FY15 Chapter 70 Aid Preliminary House 2 Proposal January 22, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WELCOME BUDGET MANAGERS AND CHIEF FISCAL OFFICERS
Advertisements

Fixing a Local Aid Glitch Discretionary Decisions in the Implementation of 2006 Education Aid Reforms.
Foundations of American Education, Fifth Edition
Introduction and Overview
Property Tax Relief and Reform: Plan Overview Joint Select Committee on Property Tax Relief and Reform June 11, 2007.
1 OAS Quarterly Resource Management and Performance Report June 30, 2013 Secretariat for Administration and Finance.
Tennessee Higher Education Commission Higher Education Recommendations & Finance Overview November 15, 2012.
New Title I/NCLB Directors Workshop NCLB Winter Conference January 16, 2007 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon, Title.
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
Title I Site Eligibility Ranking & Serving Schools NCLB Technical Assistance Audio March 28, :30 PM March 29, :30 AM Alaska Department of.
1 Finance Overview: AEAs/LEAs Barb Harms Business Manager Grant Wood Area Education Agency Management Team Meeting – 11/3/06.
NPV.
Debt Affordability Committee 1 Debt Affordability Committee August 15, 2013.
General Fund Five Year Forecast
Fiscal Year Budget Overview Citizen Academy September 3, 2013 Citizen Academy September 3, 2013.
MASBO February Bi-Monthly Meeting February Doubletree Inn, Milford MA Update on C70 and Other Funding In Governors Budget Roger Hatch and Jay Sullivan.
SB 192 – Oil and Gas Production Tax Rate/Credit Sponsored by Senator Bert Stedman Senate Resources April 9, 2014 SB 192 Senate Resources Presentation by.
Seekonk Board of Assessors
The Funding of Public Education in Wisconsin: Is a Crisis Brewing? Andrew Reschovsky Professor of Public Affairs and Applied Economics Robert M. La Follette.
CHAPTER 1: UNDERSTANDING THE FINANCIAL PLANNING PROCESS.
School Funding Formulas: A National Perspective Presentation to the Task Force on School Funding John Myers & Mark Fermanich, APA Consulting Salem, Oregon.
25 seconds left…...
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
FISCAL CONSTRAINTS & CHALLENGES PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION DECEMBER 9, Rye City School District.
Highlights From the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A
Western ND School District Funding Information Session July 17, 2013 Comfort Inn Bismarck, ND New State School Funding Model ND Department of Public Instruction.
Grants Management September 26, 2013 Prepared by Joanna Laghetto Charter School Office.
School Property Tax Relief in Wisconsin Association for Equity in Funding Milwaukee, January 19, 2012 Andrew Reschovsky Professor of Public Affairs and.
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE First Quarter Financial Status Report November 5, First Quarter Financial Status Report -- Status of.
 MAISA Summer Conference Lansing, MI, June 20-21, 2012.
Property Tax Levy. Key Tax Levy Components The Board of Education must set the FY tax levy no later than November 1, 2012 The tax.
Chapter 70 FY14 Preliminary House 1 Proposal Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1/23/2013.
1 MFP 101 Understanding the Minimum Foundation Program Formula FY
* * 0 PUBLIC EDUCATION FINANCE IN PENNSYLVANIA: UNEQUAL AND INADEQUATE Prepared by The Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia March 2008.
School Finance 101 by Ben Irwin Business Manager Parkview School District.
FY16 Chapter 70 Aid Preliminary House 1 Proposal March 4, 2015.
Wisconsin Public Schools Revenue Limits. History 1949 –State adopted a system to address property- wealth differences among districts, which provided.
1. In Massachusetts, the definition of an adequate spending level for a school district, given the specific grades, programs, and demographic characteristic.
1 State Aid to School Districts in New York State: An Overview Based on the Laws of 2007 State Aid Work Group New York State Education Department April.
MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP) AN OVERVIEW OF HOW THE FORMULA IS CALCULATED.
Public Hearing on the Budget and Proposed 2013 Property Taxes [Put Your School District Name Here] December 2012 Information on changes to school.
Chapter 70 Massachusetts School Funding Formula. Massachusetts School Revenues FY00-FY12 (in billions) 1/23/ School spending is primarily a local.
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues October 2012.
LOCAL AID What’s in House 1: Reductions with Reform March 4, 2003.
Understanding the Nuts and Bolts of the Foundation Budget and Local Contribution Roger Hatch Melissa King MASBO Annual Institute May 17 th, 2013.
Chapter 70 Aid FY14 Budget 7/12/2013. FY14 Chapter 70 Summary Aid 73 districts receive foundation aid to ensure that they do not fall below their foundation.
Community Meeting May 31, Agenda: 7:00 – 8:00 Topics to include: An overview of the “foundation funding” system of the past several years. (Mr.
 Educate the Sutton community on the annual budget process  Provide a five year overview  Provide the Sutton community with an opportunity to ask questions.
MARS General Meeting Nashoba Valley, Feb 12, 2013 Chapter 70 And State Budget Update Roger Hatch, Jay Sullivan, Christine Lynch, ESE.
FY17 Chapter 70 Aid Preliminary House 2 Proposal January 27, 2016.
College Community School District 4 Budget Calculations for General Fund Budget Year.
Role of the Property Tax in Pre K - 12 Education Funding Tom Melcher Education Finance Working Group July 31, 2012.
Municipal Tax Rates: How Are They Calculated, And How Do They Change December 2, 2015 Stephan W. Hamilton, Director Municipal and Property Division NH.
Preliminary House 1 Proposal January 25, 2017
Preliminary House 1 Proposal January 25, 2017
General Appropriations Act (GAA) July 8, 2016
Preliminary House 2 Proposal January 24, 2018
EOPS and CARE Allocation Formulas in and Beyond CCC Confer March 22, :30-3:30 Listen over your computer Or…. Call , Passcode.
General Appropriations Act July 17, 2017
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING OVERVIEW House Ways and Means Committee
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues
School Finance Mary Lynn Christel
General Appropriations Act July 26, 2018
Duxbury’s Education Spending in Context
General Appropriations Act July 17, 2017
Property Tax Levy – Taxes Payable 2019
FY20 House 1 Budget Overview
FY20 Budget Development Update – SWM Recommendations
FY20 Budget Development Update – HWM Recommendations
General Appropriations Act July 2019
Presentation transcript:

FY15 Chapter 70 Aid Preliminary House 2 Proposal January 22, 2014

Highlights from House 2 2 FY15 Chapter 70 aid is $4.40B, a 2.3% increase from FY14. This year marks a big step forward in implementing the equity component of Chapter 70 for communities required to contribute more than their targets. Those communities will have the gap between their required and target local contributions reduced by half. All eligible regular education pre-kindergarten pupils now count in the foundation budget. All districts receive at least $25 per pupil in additional aid over the prior year. 1/22/2014

Chapter 70 is the Commonwealths school funding statute A districts Chapter 70 aid is determined in three basic steps: 1.It defines and calculates a foundation budget, an adequate funding level for each district, given the specific grades, programs, and demographic characteristics of its students. 2.It then determines an equitable local contribution, how much of that foundation budget should be paid for by each city and towns property tax, based upon the relative wealth of the community. 3.The remainder is funded by Chapter 70 (c70) state aid. Local Contribution + State Aid = a districts Net School Spending (NSS) requirement. This is the minimum amount that a district must spend to comply with state law. 1/22/2014 3

Districts receive different levels of Chapter 70 aid, because their communitys ability to pay differs 1/22/2014 4

Key Factors in School Funding Formula 1/22/2014 Foundation Budget Enrollment Wage Adjustment Factor Inflation Local Contribution Property value Income Municipal Revenue Growth Factor These six factors work together to determine a districts c70 aid. 5

Foundation Budget FY15 Foundation Rates per Pupil 1/22/2014 Average Foundation Rate is $10,486 per pupil. 6

Foundation Budget FY15 Statewide Foundation Budget by Spending Category 1/22/ percent of statewide foundation is instructional in nature. 7

Local Contribution Establishing local ability to pay The foundation budget is a shared municipal-state responsibility. Each community has a different target local share, or ability to pay, based on its property values and residents incomes. Prior to this policy, required local contributions had become less linked to ability to pay. A process was established in 2007 to move each community from its 2006 baseline to its new target. 8 1/22/2014

Determining each communitys target local share starts with the local share of statewide foundation. 9 Determine local share of statewide foundation. 59% Local Contribution $5,820,946,669 41% State Aid* $4,045,064,344 Statewide, determine percentages that yield ½ from property and ½ from income. Property Effort.3624% $3,536,333,601 Income Effort % $3,536,333,601 Property and income percentages are applied uniformly across all cities and towns to determine the combined effort yield from property and income. Statewide Foundation Budget $9,866,011,313 Calculate statewide foundation budget. 1/22/2014 *This reflects the statewide target aid share. The state currently distributes more than this in Chapter 70 aid.

Individual communities target local shares are based on local property values and income, and foundation budget. 10 To determine local effort, first apply this years property percentage (0.3624%) to the towns 2012 total equalized property valuation Then apply this years income percentage (1.5113%) to the towns 2011 total residential income Local Property Effort + Local Income Effort =Combined Effort Yield (CEY) Target Local Share = CEY/Foundation budget Capped at 82.5% of foundation In FY15, 131 of 351 communities are capped. 1/22/2014

Getting Closer To the Target Contribution Determining the Upcoming Years Local Contribution Preliminary Contribution Increase last years required local contribution by the municipalitys Municipal Revenue Growth Factor (MRGF) – Calculated annually by the Department of Revenue – Quantifies the most recent annual percentage change in each community's local revenues, such as the annual increase in the Proposition 2½ levy limit, that should be available for schools Required Contribution If the preliminary contribution is above the target, reduce by the effort reduction percent (50% in FY15). If the preliminary contribution is below by less than 2.5%, the preliminary contribution becomes the new requirement. If the preliminary contribution is below by more than 7.5%, an additional 2% is added to the preliminary contribution. For those below by between 2.5 and 7.5%, 1% is added. 1/22/

Reaching the Targets Over Time 1/22/ Chapter 70 (FY15) continues the transition towards the local contribution and aid targets. 279 communities with required excess effort are reduced by 50% of that excess, amounting to $154 million in lower required contributions. 72 communities have required contributions below their targets, and are moved closer by their MRGFs, plus: an additional 1% if below by 2.5 to 7.5% (n=31), or an additional 2% if below by more than 7.5% (n=16). Additional contributions total $7.6 million. Local contribution and aid targets were first defined in FY07, with a projected five-year phase-in. Phase-in was slowed by the state revenue crisis.

Progress Toward Target Contributions 1/22/ Chapter 70 Minimum Local Contributions Amount Above and Below Targets

Progress Toward Target Contributions 1/22/

Regional Allocation Example: Berkley The city or towns required local contribution is allocated among the districts in which it is a member. This is based upon the share of its total foundation budget. 1/22/ Town of Berkley

Calculating Chapter 70 Aid 1/22/2014 Start with prior years aid FY14 c70 (statewide: $4.3B) Add together the prior years aid and the required local contribution (Row 1 and 3). If the combined amount is minus than foundation budget: Foundation aid provides additional funding for districts to spend at foundation levels (Row 4). 59 operating districts Calculate the districts foundation aid with local effort fully reduced to target. Provide 35% of that amount if its larger than the foundation aid increase. 94 operating districts If it is greater than foundation budget: Chapter 70 aid is held harmless at the prior years level. District receives at least $25 per pupil in additional aid over FY14 (201 operating districts). 16

Progress Toward Target Aid Share 1/22/ Chapter 70 Aid Amounts Above and Below Target

Progress Toward Target Aid Share 1/22/ FY2007 FY2015

Net School Spending v. Actual NSS Net School Spending (NSS) Chapter 70 Aid +Required Local Contribution Districts NSS Requirement NSS requirement is legal funding obligation for each district. – Remains fully in effect and will be enforced – Aid penalties result from non-compliance Actual NSS Computed each year from each districts End of Year Financial Report – Includes operating expenditures – Includes municipal indirect costs such as insurance, maintenance and administration – Excludes non- appropriated funds such as grants and revolving funds – Excludes capital spending 1/22/

1/22/2014 Most Districts Spend in Excess of Their Net School Spending Requirement 20

Chapter 70 Website 70/ 70/ 1/22/

Chapter 70 Contact Info Melissa King, Roger Hatch, /22/