Structure functions and intrinsic quark orbital motion Petr Závada Inst. of Physics, Prague 2nd Workshop on the QCD Structure of the Nucleon June 12-16, 2006 Villa Mondragone Monte Porzio Catone, Rome, Italy

Introduction In this talk: Presented results are based on the covariant QPM, in which quarks are considered as quasifree fermions on mass shell. Intrinsic quark motion, reflecting orbital momenta, is consistently taken into account. [P.Z. Phys.Rev.D65, 054040(2002) and D67, 014019(2003)]. Recently, this model was generalized to include the transversity distribution [A.Efremov, O.Teryaev and P.Z., Phys.Rev.D70, 054018(2004) and arXiv: hep-ph/0512034]. In this talk: Relation between structure functions and 3D quark momenta distribution Important role of quark orbital motion as a direct consequence of the covariant description

Model

Structure functions Input: Result: 3D distribution functions structure

Comments In the limit of static quarks, for p→0, which is equivalent to the assumption p=xP, one gets usual relations between the structure and distribution functions like Obtained structure functions for m→0 obey the known sum rules: Sum rules were obtained from: 1) Relativistic covariance 2) Spheric symmetry 3) One photon exchange In this talk m→0 is assumed.

Comments Structure functions are represented by integrals from probabilistic distributions: This form allows integral transforms: g1 ↔ g2 or F1 ↔ F2 (rules mentioned above were example). With some additional assumptions also e.g. integral relation g1 ↔ F2 can be obtained (illustration will be given). To invert the integrals and obtain G or H from F2 or g1 (main aim of this talk).

g1, g2 from valence quarks

Calculation - solid line, data - dashed line g1, g2 from valence quarks E155 Calculation - solid line, data - dashed line (left) and circles (right) g1 fit of world data by E155 Coll., Phys.Lett B 493, 19 (2000).

Transversity In a similar way also the transversity was calculated; see [A.Efremov, O.Teryaev and P.Z., Phys.Rev.D70, 054018(2004)]. Transversities obtained above were used for the calculation of double spin asymmetry in the lepton pair production in proposed PAX experiment; see [A.Efremov, O.Teryaev and P.Z., arXiv: hep-ph/0512034)].

Double spin asymmetry in PAX experiment 1. 2.

Quark momenta distributions from structure functions 1) Deconvolution of F2 Remarks: G measures in d3p, PG in the dp pmax=M/2 – due to kinematics in the proton rest frame, ∑p=0 F2 fit of world data by SMC Coll., Phys.Rev. D 58, 112001 (1998).

Quark momenta distributions … 2) Deconvolution of g1 Remark: H=D+-D- represents subset of quarks giving net spin contribution – opposite polarizations are canceled out. Which F2 correspond to this subset? One can calculate

Quark momenta distributions … Comments: Shape of ΔF2 similar to F2val Generic polarized and unpolarized distributions H and G are close together for higher momenta, Mean value: Numerical calculation: g1 fit of world data by E155 Coll., Phys.Lett B 493, 19 (2000).

Intrinsic motion and angular momentum Forget structure functions for a moment… Angular momentum consists of j=l+s. In relativistic case l,s are not conserved separately, only j is conserved. So, we can have pure states of j (j2,jz) only, which are represented by relativistic spherical waves:

j=1/2

Spin and orbital motion <s>, Γ1: two ways, one result -covariant approach is a common basis

Comments are controlled by the factor , two extremes: for fixed j=1/2 both the quantities are almost equivalent: more kinetic energy (in proton rest frame) generates more orbital motion and vice versa. are controlled by the factor , two extremes: massive and static quarks and massless quarks and important role of the intrinsic quark orbital motion emerges as a direct consequence of the covariant approach

Summary Covariant version of QPM involving quark orbital motion was studied. New results: Model allows to calculate 3D quark momenta distributions (in proton rest frame) from the structure functions. Important role of quark orbital motion, which follows from covariant approach, was pointed out. Orbital momentum can represent as much as 2/3 j. The spin function g1 is reduced correspondingly.

Sum rules Basis:

Manifestly covariant form: where