Fukushima Lessons Learned

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Moneer Aljawad, Abdulrahman Alshodokhi, Jericho Alves, Daniel Chief, Benjamin Kurtz, Travis Moore September 16, 2013.
Advertisements

Protecting the Public, Astronauts and Pilots, the NASA Workforce, and High-Value Equipment and Property Mission Success Starts With Safety “September 11th.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Copyright [insert date set by system] by [CH2M HILL Entity] Company Confidential Update on Fukushima Daiichi NPP 1 – Preparations for Core Debris Removal.
Assessing the Challenges Resulting from the Events at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station A Preliminary Discussion March 25, 2011 Walter L. Kirchner.
Vermont Yankee Presentation to VSNAP 7/17/13 VY/Entergy Fukushima Response Update Bernard Buteau.
Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Impact and Radiation Effects Resulting from the Nuclear Events in Japan.
Safety Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Sheldon L. Trubatch, Ph.D., J.D. Vice-Chairman Arizona Section American Nuclear Society.
Nuclear Accident at Fukushima Daiichi NPP A collection of images and data by Toro Laszlo Member of the Council of the RSRP National Institute of Public.
Overview of Incident at Fukushima Daiich Nuclear Power Station (1F) (Informal personal observations) April 2011.
Nuclear Power.
Tohoku Japan Earthquake By: Millie, Casey, McKinzie, Abbey In the 65 years after the end of World War II, this is the toughest and the most difficult crisis.
THE FUTURE OF FUKUSHIMA CHAPTER 23 NUCLEAR POWER Can nuclear energy overcome its bad rep?
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response May 17, 2011.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP January 25, 2012 Green Power for a Digital World Presented by: Natalie Wood and Marvin Fertel.
Fukushima Incident Preliminary Analysis, Consequences and Safety Status of Indian NPPs Part-1 Dr. S.K.Jain Chairman & Managing Director NPCIL & BHAVINI.
Population Considerations for the Nuclear Field Danny Smith, PhD, PE COPAFS Quarterly Meeting June 3, 2011.
What about Japan?. Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6.
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill On April 20, 2010, an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon MC252 drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico caused the rig to sink.
Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP June 2, 2011 Embassy of Japan in Bulgaria.
Fukushima Dai-ichi - LinkLink. Boiling Water Reactor – Video LinkVideo Link.
Nuclear Power Plant Accidents Reporters: Uyangurin, Mareinne L. Suico, Monica Sharlyn L. Waresa, Daryl Mae B.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
March 11, 2011 to Present. Presentation Overview Reactor Design and FeaturesChronology of EventsCurrent Status of Each ReactorRecovery Actions Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
Agenda Background Update on Fukushima Daini Update on Fukushima Dai-ichi – Summary of Events at Fukushima Dai-ichi Summary of Radiation and Reports.
Nuclear Power Plant How A Nuclear Reactor Works.
A LTERNATIVE ENERGY : NUCLEAR Group 4 Bar Shida Keane.
Fukushima I nuclear accident, March 11, 2011 What happened, why and a better design.
311 Japan Earthquake Naomi Evelina Erica Winniw.
Short how nuclear plant works how nuclear power works.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations Lecture 2-2 Lessons Learnt from Occupational.
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities U.S. Industry’s Fukushima Response Joseph Pollock, Nuclear Energy Institute Christopher H. Mudrick,
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities U.S. Industry’s Fukushima Response Joseph Pollock, Nuclear Energy Institute Christopher H. Mudrick,
The March 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan: A Nuclear Perspective Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar, PhD Associate Chair of Nuclear Engineering and Health Physics.
What do you know of Japan’s Nuclear crisis? How about any past nuclear issues? Do you feel that nuclear power is safe? Why or why not? Question of the.
Fukushima: the continuing crisis Dr Ian Fairlie Consultant on Radiation in the Environment London, United Kingdom
FLEX Mitigation Strategies Overview (Rec 4.2) Fukushima Regulatory Response Workshop April 5, 2012.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
INTRODUCTION TO NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY MEHB513 SEM 2,2014/2015 GROUP PROJECT : EVALUATE THE IMPACTS OF THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT ON THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.
Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Waste
Nuclear Power.
Section 2: Nuclear Energy
Section 2: Nuclear Energy
Objectives Describe nuclear fission.
Fukushima Daiichi Jourdan Robbins 12/6/ /16/16.
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities
Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation NRC Order EA
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events (MBDBE) Rule Implementation
FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NUCLEAR DISASTER Organizational accident analysis
9.5 Nuclear Power Although nuclear power does not come from a fossil fuel, it is fueled by uranium, which is obtained from mining and is non-renewable.
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr
Nuclear Power.
Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Waste
REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL FROM THE SAN DIEGO REGION
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions
What does the nuclear scientist do in his spare time?
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Waste
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr
Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Waste
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun - 05 April p.1
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun - 22 April p.1
Natural disasters and Engineering errors
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun - 01 June p
New Regulatory Requirements in Japan
Presentation transcript:

Fukushima Lessons Learned Brad Sawatzke VP Nuclear Generation/Chief Nuclear Officer

Video

Overview INPO sponsored trip for U.S. CNOs Coordinated with JANSI and TEPCO Allow U.S. CNOs to see first-hand consequences of the Fukushima accident Allow CNOs to interact with Japanese counterparts Sept. 9-13, 2013, INPO sponsored a visit to Japan for U.S. industry chief nuclear officers, along with representatives from the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and the Nuclear Energy institute (NEI). The trip was developed in collaboration with the Japan Nuclear Safety Institute (JANSI), and the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO). The trip was an opportunity for U.S. CNOs to see firsthand the consequences of the Fukushima accident, to discuss the U.S. response to this event, and to interact with Japanese chief nuclear officers. The trip included on-site visits to the Fukushima Daini and Fukushima Daiichi plant sites; meetings for the U.S. CNOs to discuss lessons learned from the plant visits, and preparations at U.S. plants for severe accidents; and sessions for U.S. and Japanese CNOs to discuss experiences and the benefits of increased support and engagement with each other going forward.

Daini plant visit ADDED

Daini plant visit ADDED

Dai-ichi plant visit Fukushima Daiichi consists of six boiling water reactors. Units 1,2 and 3 were operating at full power, and Units 4,5 and 6 were out of service for refueling or maintenance when the earthquake occurred. The earthquake damaged breakers and distribution towers, causing a loss of all off-site electrical power. All AC power for Units 1-5 was lost when emergency diesel generators and switchgear rooms flooded during the tsunami. The seawater intake structure was severely damaged and rendered nonfunctional. All DC power from batteries was lost on Units 1,2 and 4, while some DC power from batteries remained available on Unit 3. One air-cooled emergency diesel generator continued to function and supplied electrical power to Unit 6, and later to Unit 5, to maintain cooling to the reactors and spent fuel pools. Units 1,2 and 3 suffered extensive fuel damage when the cores could not receive cooling. Hydrogen generated from damaged fuel accumulated in the reactor buildings and ignited, damaging the Unit 1 and Unit 3 reactor buildings. Hydrogen generated in Unit 3 likely migrated to the Unit 4 reactor building, resulting in a subsequent explosion and damage.

Dai-ichi plant visit The Fukushima Daiichi event was rated as a level 7 event on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale. The Nuclear Safety Commission of Japan estimated that more than 17 million curies of iodine-131 equivalent radioactive material was released into the air and the sea during the weeks following the accident. Today, water is being injected into each reactor on Units 1-3 to keep the damaged cores cool. Water storage continues to be a challenge, with millions of gallons of contaminated water being stored on site. Some 68,000 cubic yards of contaminated concrete/metal and 94,000 cubic yards of contaminated trees are being stored to reduce radiation dose at the site boundaries.

Dai-ichi plant visit ADDED

Exclusion zone There is a 20-kilometer exclusion zone surrounding the plants. Admittance is limited to those authorized to enter. Within this is a 10-kilometer zone where there remain significant levels of contamination. Buildings and homes are vacant, some with obvious damage from the earthquake.

Exclusion zone There are visible signs of the decontamination effort. Black bags are filled with contaminated dirt and vegetation.

Exclusion zone

CNO meetings and interactions U.S. and Japanese CNOs shared perspectives and insights with each other.  

Lessons learned Leadership – coupled with the trust and dedication of a well-trained staff – can determine the ultimate outcome of a crisis Understanding roles and responsibilities, especially in the areas of command and control and communications, is essential

Lessons learned A well-conceived FLEX strategy works. The strategy developed by U.S. operators is sound FLEX strategies must be effectively drilled across every operating crew and emergency response team U.S. CNO teamwork and collaboration is a strength of our industry.

Industry Initiatives Flooding Reevaluation Seismic Reevaluation Site FLEX National FLEX Centers

Vendor Support Partnership Quality

Questions and Answers

Fukushima Lessons Learned Brad Sawatzke VP Nuclear Generation/Chief Nuclear Officer