Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest technique on late coronary artery bypass grafting patient outcomes in the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) Trial Marco A. Zenati, MD, A. Laurie Shroyer, PhD, Joseph F. Collins, ScD, Brack Hattler, MD, Takeyoshi Ota, MD, PhD, G. Hossein Almassi, MD, Morteza Amidi, MD, Dimitri Novitzky, MD, PhD, Frederick L. Grover, MD, Ali F. Sonel, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Volume 141, Issue 2, Pages 338-344 (February 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.004 Copyright © 2011 Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Enrollment, treatment, and follow-up. ROOBY, Randomized On/Off Bypass Trial; SVG, saphenous vein graft; OVH, open greater saphenous vein graft harvest; EVH, endoscopic greater saphenous vein graft harvest. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 141, 338-344DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.004) Copyright © 2011 Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier estimate of time to repeat revascularization (n = 894). The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 141, 338-344DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.004) Copyright © 2011 Terms and Conditions