Validity and Soundness

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
-- in other words, logic is
Advertisements

The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
Formal Criteria for Evaluating Arguments
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
Deduction: Validity is a matter of ARGUMENT FORM Separate out the “content” words from the “form” words Separate out the “content” words from the “form”
Lecture 2: Deduction, Induction, Validity, Soundness.
Arguments, validity, soundness, persuasiveness
What is an Argument? What does Monty Python have to say? A philosophical argument is not a disagreement. A philosophical argument is not a dispute. A philosophical.
Logos Formal Logic.
Deduction and Induction
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
Basic Argumentation.
The ubiquity of logic One common example of reasoning  If I take an umbrella, I can prevent getting wet by rain  I don’t want to get myself wet by rain.
GLE Explore the concept of premises, including false premises. Intro to Logic.
Logic and Reason. Deductive Reasoning Reasoning that moves from the general to the particular Watchdogs bark at strangers. The watchdog did not bark at.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.
FALSE PREMISE.
Arguments with Quantified Statements M Universal Instantiation If some property is true for everything in a domain, then it is true of any particular.
Unit 1D Analyzing Arguments. TWO TYPES OF ARGUMENTS Inductive Deductive Arguments come in two basic types:
Logic in Everyday Life.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
2.8 Methods of Proof PHIL 012 1/26/2001.
Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Proofs Rules of Inference Rules of Equivalence.
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
Propositions and Arguments. What is a proposition? A proposition is a predicative sentence that only contains a subject and a predicate S is P.
Symbolic Logic ⊃ ≡ · v ~ ∴. What is a logical argument? Logic is the science of reasoning, proof, thinking, or inference. Logic allows us to analyze a.
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
What is an Argument? What does Monty Python have to say? A philosophical argument is not a disagreement. … is not a dispute. … is not a quarrel. … is not.
Chapter III Evaluating Arguments. Nondeductive Arguments Most common kinds of arguments Successful arguments are a matter of degree. Deal with likelihood.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Text Table of Contents #4: What are the Reasons?.
PHIL102 SUM2014, M-F12:00-1:00, SAV 264 Instructor: Benjamin Hole
Deductive reasoning.
Arguments with Quantified Statements
ARGUMENTS.
Philosophical Arguments
a valid argument with true premises.
WEEK 3 VALIDITY OF ARGUMENTS Valid argument: A deductive argument is valid if its conclusion is necessarily and logically drawn from the premises. The.
FALSE PREMISE.
Deductive Arguments.
Philosophical Arguments
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
Evaluating truth tables
The Ontological Argument
Reasoning about Reasoning
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Arguments.
The Ontological Argument
Distinguish valid from invalid arguments and sound from unsound
Validity & Invalidity Valid arguments guarantee true conclusions but only when all of their premises are true Invalid arguments do not guarantee true conclusions.
6.4 Truth Tables for Arguments
“Still I Look to Find a Reason to Believe”
Phil2303 intro to logic.
Validity.
Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Philosophical Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Validity and Soundness Evaluating philosophical argument Validity and Soundness

Validity Validity Important tool to evaluate a deductive argument

Philosophical notion of Validity (Review) What is an argument? A set of statements, one or more of which is offered in support of some statements Premises Statement doing the supporting Conclusion The statement being supported

Philosophical notion of Validity Text Philosophical notion of Validity Deductive arguments An argument is valid or invalid What is a valid argument? P1: All humans are mortal P2: Socrates is human C: Therefore, Socrates is mortal The argument is good? All the premises and conclusion are true?

Philosophical notion of Validity Deductive arguments An argument is valid or invalid Validity has nothing to do with truth of the conclusion Or how good the conclusion is

Validity of an Argument An argument is valid If and only if the truth of its premises guarantees the truth of its conclusion Validity is a property of arguments such that if the premises of the arguments are true, then the conclusion must be true

The premises entails the conclusion Validity It’s impossible for a valid argument to have all true premises unless the conclusion is also true The premises entails the conclusion

So…. Argument can be

Argument VALIDITY is conditional If an argument is valid, then if its premises are true then the conclusion is true If an argument is valid, then the truth of its conclusion follows from the truth of its premises

Validity DUDE this is soooo abstract….

Some examples… This is a valid argument P1: All humans are mortal Validity Some examples… This is a valid argument P1: All humans are mortal P2: Socrates is human C: Therefore Socrates is mortal Remember, if the premises of this argument are true, then the conclusion must be true in this case True True True

Some examples… This is a valid argument - With all false premises Validity Some examples… This is a valid argument - With all false premises P1: All humans are immortal P2: Socrates is human C: Therefore Socrates is immortal ** It doesn’t matter if the premises are true or false! If True If True Necessarily true

Validity Some examples… This is a valid argument - With premises of which we don’t know the truth P1: All alliens speak English P2: Splock is an Alien C: Therefore, Splock speaks English Premisses could be true or false If True If True Necessarily true

Summary - Valid Argument Validity Summary - Valid Argument It’s impossible for all the premises to be true while the conclusion is false

Validity Invalid Argument The truth of the argument’s premises does not entail the truth of the conclusion…. P1: All dogs have fur P2: Claire has a lot of fur C: Therefore, Claire is a dog The truth of this conclusion doesn’t follow from the premises because Cats also have a lot of fur. If True If True Could be false

Why validity matters if the truth of the premises doesn’t matter? Validity determines whether an argument obeys logic/valid inference rules.

Now, write 3 examples of a valid or invalid argument of your own. Validity Now, write 3 examples of a valid or invalid argument of your own. Share and discuss with a partner

Soundness

Soundness of an argument requires: 1. The argument must be valid Conclusion cannot be false if the premises are true 2. The premises must all be true

Soundness Example - This is a valid argument but it is unsound because the premises are false

Soundness Example - Not every unsound arguments have false premises. To have a sound argument, we need to have both conditions - A valid argument and all the premises true.

Now, write 3 examples of a sound argument of your own. Validity Now, write 3 examples of a sound argument of your own. Share and discuss with a partner