on a case-by-case basis as part of EPA’s review and approval of each revised certification plan) Implementation Timeline Read slide 12/12/16 – Revised C&T final rule signed by Administrator 1/4/17 - Revised final rule published in FR 3/6/17 – Revised C&T final rule becomes effective 3/4/20 - Date for Certification plans to be submitted to EPA 3/4/22 – EPA completes its initial review of the revised state plans. 1/4/2017 Revised C&T final rule published in the Federal Register

Implementation Timeline Certifying authorities have until March 4, 2020 to submit modified certification plans (which may include provisions contingent upon legislative/regulatory action, etc.) to EPA. Existing plans remain in effect until EPA approves or rejects the revised plan or March 4, 2022, whichever is earlier. Timeframe for implementation/compliance with revised certification plan will be decided on a case-by-case basis as part of EPA’s review and approval of each revised certification plan. The rule gives each certifying authority 3 years from the original effective date (i.e., March 6, 2017) to submit revised certification plans demonstrating its compliance with the new requirements. If a revised certification plan (which may include provisions contingent upon legislative/regulatory action, etc.) is submitted by March 4, 2020, existing plans remain in effect until EPA approves or rejects the revised plan or March 4, 2022, whichever is earlier. Per OGC: We should start telling states that they should include a proposed implementation schedule with their modified plan. Timeframe for implementation/compliance with revised certification plan will be decided on a case-by-case basis as part of EPA’s review and approval of each revised certification plan.

EPA Certification Plan Review Workgroup HQ: OPP, OECA, OGC Regions: one rep who coordinates with POs Ensure approval process is consistent among Regions Develop guidance and tools for state plan development and approval Communicate (regular calls) Forum for Q&As, exchange of ideas and issues, drafts, model language, etc. HQ: OPP, OECA, OGC Regions: one rep who coordinates with POs Ensure approval process is consistent between regions Develop guidance and tools for state plan development and approval Communicate (regular calls) Forum for Q&As, exchange of ideas and issues, drafts, model language, etc.

Tools, Information and Support Guidance for certifying authorities What is/is not acceptable; needed explanations Checklist of what needs to be in state plans Initial assessment of what needs to change Repository of relevant documents Q&As – update regularly CPARD 3.0 Guidance for certifying authorities What is/is not acceptable; needed explanations Checklist of what needs to be in state plans Initial assessment of what needs to change Repository of relevant documents Q&As – update regularly CPARD 3.0

State Plan Approval Process States submit draft amended state plan to Regions for review Region reviews and confers with states to resolve questions and issues Certification Program lead or Project Officer Region engages EPA C&T Plan Review workgroup for input, equivalency decisions, guidance, clarification, and consistency check, etc. EPA intends to use email and submission of electronic word processing files, not CPARD, for interim review and approval of revised Certification Plans (due to EPA March 2020) EPA needs to keep record of existing approved plans in CPARD apart from new, incoming revised plans and needs to keep current CPARD active for reporting based on current plans and rule States submit draft amended state plan to Regions for review Region reviews and confers with states to resolve questions and issues Certification Program lead or Project Officer Region engages EPA workgroup for input, equivalency decisions, guidance, clarification, and consistency check, etc.

State Plan Approval Process, Continued Region gets concurrence from HQ/OPP (and C&T Plan Review workgroup) Region approves plan, and Regional Administrator signs/sends approval letter after concurrence by HQ Assistant Administrator for OCSPP HQ publishes Federal Register notice EPA-approved plans are entered into CPARD 3.0 EPA intends to use email and submission of electronic word processing files, not CPARD, for interim review and approval of revised Certification Plans (due to EPA March 2020) EPA needs to keep record of existing approved plans in CPARD apart from new, incoming revised plans and needs to keep current CPARD active for reporting based on current plans and rule Region gets concurrence from HQ/OPP (and workgroup) Region approves plan, and Regional Administrator signs/sends approval letter after concurrence by HQ Assistant Administrator for OCSPP HQ publishes Federal Register notice EPA-approved plans are entered into CPARD 3.0

Tribal Plan Approval Process Same general process Same organizations, some different people Regions lead consultations with tribes OPP will revise EPA’s plan for Indian Country Same process Same organizations, some different people Regions lead consultations with tribes OPP will revise EPA’s plan for Indian Country

Federal Agency Plan Approval Process Slightly different process Federal agencies submit their revised certification plans to EPA HQ/OPP HQ/OPP will review and approve revised Federal agency plans Same HQ offices involved in review HQ will publish notices of approvals of revised Federal agency plans Slightly different process Federal agencies submit their revised certification plans to EPA HQ/OPP HQ/OPP will review and approve revised Federal agency plans Same HQ offices involved in review HQ will publish notices of approvals of revised Federal agency plans

For More C&T Information For additional information on the revisions to the federal Certification of Pesticide Applicators rule, please visit: www.epa.gov/pesticide-worker-safety/revised-certification-standards-pesticide-applicators This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the U.S.

EPA HQ C&T Contacts Richard Pont (pont.richard@epa.gov) 703-305-6448 Jeanne Kasai (kasai.Jeanne@epa.gov) 703-308-3240 Nancy Fitz (fitz.nancy@epa.gov) 703-305-7385 Jennifer Park (park.jennifer@epa.gov) 703-347-0121 This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the U.S.