R. Granetz1, S. Wolfe1, D. Whyte1, V. Izzo1, M. Reinke1, J. Terry1, A

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ramesh Gupta, BNL D1 Dipole Design / IR Magnet Study LARP Collaboration Meeting, Oct 5-6, D1 Dipole Design Task (terminated in 2005) IR Magnet Study.
Advertisements

Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
Second Peer Review for New MGI Valves for NSTX-U (Update on Valve Testing) R. Raman, et al. October 29,
Effects of ICRF conditioning on the first wall in LHD N. Ashikawa, K. Saito, T. Seki, M. Tokitani, Y. Ohtawa 1), M. Nishiura, S. Masuzaki K. Nishimura.
Introduction to the disruption JET/MST program E. Joffrin & P. Martin Presented by P. Martin.
Density gradient at the ends of plasma cell The goal: assess different techniques for optimization density gradient at the ends of plasma cell.
Integrated Effects of Disruptions and ELMs on Divertor and Nearby Components Valeryi Sizyuk Ahmed Hassanein School of Nuclear Engineering Center for Materials.
Energy loss for grassy ELMs and effects of plasma rotation on the ELM characteristics in JT-60U N. Oyama 1), Y. Sakamoto 1), M. Takechi 1), A. Isayama.
Recent JET Experiments and Science Issues Jim Strachan PPPL Students seminar Feb. 14, 2005 JET is presently world’s largest tokamak, being ½ linear dimension.
1 st IAEA Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis, June 2015, Nice, France Peter de Vries – © 2015, ITER Organization Page 1 IDM UID:
Pro-Science 4 th International Conference of Hydrogen Safety, September 12-14, 2011, SAN FRANCISCO, USA EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF IGNITED UNSTEADY HYDROGEN.
J A Snipes, 6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting, Tarragona, Spain 4 – 6 July 2005 TAE Damping Rates on Alcator C-Mod Compared with Nova-K J A Snipes *,
Radio Jet Disruption in Cooling Cores OR, can radio jets solve the cooling core problem? OR, how do cooling cores disrupt radio jets?
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
Fast liquid Lithium “shower” injector G. A. Wurden Los Alamos NSTX Brainstorming Meeting Feb 7-8, 2012.
Summary of Rb loss simulations The goal: assess different techniques for optimization density gradient at the ends of plasma cell.
Status of Target Injector and In-Chamber Tracking Ronald Petzoldt, Dan Goodin, Neil Alexander, Gottfried Besenbruch, Tom Drake, Brian Vermillion, Bob Stemke,
CLIC Workshop – CERN, October / 17 DC breakdown experiments for CLIC CERN, TS-MME Antoine Descoeudres, Trond Ramsvik, Sergio Calatroni, Mauro Taborelli.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Piping in the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 GRAPHITE SUBLIMATION TESTS with Inert Gas Mitigation C. C. Tsai, T. A. Gabriel, J. R.
Behaviour of Runaway Electrons during Injection of High Z Impurities/Gas Puffing in HT-7 S.Sajjad INSTITUTE OF PLASMA PHYSICS,HEFEI CHINA.
Heat Loading in ARIES Power Plants: Steady State, Transient and Off-Normal C. E. Kessel 1, M. A. Tillack 2, and J. P. Blanchard 3 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
Gas Jet Disruption Mitigation Studies on Alcator C-Mod and DIII-D R.S. Granetz 1, E.M. Hollmann 2, D.G. Whyte 1, V.A. Izzo 1, G.Y. Antar 2, A. Bader 1,
Definitions in-situ density anomaly: σs,t,p = ρ – 1000 kg/m3
Edge Turbulence in High Density Ohmic Plasmas on NSTX K.M. Williams, S.J. Zweben, J. Boedo, R. Maingi, C.E. Bush NSTX XP Presentation Draft 5/25/06.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, BNL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak in collaboration with Y.
Radiation divertor experiments in the HL-2A tokamak L.W. Yan, W.Y. Hong, M.X. Wang, J. Cheng, J. Qian, Y.D. Pan, Y. Zhou, W. Li, K.J. Zhao, Z. Cao, Q.W.
Evaluation of Anomalous Fast-Ion Losses in Alcator C-Mod S. D. Scott Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory In collaboration with R. Granetz, D. Beals, C.
L.R. Baylor 1, N. Commaux 1, T.C. Jernigan 1, S.J. Meitner 1, N. H. Brooks 2, S. K. Combs 1, T.E. Evans 2, M. E. Fenstermacher 3, R. C. Isler 1, C. J.
EAST Vertical Control to D. Mueller, GA Control Group and EAST Team.
Stars and the HR Diagram Dr. Matt Penn National Solar Observatory.
Nuclear Reactions.
To ‘B’ or not to ‘B’ That is the question
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
Electronic Fuel Injection
Disruption Specification in ARIES
The Role of MHD in 3D Aspects of Massive Gas Injection
Measuring Stellar Reaction Rates with Bubble Chamber
Summary of activities of the pellet target development
Turbulence associated with the control of internal transport barriers
N. D’Angelo, B. Kustom, D. Susczynsky, S. Cartier, J. Willig
T. Markovič1,2, P. Cahyna1, R. Panek1, M. Peterka1,2, P. C
Proposal for a Transparent Off-Axis Injection Scheme for BESSY II
ICHS - October 2015 Jérôme Daubech
C. E. Kessel1, M. S. Tillack2, and J. P. Blanchard3
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
MLP Based Feedback System for Gas Valve Control in a Madison Symmetric Torus Andrew Seltzman Dec 14, 2010.
Example Design a B diffusion for a CMOS tub such that s=900/sq, xj=3m, and CB=11015/cc First, we calculate the average conductivity We cannot calculate.
Pellet injection in ITER Model description Model validation
MHD Induced Fast Ion Loss Diagnostic for Alcator C-Mod
Reduction of ELM energy loss by pellet injection for ELM pacing
L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.
Valeryi Sizyuk Ahmed Hassanein School of Nuclear Engineering
Investigation of triggering mechanisms for internal transport barriers in Alcator C-Mod K. Zhurovich C. Fiore, D. Ernst, P. Bonoli, M. Greenwald, A. Hubbard,
Stellar evolution and star clusters
Dynamics of transient divertor re-attachment
Measuring the Dynamics of Injected Boron Dust Particles in the Scrape-Off Layer Aaron Bader Dec 14, 2006 Ideas Forum 2007.
Methane Screening on C-MOD EDA ELM-mitigated Plasmas Jim Strachan, PPPL Nov. 30, 2004 Goal: compare impurity behavior in ELM mitigated plasmas – ergodic.
Stable TAE n Discrimination with Plasma Rotation
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #16 Particle Detection Silicon Photo-Multipliers
NTM Stability at Low Collisionality
R. Granetz, D. Whyte, S. Angelini, S. Wolfe
Chapter Eighteen: Energy and Reactions
Chapter Eighteen: Energy and Reactions
[EX / P7-8] 27th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference – J. Jang, et. al
Reflectometry measurements of turbulence in Alcator C-Mod plasmas
An ITPA joint experiment to study
Jetting phase analysis.
Presentation transcript:

Real-time VDE mitigation with gas jet injection, and mixed gas jets on Alcator C-MOD R. Granetz1, S. Wolfe1, D. Whyte1, V. Izzo1, M. Reinke1, J. Terry1, A. Bader1, M. Bakhtiari2, T. Jernigan3, G. Wurden4 1 MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center 2 University of Wisconsin 3 Oak Ridge National Laboratory 4 Los Alamos National Laboratory APS-DPP 30 Oct – 03 Nov 2006

Abstract Experiments have been carried out in Alcator C-Mod to test the effectiveness of gas jet disruption mitigation of VDEs (vertical displacement events) with real-time detection and triggering by the C-Mod digital plasma control system (DPCS). The DPCS continuously computes the error in the plasma vertical position from the magnetics diagnostics. When this error exceeds an adjustable preset value, the DPCS triggers the gas jet valve (with a negligible latency time). The high-pressure gas (argon) only takes a few milliseconds to enter the vacuum chamber and begin affecting the plasma, but this is comparable to the VDE timescale on C-Mod. Nevertheless, gas jet injection reduced the halo current, increased the radiated power fraction, and reduced the heating of the divertor compared to unmitigated disruptions, but not quite as well as in earlier mitigation experiments with vertically stable plasmas. Presumably a faster overall response time would be beneficial, and several ways to achieve this will also be discussed.

Gas jet disruption mitigation: Pre-programmed vs real-time All previously reported experiments with gas jet disruption mitigation on C-Mod have been done on stable, non-disrupting plasmas. Plasma was not moving prior to gas jet injection Valve trigger was fired at pre-programmed time Therefore the time response of the gas delivery system (~ 4 ms) was not an issue. Various mitigation-relevant parameters were measured and compared to ‘naturally occurring’ disruptions.

Pre-programmed gas jet injection is successful at disruption mitigation With argon gas jet: Halo current reduced by 50% Divertor tile heating reduced by 80°C

Ultimate goal: real-time disruption mitigation with gas jet injection. For our first attempt at this, we have used VDEs, since we have simple and reliable methods for reproducibly making a VDE and for early detection of a VDE. Response time of gas delivery system now becomes an issue, since it is similar to VDE disruption timescale (a few milliseconds) Mitigation of VDEs may be more difficult than mitigation of non-VDE disruptions (high β, locked mode, density limit, etc.)

Mitigation of VDEs on Alcator C-Mod 3 different experiments were done to test argon gas jet mitigation of VDEs: Pre-programmed turnoff of vertical position control, and pre-programmed firing of gas valve Compare mitigation of static vs moving plasma Determine trigger level (vertical displacement at which gas jet is fired) Pre-programmed turnoff of vertical position control, and real-time detection of VDE by DPCS and firing of gas jet Cause VDE by ramping up elongation, and real-time detection of VDE by DPCS and firing of gas jet

Example of VDE initiated by turning off vertical position feedback control Trigger level of 11 mm works well (a=22 cm)

Example of VDE initiated by ramping up elongation (leaving vertical feedback on) Elongation ramped up: 1.681.78 Plasma becomes vertically unstable and gas jet is trigger by DPCS

Halo current mitigated, but not quite as well as with vertically stable plasmas For comparison, in vertically stable plasmas halo current is reduced by 50% with pure argon gas jet

Radiated energy fraction increased, but not quite as much as with vertically stable plasmas For comparison, in vertically stable plasmas, Erad/Wtot is ≥ 80% with pure argon gas jet

Summary of real-time mitigation of VDEs Real-time VDE prediction and gas jet firing works, and mitigation is good, although not quite as good as with pre-programmed, midplane disruptions. Response time of gas delivery system may be an issue Response time is dominated by flow speed of argon in the gas tube

Mixed gas jets can speed up response time Flow speed (~ sound speed) of lighter, low-Z gas is faster than heavier, high-Z gas, but high-Z is much better at disruption mitigation. Small amounts of a heavy gas mixed in with a lighter gas will flow at approximately the sound speed of the lighter gas, since the flow is in the viscous regime. This is a simple way to speed up the delivery of high-Z gas to the vacuum chamber. (M. Bakhtiari, et al, DPP06/J01.00006) Helium carrier gas used on C-Mod 5%-35% argon mixed in

10-15% argon fraction optimizes Te collapse 100% helium (red) does not collapse Te effectively 20% argon does not collapse Te as quickly

M. Bakhtiari, et al, DPP06/J01.00006

~ 2 ms M. Bakhtiari, et al, DPP06/J01.00006

Summary Real-time gas jet mitigation of VDEs was successful Mitigation was not quite as good as for stable, midplane plasmas Time response of gas jet delivery may be an issue Mixing argon into helium carrier speeds up response time by ~ 2 ms while still resulting in good mitigation Near-term plans: real-time detection and mitigation of locked mode disruptions