YouTube - The Declaration of Independence

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Due Process and Search and Seizure- 4 th and 14 th Amendments.
Advertisements

Landmark Supreme Court Case Integrated Government Mrs. Brahe and Mrs. Compton.
Historical Background Dollree Mapp was under suspicion for possibly hiding a person suspected in a bombing. Mapp refused to let the police in her home.
Rights of the Accused th – Amendment Presumption of innocence Presumption of innocence Manzanar –one of our big failings Reasonable doubt Reasonable.
Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?
Instructions for using this template. Remember this is Jeopardy, so where I have written “Answer” this is the prompt the students will see, and where.
Criminal Justice Process: the investigation – Chp 12 Arrest – Suspect taken into custody 4 th Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their.
Law enforcement officers conduct searches every day in an effort to find evidence that can be seized and used in court to prosecute people who have violated.
Objective 29L Analyze he rights of the accused as set forth in the 4 th,5 th,6 th,8 th, and 14 th Amendments, including but no limited to such cases as.
+ Protecting Individual Liberties Section 1 Chapter 14.
Unit Five Lesson 31 How do the Fourth and Fifth Amendments Protect Against Unreasonable Law Enforcement Procedures.
Objective 29l-Analyze the rights of the accused Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois.
Mapp v Ohio By: Gavin Koonts 10/27/13 Block 2. Mapp v Ohio  Dollree Mapp v State of Ohio  Argued: March 29, 1961  Decided: June 19, 1961.
Street Law Fourth Amendment Rights
California vs. Acevedo By: Caroline Correa & Raul Perez.
MAPP V. OHIO Rachel Simmons. Background & Freedom at Issue  The 4 th and 14 th Amendments  With reasonable suspicion of a bomb at the house, the police.
By: Holden Luce.  Mapp was accused of harboring a criminal involved in a bombing case.  The Officers confronted Mapp at her home and demanded that she.
The Fourth Amendment What are Your Rights? Search and Seizure:
Plain View Doctrine  Allows a police officer to seize evidence found in “plain view” during a search without a warrant. Also, when officers are carrying.
The Bill of Rights The First Fundamental Changes of the Constitution.
THE 4 TH AMENDMENT The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall.
 What is the exclusionary rule  Explain stop and frisk  What is the plain view doctrine  What did Miranda v Arizona require police to do  What happens.
LS100 Eight Skills Prof. Jane McElligott.  A Miranda Warning is a statement police must read to a suspect prior to interrogation of the suspect once.
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated;
Mapp v. Ohio (1961).
 The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,
The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) FACTS OF THE CASE: On May 23, 1957, police officers in near Cleveland, Ohio received information that a suspect in a bombing case,
Slide 1 III. Criminal Procedure and the Constitution A.Analyze and Define Criminal Procedure B.Analyze the provisions of the 4 th and 5 th Amendments pertaining.
Legal Studies * Mr. Marinello ARRESTS AND WARRANTS.
Essential Question How does the Constitution protect the rights of the accused?
Vernonia School District V Acton Oregon-Late 1980’s school officials recognized higher rate of drug use among athletes Oregon-Late 1980’s school officials.
Rights of the Accused. 1. Arrest With a warrant: a) based on probable cause b) warrant obtained from a judge presented with probable cause With a warrant:
CJ305 UNIT 7 Instructor: K. Austin Zimmer, J.D. Make sure you adjust your speakers and audio settings on your computer so you can hear the music.
Fourth Amendment And Probable Cause. By the end of this presentation you should be able to understand; ◦Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution ◦How.
Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation The criminal justice process includes everything that happens to a person from the moment of arrest, through.
U.S. Supreme Court Cases Makayla Putman, Matthew Esken, Megan Rich, & Sam Fagel.
Unit 3 The Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment To The United States Constitution The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Law-Related Ch Notes The criminal justice process includes everything that happens from the arrest to the punishment of a defendant. I. Arrest:
SEARCH & SEIZURE.
Limiting the Right of Search
Rules of Evidence.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual rights
Supreme Court briefs.
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) 367 U.S. 643.
By Maura Hertig, Ryan Hornickel, and Mia Lerner
Impact of Supreme Court Cases on Law Enforcement
Part of the 4th Amendment
By Michael Cleary Period 8 10/3/13 College Business Law Mr. Como
Name that tune! Raise your hand if you know how to answer BOTH of the questions below. Artist? How does this song relate to what we’re learning today?
The Bill of Rights The First 10 Amendments to the Constitution
Liberalism vs. Conservatism
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES:
Michelle D. Rivera 7th period November 15, 2011
Fourth Amendment And Probable Cause.
Evan Parkinson and Ryan Richmond
The Investigation Chapter 12
By: Arron Ferguson Ignacio Leibas
October 16, 2018 Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda:
4th Admendment Mapp Vs Ohio
4th amendment By: KEila Aguilar.
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATIVE PHASE
Defendants’ Rights Edgenuity Lessons 3.4 and 3.5.
Rochin, schmerber & mapp
4th Amendment: Search and Seizure
The 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments
Presentation transcript:

YouTube - The Declaration of Independence

Mapp v. Ohio (1961): The Facts Dollree Mapp, a woman in her early twenties, carried on a number of illegal activities in her Cleveland home. For several months the police had attempted to shut down her operations, but apparently Mapp was tipped off because each time police planned a raid, she managed to elude them. One day, plainclothes police Sgt. Carl Delau tried to enter Mapp’s house, this time on the ground that she was harboring a fugitive from justice (the fugitive was suspected of bombing the house of an alleged Cleveland numbers racketeer, Don King, who later became a boxing promoter). When Delau arrived, Mapp refused to let him in because he did not have a search warrant. Delau returned to his car, radioed for backup and a warrant, and kept the house under surveillance for three hours. Meanwhile, Mapp called her attorney and he showed up just as the police again knocked on the door. Mapp was upstairs and did not answer and the police forced the door open. Mapp’s attorney was not allowed to enter the house. Hearing the police break in, Mapp came downstairs and began arguing with them. Delau held up a piece of paper which he claimed was a search warrant. Mapp grabbed it and stuffed it down her blouse. A fight broke out, during which police handcuffed Mapp, retrieved the paper, and searched the house. The did not find the fugitive but did seize some allegedly obscene pictures, which were illegal to posses under Ohio law. At trial, the prosecution did not produce the search warrant and no explanation was offered the failure to do so. Mapp was found guilty of possession of obscene materials and sentenced to prison. Mapp appealed to the Supreme Court on 1st Amendment grounds, but the justices were more interested in exploring the search and seizure issue. Dolly Mapp Sgt. Carl Delau

Mapp v. Ohio (1961): The Facts Dollree Mapp, a woman in her early twenties, carried on a number of illegal activities in her Cleveland home. For several months the police had attempted to shut down her operations, but apparently Mapp was tipped off because each time police planned a raid, she managed to elude them. One day, plainclothes police Sgt. Carl Delau tried to enter Mapp’s house, this time on the ground that she was harboring a fugitive from justice (the fugitive was suspected of bombing the house of an alleged Cleveland numbers racketeer, Don King, who later became a boxing promoter). When Delau arrived, Mapp refused to let him in because he did not have a search warrant. Delau returned to his car, radioed for backup and a warrant, and kept the house under surveillance for three hours. Meanwhile, Mapp called her attorney and he showed up just as the police again knocked on the door. Mapp was upstairs and did not answer and the police forced the door open. Mapp’s attorney was not allowed to enter the house. Hearing the police break in, Mapp came downstairs and began arguing with them. Delau held up a piece of paper which he claimed was a search warrant. Mapp grabbed it and stuffed it down her blouse. A fight broke out, during which police handcuffed Mapp, retrieved the paper, and searched the house. The did not find the fugitive but did seize some allegedly obscene pictures, which were illegal to posses under Ohio law. At trial, the prosecution did not produce the search warrant and no explanation was offered the failure to do so. Mapp was found guilty of possession of obscene materials and sentenced to prison. Mapp appealed to the Supreme Court on 1st Amendment grounds, but the justices were more interested in exploring the search and seizure issue. Dolly Mapp Sgt. Carl Delau

When can a search and seizure be done? Reasonable Suspicion – School officials have some evidence regarding a particular situation, which may include a violation of school rules. When school officials are given information, as long as the informant appears to be credible. When a police officer assigned to a school has probable cause to search an individual.

Seizure Standards Consensual Traffic Stop Terry Stop Apprehension (Custody) No Seizure Reasonable Suspicion Reasonable Suspicion Probable Cause