Development of Cotton N Fertilization Algorithms, Southern USA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sensor-Based Approaches for Cotton Nitrogen Management.
Advertisements

EVALUATION OF GREENSEEKER FOR NITROGEN FETILIZATION IN COTTON ALABAMA REPORT 1 Evaluation of Green Seeker for Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton – Preliminary.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGIA AGROPECUARIA SECRETARIA DE AGRICULTURA, GANADERIA, PESCA Y ALIMENTACION "Wheat yield prediction by using an active sensor.
Indirect Measurement of Plant Height in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Pam Turner Oklahoma State University.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
AZdrip 2008 Cotton Growth Stage mid bloom (08/14/2008) * = Nodes Above White Flower ** = per plant # drip lines per bed HUAP NAWF * # Nodes H:N(in) # Bolls.
May 15,  Rates – current industry recommendations  Soil and Foliar Applied ◦ Boron, Chlorine, Copper, Zinc ◦ Calcium – Foliar only  NDVI, Soil,
1 CANOPY REFLECTANCE (HRWW AND HRSW) IN SOUTH DAKOTA ECONOMIC OPTIMUM NITROGEN RATE FOR HRSW IN SOUTH DAKOTA Nitrogen Use Efficiency Meeting Cheryl Reese*,
Phosphorus Nutrition of Cotton
Operating the Oklahoma State Univ. Ramp Mobile Analysis V2.0.
New Technology and Strategies for Nitrogen Management.
Challenges to sensor- based N-Management for Cotton E.M. Barnes 1, T. Sharp 2, J. Wilkerson 3, Randy Taylor 2, Stacy Worley 3 1 Cotton Incorporated, Cary.
Cotton Research Oklahoma State University. Exp. 439, Altus OK
Operating the Oklahoma State Univ. Ramp_Mobile_Analysis Program V.1.
Use of By-Plot CV’s for Refining Mid-Season Fertilizer N Rates Daryl Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Use of Alternative Concepts for Determining Preplant and Mid-Season N rates.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
GreenSeeker Sensor Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Development of a SBNRC Calculator for Cotton D. Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University W. Raun, J. Solie, M. Stone, R. Taylor, O. Walsh, D. Edmonds, C.
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Spectral Reflectance-based Nitrogen Management for Subsurface Drip Irrigated Cotton Raj Yabaji, Kevin Bronson, Cary Green, Eduardo Segarra, and Adi Malapati.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
Moving Beyond NDVI for Active Sensing in Cotton
Blueberry Fertilization Demonstration Trials November 20, 2014 BC Blueberry Council Field Day David Poon 1, Eric Gerbrandt 2, Mark Sweeney 1 1.BC Ministry.
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma.
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y E VOLUTION OF N ITROGEN R EFERENCE S TRIPS.
Source: Becton Trial - Lubbock, Texas Stoller SUGAR MOVER TM Lint Yield (lb/ac) From 16 acre plots Treatement Field A2005 Field B Control
Active and Passive Reflectance Sensor Comparison in Cotton Kevin F. Bronson Texas A & M Univ. – Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
Texas Tech University College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Dept. of Agricultural & Applied Economics Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.
Regional Project Objectives  To evaluate the performance of sensor-based N recommendation algorithms across a wide range of soil and climate conditions.
How the adoption of the N-Rich Strip has changed N Management
Components of a Variable Rate Nitrogen Rec
Exploratory Research in Corn
Texas Alliance for Water Conservation
Variable Rate Nitrogen
Yang Fang Graduate Student David Liu and Jeff Williamson
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech
Evaluation of the Yield Potential Based NFOA for Cotton
Fig 1: Nitrogen fertilizer application at V7.
How High Should NUE Be, and Can Knowing Soil N Help Us Get There
2017 NUE Conference Baton Rouge, LA – August 7 - 9, 2017
EVOLUTION OF NITROGEN REFERENCE STRIPS
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Predicting Yield Potential, 2007
Predicting Winter Wheat Grain Yield under Grazed and Non-Grazed Production Systems Jason Lawles.
REVIEW.
Annual ASA Meeting, Indianapolis
Corn Algorithm Comparisons, NUE Workshop
Recommendations All BMPs to give a healthy crop, especially . . .
Objective: To discuss the current regional project and identify improvements needed for conducting future collaborative sensor-based research.
Corn Algorithm Comparisons, NUE Workshop
Gyles Randall and Jeff Vetsch University of Minnesota
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.407
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.502
Experiment #601 Long-term Top-Dress N Trial Stillwater, OK
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.406
Tastes Great. Less Filling
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.222
Variability in Corn Response to N Fertilizer along a 1000-ft Hillslope
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.502
Jeff Vetsch and Gyles Randall University of Minnesota
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.407
Presentation transcript:

Development of Cotton N Fertilization Algorithms, Southern USA Kevin Bronson Brenda Tubana Brian Arnall

Kevin F. Bronson, Adi Malapati Jason Nusz, Jeff Johnson Improved Strategies for Nitrogen Management in Subsurface Drip Irrigated Cotton Kevin F. Bronson, Adi Malapati Jason Nusz, Jeff Johnson Texas A & M AgriLife Res, and Texas Tech Univ. Lubbock, TX

Treatments Soil test based N mgt (STB) 32-0-0 injected early square to mid bloom for 2.5 bale/ac yield goal (125 lb N/ac – 0-24 in soil test NO3-N – irrigation water NO3) 0.5 X Soil test based (0.5 STB) 1.5 X Soil test based (1.5 STB) Zero-N (1 plot/station/rep) Reflectance-based mgt 1: initially 0.5 STB N rate, N injection rate adjusted upwards to STB rate when NDVI REF1 is statistically < NDVI REF1. Reflectance-based mgt 2 : initially STB N rate, N injection rate adjusted upwards to 1.5 STB rate when NDVI REF2 is statistically < NDVI 1.5 STB.

N fertilizer injecteda --------------- lb/ac -------------- First open boll biomass, N accumulation, N fertilizer recovery efficiency, seed and lint yields as affected by nitrogen management, Lubbock, TX, 2007. N treatment N fertilizer injecteda Total N uptake Recovery efficiency Biomass Seed yield Lint yield ---- lb N/ac ----- % --------------- lb/ac -------------- 1.5*STB 120 - 2379 a 1347 a   Refl- strategy 2 90 131 a* 62 a 7666 a 2253 a 1330 a STB 80 128 a 65 a 7704 a 2241 a 1326 a Refl.strategy 1 62 120 a 72 a 7561 a 2350 a 1372 a 0.5*STB 40 2270 a 1365 a Zero-N 76 5362 1692 1062 a Injected from 11 July to 11 August *Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05

--------- lb N/ac ------ --------------- lb/ac ------------- First open boll biomass, N accumulation, N fertilizer recovery efficiency, seed and lint yields as affected by nitrogen management, Lubbock, TX, 2008. N treatment N fertilizer injected1 Total N uptake Recovery efficiency Biomass Seed yield Lint yield --------- lb N/ac ------ % --------------- lb/ac ------------- 1.5*STB 94 138 a 75 a 7993 a 2553 a 1532 a   Refl.strategy 2 62 - 2572 a 1586 a STB 130 a 101 a 7546 a 2455 a 1495 a Refl.strategy 1 46 110 b 94 a 6587 b 2542 a 1538 a 0.5*STB 31 2129 b 1283 b Zero-N 67 4968 1640 1006 a Injected from 26 June to 16 July and 5 to 8 August *Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05

First open boll biomass, N accumulation, N fertilizer recovery efficiency, seed and lint yields as affected by nitrogen management, Lubbock, TX, 2009 N treatment N fertilizer injected1 Total N uptake Recovery Efficiency Biomass Seed yield Lint yield ---------- lb N/ac ------- % --------------- lb/ac ------------- 1.5*STB 72 124 a 47 a 7761 a 2526 a 1527 a Refl.strategy 2 48 - 2487 ab 1509 a STB 114 a 49 a 7670 a 2471 ab 1522 a Refl.strategy 1 24 109 a 77a 8058 a 2581 a 1610 a 0.5*STB 2326 b 1487 a Zero-N 90 6962 2029 1336

Summary of three years of Refl Summary of three years of Refl. Strategy 1 N fertilizer management in SDI cotton, Lubbock, TX, 2007-2009 Units 2007 2008 2009 0-24 inch NO3 lb /ac 17 30 18 Starter N fertilizer lb N/ac 10 22 Irrigation NO3 20 Injected fertilizer 62 46 24 Recovery efficiency % 72 94 77 Lint yield 1372 1538 1610

Summary of three years of soil test based strategy for N fertilizer management in SDI cotton, Lubbock, TX, 2007-2009 Units 2007 2008 2009 0-24 inch NO3 lb /ac 24 35 21 Starter N fertilizer lb N/ac 10 22 Irrigation NO3 20 30 Injected fertilizer 80 62 48 Recovery efficiency % 65 101 49 Lint yield 1326 1495 1522

Conclusions Recovery efficiency of daily injection of N between early square and mid bloom was 62 to 94 %. Reflectance-based N management strategy1 saved 22, 26, and 50 % N compared to soil test based management during 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively. EONRs ranged from 22 to 68 lb N/ac for lint.

LSU

2009 NDVI and Yield best correlated at later stage. 4 weeks after first bloom RI NDVI and RI yield best correlated at 2 weeks after first bloom Tested 08 algorithm

Ok State 4 years of Data NDVI and Cumulative GDD’s First White Flower Stillwater and Altus NDVI and Cumulative GDD’s First White Flower Environment

Yield Prediction

YP Models

Response Index

2010 Continue Catch-up and YP trials (long-term). SBNRC trts. Altus 30 lb pre 62 lbs applied (42-96) 60 lb pre 26 lbs applied (17-42) LCB 0 lb pre 28 lbs applied ( 17-45) 40 lb pre 16 lbs applied (4-27)

Thank you