ETF Emulsion/Residue Testing Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Karl Zipf DelDOT February 2014
Advertisements

ROAD PAVEMENT FORUM GUIDELINES ON MODIFIED BINDERS FOR USE IN HOT- MIX ASPHALT AND SURFACING SEAL APPLICATIONS.
Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC “Engineering Services for the Asphalt Industry” WHRP Project Effect of Recovered Binders from Recycled Shingles.
SuperPave Asphalt Specifications
2014 Chip Seal Training ODOT Specifications
Binder Characterizations for High Tire Pressure Project 04/26/2012 Injun Song Injun Song, Ph.D., P. E. SRA International, Inc. Federal Aviation Administration.
Office of Infrastructure R&D U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Use in Asphalt Mixtures Canadian.
Optimal Timing of Preventive Maintenance for Addressing Environmental Aging in Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavement Pooled Fund Study TPF5-153 MnROAD 27 May 2010.
Development of Biopolymers from Soybean Oil Andrew Cascione & Nacú Hernández Dr. Christopher Williams and Dr. Eric Cochran 1 October 10, 2012.
New Technologies Land on Airport Pavements Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conference February 18-20, 2009.
Chapter 13 Selecting a Data Collection Method. DATA COLLECTION AND THE RESEARCH PROCESS Steps 1 and 2: Selecting a General Research Topic and Focusing.
Types, Properties and Grades of Asphalt-Part B
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
EUA Convention of European Higher Education Institutions Graz, May 2003 Theme III Consolidating a Quality Culture in Europe’s Universities.
HUSKY ASPHALT 1-2-3’s of PGAC Calgary Presentation August 14, 2006.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:5 Develop Policies and Plans that Support Individual and Community.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 3-1.
Characterization of Alaskan Hot-Mix Asphalt containing RAP
Student Learning Objectives A Guiding Framework for Selecting Student Assessments to Inform Educator Evaluation Student Learning Objectives Training Series.
Binders Trevor Distin.
2 3 WMA Technical Working Group (WMA TWG) Formed in 2005 Purpose: Promote Technology Transfer Facilitate Product Approval Methods Encourage Research.
AAPA 2012 Study Tour to Europe – High performance asphalt and binders – Part 2 v1 High performance asphalt and binders Part 2.
Conclusions of the National Stakeholders Meeting The Secretariat, RRCAP.
 The methods used for the characterization and testing of asphalt materials have advanced considerably in the past 20 years. The State of Qatar has.
Monitoring Activities Answer the Following Questions: What is being done? Scope How well is it being done? Quality Are we doing it on a large enough scale?
February 5, Fatigue of Asphalt Mixtures, Endurance Limit, Polymer Modifications, Healing 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E-07 1.E-05 1.E-03 1.E-01.
Road Pavement Forum May 2006 Technical Guideline: The use of Modified Bituminous Binders in Road Construction (TG 1: 2001)
6th China Asphalt Summit
February 16, 2016 Data Advisory Task Force. MoSTEMWINS Data Projects Strategy 1 -- Develop and Implement a statewide data system in support of tracking.
1 Polymer Technology Department, Gdansk University of Technology - Poland by M. Sulyman, M. Sienkiewicz, J. Haponiuk 2 nd World Congress and Expo on Recycling.
Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS): Overview
Critical Factors Affecting Asphalt Concrete Durability
A ACLAND.BIZ MAPPING CRACK SUSCEPTIBILITY OF BITUMINOUS MATERIALS WITH BINDER DURABILITY Daru Widyatmoko & Ric Elliott (Scott Wilson Pavement Engineering.
Update from FHWA Emulsion Task Force
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Sixth Edition
TxDOT Implementation Project Darren Hazlett, Jerry Peterson
Lab Roles and Lab Report
QC Document Update Todd Shields, INDOT.
Research on Asphalt Emulsion Test technology
Binders Trevor Distin.
SCOPE OF PRACTICE FOR NURSES
3.01 Understand Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services
Objective 3.01 Understanding Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services
The Urban Forest Management Plan
Performance Graded Specifications for Emulsified Asphalt
Paramix mid-term meeting in Barcelona November 13, 2002
Chip Seal Quality Assurance Guide
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Emulsion Task Force (ETF)
Emulsion Task Force Meeting
Jerry Peterson, Construction Division
Objective 3.01 Understanding Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services
Performance Graded Specifications for Emulsified Asphalt
Background information on the progress of public governance reform
Scrub Seal Emulsions with Rejuvenators
Emulsion Task Force (ETF)
Quality Assurance for Emulsified Asphalt Surface Treatments
Objective 3.01 Understanding Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services
Objective 3.01 Understanding Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services
ADOT SPR-742 PROJECT Akshay Gundla, Ph.D. Applied Research Associates
What is IT audit? An examination of how IT systems where implemented to ensure that they meet the organization’s business needs without compromising.
Objective 3.01 Understanding Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services
Objective 3.01 Understanding Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services
Objective 3.01 Understanding Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services
Objective 3.01 Understanding Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services
ETF Emulsion/Residue Testing Program
Recovery Method Comparison
NCHRP Project Update: A Calibrated and Validated National Performance-Related Specification for Emulsified Asphalt Binder Greg Harder AASHTO TSP•2.
Rethinking PP Timing Strategies
TSP2 - ETF Meeting ETF Indianapolis, IN June 12-13, 2019
Presentation transcript:

ETF Emulsion/Residue Testing Program Mike Anderson AASHTO TSP•2 – Emulsion Task Force (ETF) Meeting Warner Babcock Institute (WBI) for Green Chemistry Wilmington, MA November 29-30, 2017

2017 ETF Testing Program The principal goals of the program are to: Determine appropriate procedures to be used for high and low temperature rheological properties Determine the need for long-term aging Evaluate procedures intended to ensure the quality of polymer modification without excluding good performers

2017 ETF Testing Program Scope Coordinate Sampling, Shipment, and Testing for Plant- Produced Emulsions Approximately 25 total samples with geographic diversity within the United States Samples to primarily include CRS, CRS-2P (SBS), CRS-2L (SBR Latex), and HFRS-2P emulsions A maximum of 3 samples of HFRS-2P (or other high float emulsion) will be chosen

2017 ETF Testing Program Scope Coordinate Testing Program for Plant-Produced Emulsions Husky (Jen Penner) MTE Services (Andrew Hanz) Paragon Technical Services (Codrin Daranga) Other Labs as available Collate and Analyze Data from Residue Rheological Testing Program Compile data from participating labs and compare grades based on SPG and EPG systems. Compare: 4-mm DSR results to 8-mm DSR and BBR results; High temperature grading using G*/sin δ and Jnr; PAV-aged results with results obtained with no aging.

2017 ETF Testing Program Scope Provide assistance to the ETF, based on the analyzed data, on the grading of polymer modified emulsions and polymer identification Evaluate and recommend modifications to AASHTO Test procedures Work with ETF to develop the framework for implementation of Performance-Related Specifications for chip seal residues

2017 ETF Testing Program Samples Year – UPG – Sample ID 17 Identification Year – UPG – Sample ID 17 01 (Pacific) 02 (Rocky Mountain) 03 (North Central) 04 (Southeast) 05 (Northeast) 06 (Canada) 01 . n

2017 ETF Testing Program Samples # of Samples Type of Samples Location(s) 6 CRS-2P 01, 02, 03, 03, 04, 04 3 CRS-2L 03, 04, 05 CRS-2 03, 04, 04 1 CRS-2M 03 HFRS-2 05 HFRS-2P 04 HFMS-2ST HFE-150

ETF Testing Program: Data Sheet

2017 ETF Testing Program: SPG Grading Comparison

2017 ETF Testing Program: SPG Grading Comparison

2017 ETF Testing Program: EPG Grading

2017 ETF Testing Program: EPG Grading

2017 ETF Testing Program: EPG Grading

2017 ETF Testing Program: EPG Grading

2017 ETF Testing Program: EPG Grading

2017 ETF Testing Program: EPG Grading

2017 ETF Testing Program: Grading Comparison

2017 ETF Testing Program: Polymer Identification

2017 ETF Testing Program: MSCR Recovery

2017 ETF Testing Program: MSCR Recovery

2017 ETF Testing Program: MSCR Recovery

2017 ETF Testing Program: CRS-2P

2017 ETF Testing Program: CRS-2P

2017 ETF Testing Program: CRS-2L

2017 ETF Testing Program: Polymer Identification

2017 ETF Testing Program: Polymer Identification

2017 ETF Testing Program Other Tests 4-mm DSR BBR As Recovered and Recovered + PAV Low Temperature Surface Stiffness G(8) Low Temperature PG G(60) m(60) ΔTc BBR S(60), m(60), ΔTc

2017 ETF Testing Program Other Tests Recovered + PAV Critical Phase Angle Phase Angle (Polymer Presence) MSCR (Jnr, R)

2017 ETF Testing Program Next Steps Collect and analyze data from other samples and labs Compare grades based on SPG and EPG systems. 4-mm DSR results to 8-mm DSR and BBR results High temperature grading using G*/sin δ and Jnr PAV-aged results with results obtained with no aging Review procedures and recommend necessary changes e.g., use of high frequencies (100 rad/s) in temperature- frequency sweep testing

Thanks!