Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (February 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (May 2011)
Advertisements

Kurt C. Marsden, Michael Granato  Cell Reports 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Vesicle Docking Is a Key Target of Local PI(4,5)P2 Metabolism in the Secretory Pathway of INS-1 Cells  Chen Ji, Fan Fan, Xuelin Lou  Cell Reports  Volume.
Pinky Kain, Anupama Dahanukar  Neuron 
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 90, Issue 5, Pages (June 2016)
Dopaminergic Modulation of Sucrose Acceptance Behavior in Drosophila
Deconstructing Memory in Drosophila
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Age-Related Changes in Insulin-like Signaling Lead to Intermediate-Term Memory Impairment in Drosophila  Kento Tanabe, Motoyuki Itoh, Ayako Tonoki  Cell.
Dopamine Is Required for Learning and Forgetting in Drosophila
Starvation-Induced Depotentiation of Bitter Taste in Drosophila
Representations of Taste Modality in the Drosophila Brain
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
Tetsuya Koide, Yoichi Yabuki, Yoshihiro Yoshihara  Cell Reports 
A Leptin Analog Locally Produced in the Brain Acts via a Conserved Neural Circuit to Modulate Obesity-Linked Behaviors in Drosophila  Jennifer Beshel,
Comprehensive Characterization of the Major Presynaptic Elements to the Drosophila OFF Motion Detector  Etienne Serbe, Matthias Meier, Aljoscha Leonhardt,
Dopaminergic Modulation of Axon Initial Segment Calcium Channels Regulates Action Potential Initiation  Kevin J. Bender, Christopher P. Ford, Laurence.
Linking Memories across Time via Neuronal and Dendritic Overlaps in Model Neurons with Active Dendrites  George Kastellakis, Alcino J. Silva, Panayiota.
Jason Jacoby, Yongling Zhu, Steven H. DeVries, Gregory W. Schwartz 
Dopamine Is Required for Learning and Forgetting in Drosophila
Volume 25, Issue 22, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 13, Pages (July 2013)
Kurt C. Marsden, Michael Granato  Cell Reports 
Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 16, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 139, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 17, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Learning: The Good, the Bad, and the Fly
GABAA Receptor RDL Inhibits Drosophila Olfactory Associative Learning
Tomoyuki Miyashita, Emi Kikuchi, Junjiro Horiuchi, Minoru Saitoe 
Ryan G. Natan, Winnie Rao, Maria N. Geffen  Cell Reports 
A GABAergic Feedback Shapes Dopaminergic Input on the Drosophila Mushroom Body to Promote Appetitive Long-Term Memory  Alice Pavlowsky, Johann Schor,
Sleep-Stage-Specific Regulation of Cortical Excitation and Inhibition
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 79, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 21, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 19, Pages (October 2011)
Dual Dopaminergic Regulation of Corticostriatal Plasticity by Cholinergic Interneurons and Indirect Pathway Medium Spiny Neurons  Shana M. Augustin, Jessica.
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 17, Pages (August 2015)
Extinction Antagonizes Olfactory Memory at the Subcellular Level
Target-Specific Glycinergic Transmission from VGluT3-Expressing Amacrine Cells Shapes Suppressive Contrast Responses in the Retina  Nai-Wen Tien, Tahnbee.
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Age-Related Changes in Insulin-like Signaling Lead to Intermediate-Term Memory Impairment in Drosophila  Kento Tanabe, Motoyuki Itoh, Ayako Tonoki  Cell.
Comprehensive Characterization of the Major Presynaptic Elements to the Drosophila OFF Motion Detector  Etienne Serbe, Matthias Meier, Aljoscha Leonhardt,
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (September 2016)
Spontaneous Neurotransmitter Release Shapes Dendritic Arbors via Long-Range Activation of NMDA Receptors  Laura C. Andreae, Juan Burrone  Cell Reports 
Bettina Schnell, Ivo G. Ros, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Memory-Relevant Mushroom Body Output Synapses Are Cholinergic
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Pierre-Yves Musso, Paul Tchenio, Thomas Preat  Cell Reports 
Volume 22, Issue 21, Pages (November 2012)
Marie P. Suver, Akira Mamiya, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Piezo-like Gene Regulates Locomotion in Drosophila Larvae
Volume 90, Issue 5, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Shixing Zhang, Gregg Roman  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 13, Pages (June 2018)
Jacob A. Berry, Anna Phan, Ronald L. Davis  Cell Reports 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 2346-2358 (February 2018) Two Parallel Pathways Assign Opposing Odor Valences during Drosophila Memory Formation  Daisuke Yamazaki, Makoto Hiroi, Takashi Abe, Kazumichi Shimizu, Maki Minami-Ohtsubo, Yuko Maeyama, Junjiro Horiuchi, Tetsuya Tabata  Cell Reports  Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 2346-2358 (February 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.012 Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2018 22, 2346-2358DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.012) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 γCRE-p Neurons Play Pivotal Roles in 2-hr Aversive Memory (A) Schematic showing MB lobes and γCRE-p and γCRE-n neurons (left). The expression patterns of γCRE-p (middle) and γCRE-n neurons (right) are shown in green. MBs were co-labeled using MB247-DsRed, shown in magenta. In these and subsequent confocal images, images were compressed and contrasts were linearly (green channel) or non-linearly (magenta channel) enhanced for visibility. See also Movies S1 and S2. Background non-mushroom body cells are labeled with asterisks in the γCRE-n panels. These cells do not synapse onto the MBs (see Movie S2) and are not labeled with an independent MB607 driver (see Figure S4). (B–D) Inhibition of γCRE-p neurons during memory acquisition (B), consolidation (C), or retrieval (D) causes 2-hr aversive memory defects (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, ∗p < 0.05, n = 6–14 for all data). (E–G) Inhibition of γCRE-n neurons does not affect acquisition (E) or consolidation (F) of 2-hr aversive memory, but does affect retrieval (G). Total γ inhibition resulted in the same effect. (G, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, n = 8–14 for all data). (H–J) Thermal activation of γCRE-n neurons using dTrpA1 impaired acquisition (H), consolidation (I), and retrieval (J) of 2-hr aversive memory (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, n = 8–12 for all data), whereas activation of γCRE-p neurons did not affect any phases. Data are expressed as the means ± SEM. Cell Reports 2018 22, 2346-2358DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.012) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Opposing Functions of γCRE-p and γCRE-n Neurons during Appetitive Memory (A–C) Inhibiting activity of γCRE-n neurons disrupted acquisition (A), consolidation (B), and retrieval (C) of 2-hr appetitive memory (pale orange bar, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). Activation of γCRE-p neurons had a similar effect (deep blue, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). Activation of γCRE-n neurons (brown) or inhibition of γCRE-p neurons (pale blue) had no effect on the 2-hr appetitive memory. n = 8–12 for all data. Data are expressed as the means ± SEM. (D) Schematic summary of the effects of γCRE-n and γCRE-p manipulation on the acquisition and consolidation of 2-hr memory. (1) γ neurons are subdivided into γCRE-n and γCRE-p types. (2) Blocking activity of γCRE-p neurons disrupts aversive memory, while (3) blocking activity of γCRE-n neurons disrupts appetitive memory. (4) Blocking activity of both types of neurons has no effects. (5) Activation of γCRE-n neurons disrupts aversive memory, while (6) activation of γCRE-p neurons disrupts appetitive memory. (7) These results suggest that γCRE-p neurons promote aversive memory by disinhibiting γCRE-n neurons, and γCRE-n neurons promote appetitive memory by disinhibiting γCRE-p neurons. Cell Reports 2018 22, 2346-2358DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.012) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Opposing Activities of γCRE-p and γCRE-n Neurons in Valence Assignment (A) Inhibition of γCRE-n activity during odor exposure produces aversive associations in both fed and starved flies (pale orange bars, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). (B) Strong inhibition of γCRE-p activity during odor exposure induces appetitive associations in starved flies (shaded purple bar, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). (C) The same effect as in (B) can be seen by activation of γCRE-n neurons in starved flies (shaded brown bar, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). (D) Conversely, activation of γCRE-p neurons during odor exposure induces aversive associations, similar to the result seen in (A) (blue bar, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). (E) Inhibition of all γ neurons induces aversive associations in fed flies (pale green bar, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001) and appetitive associations in starved flies (shaded pale green bar, ∗∗p < 0.01). n = 6–13 for all data. Behavioral experiments inhibiting (A) and activating (B) γCRE-n were performed at the same time so genetic control (−/− and γCRE-n -GAL4/+) data are the same in (A) and (C). Likewise, genetic control data are the same in (B) and (D). Data are expressed as the means ± SEM. Cell Reports 2018 22, 2346-2358DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.012) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Functional Ca2+ Imaging Reveals Mutual Inhibition between γCRE-n and γCRE-p Neurons (A and B) Dorsal views of γCRE-p (A) and γCRE-n (B) neurons labeled using CsChrimson::tdTomato. Only the γ3–γ5 region is shown, and the pixel values of the background field (outside of the GCaMP6f signals) were set to zero. (C) Ca2+ responses during light activation of γ lobes as a function of tdTomato expression. CsChrimson::tdTomato was expressed in γCRE-n neurons, and Ca2+ responses were measured in the presence of TTX. Pixels in the γ3–γ5 region were divided into 10 populations (each 10th percentile) based on tdTomato signal intensities. The magnitudes of the Ca2+ responses upon 588 nm light stimulation increased monotonically as the pixel intensity of the tdTomato signal increased. Ca2+ responses were normalized to the peak intensity in each fly. The lowest 15% of tdTomato signals were defined as γCRE-p neurons. (D) Relationship between tdTomato fluorescence and peak δF/F0 GCaMP6f responses in γCRE-p > CsChrimson::tdTomato and γCRE-n > CsChrimson::tdTomato γ3–γ5 regions. (E and F) Distribution of pixels with the highest 15% and lowest 15% tdTomato fluorescence in γCRE-p > UAS-CsChrimson::tdTomato, MB247-LexA > LexAop-GCaMP6f (E) and γCRE-n > UAS-CsChrimson::tdTomato, MB247-LexA > LexAop-GCaMP6f flies (F). (G) Activation of γCRE-p neurons inhibits Ca2+ signals in γCRE-n pixels. The horizontal red bar shows the light stimulation period (20 s), and the vertical scale bar represents 0.1 δF/F0. n = 16 for the experimental group and n = 19 for the control group. (H) γCRE-n activation decreases Ca2+ signals in γCRE-p pixels. After an initial increase, there is a reduction in GCaMP6f fluorescence in γCRE-n > UAS-CsChrimson::tdTomato, MB247-LexA > LexAop-GCaMP6f flies. n = 20 for the experimental group and n = 20 for the control group. Vertical black bar, 0.1 δF/F0. (I and J) TTX treatment prevents inhibition between γCRE-n and γCRE-p. Traces in (I) and (J) were obtained by subtracting control traces in (G) and (H) from experimental traces. Treatment with TTX prevents inhibitory responses. n = 7 for CRE-p > CsChrimson::tdTomato flies and n = 19 for control flies in the presence of TTX. n = 14 for CRE-n > CsChrimson::tdTomato group and n = 20 for the control group. The horizontal red bar shows the light stimulation period (20 s). Vertical black bar, 0.05 δF/F0. Cell Reports 2018 22, 2346-2358DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.012) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 MBON-γ5β′2α/β′2mp Is Required for All Phases of Aversive Memory, and MBON-γ2α′1 Is Required for All Phases of Appetitive Memory (A and B) GFP expression patterns driven from MB077B (A, MBON-γ2α′1) and MB210B (B, MBON-γ5β′2a/β′2mp). The MB structure is shown in magenta from MB247-DsRed. Scale bars, 10 μm. (C–E) Inhibiting output from MBON-γ2α′1 during acquisition (C), consolidation (D), or retrieval (E) using shits resulted in impairment of 2-hr appetitive memories (pale purple bar, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001), but not 2-hr aversive memory. Inhibiting output from MBON-γ5β′2α/β′2mp caused deficits in 2-hr aversive memory (pale green, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001), but not 2-hr appetitive memory. n = 8–10. Data are expressed as the means ± SEM. Cell Reports 2018 22, 2346-2358DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.012) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 MBON-γ5β′2a/β′2mp Functions Downstream of γCRE-p Neurons and MBON-γ2α′1 Functions Downstream of γCRE-n Neurons (A–C) Top: blocking output from MBON-γ2α′1 (MB077B) restored the aversive memory defects in acquisition (A), consolidation (B), and retrieval (C) caused by the inhibition of γCRE-p neurons (blue versus pale purple bar), while blocking γCRE-n neurons failed to restore the aversive memory defects in acquisition (A), consolidation (B), and retrieval (C) caused by the inhibition of MBON-γ5β′2a/β′2mp (MB210B) neurons (yellow versus pale green bar). n = 8–10, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Bottom: blocking output from MBON-γ5β′2a/β′2mp (MB210B) restored the appetitive memory defects in acquisition (A), consolidation (B), and retrieval (C) caused by the inhibition of γCRE-n neurons, while blocking γCRE-p neurons did not restore the appetitive memory defects in acquisition (A), consolidation (B), and retrieval (C) caused by the inhibition of MBON-γ2α′1 (MB077B) neurons. n = 8–10, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Data are expressed as the means ± SEM. (D) Schematic summary of epistatic analyses. (E) Model of γCRE-p and γCRE-n circuit function. γCRE-p and γCRE-n neurons mutually inhibit each other, through a mechanism that may be mediated by recurrent loops mediated by APL neurons or MBONs. γCRE-p neurons acting through MBON-γ5β′2a/β′2mp promote aversive memory, while γCRE-n neurons acting through MBON-γ2α′1 promote appetitive memory. This circuit is a part of a multi-layered network (gray color) including other KCs, MBONs and DANs. It remains unknown how valence-coding DANs converge on this circuit. Cell Reports 2018 22, 2346-2358DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.012) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions