Geometry Review PPT Finnegan 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2.1.4 USING LOGICAL REASONING
Advertisements

Geometry 2.3 Big Idea: Use Deductive Reasoning
Bell Work 1) Find the value of the variables 2)Write the conditional and converse of each biconditional, and state if the biconditional is true or false.
Parallel Lines and Transversals Geometry D – Section 3.1.
1 Spring 2013 Student Performance Analysis Geometry Standards of Learning Presentation may be paused and resumed using the arrow keys or the mouse.
So far we have learned about:
Geometry Geometric Proof
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Algebraic Reasoning  Addition Property of Equality - Add (+) the same thing to both sides of the equation  Subtraction Property of Equality - Subtract.
Postulates and Paragraph Proofs
Bell Ringer.
Geometry Vocabulary 2.7 Substitution Property: When pairs of angles or segments are congruent to each other, one may be substituted into any statement.
2.3: Deductive Reasoning p Deductive Reasoning Use facts, definitions and accepted properties in logical order to write a logical argument.
Geometry Unit 2 Power Points Montero to 2.3 Notes and Examples Patterns, Conditional Statements, and BiConditional Statements Essential Vocabulary.
Conjectures that lead to Theorems 2.5
Introduction to Geometric Proof Logical Reasoning and Conditional Statements.
In the diagram below, AB and CD intersect at E, (m) Angle AEC = 6x -20 and the (m) Angle BED is 4x Find the value of x. (6x -20) (4x + 10) A E B.
Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Deductive Reasoning.  Conditional Statements can be written using symbolic notation  p represents hypothesis  q represents conclusion  is read as.
Postulates and Paragraph Proofs Section 2-5.  postulate or axiom – a statement that describes a fundamental relationship between the basic terms of geometry.
Deductive Reasoning (G.1d) Obj: SWBAT apply the laws of validity: Detachment, Contrapositive & Syllogism and the symbolic form (2.4). Homework (day 20)
Do Now. Law of Syllogism ◦ We can draw a conclusion when we are given two true conditional statements. ◦ The conclusion of one statement is the hypothesis.
Welcome to Interactive Chalkboard Glencoe Geometry Interactive Chalkboard Copyright © by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Developed by FSCreations, Inc.,
Algebraic Proof Addition:If a = b, then a + c = b + c. Subtraction:If a = b, then a - c = b - c. Multiplication: If a = b, then ca = cb. Division: If a.
2-6 Proving Angles Congruent. Theorem: a conjecture or statement that you prove true.
Chapter Two: Reasoning and Proof Section 2-5: Proving Angles Congruent.
EXAMPLE 3 Prove the Vertical Angles Congruence Theorem
2-4 Venn Diagrams & Deductive Reasoning 1. Venn diagrams :  Diagram that shows relationships between different sets of data.  can represent conditional.
Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Section 2-4: Deductive Reasoning Objectives: Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Inductive Reasoning: based on observing what has happened.
Deductive Reasoning Geometry Chapter 2-3 Mr. Dorn.
Section 2.3: Deductive Reasoning
Deductive s. Inductive Reasoning
Name vertical angles and linear pairs. Name a pair of complementary angles and a pair of supplementary angles.
Spring Student Performance Analysis Presentation may be paused and resumed using the arrow keys or the mouse. Geometry Standards of Learning.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
Proving Angles Congruent Chapter 2: Reasoning and Proof1 Objectives 1 To prove and apply theorems about angles.
Deductive reasoning.
Reasoning and Proof Unit 2.
Section 2.3 – Deductive Reasoning
a valid argument with true premises.
Logic.
1. Find the value of x. ANSWER 32
Geometry Review PPT Finnegan 2013
Chapter 8 Logic Topics
Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning
Logic Lesson 2-2: Logic.
Daily warm-up.
2.4 Deductive Reasoning.
2-3 Deductive Reasoning Objectives:
4.1 Angles Formed by Intersecting Lines
Topic 2: Reasoning and Proof
Venn Diagrams & Deductive Reasoning
Geometry Review PPT Finnegan 2013
Venn Diagrams & Deductive Reasoning
2-4 Deductive Reasoning 8th Grade Geometry.
Lesson 5.6 Deductive Proofs pp
Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning
Reasoning and Proofs Deductive Reasoning Conditional Statement
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 2: Reasoning and Proof 2-4: Deductive Reasoning Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning: Using facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions. Law of Detachment: A form.
Geometry Review PPT Finnegan 2013
TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2
Lesson 2-R Chapter 2 Review.
 congruent complement and supplement theorems. Opener: Given:
Chapter 2 Reasoning and Proof.
Presentation transcript:

Geometry Review PPT Finnegan 2013 SOL G.1 Logic and Conditional Statements

Given the following statement, select the conclusion that would make this a valid argument and would complete the blank line.   If 𝟖𝒙 + 𝟒 = 𝟏𝟐, then 𝒙 = 𝟏 𝒙 ≠ 𝟏 ∴

Directions: Highlight the box you want to select Directions: Highlight the box you want to select. Determine which law of deductive reasoning, if any, was used to make the following argument. If two angles are vertical, then they are congruent. 1 and 2 are vertical angles. Therefore, 1 ≅ 2.

Directions: Highlight the box you want to select Directions: Highlight the box you want to select. You must select all correct answers. Given the following Venn diagram that represents the relationship between Talamazoos, Aburas and Omeets, which statements are true?

Directions: Highlight the box you want to select Directions: Highlight the box you want to select. You must select all correct answers.

Directions: Write your answer in the empty boxes Directions: Write your answer in the empty boxes. You may select from the choices in the shaded box. Given the following statements: 𝒑: the cat chased the mouse 𝒒: the dog chased the cat What is the symbolic representation of “The dog chased the cat and the cat chased the mouse.”?