Creating the Housing Shortage: The Role of the Volume House builders; Findings from a study of new housing development in Northampton and Milton Keynes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jonathan Fair Chief Executive © Homes for Scotland Affordable Housing Investment Reform Scottish Developers Perspective Aug 2009.
Advertisements

Comments on What are the constraints on inclusive growth in Zambia? Elena Ianchovichina and Susanna Lundström Arne Bigsten University of Gothenburg.
Tackling the Environmental Impact of Transport Presentation by David Jamieson MP to the Institute for Public Policy Research Wednesday 15th October 2003.
One NorthEast Response: Improving Access to Employment Pat Ritchie Director, Strategy & Development.
The Housing Crisis: There is an Alternative Birkbeck College Duncan Bowie University of Westminster 18 th November 2011.
Housing Futures Housing Supply John Stewart HBF Director of Economic Affairs 17 July 2007.
PLANNING AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE Nuleaf Seminar– Radioactive Waste Management Mark Plummer, Minerals and Waste Planning, Department for Communities and Local.
Barriers and Solutions Modern Methods of Construction
March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
Lambeth Low Carbon Economy What is the low carbon economy? What is a green business? What is a green job? Jeremy Keates.
Planning, housing and markets Sarah Monk and Aoife Ni Luanaigh
© The Treasury 1 Better Business Cases “Investing for change” Overview.
Matthew Delaney Regional Director Sport England London.
November 14 th 2012 Prof. Allan Cochrane, Open University Dr Martin Field, University of Northampton.
Communities and Growth – Lessons from a case study of Northamptonshire and Milton Keynes Dr Bob Colenutt, Dr Martin Field, Professor Allan Cochrane University.
The Challenge of Land for Housing Bob Colenutt, NIUA, for the Labour Land Campaign Meeting November 14 th 2012.
The Challenge of Building Sustainable Urban Extensions in the UK: Resurrecting Quality from Austerity Paper for EURA 2013, Enschede, July 4 th 2013 Bob.
Building an affordable utopia: The State, State Policies and Market Logics Paper presented at RGS-IBG Annual International Conference’ London 30 August.
© 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair Prepared by: Fernando & Yvonn Quijano 12 Chapter General Equilibrium.
Matthew Owens (RHE Pembrokeshire) Delivering Rural Affordable Housing PCNPA: Community Panel Meetings (2009)
Funding Infrastructure Provision through value capture : Examining the implementation of the UK Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Brian S Peel Postgraduate.
Financial Reporting changes for FReM compliant entities Fact Sheet Overview This Fact Sheet highlights the key changes in the HM Treasury.
ROLE OF THE GOVERNMENT.
The Croydon Monitoring Report Homes January 2015.
Revise Lecture 22.
Last Gasp John Baker the potential of spatial planning to contribute to air quality.
Enhancing Access To, and use and Quality of, Information and Communication Technologies.
Thriving communities, affordable homes. Homes & Communities Agency and Planning Trevor Beattie Director Strategy Policy Performance Research National.
GEORGE WIMPEY PLC Interim Results for the half year ended 30 June 2001 Tuesday 31 July 2001.
Better Homes: The Localist Solution Sir Bob Kerslake Kent Housing Forum Permanent Secretary Department for Communities and Local Government Tuesday 17.
Housing and planning policy: Constraints and Options Duncan Bowie University of Westminster Somers Town 11 th June 2014.
© University of Reading 2006www.reading.ac. uk June 1, 2015 Can Australia build a way out of its affordability problems? Lessons from the UK Geoffrey Meen.
Immigration as a Supply Side Policy.
Housing in London – the Mayor’s new role Alan Benson - GLA.
1 Contaminated Land and Brownfield Remediation 22 nd September 2009 Ian Heasman, Brownfield Remediation Manager Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd Brownfield Remediation.
Meeting the challenge of housing growth in Birmingham
Land values, Property markets and Labour Party politics Labour Land Campaign Meeting February 22, 2014.
The Housing Market. Content Housing market Regional differences in house prices Changes in pattern of housing tenure Market failure and government intervention.
“Bespoke Land Solutions”
Investor Relations Presentation September INVESTOR RELATIONS PRESENTATION - SEPTEMBER 2002 Agenda Introduction David Calverley Chief Executive Highlights.
Working and living in rural areas: People, Places and Policy Helen Mc Henry, Policy Analyst.
Confidential The Budget Presentation to the JCC By Eddie Teare MHK, Treasury Minister 18 February 2015.
Maximising Investment Opportunities: releasing value from estates Barclays Private Equity 15 th May 2008.
The South West’s 2008/11 Affordable Housing Programme Phil Deacon April 2008.
Ian Bowen Planning Policy Manager South Derbyshire District Council 7 April 2011 Planning for Housing: The local authority perspective.
North East Lincolnshire Employment Land Study Reefer Conference 30 March 2007.
Land Promotion Opportunities. In Simple Terms Emcland partner land owners to promote their site through the planning process. We use our expertise and.
UK government policy on social enterprise and public procurement Jonathan Bland 1.
WHAT’S CHANGED POST THE FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY INQUIRY? FMG Seminar 27 March 2009 Presented by John Comrie.
Making the case for a fair recovery Nicola Smith Head of Economic and Social Affairs, TUC.
Land Value Taxation Recapturing Community Created Land Values.
What has been the role of business investment in contributing to GDP growth in the UK To see more of our products visit our website at
1 Enterprise Restructuring in Industry By Saul Estrin Adecco Professor of Business and Society, London Business School Notes for presentation at “Belarus:”
HMI Conference 2004 The challenges facing the Board Peter Johnson CEO George Wimpey Plc Tuesday 7 September 2004.
Translating national localism into local (planning) localism 19 July 2011 Janice Morphet UCL and rmjm consulting.
Business Support Policy in Greater Manchester Adele Reynolds, Head of Business & Science Policy, New Economy Unlocking a new era of business growth and.
Affordable Housing Delivery by the Private Sector Lessons from elsewhere Integrated Housing Delivery CfHE 2015 Symon Sentain Symon Sentain Associates.
George Wimpey Plc Annual General Meeting 2004 The Royal Aeronautical Society Thursday 22 April 2004.
Herefordshire Local Plan Members’ Seminar 9 October 2015.
Why do we need more housing? The East Midlands Regional Plan is still in force, which requires 510 houses to be built per annum between 2006 and 2026 Although.
PAS Peer Day 10 th February 2015 Zoe Willcox Service Director Planning Place Directorate Positive Planning: Delivering Housing Unblocking stalled sites.
MHPP Forum James Shuttleworth Planning and Infrastructure Manager, MCC 9 December 2015 Greater Manchester Spatial Framework.
Guest speaker: Lizzie Cullum (Savills). savills.com Viability Testing of CIL and Local Plans Effective Practice Lizzie Cullum BA (Hons) MRICS Surveyor,
The Myth of Spatial Planning – Housing markets, cartels and housing delivery in a global urban region Bob Colenutt, and Martin Field, University of Northampton;
Chair of PDIIDG Clive Faine Alan Humphreys
Reflections on Implementing Gender Budgeting
Responding to Barker – HMT perspective
Conty Context Housing Finance Ltd
A Developers Perspective
Carol Cairns – Head of Home Ownership and Supply, South East
Presentation transcript:

Creating the Housing Shortage: The Role of the Volume House builders; Findings from a study of new housing development in Northampton and Milton Keynes Bob Colenutt Northampton Institute for Urban Affairs, University of Northampton October 29 th 2013

The housing shortage

Why the shortage of new market housing in the UK? Usual reasons; (a) Demand factors: supply of credit and lack of affordability of new units (b) Supply factors: Prices not rising fast enough for make development viable; lack of land and planning permissions for housing; The underlying constraint on housing is the supply of land Barker. Interim Report p.10, HM Treasury 2003 BUT it is our contention is the key to understanding low levels of new market housing delivery lies not in the supply of land but in the way the landowner/housebuilder business model works. This model of delivery has achieved almost complete domination of public policy about new housing supply in the UK over the last 20 years. What does our research on new housing development in Milton Keynes/Northamptonshire tells us about the nature of this domination and its implications?

Large Housing sites: the case of MK/Northamptonshire The Sustainable Communities Plan Growth Areas Programme 2005 highlighted need for more land to be allocated for housing In MK/Northamptonshire 50% of the new housing growth was designated in large sites with 1000 plus homes; i.e. approx 70,000 homes to be built over 20 years The large housing sites are called Sustainable Urban Extensions (SUEs) Assumption: if land was designated in Core Strategies, then the main barrier to delivery would be removed; and, because it was part of the new spatial planning system, new development would be joined up and sustainable See Building an Affordable Utopia paper to IBG Sept 2013 The Crash exposed the naivety/delusion of this assumption; but the problem lies deeper than boom-bust cycles

Sustainable Urban Extensions (SUEs) 24 SUEs were designated in our study area; several of the sites had been in Local Plans for some years before Most have planning permissions to major HBs Only 5 started on site (4 in MK on former NT land) by Is the lack of progress due to a slow planning system? -Lack of infrastructure? e.g. A14 widening -Local objections? Limited in our area -To understand whats really going on we have look closely at the landowner/HB business model and how it operates on an area basis.

Housebuilders Business Model Land is bought in advance (betting on future price rises in that area). They have significant upfront costs on land and infrastructure but house sale prices reflect original land costs, plus costs of infrastructure and a profit rate of 20%. But HBs are not simply housing development companies. Profits are also made from land by the way they manage their land banks; by trading in some land, or by holding on in order to get the benefit of rising prices

A closer look at land banking There are two types of land bank (a) Short term oven ready land banks with planning permission (b) Strategic long term land held mainly on year options The major housebuilders hold a large portfolio of sites in each category, on a sub-regional basis as in Northamptonshire or MK, bringing them forward in a carefully managed way in relation to competition and forecast price movements. Although the main stated reason for landbanks is to maintain a pipeline to plan future development; in fact it more complicated than that. Some sites are held to keep out others and maintain prices. Overall they manage the portfolio to ensure that final house sale prices meet or exceed their target prices when they bought the land, balancing this against holding land as an investment Because land value for housing rises considerably faster than the rate of growth of the economy as a whole (see chart), Strategic Land is also held for trading and for investment. i.e. There is no business necessity for a large HB to bring all the plots he controls in an area to construction quickly BUT rather to promote the likelihood of development in the future by continual engagement with the planning system. This keeps options alive while values increase over the long term with house price inflation. This appears to be the case in our case study area.

Heres why strategic land is so important

The volume builders are especially important in this process After each crash and recovery (1973, 1989, 2008) the large housebuilders have grown larger and taken a greater share of the new homes market Over the last 20 years the large builders (over 500 homes pa) have increased their share of the total new homes market by 20% to while smaller builders have reduced their share by 20% Land banks have increased proportionately, and continue to do so. Locally hope values have been spread out further around all major towns and conurbations as they succeed in getting more land optioned to them Just the top 5 builders, who deliver 35% of total UK supply of new housing, have 12 years of UK total annual supply (at current rates) in their land banks

Dominance of large HBs

Land Banks on top 5 Housebuilders in Numbers of Plots CompanyShort term land bank 2010 Short term land bank 2012 Long Term land bank 2010 Long term land bank 2012 Annual completions 2012 Bellway Barratt Berkeley Persimmon n/a Taylor Wimpey Source: Annual report and accounts

Conclusion 1. Landownership by HBs must be subject to a full OFT investigation We have not found any evidence to support the view that at the national level, housebuilders are hoarding large amounts of land with implementable planning permissions on which they have not started construction 5.89 Office of Fair Trading Review investigation into the housebuilding industry 2008 Carefully selected words...but are they misleading? Our evidence suggests the Big Five are doing just that, for their own business reasons. The OFT acknowledges that there is little public information about how HBs hold land e.g. about land options. So the OFT Report must not be end of the matter. In fact a new investigation, including possible local collusion among HBs, is needed. Sounds familiar? The Big Six Energy companies...

Conclusion 2. Spatial Planning has failed and must be radically changed The spatial planning assumption that allocating land was a sufficient incentive for HB sector to deliver spatial planning policy objectives was misplaced. From the HB perspective, these objectives were always a cost be minimised; the more so as the recession hit. In particular the affordable housing policies were seen as lowering land value (less value to distribute)- yet the planners relied on cross-subsidy Far too much time of the planners was spent on spatial policy guidance for example on sustainability and far too little on the economics of development i.e. how delivery would take place There was remarkably almost no serious land or property market analysis in SHMAs or Core Strategies (see our forthcoming paper for Regional Studies Association conference, 2013). And this remains the case. Hence, the planners made over optimistic/naive assumptions about the market. Current revisions to Core Strategies assume that high rates of new housing provision, including affordable housing, will come from HBs

Conclusion 3. Planning for New housing has been captured by the landowner/HB sector In the Growth Areas, the State was reliant on HB/landowner sector for delivery; there was no plan B. Neither government nor the private sector provided opportunities in the form of capital, land or capacity to enable other sectors to enter the field. HB landownership excluded other providers. HB model may have failed to meet public policy objectives but it successfully delivered for its shareholders increases in land value and rising house prices, including capturing increases in value from publicly funded infrastructure Most SUEs were optioned to major HBs (except in MK). Where construction began, HBs drip feed supply to keep up prices (see David Adams work). Local authorities or light touch Local Delivery Vehicles did not have the tools to speed up delivery HBs and landowners captured the Local Plan Inquiry system. Large numbers of objections from the housebuilders dominated the West Northants Core Strategy Inquiry 2013 arguing that strategies were unsound since they did not include enough housing land They also captured crucial local plan policies such as on section 106 affordable housing agreements because they argued local authority requirements made their schemes unviable, at which many local authorities backed off

Ed Milliband said in his LP Conference speech 2013 that developers who did not develop land should use or lose it What would that mean in practice? If there was proven evidence that developers with planning permissions were not implementing them, the land would be acquired by CPO. Very expensive if the full land value was being paid; has to be at existing use value surely BUT this would only make a difference if other housing providers came in A more radical and effective proposals would be apply the principle of Use it or Lose it to all designated housing land whether with outline permission or not; Back up land acquisition with a publicly funded infrastructure investment plan paid back through rising land values Use public or community landownership to bring down prices of housing; and retain as much land as possible in public ownership to enable land value increases to be captured for community benefit Or do we need a land value tax?....