pRNA induces structural changes in 6S‐1 RNA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RNA Secondary Structure Prediction. 16s rRNA RNA Secondary Structure Hairpin loop Junction (Multiloop)Bulge Single- Stranded Interior Loop Stem Image–
Advertisements

Figure S1 cmSP165/166 severe b MIM159 (mir159a) a Figure S1: Detailed phenotype of severe cmSP165/166 and MIM159 plants. Severe cmSP165/166 (15x) plants.
Figure 1. RISC activity in BYL. ( A ) Quantity of AGO1 protein in BYL
MINX RNA nt 120 nt 74 nt 45 nt M M nt 150 nt 239 nt MINX RNA
Figure 4 RNA stem–loop structure of the psbD 5′ region
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Expression of Hoxa9 and Meis1a in spleen cells isolated from leukemic recipients of Hoxa9‐ and Meis1a‐transduced bone marrow cells. Expression of Hoxa9.
(A, B) Stereoscopic views of the P3 RNase MRP RNA domain in complex with the RNase MRP/RNase P protein components Pop6 and Pop7. (A, B) Stereoscopic views.
The RNA components of eukaryotic RNase P and RNase MRP have multiple common structural features including the P3 domain. The RNA components of eukaryotic.
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Cooperative formation of a higher‐order complex containing AP1 and HMG‐I(Y). Cooperative formation of a higher‐order complex containing AP1 and HMG‐I(Y).
Role of pRNA length and pRNA:6S‐1 RNA duplex stability.
The RNA World of the Nucleolus: Two Major Families of Small RNAs Defined by Different Box Elements with Related Functions  Andrey G Balakin, Laurie Smith,
B. subtilis 6S‐1 RNA forms stable hybrids with pRNA in vitro.
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Consequences of T‐DNA insertion on SWP expression in swp mutant.
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (February 1998)
Modification of U6 Spliceosomal RNA Is Guided by Other Small RNAs
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Base-Pairing between Untranslated Regions Facilitates Translation of Uncapped, Nonpolyadenylated Viral RNA  Liang Guo, Edwards M. Allen, W.Allen Miller 
A Non-Stem-Loop CRISPR RNA Is Processed by Dual Binding Cas6
The Real-Time Path of Translation Factor IF3 onto and off the Ribosome
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (April 1998)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 135, Issue 2, Pages e1 (August 2008)
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
The chloroplast 4.5S ribosomal RNA
VgRBP71 Stimulates Cleavage at a Polyadenylation Signal in Vg1 mRNA, Resulting in the Removal of a cis-Acting Element that Represses Translation  Nikolay.
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2003)
A Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetase Recognizes a Conserved tRNA-like Structural Motif in the Group I Intron Catalytic Core  Mark G Caprara, Valerie Lehnert, Alan.
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Rapid identification of efficient target cleavage sites using a hammerhead ribozyme library in an iterative manner  Wei-Hua Pan, Ping Xin, Vuong Bui,
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
A Non-Stem-Loop CRISPR RNA Is Processed by Dual Binding Cas6
Volume 125, Issue 5, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Katherine Launer-Felty, C. Jason Wong, James L. Cole 
Linear Mitochondrial Plasmids of F
Figure 1. RNase III processes the 23S-5S rRNA precursor in vivo
An RNA Aptamer that Induces Transcription
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2010)
Folding of the Adenine Riboswitch
Gene regulation by Spot 42 conferred through insertion of an Hfq‐binding site. Gene regulation by Spot 42 conferred through insertion of an Hfq‐binding.
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages (July 2013)
Anne Dallas, Harry F Noller  Molecular Cell 
Helena Celesnik, Atilio Deana, Joel G. Belasco  Molecular Cell 
Generalized RNA-Directed Recombination of RNA
Direct Visualization of Uridylate Deletion In Vitro Suggests a Mechanism for Kinetoplastid RNA Editing  Scott D Seiwert, Stefan Heidmann, Kenneth Stuart 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Isolation and characterization of fluorophore-binding RNA aptamers
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)
Coby B. Carlson, Momchilo Vuyisich, Barry D. Gooch, Peter A. Beal 
Nickel2+-Mediated Assembly of an RNA-Amino Acid Complex
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Specific DNA-RNA Hybrid Recognition by TAL Effectors
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
A Regulated Two-Step Mechanism of TBP Binding to DNA
Modification of the Properties of Elongating RNA Polymerase by Persistent Association with Nascent Antiterminator RNA  Ranjan Sen, Rodney A King, Robert.
Controlling Protein Activity with Ligand-Regulated RNA Aptamers
Structure and Function of Eukaryotic Ribonuclease P RNA
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Functionality of Human Thymine DNA Glycosylase Requires SUMO-Regulated Changes in Protein Conformation  Roland Steinacher, Primo Schär  Current Biology 
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Presentation transcript:

pRNA induces structural changes in 6S‐1 RNA pRNA induces structural changes in 6S‐1 RNA. (A) Structure probing using 5′‐endlabelled 6S‐1 RNA. Lane 1: 5′‐endlabelled 6S‐1 RNA directly loaded onto the gel; lane 2: alkaline hydrolysis ladder of 6S‐1 RNA; lane 3: limited RNase T1 digest under denaturing conditions; lanes 4 and 5: free 6S‐1 RNA subjected to the annealing procedure (lane 5) or not (lane 4) before lead probing; lane 6: 10 pmol 5′‐endlabelled 6S‐1 RNA and 100 pmol pRNA 14‐mer were subjected to the annealing procedure in 6 μl 1 × TE buffer before lead probing. pRNA induces structural changes in 6S‐1 RNA. (A) Structure probing using 5′‐endlabelled 6S‐1 RNA. Lane 1: 5′‐endlabelled 6S‐1 RNA directly loaded onto the gel; lane 2: alkaline hydrolysis ladder of 6S‐1 RNA; lane 3: limited RNase T1 digest under denaturing conditions; lanes 4 and 5: free 6S‐1 RNA subjected to the annealing procedure (lane 5) or not (lane 4) before lead probing; lane 6: 10 pmol 5′‐endlabelled 6S‐1 RNA and 100 pmol pRNA 14‐mer were subjected to the annealing procedure in 6 μl 1 × TE buffer before lead probing. (B) Structure probing using 3′‐endlabelled 6S‐1 RNA. Lanes 1–3, 6 and 7: as lanes 1–3, 5 and 6, respectively, in (A); lanes 4 and 5: as lanes 6 and 7, but RNase T1 cleavage (under native conditions). Note that lane 1 was taken from a separate gel using the same batch of 3′‐endlabelled 6S‐1 RNA as in lanes 2–7. (C) Structure probing using 3′‐endlabelled 6S‐1 RNA. For lanes 1–5, see (B); lanes 6 and 7, cleavage by RNase V1. (D) Structure probing of the 5′‐endlabelled circularly permuted 6S‐1 RNA (6S‐1 cp) variant (see Supplementary Figure S1). Lanes 1–7 correspond to lanes 1–7 in (C); lanes 8 and 9 correspond to lanes 6 and 7 in (B). For details of probing reactions, see Supplementary data. Asterisks in (B–D) mark the regions of band compression. (E) Model of the pRNA‐induced structural rearrangement of the 6S‐1 RNA core region (grey shaded in the 6S‐1 RNA secondary structure at the top). The structural rearrangement can be induced by the RNA 14‐mer (orange) but also by an all‐LNA 8‐mer (red; see Supplementary Figure S2) mimicking the 5′‐terminal 8 nt of the 14‐mer. The orientation of helical elements after the rearrangement is arbitrary, their exact orientation is unknown. RNAfold analysis of the 6S‐1 RNA core structure (nt 15–81–(N)4–126–174) predicts that the central bulge collapse occurs when the first nine pRNA‐encoding nucleotides are blocked (by constraint folding) for base‐pairing with other 6S‐1 RNA nucleotides. The three A–U base pairs (U51–53/A153–155) are predicted by RNAfold and mfold in dot plots of suboptimal structures with free energies close to that of the minimum free energy (MFE) structure. Benedikt M Beckmann et al. EMBO J. 2012;31:1727-1738 © as stated in the article, figure or figure legend