The Marshall Court.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Supreme Court Nullification Enter John Calhoun
Advertisements

The Marshal Court How was the Federalist party able to stay relevant despite not winning any presidential elections since the John Adam’s administration?
The Marshall Court Mr. Johnson AP US History.
John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Landmark Cases in Support of an Important Concept.
Who was John Marshall?  The Democratic-Republican victory in the 1800 election began a long run of Republican political success.  In spite of Federalists'
Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The Constitution is not clear about the power of the Supreme Court.
John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court
Marbury v. Madison (Appointed fed. Judge by Pres. Adams night before Adams left office) (Sec. of State for Jefferson) (1803) Background –“Midnight Judge”
The Marshall Court. Marshall was born in the foothills of the Virginia's Blue Ridge Mountains in 1755, far from the wealthy tobacco and slave Tidewater.
In a series of Marshall Court decisions from , A) state charters were not recognized as legal contracts B) a strong federal government was promoted.
John Marshall, Chief Justice
SUPREME Court’s Decisions
SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.
Federalism and the Supreme Court McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)
The Supreme Court (The Judicial Branch) What’s the big deal?
JOHN MARSHALL’S GREATEST HITS Marbury v. Madison1803 Fletcher v. Peck1810 McCulloch v. Maryland1819 Gibbons v. Ogden1824.
The Marshall Court Chapter 8. John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Marshall was the most important chief justice in U.S. history ( ) Significantly.
John Marshall, Chief Justice  Nominated to Supreme Court by John Adams in1801  Marshall agreed, and upheld Hamilton’s doctrine of “implied powers” 
Interpretation of the US Constitution US Supreme Court before 1830.
Thomas Jefferson. Election of 1800  Thomas Jefferson- Democratic- Republican  Supported by poor farmers  Favored Popular Democracy & States’ Rights.
Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing attorney. 2 nd cousin of.
UNIT IV – CH. 8. NOW WHAT? Let’s fix America!!! Goal of War of 1812 – resume American economic success = AMERICAN SYSTEM Second Bank of the United States.
Marshall Court I.Chief Justice John Marshall A. Dominates Supreme Court B. Strengthened federal govt. at the expense of state governments.
Supreme Court Cases Overview. Marbury v. Madison Marbury sued Sec of State Madison for his appointment to be a judge (midnight judges – Adams administration)
“I shall…by the establishment of republican principles…sink federalism into an abyss from which there shall be no resurrection.” -Jefferson With their.
Confederation to Constitution 1776: 2 nd Continental Congress declares independence; PA creates democratic state constitution 1781 : Articles of Confederation.
Chief Justice John Marshall
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT Mr. Sandford AP United States History.
Thomas Jefferson Election of 1800 In a presidential election you are really voting for electors who meet in what is known as the electoral college.
Supreme Court Cases The John Marshall Court strengthened the federal government by supporting.
Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The strength and path of the court were found with Chief Justice John Marshall 4 th Chief Justice 1801 – 1835.
The Marshall Courts. Purpose of the Judicial Branch  Interpret the Law –Set Legal Precedents –Determine if laws passed by Congress or Presidential Actions.
Born in Virginia, 1755 Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing.
The Emergence of the Supreme Court The Marshall Court
Supreme Court of the United States  SCOTUS Branch of gov’t which interprets/applies the law Makes sure laws/gov’t action are constitutional  Judicial.
UNITED STATES HISTORY AND THE CONSTITUTION
Supreme Court USHC-1.7.
Implied Powers of the National Government
Anti-federalists vs Federalists
Supreme Court Cases Landmark Supreme Court cases that outlined the powers of the Judicial Branch.
Supreme Court USHC-1.7.
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT
Establishing Judicial Review
VUS5e John Marshall How did Chief Justice John Marshall, a Virginian, contribute to the growth of the U.S. Supreme Court’s importance in relation to the.
The Federalist Judiciary
McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court
Expanding the powers of the Judicial Branch
Revenge of the Federalists
John Marshall's supreme court
Judicial decisions Colin Bouchard.
The Marshall Court.
Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION
Reviewing Marshall Court Decisions
The Marshall Court- A Stronger National Govt.
NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT
Growth of the Supreme Court
Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?
Establishing Judicial Review
Defining the Powers of the National Government
Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?
Topic: Evaluating the Decisions of the Marshall Court
Supreme Court Cases of the early Republic
JOHN MARSHALL Born in Virginia, 1755
JOHN MARSHALL Born in Virginia, 1755
Do Now (Background Essay)
Marshall Court AIM: Did the Supreme Court under John Marshall Give Too Much Power to the Federal Government at the Expense of the State Governments?
The Legacy of the Marshall Court
The Marshall Court.
Presentation transcript:

The Marshall Court

Who Interprets the Constitution? John Marshall Judicial review Thomas Jefferson Nullification by states

John Marshall Federalist Chief Justice from 1801-1835 National supremacy Economic growth Independence and power of judicial branch Chief Justice from 1801-1835

Marbury v. Madison, 1803 “Midnight Judges” Outgoing Federalists vs. incoming Democratic-Republicans Supreme Court’s power of judicial review

Cohens v. Virginia, 1821 Cohens was convicted in Virginia for selling illegal lottery tickets Supreme Court asserts its power to review state court decisions

Fletcher v. Peck, 1810 Georgia legislature granted land to speculators in exchange for bribes After election, new Georgia legislature canceled the deal Decision Sanctity of contracts Victory of “wealth over mob”

Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 1819 Royal charter from King George III New Hampshire tried to place college under state control Decision Charter stands Sanctity of contracts Laissez-faire

McCulloch v. Maryland, 1819 National bank vs. Maryland state tax Decision Bank is constitutional under the necessary & proper (“elastic”) clause “The power to tax is the power to destroy” National supremacy

Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824 Steamboats Decision State monopoly license vs. federal license Decision Only the federal government may regulate interstate commerce National supremacy

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.