Survey Results – 4A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How good are our measurements? The last three lectures were concerned with some basics of psychological measurement: What does it mean to quantify a psychological.
Advertisements

Some (Simplified) Steps for Creating a Personality Questionnaire Generate an item pool Administer the items to a sample of people Assess the uni-dimensionality.
Quiz Do random errors accumulate? Name 2 ways to minimize the effect of random error in your data set.
The study of how we think about, influence and relate to one another.
Social Psychology Studying the way people relate to others. Attitude Attraction Aggression Group Behavior.
Chapter 1: Introduction to Statistics
Discuss two errors in attributions. But we are human and seem to make a lot of mistakes when attributing other people’s behavior…..
WARM UP What is your understanding of ‘victim blaming’? How do you feel when this happens? Is it justified at times?
Mathematics Education Around the World: Bridging Policy and Practice Park City Mathematics Institute International Conference. July 14-18, Jean Michel.
Peer Planner Evaluation, Prepare for quiz then Response 7 1. Write about a positive success story about a time you did your best on a test. How did you.
Social Psychology AttitudeAttractionGroup Behavior.
Digital Information Technology(ECS)
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY FILM ANALYSIS.
SOC 100 PAPER Success trials - soc100paper.com
Warm Up: Imagine you are sitting in a restaurant waiting for your date to show up. You agreed with your date to meet at the restaurant at 6:00. It is.
Attribution errors.
Attribution Theory Prepared by: Carmelo Perez Anceta Coc Manuel Canti
EPortfolio Title Page By.
Chapter 6: Social Influence and Group Behavior
Attitudes, Actions, and Attributions
Unit 2 Research and Methods.
-You will need Unit 3 NOTECARDS and your Notes
Mixed signal: Charity reporting when donations signal generosity and income Bracha A. and Verstelund L.
30 Slips Try to collect slips of paper from classmates, friends, relatives, teachers, etc. describing your personality in a word or two.  Keep them.
“We cannot live for ourselves alone.”
Providing Instruction & Explanation
Identifying Equivalent Expressions
Reading Pass: Rhetorical Situations
LO: To reflect on assessment results and areas for improvement
Attribution Theory Attributions - are the reasons we we give for our own and others behaviors. People are motivated to understand the causes of behavior.
Research methods Lesson 2.
Social Psychology The scientific study of how we think about, influence and relate to one another.
Research Methods A Method to the Madness.
Central Limit Theorem General version.
Social Psychology The scientific study of how we think about, influence and relate to one another.
Survey Results – 4B.
What Is Science? Read the lesson title aloud to students.
What Is Science? Read the lesson title aloud to students.
Correct the errors Unfortunately, the data does not support our prediction. The data do not support our prediction.
Social Psychology The scientific study of how we think about, influence and relate to one another.
Discuss Two Errors in Attributions
Academic Integrity integrity = making choices based on
What is Social Psychology?
Kayla Armijo Jessica Nguyen Claire Choi Social Thinking Pgs
Does it matter if elementary students like their curriculum?
Pair up. Get to “know” your partner
Who am I? Audrey Larocque.
558 Research to Improve Student Learning
Reliability, the Properties of Random Errors, and Composite Scores
Constructive Feedback
Two-Sample Between-Subjects Experiments and Independent-Samples t-Tests So far, we’ve talked about experiments in which we needed to take only one sample.
Observational Studies
New Unit: Life’s Challenges.
Sampling Distributions
Now What? Part 2 By Cindy Marcum
What Is Science? Read the lesson title aloud to students.
The Outsiders – Character Trait Activity Name:
Psychological Measurement: Reliability and the Properties of Random Errors The last two lectures were concerned with some basics of psychological measurement:
What mental picture do you have of yourself
Selecting a Sample Notes
The Importance of Self-Belief
Psychological Research Methods
The Writing Process.
Preview p.2 Test your intuitions about Psychology, the study of behavior. Pick up a T/F quiz at the front table. DO NOT WRITE ON QUIZ List your answers.
Survey Results – 1B.
Exploratory Challenge: Game Show—Picking Blue!
Grade 10 Promoting Respect Workshop Gender Identity & Sexual Orientation Greater Mankato Diversity Council.
How Do We Explain Our Actions
Jones and Davis’s Correspondent Inference Theory
Chapter 6 Selecting Employees
Presentation transcript:

Survey Results – 4A

False Consensus Effect – 1B You all answered “YES” or “NO” to 10 questions. You were then supposed to estimate the percentage of your classmates that you thought would answer “YES.” The False Consensus Effect is demonstrated IF people overestimated the percentage that would agree with them – those who answered yes thought more people would also answer yes, and vice versa.

Question 1 Are you more attracted to “sensible” people than to “imaginative” people? In reality, 55% of you answered YES. On average, those who answered YES thought 62% of their classmates would also answer YES, which was an overestimate. In reality, 45% of you answered NO. On average, those who answered NO thought 57% of their classmates would also answer NO, which was an overestimate. Those answering YES & NO demonstrated the False Consensus Effect.

Question 2 Would you rather write a paper than take an exam? In reality, 34% of you answered YES. On average, those who answered YES thought 62% of their classmates would also answer YES, which was an overestimate. In reality, 66% of you answered NO. On average, those who answered NO thought 51% of their classmates would also answer NO, which was an underestimate. Those answering YES demonstrated the False Consensus Effect.

Question 3 If you and a same-sex friend were sharing a pizza, and only a large slice and a small slice remained, and you were still rather hungry, would you offer the larger slice to your friend? In reality, 52% of you answered YES. On average, those who answered YES thought 60% of their classmates would also answer YES, which was an overestimate. In reality, 48% of you answered NO. On average, those who answered NO thought 61% of their classmates would also answer NO, which was an overestimate. Those answering YES & NO demonstrated the False Consensus Effect.

Question 4 Do you enjoy analyzing the causes for people’s behavior? In reality, 79% of you answered YES. On average, those who answered YES thought 49% of their classmates would also answer YES, which was an underestimate. In reality, 21% of you answered NO. On average, those who answered NO thought 49% of their classmates would also answer NO, which was an overestimate. Those answering NO demonstrated the False Consensus Effect.

Question 5 Have you ever stolen anything, even something very small? In reality, 70% of you answered YES. On average, those who answered YES thought 78% of their classmates would also answer YES, which was a slight overestimate. In reality, 30% of you answered NO. On average, those who answered NO thought 54% of their classmates would also answer NO, which was an overestimate. Those answering YES & NO demonstrated the False Consensus Effect.

Question 6 Do you give blood at least once every two years? In reality, 7% of you answered YES. On average, those who answered YES thought 41% of their classmates would also answer YES, which was an overestimate. In reality, 93% of you answered NO. On average, those who answered NO thought 63% of their classmates would also answer NO, which was an underestimate. Those answering YES demonstrated the False Consensus Effect.

Question 7 Do you like desserts that are very dense and very sweet? In reality, 66% of you answered YES. On average, those who answered YES thought 63% of their classmates would also answer YES, which was slight underestimate. In reality, 34% of you answered NO. On average, those who answered NO thought 45% of their classmates would also answer NO, which was an overestimate. Those answering NO demonstrated the False Consensus Effect.

Question 8 Do you like soccer? In reality, 63% of you answered YES. On average, those who answered YES thought 51% of their classmates would also answer YES, which was an underestimate. In reality, 37% of you answered NO. On average, those who answered NO thought 52% of their classmates would also answer NO, which was an overestimate. Those answering NO demonstrated the False Consensus Effect.

Question 9 If you had the opportunity to cheat on an exam in a course you did not like, and you could be assured of not getting caught, would you cheat? In reality, 66% of you answered YES. On average, those who answered YES thought 84% of their classmates would also answer YES, which was an overestimate. In reality, 34% of you answered NO. On average, those who answered NO thought 44% of their classmates would also answer NO, which was an overestimate. Those answering YES & NO both demonstrated the False Consensus Effect.

Question 10 Do you like having to get very dressed up for special events? In reality, 62% of you answered YES. On average, those who answered YES thought 51% of their classmates would also answer YES, which was an underestimate. In reality, 38% of you answered NO. On average, those who answered NO thought 44% of their classmates would also answer NO, which was an overestimate. Those answering NO demonstrated the False Consensus Effect.

Fundamental Attribution Error (Quiz Show) You all watched while I randomly picked two participants, and randomly assigned them to “quiz master” or “contestant” and instruct the “quiz master” to write 5 challenging questions from his/her own store of general knowledge. Since either participant could have been the quiz master, the results of the “quiz show” say nothing about either participant’s level of general knowledge, only that the two have DIFFERENT stores of knowledge. So, logically, both participants should have been rated equally on levels of general knowledge. But according to the fundamental attribution error, we focus on personal causes for behavior rather than situational influences.

Results Quiz Master’s score (by you) on general knowledge: 7.9 (out of 10) Contestant’s score (by you) on general knowledge: 4.1 (out of 10) The Quiz Master even rated him/herself higher in general knowledge than the Contestant… by 7 points! But wait… even the Contestant rated him/herself lower in general knowledge than the Quiz Master… by 6 points!

Actor-Observer Effect You filled out three identical surveys – one on yourself, one on a friend, and one on a teacher – where you were asked to describe each person’s personality with a series of adjectives. For each question, you could choose one of two specific and opposite adjectives, or you could choose “depends on the situation.” The actor-observer effect predicts that we tend to make situational attributions to explain our own behavior, but personal attribution to explain the behavior of others. Why do you think this is?

Results For the actor-observer effect to be demonstrated, the average number of times you marked “depends on the situation” for YOURSELF would be higher than the number of times you marked it for a friend, which would be higher than the number of times you marked it for a teacher. This is because you have the most information about yourself, and more about a friend than a teacher. Number of times (average) that you marked “depends on the situation” for: Self: 8.5 Friend: 5.5 Teacher: 4.3