LAMP Project work 2015/16 An overview Betsy Scott RMN, Msc, FHEA LAMP Project Lead

LAMP Project work 2015/16: An overview ‘Shape of caring review’ would continue to make preceptorship an important component of professional development. An opportunity to take stock of where our respective Trust were with our own programmes An opportunity to identify areas of excellent practice, to benchmark to Comparative Study of the uptake of the HENCEL preceptorship standards across London Comparative study of the preceptorship programmes across London www.lampmentor.london lamp@city.ac.uk

London Preceptorship: an overview Management Support for preceptees Evaluation and Quality Improvement

Methodology Questionnaires Focus groups 7 out of 9 Trusts responded

Management All London Trusts ran a preceptorship Programme All were Nursing focused Workbook Workshop programme Named lead Line managers informed the named lead Database of preceptees One Trust ran a module for preceptors Trusts & HEI’s – Workshop programme Mentors

Support of Preceptees Named preceptor Team approach vs individual support Protected time for preceptor Protected time to attend workshops Training Needs analysis Appraisal Emotional Resilience

Workshop themes Medicines Management Accountability Career Development Managing conflict Delivering safe care + Physical Health/ Diabetes/Clozapine Management/ Escalating physical health concerns Emotional Intelligence Leadership Quality improvement Reflection Safe Staffing Raising concerns Team Working Medicines Management Values Communication Therapeutic Boundaries Assessment, interventions and care planning Common blood results Risk assessment & Management Managing emergencies & Crisis situations Mental Health Act / Capacity Act Delegating to junior staff Delivering CQUIN targets Financial aspects of commissioning

Evaluation and Quality Improvement Questionnaires Structured programme – Executive Nurse Board Level Aligned to the organisations appraisal framework Commitment to the 6c’s Preceptees contributed to the development of future programmes Workshops were evaluated Career paths beyond preceptorship Cost of programmes Preceptors Mentors Quality Improvement: No Standardised evaluation tool Some formal standardisation across London More collaboration across Trusts Board level Cost of programmes Preceptors involvement in future development Role of the Mentor Career paths beyond preceptorship Training needs analysis – Appraisal Thematic analysis – Feedback loops – Training Teams – HEI’s Mentors informing Simulated practice Curriculums More partnership working between HEI’s and Trusts Leads given time and support

Conclusion Safe landing Time to step back and breathe Preceptorship leads should continue to meet